Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Yellow Tang

Yellow Tang[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 May 2013 at 22:56:28 (UTC)

Reason: Nice picture, high EV
Articles in which this image appears: Yellow Tang
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish
Creator: Lviatour

Support as nominator --Tomer T (talk) 22:56, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:58, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support '''SAMƏK''' (talk) 23:51, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 01:50, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - very nice picture. BNK(talk) 06:49, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support~~ Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 13:35, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Oppose~~ it's not exactly sharp. --Wingtipvorte^X PTT ∅ 22:30, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove my Oppose vote per the discussion below. --Wingtipvorte^X PTT ∅ 21:14, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Per Wingtipvortex. Initially, I thought it was my eyes. Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 09:47, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed it too, but I thought that was a common thing with underwater photography? I should probably study up on more underwater FPs then. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 19:04, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is. Tomer T (talk) 19:34, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If it is just a product of underwater photography, then shouldn't that be overlooked here? I mean, it's a picture of a fish, you kind of have to image it in water. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rreagan007 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 21 May 2013‎

Fishes are probably always in water; but photographers may not. Sometimes one can take photograph through the glass standing outside; if it is in an aquarium. In that case, we can demand good quality. But if it is a pure underwater photography like this, we've to compromise more. J Kadavoor J e e 17:40, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Zebrasoma flavescens Luc Viatour.jpg --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 23:00, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]