From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

(Redirected from Wikipedia:DELT)

Jump to: navigation, search

Shortcut: WP:DELT

This page transcludes (or when this is not feasible, links to) all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.

1 Speedy deletion candidates
2 Articles
3 Files
- 3.1 Possibly unfree files
  - 3.1.1 February 11
    - 3.1.1.1 File:Randy Racing 5.jpeg
- 3.2 Files for deletion
  - 3.2.1 February 11
4 Categories
- 4.1 February 11
5 Redirects
- 5.1 February 11
  - 5.1.1 Do Right and Kill Everything
  - 5.1.2 South Texas Plains
6 Templates
- 6.1 February 11
7 Stub types
8 Miscellany (WikiProjects, user pages, etc.)
9 Deletion review
- 9.1 11 February 2012

[edit] Speedy deletion candidates

The category is at Category:Candidates for speedy deletion.

[edit] Articles

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday February 9 (Thu) February 8 (Wed) February 7 (Tue) More...

< 10 February	12 February >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

[edit] Jean Andeka

(Find sources: "Jean Andeka" – news · books · scholar · free images)

Delete per WP:BLP1E. Andeka is only relevant as a candidate in an election (in which he received less then 1% of the vote) and other then that is a non-notable an attorney (http://www.lareference.cd/2011/09/the-attorney-jean-marie-andeka.html). Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 18:16, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:35, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:36, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Delete Unsuccessful political candidate. Google News finds only minimal coverage, which all appears to be routine mentions in connection with the election. --MelanieN (talk) 01:26, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:18, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Josué Alex Mukendi

(Find sources: "Josué Alex Mukendi" – news · books · scholar · free images)

Deleted per WP:BLP1E, as Mukendi is only notable for an election in which he garnered <.5% of the vote. According to this http://www.openandfreedrc.org/#/profiles-2/4559170588 he's a pastor when not running for office. Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 18:25, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:38, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Delete Unsuccessful political candidate; only minimal coverage found, all related to the election. --MelanieN (talk) 01:20, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:18, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Evan Feldman

(Find sources: "Evan Feldman" – news · books · scholar · free images)

borderline musician. article is a resume, BLPProded multiple times and removed. Refs included do not meet RS standards imo. proposing for deletion to achieve consensus. Gaijin42 (talk) 22:07, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 23:56, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Delete - seems to fail WP:BIO as a basically unremarkable person. I can't find any significant coverage in reliable sources myself. Robofish (talk) 02:39, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:17, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] TMCR 95.3

(Find sources: "TMCR 95.3" – news · books · scholar · free images)

Original author is no longer part of the project, as noted in the Talk page of the main item. Rather than leave old information standing, with no author to maintain the entry, it was felt better to delete the entire thing. TrustAM (talk) 05:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Keep I'm sorry, but our policies are quite clear. Even if an editor (with a conflict of interest as admitted here) leaves their workplace and was the majority editor, others have edited the article besides the original author (a long-departed IP), and under the terms of Creative Commons and the GFDL which makes all contributions property of the Project, this article should remain as station has not left air and is publicly licensed. Others can easily help maintain the article in the future. Nate • (chatter) 06:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Boo Koo

(Find sources: "Boo Koo" – news · books · scholar · free images)

Real product, possibly popular, not notable. There is no significant coverage, and there is little hope of expanding this article past ingredients, sizes, and availability. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 05:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] TEHO

(Find sources: "TEHO" – news · books · scholar · free images)

Real product, possibly popular, not notable. There is no significant coverage, and there is little hope of expanding this article past ingredients, sizes, and availability. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 05:10, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Ace Energy Drink

(Find sources: "Ace Energy Drink" – news · books · scholar · free images)

Real product, possibly popular, not notable. There is no significant coverage, and there is little hope of expanding this article past ingredients, sizes, and availability. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 05:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] 3sum

(Find sources: "3sum" – news · books · scholar · free images)

Real product, possibly popular, not notable. There is no significant coverage, and there is little hope of expanding this article past ingredients, sizes, and availability. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 05:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Samu (Zen)

(Find sources: "Samu (Zen)" – news · books · scholar · free images)

Deprodded with useless edit summary of "expandable". I don't see anything to expand it with though; is this notable? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Efi Thodi

(Find sources: "Efi Thodi" – news · books · scholar · free images)

Deprodded based on longevity of career, but I see no reliable sources in English or Greek. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] The Funny Face Show

(Find sources: "The Funny Face Show" – news · books · scholar · free images)

