Wikipedia:Cleanup

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
  Main page   Posts   Archived posts   Resources   Templates   Barnstars   Members   Talk page  
Welcome to WikiProject Cleanup
Edit-clear.svg
Shortcuts:
WP:CLEAN
WP:CLEANUP
People icon.svg This is a WikiProject, an area for focused collaboration among Wikipedians.

Archives
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
For cleanup templates see Template messages/Cleanup (WP:TC)
For information about cleaning up vandalism, see Cleaning up vandalism

WikiProject Cleanup is a resource for Wikipedia cleanup information and discussion. Cleanup issues that this project covers may include page layout, wikification, spelling, grammar, typographical errors, tone, and sourcing. All users are welcome to help in editing or fixing any page on these lists. Please remember to remove the appropriate tag(s) off the page after cleaning an article, then just strike-out the entry on this page using <s> </s>, which produces: (sample text). This retains the listing for historical reference regarding accomplishments of the project. Please also consider documenting improvements on an article's talk page or in edit summaries for the reference of other editors.

Gtk-dialog-info.svg Information

Resources for maintenance and collaboration
Cleanup
Categories
Create an article
Referencing
Stubs
Deletion
Polishing
Translation into English
Images
Controversy
To-do lists
Disambiguation
More

For comprehensive lists of pages requiring cleanup, which are automatically generated from the {{cleanup}} banners placed on articles, please refer to:

for older articles with issues that have not been dealt with in some time, refer to:

If you've arrived at this page from a link on a {{cleanup}} template that someone placed on an article, it most likely was because the article does not meet one or more of Wikipedia's standards on content and style. Try reading Wikipedia:Writing better articles to get a sense of what Wikipedia's standards are. The advice on that page should help editors to effectively clean up any article.

Information on the cleanup process may be found at Wikipedia:Cleanup process. Other resources may be found at Wikipedia:Cleanup resources and Wikipedia:Template messages/Cleanup, for help on posting problems with Wikipedia pages, or to use as a guide. For older entries, please refer to the project's archives.

Contents
Please place new posts at the top of the list.

2013 posts

May

April

Attempted to lessen the one-sided, grandiloquent writing by (hopefully) removing personal observation, interpretation, and synthesis. Not perfect by any stretch. More help is welcomed!  :D Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:55, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

March

  • Had a go at it. I think that someone else may have already gone through and attempted Wikification. Chri$topher 12:04, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
I worked on grammar and punctuation along with others and that seems to be handled.Coaster92 (talk) 22:28, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

February

I copyedited the whole thing, formatted all of the sources properly, added an infobox, started the talk page with a header that it was under the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, and added a stub tag at the bottom. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 16:18, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
  • New Jersey Turnpike - needs additional sources and formatting improvements. In addition, consistency with naming conventions such as the word "exit" (like in exit 5), the "E" should be lowercase in the body and lead. Footnote number 22 needs to be replaced with a more reliable source. Tinton5 (talk) 21:37, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Garden State Parkway - needs extra sources, formatting improvements, and consistency with naming conventions throughout. Tinton5 (talk) 21:37, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Belt Parkway - extra sources are needed, especially in "history" section. Tinton5 (talk) 21:37, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Skye Townsend - needs additional sources and minor formatting improvements, also needs more categories. Tinton5 (talk) 21:37, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Cleaned up a bit, and added categories. Tinton5 (talk) 21:33, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Dingo - the body is great and I can fix any little errors, but I have no idea how to tackle a monster like the lead. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 16:10, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Somerset House - much of the prose is essay-like, and in need of verifiable sources.Trillig (talk) 14:34, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 – I've performed page cleanup and some copy editing; the article would still benefit from more copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:54, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
I've cleaned up grammar and syntax and removed the copy edit tag. I don't know how to show a strike-through of this project here.Coaster92 (talk) 01:52, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Chach Nama and related articles - article and related ones regarding a chronicle of 7th-century India. Though listed as low-importance, there are abundant resources regarding this period of history and the articles could use better sourcing, restructuring, and content additions. dci | TALK 16:07, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Indian Institute of Planning and Management - cleanup tagged since December 2009. NPOv issues:favors IIPM in almost all topics. Advert templates. Controversy section and dubious citations. Primary sources. Tall claims.--Nizil (talk) 21:26, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Law of value - A subject of extreme WP:OWN as shown by the talk page. One of the largest articles on Wikipedia and is likely filled with original research. It needs to be condensed, made understandable and neutral.--Neoconfederate (talk) 00:25, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

