Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Capri

Isle of Capri [edit]

I visited the Isle of Capri a year ago and it is one of the most beautiful places I've ever seen.

Nominate and support. - Grant-o 18:03, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - It looks kind of dull, and red too, so I uploaded this edit. The JPEG artifacting is kind of heavy, too.PiccoloNamek 20:42, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The second is a bit too contrasty. --vaeiou 22:50, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Very cool image - good luck! - JustinWick 00:42, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I don't often see artefacts, but here the sky has a lot of them. Can someone fix it? - Mgm|^(talk) 09:16, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Gotta agree that the artifacts are highly visible and obvious all over this one. You really can't remove them; you'd need to have a non-recompressed source image. I'll oppose the image if a better quality version isn't uploaded. -- uberpenguin 23:01, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Amazing photo. Artifact just enhances it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hamedog (talk • contribs) .
Oppose Original and first edit: Way too much compression artifacts and I don't see how artifacts can enhance a picture! Neutral about second edit. Glaurung 07:35, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A huge conflict (for me anyway) between the foreground column and the background mountains and town. It seems the image is trying to rip itself in half. D e nni ☯ 02:32, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The colours look rather off. Enochlau 00:01, 15 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Resolution far too low, jpeg artifacts.. the edited version makes the artifacts much worse. --Gmaxwell 06:46, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. Flcelloguy (A note?) 16:38, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Edited it to remove artefacts, as much as possible without losing too much detail. I've also adjusted the contrast and got rid of the red colour cast. What do you folks think? --SunTzu2 03:05, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Raven4x4x 03:23, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]