This article has no sources, and no indication of notability. It's about a cartoon possibly coming out in 2013. The article itself even explicitly states that it may not be picked up. This directly violates WP:NFF, which, granted is about films and, granted, is only a guideline...but the same idea applies: a piece of media that has not yet been created and whose very creation is in doubt is not notable enough for an article. Once the series is actually produced and aired, it will likely be notable enough for an article, but since that may never happen, it needs to be deleted for now. Qwyrxian (talk) 04:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Delete textbook WP:TOOSOON. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:23, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] ICCF Finland

(Find sources: "ICCF Finland" – news · books · scholar · free images)

Subdivision of parent company which doens't have an article. Dubious notability, minimal sourcing. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:06, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Organizational configuration

(Find sources: "Organizational configuration" – news · books · scholar · free images)

As 22 months ago, many issues but mostly written like an essay with sourcing, OR and POV issues. It was suggested it could be fixed but it's been barely touched since. There's already an article organizational structure on essentially the same topic without these issues. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 02:46, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Pyro Desktop

(Find sources: "Pyro Desktop" – news · books · scholar · free images)

This is an old article that's been marked for notability for a long time. Googling for it doesn't reveal very much recent, most of it seems to be an unrelated desktop wallpaper. The original sources don't seem to indicate sufficient notability either. The desktoplinux.com blurb (labeled as eweek) is really just an announcement from the project, and the slashdot post is the same. The only real review is the arstechnica article. It's a fine project, but I'm not sure it meets notability criteria. However I didn't want to prod it without review. Shadowjams (talk) 02:28, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Update - I just noticed there was a previous nomination. However, that was almost a year ago and the result was no consensus, so I don't think there's harm in renomination now. Shadowjams (talk) 02:31, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Lake Erie Drum and Bugle Corps

(Find sources: "Lake Erie Drum and Bugle Corps" – news · books · scholar · free images)

I can't find any sources to reference notability. A Google, Google News, and Google Books search doesn't turn up anything. Fails WP:GNG. Albacore (talk) 01:56, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

I am the source. I have the award from the Civil Rights Commission sitting in my living room. Also, the picture below the article is a clipping from the local newspaper. It is too old to be found in online records, but clearly shows that the team was a world champion. I have photos of the award if you do not find me credible enough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JustRealMC (talk • contribs) 04:14, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Comment: The article itself inserts a news source clipping right now that shows the group won an international championship. Frankly, this makes the nomination's claim that no sources can be found a bit ridiculous. We need to be looking a little harder, I think, though the lack of online sources will be a difficulty.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 04:28, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Springfield Road, Kelowna

(Find sources: "Springfield Road, Kelowna" – news · books · scholar · free images)

Fails WP:GNG. Article provides no WP:RS evidence of notability. It was a waste of other editors' time to create this article. Unfortunately the author has created many of this type. Logical Cowboy (talk) 00:53, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Chaâbi Rock'n Bled

(Find sources: "Chaâbi Rock'n Bled" – news · books · scholar · free images)

Album lacks substantial RS coverage. Was PRODed, but creator removed PROD without explanation. Epeefleche (talk) 00:52, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Delete per nom. I'm seeing listings for this album at iTunes/Amazon and the like, as well as mentions on Facebook and other social media sites, but nothing in reliable sources; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NALBUM. Gongshow ^Talk 03:16, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] EDIFECS

(Find sources: "EDIFECS" – news · books · scholar · free images)

Not really notable. references do not establish notability. Existing isn't enough to pass WP:CORP Dennis Brown (talk) 00:51, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Mild delete - gnews hits are about 90% press releases, and most of the rest are two-to-four sentence mentions like this, but mixed in there is this more in-depth piece. Still, the article in its current state could probably get speedied as WP:PROMO. --Nat Gertler (talk) 03:30, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] WE'AR

(Find sources: "WE'AR" – news · books · scholar · free images)

New article with no references, no claim of notability and obvious notability. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:32, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Diary of Compton

(Find sources: "Diary of Compton" – news · books · scholar · free images)

Crystalball. Album to be released in a year or so. Maybe. Dennis Brown (talk) 00:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Delete. No confirmed release date or track listing for this possible future release, and I'm not finding significant coverage in reliable sources that might otherwise satisfy WP:NALBUM. Gongshow ^Talk 03:12, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Files

[edit] Possibly unfree files

[edit] February 11

[edit] File:Randy Racing 5.jpeg

File:Randy Racing 5.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Credit to Willa Stein 2010 conflicts with license. Eeekster (talk) 01:22, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Files for deletion

