anything that has to do with references and sources will be updated, included, etc. so no need to comment on that. no need to comment on neutral point of view either. you should edit the article yourself instead of just commenting on anything you'd like improved.
Comment. Hi Waveclaira, welcome to FAC. Have you notified the main editors of this article already? See the instructions at the top of the WP:FAC page. - Dank (push to talk) 23:40, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
im a main editor. there's no instructions about notifying. you should quote word for word. like "this"Waveclaira (talk) 23:50, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
and there's a template onthe talk page so everyone is automatically notified, just so you knowWaveclaira (talk) 23:52, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Skeptical comment. I am very concerned that this article does not (and perhaps, by its nature, cannot) meet criterion 1(e) [stability] — or whether we can get a stable consensus for criterion 1(d) [neutrality]. People are constantly arguing over the content and changing things back and forth in an attempt to make the article read according to their views (pro or con) on the topic. Am I being too pessimistic here? What do others think? — Richwales 00:51, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
I suggest this be speedily closed--the nominator is a new account whose only activity has been to nominate this. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:54, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.