January

Re-wrote the entire article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:52, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

2012 posts

December

November

  • Poor man's copyright – This article is full of original uncited research. Would benefit from a complete work-over to make sure what is said is factually backed. 12:57, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Lensman series – A long article that lacks appropriate inline citations. The plot section would benefit from abbreviation, and the article contains too much unsourced fancruft information. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:19, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
  • Rongpa – This article about an Indian village would benefit from being edited for content, context, and formatting. While informative, it lacks citations.
  • Australian Army Cadets – To much information. The article is somewhat spammed with excess information which can be deemed as irrelevant to the general public. Sources not states throughout the majority of the article.
  • Toonami (Asia) This Article is about an upcoming television channel in South-East Asia. Help me to match it with Wikipedia Wiki Verification.
Article removed. 4DHS (talk) 06:25, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
I removed the strike-out that was previously in place for this article above; the article exists (appears to have been recreated) and remains in need of work. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:31, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Do you have any sources you could provide that would suggest this claim? 4DHS (talk) 06:49, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

October

  • Letter of credit – Much uncited material. Confusing. Self-published sources. It's difficult to find good sources; Google searches turn up Investopedia, sites promoting various financial products, "standby letter of credit" scams, and other junk sources. It's a real topic, but probably needs to be cited to some offline book. This needs attention by a financial professional. John Nagle (talk) 04:56, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
  • UVB-76 – It was ok before but recently editors have been adding information about the station's day-to-day business which is really not that interesting or notable and reads more like a logbook than an article. CodeCat (talk) 12:14, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Puffed grain – No inline citations. 3 Further reading section entries exist that may possibly be usable to improve the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:26, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Pizza delivery – Lead requires expansion. Needs more inline citations per "citation needed" tags.
  • History of pizza – Several clean-up matters tagged atop the article.
  • Sicilian pizza – Would benefit from expansion. Has exactly one source as of this post.
— Northamerica1000(talk) 13:54, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Almost completely rewritten. — Hex (❝?!❞) 10:30, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

September

— Above posted by Northamerica1000(talk) 20:18, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

August

July

  • Bondo (putty) Generally sloppy. Only one citation. Very biased tone. Information about the product is very limited and does not include information about other products in the Bondo line (fiberglass filler, plastic filler, etc.) or any history on the brand. Not much information on how it works or why it is used (it is also extensively used for sculpture and modification of consumer goods). Doesn't even contain a link to the product web page. Chrisbrl88 (talk) 09:56, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 – I added a few sources to the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:47, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Rue21 Generally sloppy, reads like an advertisement. JEMdev (talk) 07:21, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
 – The layout has been cleaned-up, and the article has been copy-edited to reduce promotional tone. Northamerica1000(talk) 20:44, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

