Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Millennium Park

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Millennium Park[edit]

Main page Articles
Good article Millennium Park Good article Crown Fountain - Good article Cloud Gate - Good article Jay Pritzker Pavilion - Good article McCormick Tribune Plaza & Ice Rink - Good article BP Pedestrian Bridge - Good article Lurie Garden - Good article Harris Theater (Chicago) - Good article Wrigley Square - Good article Exelon Pavilions - Good article McDonald's Cycle Center - Good article Boeing Galleries - Good article Chase Promenade - Good article AT&T Plaza

While Torsodog (talk · contribs) and I continue to pursue WP:FACs for several at the items in hopes of qualifying it for WP:FT, we bring it here to WP:GTC. Currently, both Chase Promenade and AT&T Plaza are at WP:PR. Neither has much notable subject matter to add.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 01:06, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

  • Comment Articles have to complete PRs before than can be considered audited for quality. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:09, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose and as a comment, you're right, I hadn't even noticed the peer reviews for the articles to do with Slipknot weren't finished. I shall go and switch my vote to oppose for that one, too. And as a comment, I personally will oppose the inclusion of any Audited article of limited subject matter-articles until they've been nominated for GA, and failed solely due to inherent shortness. i.e., I want a very literal demonstration that these articles cannot pass GA - rst20xx (talk) 13:19, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Oppose - You need to either get the two check marked articles to Good Article status or merge them, because they are not "unreleased items" or articles will a big potential for future growth. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 16:18, 13 September 2008 (UTC)
  • I guess this should be considered On hold until the GACs/PRs have all finished, at which point the nom will effectively be able to start properly - rst20xx (talk) 01:02, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Support as GT now that all articles have passed GAC. To TonyTheTiger, don't worry, there are much shorter GAs, including New York State Route 164, one of my own. Cheers, –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:57, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Support - well done! And this whole exercise Tony also means that you have two more GAs to your name :) rst20xx (talk) 21:00, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Support - Fantastic work, good job! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 23:20, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Support Great job getting those 2 articles to GA. Pie is good (Apple is the best) 21:15, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Support Zginder 2008-09-29T23:35Z (UTC)
  • Support – great work on these articles. —sephiroth bcr (converse) 00:05, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Someone close this - It has clearly passed, so load it up! Judgesurreal777 (talk) 12:22, 8 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment I agree. This has had five supports for ten days and six for eight days.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:02, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
  • Close with consensus to promote - Things have been a bit slow around here lately and I appologise for that. However, promotions are meant to stay open for 10 days, and in this case, only yesterday was that limit effectively met - rst20xx (talk) 10:33, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Supplementary nominations[edit]

  1. Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Millennium Park/addition1
  2. Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Millennium Park/addition2