I am nominating this for featured list removal because of its heavy use on unreliable sources and WP:ACCESS issues. Per WP:VG/RS, GameFAQs is not a reliable source because its database is entirely user-contributed with no editorial oversight, and this list is heavily dependent on GameFAQs. Also, the table has issues; color alone is not an issue, but there's no use of text to denote regional releasing (an accessibility issue to the colorblind) and is not compliant with MOS:DTT. Red Phoenixbuild the future...remember the past... 22:35, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Comment – I removed the colors in response to the previous FLRC 5 years ago to address the issue, but another user has added them back in since → . --MuZemike 00:50, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Delist. I know this came up at WT:VG recently (related). I suppose it's theoretically possible to source the list from print sources, but it's going to take a whole lot to rescue. The article should be delisted until it's sourced from a place agreed to be reliable. This article wouldn't pass a FAC today on the basis of the GameFAQs refs. Ping me if circumstances change, because I would try to help. czar ♔ 06:58, 24 December 2013 (UTC)
Delist - Huge reliance on unreliable sources, as well as access issues. No attempts made to improve list during FLRC. Dana boomer (talk) 18:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
"Delist' unreliable sources per the project, list needs some work per ACCESS as noted. Not good enough right now. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:14, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.