June

 – cleaned up.--jcnJohn Chen (Talk-Contib.) RA 03:59, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Political culture – Would benefit from general cleanup, copy editing, more inline citations and better organization. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Moshi Monsters – The article is in desperate need of wikification, and from a little research seems incomplete. User:Bilky_asko ☞ Talk Pagé 09:30, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
  • VEISHEA – An historic festival at Iowa State University founded in 1922. Needs copy-editing, the addition of inline citations and general clean-up. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:36, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 – Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 19:52, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Jayne Mansfield - Citation cleanup using cite templates, copyedit to conform to MOS, and oversight by someone familiar with Hollywood biographies. Aditya(talk • contribs) 04:42, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Narayan Kaji Shrestha - BLP needs significant general editing and additional citations. Could benefit from someone knowledgeable in Nepal and its politics. Taroaldo (talk) 08:08, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Poverty in Tanzania – Needs significant copy editing, it's written like an essay and needs more sources and inline citations. Northamerica1000(talk) 01:23, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
 – Layout is cleaned up. Still needs work. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:22, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

May

 – Cleaned up the layout. The article still needs more sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:38, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Raw water - Cleanup required, several links just copied in and written to sound like an advertisement.
 – The article has been cleaned-up by other users and in some edits I have done. The article would still benefit from more sources. Northamerica1000(talk) 00:58, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Fair trade coffee – The article would benefit from copy editing, layout cleanup and more specific sourcing. There's some information on the article's talk page regarding the latter within this comment. Northamerica1000(talk) 14:54, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
 – The article has been cleaned up. It would still benefit from copy editing and better organization. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

April

 – Was merged to Saga of the Skolian Empire. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:49, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Chicago Bulls - Needs major work, clean up and improvement so it could be and reach good article status. JamesCarter05 (talk) 5:56, 18 April 2012 (CT)
  • Fruit snack – Unreferenced. No sections. Needs copy editing; may contain original research.
 – The article has been cleaned up. However it could still be reviewed and have more references.Moony22(talk) 20:39, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
  • General Motors Diesel – Lede section needs expansion. Unreferenced. History section would benefit from better organization and subsections.
  • Hotel manager – Primarily in list format; conversion to prose would be an improvement. Unreferenced. Could use better organization.
  • Landry's Restaurants – Would benefit from page layout cleanup and copy editing. Primarily in list format; conversion to prose would be an improvement.
  • Market Theatre (Johannesburg) – Could use page and image layout cleanup. Unreferenced.
 – Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Roland Rat – Needs better organization into sections. Has bare urls and needs more sources.
  • Have done some preliminary cleanup on the Roland Rat article. Fixed bare urls, added sections. Northamerica1000(talk) 21:41, 24 April 2012 (UTC)
 – The above 6 entries were posted by Northamerica1000(talk) 08:26, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
 – Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:45, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 – The article has been cleaned up as of the time of this post. It would benefit from further copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:43, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Ike & Tina Turner- I tagged this a while back as having multiple issues, the templates have been removed but it's not much better as far as I can see. Sloppily written and poorly researched with barely any citations. I stand by my comments in the talk section Kaleeyed (talk) 11:30, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Cassette culture - Needs some work. Kaleeyed (talk) 12:11, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Solomon Burke - How long have you got? Going to be a Herculean task this one, it really needs hacking back and surplus information moving to other articles. It's out of control. Kaleeyed (talk) 12:15, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
 – Cleaned up. A long article with 500 inline citations at this time. The article would still benefit from copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:35, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