[edit] February 11

[edit] File:Wiki SD75 side view.jpg

The same user, who appears to be the owner of the image, uploaded a higher-resolution non-watermarked version to commons as File:SD75M.jpg. There is no need for this version. Mackensen (talk) 00:29, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:N516323345 2054.jpg

i tagged it for deletion a week ago, and apparently it was never added to the FFD, so readding it, orphan, uneyclopedic image Secret ^account 02:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:IEEE11073 PHD Association Request 1 UML Sequence Diagram.jpg

Orphaned, used in a now deleted article on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 04:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Lou-on-Set.jpg

Orphaned, used in a now deleted article on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 04:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:El Yucateco extra hot.png

Orphaned, used in a now deleted article on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 04:08, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:NIPPSS1.jpg

Orphaned vanity photo, low quality, unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 04:10, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Amethyst bradley ralani.JPG

Orphaned, used in a now deleted article on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 04:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Andrew Weinreich in 2010.jpg

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 04:12, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] File:Church.gif

Orphaned, Low Quality, obsoleted by File:Church clipart.svg, no foreseeable use. FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:24, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Move to commons it's a PD image, the other one is CC, so has more restrictions. 70.24.247.54 (talk) 05:51, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Categories

[edit] February 11

[edit] NEW NOMINATIONS

[edit] Category:Old Queens

Propose renaming Category:Old Queens to Category:People educated at Queen's College, London

Nominator's rationale: Rename to avoid a very different primary meaning. The term "old queen" is predominantly used as a derogatory slang for a gay man. (see 491,000 ghits for "old Queen" + gay. The new name follows the established convention for Category:People educated by school in England, which is to use a descriptive category name including the name of the school (in this case Queen's College, London). --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:50, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Old St Andrews

Propose renaming Category:Old St Andrews to Category:People educated at St Andrew's School, Pangbourne

Nominator's rationale: Rename to eliminate ambiguity. St. Andrew's School (disambiguation) lists many schools to which "Old St Andrews" may refer, even amongst those who are familiar with the "old fooian" term used by a minority of schools in England.
The proposed new category name adopts plain English, avoids obscure WP:JARGON and fits the convention of Category:People educated by school in England which has been upheld at numerous other CFDs and incorporates the general principle of WP:NCCAT that category names should normally correspond to the name of a Wikipedia article (in this case, the article on St Andrew's School, Pangbourne). BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 04:02, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Old Ilkestonians

Propose renaming Category:Old Ilkestonians to Category:People educated at Ilkeston Academy

Nominator's rationale: Rename to adopt plain English, avoid obscure WP:JARGON and fit the convention of Category:People educated by school in England which has been upheld at numerous other CFDs and incorporates the general principle of WP:NCCAT that category names should normally correspond to the name of a Wikipedia article (in this case, the article on the school).
The "old fooian" terms rarely achieve common usage outside of the narrow circle of the former pupils themselves, and in contrast to the widely-used Old Etonians I see no evidence that this one has become common usage. It is not used in the article on the school.
The category currently claims to refer only to Ilkeston Grammar School, which became "Ilkeston School" in 1977 and is now "Ilkeston Academy" (on which there is neither a separate wikipedia article nor mention in the article on the grammar school). The website of the Ilkeston Academy does not even mention the term "Old Ilkestonian"search), and since the convention is to categorise alumni of all incarnations of a school under its current name, the Academy's name is the one to use. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:33, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Hong Kong expatriates in the People's Republic of China

Nominator's rationale: Recently created by suspected sock.

This category doesn't make sense unless you take the POV position that Hong Kong is separate from China. Hong Kong is a territory of the People's Republic of China. While the PRC does maintain control over citizens moving to and from SEZ and SARS, it still doesn't amount to be being expatriates to go from one place to another with the same country. Also, not a notable piece of knowledge about the person, over-categorization. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 03:31, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Old St Edwards

Propose renaming Category:Old St Edwards to Category:People educated at St Edward's School, Oxford

Nominator's rationale: Rename to eliminate ambiguity, adopt plain English, avoid obscure WP:JARGON and fit the convention of Category:People educated by school in England which has been upheld at numerous other CFDs and incorporates the general principle of WP:NCCAT that category names should normally correspond to the name of a Wikipedia article (in this case, the article on St Edward's School, Oxford).
The "old fooian" terms rarely achieve common usage outside of the narrow circle of the former pupils themselves, and in contrast to the widely-used "Old Etonians)I see no evidence that this one has become common usage.
This usage is also highly ambiguous, because even if the reader is aware of the habit of some English schools of adopotinmg this terminology for alumni, they cannot tell which of the many posible schools it refers to: St. Edward's School (disambiguation) lists more than 5 similarly-named schools in England alone, with more outside the UK. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:18, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Female bishops

