Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Mentors

The following is a list of users who have volunteered to act as mentors to good article reviewers. New reviewers are strongly encouraged to contact one of the editors below on their user talk page for assistance and advice on using the good article nominations process, applying the good article criteria, and producing a good review. All reviewers are welcome to contact mentors for advice on individual issues.

Please note that the listing of a user below is not a guarantee that they will be able to respond to a particular mentoring request. It is probably a good idea to check user contributions to make sure that the user is recently active.

Mentors often specialize in reviewing articles within a particular area. They also may have expertise in a particular aspect of the GA process. This is indicated after their user names below.

List of mentors

	This user is a Good articles mentor.

(Userbox)

Editors willing to mentor can add their name to this list using {{User|username}}, followed by their reviewing interests.

1. Nehrams2020 (talk · contribs) – Can assist with issues concerning images, inline citations/references, GA sweeps, and GA nominations general questions. A list of the reviews I have performed can be seen at my GA subpage.
2. bibliomaniac15 (talk · contribs) – Mostly experienced with CVG and organism GAs, but I'm pretty sure I can handle image, citation, and general questions about GAN.
3. Yamanbaiia (talk · contribs) – Manual of Style enthusiast.
4. Juliancolton (talk · contribs) – I can help with pretty much anything related to the GA process.
5. OhanaUnited (talk · contribs) – Sweeps, references, weasel words, and jargon words
6. Ceranthor (talk · contribs) – I'll do anything, as long as it is geography, animals, science, etc.
7. Protonk (talk · contribs) – Economics, some math, history, anything but music or sports. Happy to offer a second opinion on request.
8. Majoreditor (talk · contribs) – I am happy to help with most any type of review.
9. Sanguis Sanies (talk · contribs) – Anything Film and Television related, I'll take stab at anything else: the two GA articles I helped were both Law related.
10. Mm40 (talk · contribs) – Quality of prose and reference formatting are strong points in my reviews. History, arts, or sports related articles, see here for my reviews.
11. Nikkimaria (talk · contribs) – anything not pop culture or sports is probably fair game for me.
12. Arsenikk (talk · contribs) – Transport (my field of excellence), video games, economics, business, politics, government, geography, places and engineering; I'm better at content, referencing, images, aesthetics and MOS than prose.
13. Jezhotwells (talk · contribs) – Art, Architecture, Theatre, Film, most topics really, but I tend to avoid American sports, TV shows and contemporary pop music.
14. Aircorn (talk · contribs) Willing to help out in most topics.