March

  • Burton upon Trent I just looked at this article and did a bit of rearranging, but I think it's struggling a bit and could do with some help. This could be a really great article but at the moment it's pretty weakly written and lacks some research. Thought I'd draw some people's attention to it. Kaleeyed (talk) 18:11, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
 – Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:32, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
  • UK miners' strike (1984–1985) – This article is full of OR/POV and unsourced sections and statements. There seems to be a massive left-wing bias in this article and I feel it needs thorough scrutiny. Thank you. Christian1985 (talk) 21:58, 23 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Anticuchos – No references. Would benefit from copy-editing and better organization.
  • Anti-social behaviour – Could use copy-editing for cohesion and to clean-up grammatical choppiness. Needs more references.
 – Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:10, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Cabinet of Bangladesh – “Functions” section in list format; would benefit from conversion to prose. Only one reference, and no inline citations.
 – Cleaned up. Needs more citations and copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:07, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Hair museum – Needs expansion; has seven listed sources that could be used to expand the article with inline citations.
 – Cleaned up.
  • K L University – Article would benefit from copy-editing for cohesion; prose is choppy. References section needs copy-editing. Article needs more inline citations
 – Cleaned up. Could still use more sources and copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:56, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Madison Symmetric Torus – Article has only one reference, would benefit from copy-editing, and may contain original research. The article would also benefit from some reduction and better summarization of technical information. Bare URLs need cleaning-up.
  • Occupy Ottawa – Needs more references and inline citations. Could use better organization and copy-editing for cohesion. Currently has no images.
 – Cleaned up. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:59, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Pan-American Conference – Tables need layout formatting and clean-up. Only has one reference/inline citation. No assigned WikiProjects on talk page.
  • Salal Hydroelectric Power Station – Primarily in list format; conversion to prose would improve the article. References section needs copy-editing. Needs inline citations.
  • Ukrainian culture – Art section is very long, somewhat choppy, would benefit from copy-editing and formatting. Other areas are also choppy; consolidation of information into paragraphs would be an improvement. Article has many empty sections that need to be populated with sourced information. Bare URLs need cleaning up. Needs more references and inline citations.
—The above 12 posts are from Northamerica1000(talk) 10:17, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 – I've done some preliminary clean-up to the page's layout and added the "expert attention requested" template. Northamerica1000(talk) 04:11, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

February

  • The Sopranos: The whole article is unbelievably laboured throughout. Extent of content in Info' box has been discussed previously, and has been debated extensively but to no avail, thanks to the aggressive participation of non-registered IPs. Suggest partial protection before attempting editing on this article. A project on which I would then be more than pleased to participate.
--- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 11:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)
Have you tried requesting protection at WP:RFPP? -- Ϫ 02:04, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘I have just put in a request for Temporary semi-protection. I should like to thank El duderino, and everyone else who has helped on The Sopranos since 25 February 2012 (UTC)--- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 10:45, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

The Sopranos (edit|talk|history|protect|links|watch|logs)
Indefinite semi-protection:
Persistent sockpuppetry. Repeated deletion of sourced material by new editors. Persistent vandalism. I have had help from the Wikipedia:Cleanup Project (since February 25) and I should welcome your help in maintaining this article. Thank you, Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 11:06, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Jayjg (talk) 03:36, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 – Added a reference:
—"China National Tea Museum". China.org.cn. October 15, 2011. Retrieved February 17, 2012.  (Includes text and video). Northamerica1000(talk) 20:52, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
 – The link China National Tea Museum is functional as of the time of this post. Northamerica1000(talk) 10:40, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Rail transport in Russia – Lede is short. Tagged for tone and neutrality issues. Information could be better-organized into sections and subsections.
  • Rail transport in Queensland – Lede is very short. Much content is in list format; conversion to prose may benefit the article. Additional inline citations are needed.
  • Bank of Hawaii – History section is very choppy, could use organization and consolidation into paragraphs. Most of the article is within its "History" section; better organization with new sections may be an improvement. Much of the content is missing inline citations.
 – Added lede to the article. Northamerica1000(talk) 18:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Quarantine technology – Unreferenced. Citations and clarification needed. Primarily in list format; conversion to prose may be an improvement. Article tagged as providing insufficient context.
  • Duane Hagadone – Lede is very short. List formatting could use conversion to prose.
  • Halton Hills Public Library – Some sections are very long without any inline citations, could use some reduction. Article has no inline citations. "Assets" section could use rewriting to clarify the content.
  • Hai Sing Catholic School – Prose is choppy, much of the article is in list format, which may be better as prose. The verifiability of the article is tagged as disputed. Unreferenced as of this post.
—Northamerica1000(talk) 0:55, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