Rename Category:Female bishops to Category:Women bishops
Nominators rationale This is basically for all the same reasons with lawyers. There is even less of a chance that a bishop will be under 18 than a lawyer. Yes, there are historical precedents of under-18 bishops but they are all from times in the orgainizations in question when those organizations did not ordain women to the priesthood at all.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:15, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Female lawyers

Rename Category:Female lawyers to Category:Women lawyers
Rename Category:American female lawyers to Category:American women lawyers
Rename category:African American female lawyers to Category:African American women lawyers
Nominators rationale women is the word for human females. Some claim "but it only applies to adults". I would argue it is the default word for all ages. I can say "I would like all the men and women in the audience to listen to me" and be thought to include everyone present, even if there are children well under 7 there. Beyond this, it is not like there are very many lawyers under the age of 18 anywhere. Lastly, there are more categories in the tree that use the term women than do not at present.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:02, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Auckland Councillors

Propose renaming Category:Auckland Councillors to Category:Auckland city councillors

Nominator's rationale: Less confusing and rm caps. Same applies to Category:Wellington Councillors and Category:Christchurch Councillors -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 02:47, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Keep as Category:Auckland Councillors, because the head article is at Auckland City Council (successor to Auckland City Council). The caps are correct, because the category refers to members of a specific body rather than being a catch-all categ for various local council in the Auckland arae. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:51, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
Strong Keep as above, the category is for members of the Auckland Council. Thank you BrownHairedGirl, couldn't have put it better myself. Mattlore (talk) 04:58, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Territorial Authorities of New Zealand

Propose renaming Category:Territorial Authorities of New Zealand to Category:Territorial authorities of New Zealand

Nominator's rationale: caps. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 02:43, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Old Buxtonians

Propose renaming Category:Old Buxtonians to Category:People educated at Buxton College

Nominator's rationale: Rename to adopt plain English, avoid obscure WP:JARGON and fit the convention of Category:People educated by school in England. This incorporates the general principle of WP:NCCAT that category names should normally correspond to the name of a Wikipedia article (in this case, the article on the school).
In this case I can find no evidence that the term "Old Buxtonian" any currency outside of the circle of those who attended the school; and no evidence that it was even used by those who attended the school. (The head article Buxton College doesn't even mention the term). On the contrary, the term "Buxtonian" seems to be predominantly used as a general one for people from the village of Buxton, Guyana (and not Buxton in Derbyshire England). A "Old+Buxtonian" Google search for "Old Buxtonian" throws up 79 results, of which the vast majority are of the form "22-year-old Buxtonian". In fact, I can find not one search result which confirms any use of the term within school-related circles (the three possible results [1], [2], [3] offer no clue of the user's intent) ... and the closest I can find is a ref in Google Books to the school magazine having been called The Buxtonian. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:53, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Merchant Taylor's schools

Propose renaming

Nominator's rationale: Rename both to adopt plain English, avoid WP:JARGON and fit the convention of Category:People educated by school in England. This incorporates the general principle of WP:NCCAT that category names should normally correspond to the name of a Wikipedia article (in this case, the article on the school).
Aside from the general failings of "old fooian" category names (see below), these two pose particular problems of ambiguity. The Worshipful Company of Merchant Taylors is a London Livery Company associated with a wide range of almhouses and charities, so the "Old Merchant Taylors" (OMT) label could reasonably be assumed to refer to people associated with the company itself or any of its many activities. In fact, OMT is used to refer only to one of the 7 schools with which the Company is associated, even though three of the schools bear the Company's name (see Merchant Taylors' School (disambiguation)). The resulting ambiguity creates confusion for the reader and also for editors who add articles to the category.
"Old Crosbeians" is also ambiguous, because there are at least 9 secondary schools in Crosby, including the Merchant Taylors' School, Crosby and Merchant Taylors' Girls' School. The application of the term "Old Crosbeian" to only one of the MT schools in Crosby two risks further confusion for editors and readers.
The Old Fooians format for former pupils is used by a significant minority of schools in England, but the relationship between the school name and Old Fooian term is frequently obscure even to those who understand the format, and those from outside England are unlikely to even know of the format (Wikipedia is written for an international audience, not an English one). The terms have reached common usage in the case of only a small minority of particularly high-profile public schools, such as Old Etonians for Eton College, and I can find no evidence that these terms have anything remotely approaching such widespread usage. If an Old Fooian term is used in article, its usage can be explained, but a category name appears on an article without explanation; that's why descriptive formats are preferred in category names, and abbreviations deprecated. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:55, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Support These terms have the added problem besides being obscure jargon that if you are not supper familiar you might accidently use the Merchant taylors term for people who gradauted from the wrong school.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:58, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Redirects

