Wikipedia:Extant Organizations/Noticeboard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to the Extant Organizations Noticeboard
This page is for attracting broader community discussion and scrutiny to content discussion on pages about organizations. In particular, non-neutral articles like attack or puff pieces may be brought here for wider review or discussion.

Autism Research Institute[edit]

A recent AfD was initially leaning towards a merge with the article on the founder Bernard Rimland. A few last-minute KEEP votes resulted in a "no consensus" close of the AfD. However, user:MrBill3 said here that consensus seems to be to at least stub it and see what's left. The current article has 44 sources, but almost all of them are primary or sources about autism in general that do not say anything about the Autism Research Institute specifically. The article (as well as this section of the Rimland page) is rife with promotion, original synthesis, etc. and both could use an axe.

Because I have a COI and the organization seems to advocate for fringe views on autism treatment (not a popular view here on Wikipedia) I didn't think anything useful would come from me attempting to author the stub. Bill said he/she may do it, but you know, people get busy and whatnot, have dayjobs and all that + nobody responded to his discussion string about it. So I wonder if anyone here might be willing to pick up the axe? CorporateM (Talk) 18:59, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

I agree there is promotion and advocacy of fringe treatments resulting in presentation of consensus views on these treatments. The article (and related section at Rimland) could use a solid trimming. There is considerable discussion of the organization and it's activities and positions with analysis in a couple of the sources I identified on the AfD and the talk page, but if no one wants to invest the effort, after a trim and possible restructure I could add the third party sources for the facts that remain. - - MrBill3 (talk) 19:11, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Requesting input in proposed merger of articles regarding related organizations[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Talk:Landmark Worldwide#Proposed merger with Werner Erhard and Associates and Erhard Seminars Training regarding merging articles of three organizations which are all related in some way to Werner Erhard and his original Erhard Seminars Training. The topic itself has recently been the subject of an arbitration case in which the arbitrators asked for more editors to be involved as seen at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Landmark Worldwide#Additional eyes invited. Any input, particularly regarding how wikipedia handles similar cases of organizations which may have or have had similar relationships, would be more than welcome. John Carter (talk) 15:25, 10 January 2015 (UTC)