*Jeanie Johnston - "Personal communication" as a reference. Would someone please look at (and probably revert) this edit of Jeanie Johnston [6] I would explain that <ref>{{Personal communication, Aiseanna Mara Teoranta}}</ref> is not acceptable, (and it is tagged as such), but in the light of the reason given for the changes: (I reverted some of user Lugnad's changes, as he or she deleted withouth comment several unfavourable, but researched and sourced facts about the ship. Also fixed some typos.) It might be better received from someone other than I. Just to add, I have no idea what changes of mine are being referred to. Thanks, Lugnad (talk) 11:34, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for responding Lugnad (talk) 18:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
I've chopped the pers. comm. ref and claim. Bet it comes back. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:51, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Football hooliganism – Could use some copy editing. Some sections need more references. Some of the references need better formatting. The article would benefit from some of the information being condensed. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:44, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Stormworld – The article has significant lists that could be changed to prose. Could use more references. Could use images. Northamerica1000(talk) 06:31, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Open University of Sudan - A user that seems to be related to this university added lots of content. First I've rollbacked it, than I've replaced and fixed it as a minor layout copyedit. All this content is related to this university and may be useful but I still have the doubt that it's wroten as a sort of Brochure. --Dэя-Бøяg 21:23, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
 – Information very likely copied and pasted, or written verbatim per University literature has been removed. The article is now a stub. Northamerica1000(talk) 08:00, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

January

 – The article appears to be cleaned up as of this post. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:44, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 – The article appears to be cleaned up as of this post. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:40, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
  • 1984 in organized crime – No lede section. Empty "births" section. Unreferenced. Needs more references. Would benefit from summaries preceding the list information in its sections.
 – Added a lede sentence. Northamerica1000(talk) 13:57, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Early classical guitar recordings – No lede section. Some of the content in the "History of early classical guitar recordings" section may be better rewritten in a list format.
 – Added a lede sentence. Northamerica1000(talk) 16:03, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Eco Marine Power – An article about a company that develops and markets environmentally friendly power and propulsion systems for ships and other vessels. The article is tagged as written like an advertisement, could use some rewriting. I added a few references to the article, which could be used for more inline citations.
 – The article has been cleaned up. It would still benefit from copy editing. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:46, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
  • Economy of Cuba – The "Public Facilities" and "Other statistics" sections are entirely in list format. Article could use more inline citations, references.
—Northamerica1000(talk) 01:28, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Archived posts

For older entries, please refer to the project's archives.

2 people Members

To join WikiProject Cleanup, just add your name to the member list below.
Please place new entries at the end of the list with # ~~~~.