[edit] February 11

[edit] Do Right and Kill Everything

Do Right and Kill Everything → Drake (entertainer) (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

Delete redirect: Per WP:Redirect, "If the redirect is a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name, it is unlikely to be useful", "The redirect makes no sense". Dan56 (talk) 04:28, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] South Texas Plains

South Texas Plains → Tamaulipan mezquital (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

Either redirect or delete. South Texas Plains is a recognized geographical area of the state of Texas. Texas Parks and Wildlife Dept page defining South Texas Plains to specific counties in Texas. The target on this redirect is an area that includes a large part of Mexico.Maile66 (talk) 00:36, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Templates

[edit] February 11

[edit] Template:Noodle

Redundant to the more general Template:Pasta, which has been around much longer & is better for describing pasta products & subjects contained in the pasta template. Removing the pasta template & replacing it with a noodle template for all the pasta products & subjects is not helpful. FieldMarine (talk) 05:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

The old template Template:Pasta is specific to Italian pasta. The new Template:Noodle includes the old Pastat template info and adds other countries. jmcw (talk) 05:59, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] Stub types

Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2012/February/11

[edit] Miscellany (WikiProjects, user pages, etc.)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion#2012-02-11

[edit] Deletion review

[edit] 11 February 2012

Centralized discussion

Proposals	Discussions	Recurring proposals
RFC on appropriate handling/removal of non-free images that breach WP:NFCC policy #9. RfC on the proposed cessation of selective delete (other than history merge fixes) and resulting changes to deletion policies, including the removal of a Revision Deletion criterion. Invitation to comment on candidates standing for 2012 Audit Subcommittee appointment RfC about whether "new messages" banner hoaxes should be prohibited RfC on how files from non-copyright states should be treated and used on WP RfC on aspects of the leadership of the featured article process Note: inactive discussions, closed or not, should be archived.
archive · talk · edit · history · watch

Wikipedia:XfD today

Contents

[edit] Speedy deletion candidates

[edit] Articles

[edit] Jean Andeka

[edit] Josué Alex Mukendi

[edit] Evan Feldman

[edit] TMCR 95.3

[edit] Boo Koo

[edit] TEHO

[edit] Ace Energy Drink

[edit] 3sum

[edit] Samu (Zen)

[edit] Efi Thodi

[edit] The Funny Face Show

[edit] ICCF Finland

[edit] Organizational configuration

[edit] Pyro Desktop

[edit] Lake Erie Drum and Bugle Corps

[edit] Springfield Road, Kelowna

[edit] Chaâbi Rock'n Bled

[edit] EDIFECS

[edit] WE'AR

[edit] Diary of Compton

[edit] Files

[edit] Possibly unfree files

[edit] February 11

[edit] File:Randy Racing 5.jpeg

[edit] Files for deletion

[edit] February 11

[edit] File:Wiki SD75 side view.jpg

[edit] File:N516323345 2054.jpg

[edit] File:IEEE11073 PHD Association Request 1 UML Sequence Diagram.jpg

[edit] File:Lou-on-Set.jpg

[edit] File:El Yucateco extra hot.png

[edit] File:NIPPSS1.jpg

[edit] File:Amethyst bradley ralani.JPG

[edit] File:Andrew Weinreich in 2010.jpg

[edit] File:Church.gif

[edit] Categories

[edit] February 11

[edit] NEW NOMINATIONS

[edit] Category:Old Queens

[edit] Category:Old St Andrews

[edit] Category:Old Ilkestonians

[edit] Category:Hong Kong expatriates in the People's Republic of China

[edit] Category:Old St Edwards

[edit] Category:Female bishops

[edit] Category:Female lawyers

[edit] Category:Auckland Councillors

[edit] Category:Territorial Authorities of New Zealand

[edit] Category:Old Buxtonians

[edit] Merchant Taylor's schools

[edit] Redirects

[edit] February 11

[edit] Do Right and Kill Everything

[edit] South Texas Plains

[edit] Templates

[edit] February 11

[edit] Template:Noodle

[edit] Template:Colonial New England

[edit] Template:Take-Back 60 Entertainment

[edit] Template:Horrorfilmlist2

[edit] Stub types

[edit] Miscellany (WikiProjects, user pages, etc.)

[edit] Deletion review

[edit] 11 February 2012

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

Actions

Search

Navigation

Interaction

Toolbox

Print/export