Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/The unlucky Ophiucus Set (3)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The unlucky Ophiucus Set (3)[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2015 at 08:47:44 (UTC)

Reason
First nom and second nom failed due to unexplained(?) reasons. So here again are a quality set of astro images used in Ophiucus...
Articles in which this image appears
Ophiucus
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Space/Looking out
Creators
Please see file description
  • Support as nominatorThe Herald : here I am 08:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - Maybe 3rd time's the charm. Rreagan007 (talk) 17:14, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Magnificent images! JJARichardson (talk) 18:02, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - third time. Hafspajen (talk) 14:32, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Conditional Support Scale down the first (by NASA), because at 10Kx10K pixels, it is very unsharp (possibly upscaled? On the WISE page, it's sharpest at only a bit over 1Kx1K !) 3Kx3K should be more than enough, and won't lose any detail at all - the full-sized is that fuzzy! --Janke | Talk 21:01, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Janke: But I am sure to lose some details by scaling down, specially when it comes to astro images. There is a reason why they have high-scaled version. Those stars are too minute to see even to telescopic eyes... - The Herald (here I am) 13:53, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Did you look at the first image full-size? Waste of bandwidth, IMO... ;-) (Note though, that I do not oppose!) --Janke | Talk 15:19, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Rho Ophiuchi.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 13:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted File:Guisard - Milky Way.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 13:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Promoted File:Rho Ophiucus Widefield.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 13:30, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]