  1. Northamerica1000, February 2012
  2. OlEnglish, February 2012
  3. Aleksa Lukic, February 2012
  4. RoyalMate1 21:56, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  5. Haruth, February 2012
  6. ReelAngelGirl, February 2012
  7. Lugnad, February 2012
  8. User:Jackiespeel, February 2012
  9. Amadscientist, February 2012
  10. EdiOnjales, February 2012
  11. AuthorAuthor (talk) 00:20, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
  12. StavinChain, 00:35, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
  13. SMcCandlish   Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ   Contrib. 01:02, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
  14. ɠǀɳ̩ςεΝɡbomb 03:24, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
  15. Suraj T 04:11, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
  16. Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:18, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
  17. JOHNMOORofMOORLAND 09:58, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
  18. Unicorn Tapestry {say} 11:57, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
  19. IVORK Discuss March 2012 (UTC)
  20. Benjitheijneb (talk) 18:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
  21. MichaelProcton (talk) 20:24, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
  22. --Ankit MaityTalkContribs 06:12, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
  23. RubinkumarTalk 13:53, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
  24. ScottDelaney1067Talk 21:03, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
  25. Swat (talk) 05:35, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
  26. Fvillanustre (talk) 20:35, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
  27. Kaleeyed Kaleeyed (talk) 15:55, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
  28. Idunno271828, April 14, 2012
  29. Faizan Ali Varya, May 26, 2012
  30. --Anusha.malhotra (talk) 07:37, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
  31. Misa-chan (talk) 06:34, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
  32. SRaemiA talk 23:38, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
  33. Aikomatsu talk 20:15, 8 August 2012 (GMT)
  34. JC.Torpey 20:42, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
  35. Rainbow Shifter (talk) 18:21, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
  36. Rahul Krishnan (Talk) 8 Feb 2013
  37. Missionedit (talk) 16:51, February 16 2013
  38. DiptanshuTalk 13:37, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
  39. dci | TALK 16:05, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
  40. --Epeefleche (talk) 16:05, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
  41. --Skamecrazy123 (talk) 16:19, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
  42. Tinton5 (talk) 16:29, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
  43. Sowlos 17:37, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
  44. rouenpucelle (talk)Rouenpucelle, February 2013
  45. DGG ( talk ) 19:45, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
  46. SMP0328. (talk) 22:59, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
  47. öBrambleberry of RiverClan 23:30, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
  48. --NickPenguin(contribs) 01:19, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
  49. Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...) 09:16, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
  50. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:12, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
  51. Steven Walling • talk 23:41, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
  52. Trillig - mainly historical buildings Trillig (talk) 14:49, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
  53. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 19:52, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
  54. Coaster92 (talk) 06:44, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
  55. OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:26, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
  56. JimnChina (talk) 13:31, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
  57. Racecar48 7:06, 3 April 2013
  58. Dreadfullyboring (talk) 04:27, 13 April 2013 (UTC)
  59. FrigidNinja 18:32, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
  60. ComfyKem (talk) 20:48, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
  61. Chri$topher 11:51, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
  62. GbySmn 13:57, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
  63. Vignesh Mani M (talk) 09:01, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
  64. BsBsBs (talk) 14:08, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
  1. Nishitpatira

Templates

The following are templates used by WikiProject Cleanup.

User box

After joining, feel free to add the project's userbox to your userpage:

{{WikiProject Cleanup userbox}}

Edit-clear.svg
This user is a member of
WikiProject Cleanup.


Invitation

To invite someone to join the project, just copy and paste the following to their user talk page:

{{subst:WikiProject Cleanup invitation}}

Which creates the following invitation:

Edit-clear.svg
Hello, {{SUBST:BASEPAGENAME}}.

You are invited to join WikiProject Cleanup, a WikiProject and resource for Wikipedia cleanup listings, information and discussion.
To join the project, just add your name to the member list. ~~~~

The recipient's user name is automatically added in the introduction, and your signature is automatically added at the end.

Barnstars

The following are barnstars used to award users who clean up articles. To award a user, just copy and paste one of the following barnstars to a user's talk page, customizing your message where it says "message" within the code:

{{subst:The Cleanup Barnstar|message ~~~~}}

CleanupBarnstar.PNG The Cleanup Barnstar
(Message)

{{subst:The Cleanup Barnstar|message ~~~~|alt}}

Cleanup Barnstar Hires.png The Cleanup Barnstar
(Message)

WikiProjects puzzle Related WikiProjects

See also

Tools

Main tool page: toolserver.org
  • AutoEd – A user script that helps to automatically make clean-up changes in articles, and it also allows for easy design, use, and customization of user scripts related to automated article cleanup.
  • Reflinks – Edits bare references - adds title/dates etc. to bare references
  • Checklinks – Edit and repair external links
  • Dab solver – Quickly resolve ambiguous links.
  • Peer reviewer – Provides hints and suggestion to improving articles.


Directory Directory of WikiProjects

  

Council WikiProject Council

  

Guide Guide to WikiProjects
Overview
Project-wide principles
Core content policies
Other content policies
Content guidelines
Behavioural policies
Behavioural guidelines
Editing guidelines
Style conventions
Classification guidelines
Wikimedia Foundation
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Cleanup&oldid=556636641"