From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

This is an archive of prior applications. New applications should be listed at Wikipedia:HighBeam. Thanks!

Applications--April 9th round (delivered by the 16th)[edit]

These were sent out successfully April 16th. A minority of the codes failed to deliver because recipients' email addresses were not enabled. If you didn't get your code, drop a note on my talk page Ocaasi t | c 01:24, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Applicants for round 2, April 16th to May 1[edit]

These were sent out successfully May 2. A minority of the codes failed to deliver because recipients' email addresses were not enabled. If you didn't get your code, drop a note on my talk page.Ocaasi t | c 16:07, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Round 3, open period, delivered weekly[edit]

Round 4: Delivery in late July[edit]

Round 5, delivered late August[edit]

Round 6[edit]

Round 7[edit]

Round 8[edit]

  1. User:Iselilja. Renewal. Mostly English Wikipedia lately, but also Norwegian bokmål Wikipedia. I write about society and politics, so newspaper articles are of high interest. I have found HighBeam especially valuable for topics from non-English speaking countries (other than Scandinavian) because there are often a draught of sources for those topics. Regards, Iselilja (talk) 17:30, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
  2. User:درفش کاویانی. Renewal. My account has expired, and I would like to extend it please. im ctive in Persian Wikipedia, Tajik Wikipedia, English Wikipedia and German Wikipedia. I start editing in wikipedia since 14 August 2008. i wrote 7 featured article and 3 good article in Persian Wikipedia. I write about History and Photography. Thanks Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 15:36, 3 October 2013 (UTC)
  3. User:TenPoundHammer. Renewal. Expired and I'd like to extend. I'm mainly active on retail and country music articles, and the Highbeam subsription was extremely useful in fleshing out mall articles. I've been editing since December 2005 and have created nearly 1,500 articles. Highbeam has a lot of information that is of great use to me. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 04:00, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
  4. User:MrX. Renewal - I have used Highbeam extensively over the past year to add references to newly created and existing articles. I have more than 30,000 edits and have created 138 articles. Thank you for your consideration. - MrX 12:21, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
  5. User:Malik Shabazz Renewal. I've been an editor since 2006 and have made more than 76,000 edits. Very helpful resource. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 18:48, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
  6. User:Gobonobo. Renewal. Despite having library access to many databases, I often find myself wanting access to HighBeam sources. I intend to use access to work on historical biographies of women. Gobōnobō + c 20:20, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
  7. WhisperToMe (talk · contribs) - I have been active editor for about a decade and I would like to have Highbeam to help expand my sourcing. I do not have highbeam access from an alternate source. WhisperToMe (talk) 17:39, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
  8. 4nn1l2 (talk · contribs). Persian Wikipedia. It's the second year I'm editing on Wikipedia and of course enjoying it. I usually write about Middle East history, culture, and societies. Aside from Middle East topics, I enthusiastically edit articles on engineering and fundamental sciences. I have wrote 2 Featured article yet and expanded a whole bunch of other ones. I intend to expand my work on Wikipedia but unfortunately due to recent sanctions against Iran, I have lost my access to digital libraries. I really appreciate it if you let me have access to HighBeam. 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:36, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
  9. User:Shalbat. Spanish Wikipedia. I have more than 24 000 edits and I have created more than 200 articles. I would like to go on with this work. --Shalbat (talk) 15:07, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
  10. User:Smsarmad Renewal, I am an active English Wikipedia user and have more than 26,000 edits. I mostly edit articles related to Pakistan, a topic area that lacks in a number of ways, one of which is availability of online sources. HighBeam is a good resource and was helpful in creating/expanding a number of articles. -- SMS Talk 10:25, 10 October 2013 (UTC)
  11. User:Mackensen Renewal. I've used HighBeam over the last year to improve our coverage of North American railroading topics. I do not have access from an alternative source. Thank you. Mackensen (talk) 13:05, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
  12. User:Czar. enwp. History of education, art, and video games—mostly content expansion, new articles, but also source verification. I've hit the paywall dozens of times in the last year and my institution doesn't have HB access. My research time spent would be greatly improved with access. czar  13:12, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
  13. User:Apwoolrich I am an independent scholar, interested in C19 industrial history and biography. Just now doing intensive research into Rees's Cyclopaedia Apwoolrich (talk) 06:59, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
  14. Doc Taxon (talk · contribs): I am active in en:WP:REX and especially active in its German sister project de:WP:BIBA or de:WP:BIBR. I am looking for articles and literature for all the users who need it and for myself, to build well researched articles in English, German and Wikipedia of other languages. Thank you, -- Doc Taxon (talk) 13:47, 22 October 2013 (UTC)
  15. User:Blackberry Sorbet. Interest lies largely in articles that often predate the commonality of the internet and access to HighBeams digitized archives of older print publications would be extremely useful in sourcing material as well as opening avenues for new articles which might otherwise fall by the wayside for lack of access to sources. BlackberrySorbet 18:24, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
  16. -jkb- (talk) 15:00, 27 October 2013 (UTC) dewiki, cswikisource, etc.; renewal needed for research in quite difficult themes (Czechoslovakia - History, Eastern Europe, etc.), thanks, -jkb- (talk) 15:00, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  17. User:Aalfons Renewal. 19.000+ edits since 2007. dewiki, meta, relevance check, research support for other wikipedians. --Aalfons (talk) 20:55, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  18. User:Thoughtfortheday Renewal. I have found some of the publications (often behind a payroll) very useful, for example for classical music content. I hope to introduce the resource to other wikipedians. Thoughtfortheday (talk) 21:11, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  19. Jason Rees: I have found some of the materials useful, so i would love to renew this account if at all possible.Jason Rees (talk) 21:13, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  20. User:Dougweller Renewal I spent a lot of time finding source for articles on archaeology and history, and this has been very useful for me. About 107,000 edits. Dougweller (talk) 21:33, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  21. OwenX (talk · contribs) Renewal. Made good use of the service to dig up citations. Would love to continue. Thank you! Owen× 21:35, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  22. GrapedApe (talk · contribs) Renewal Really enjoyed the first year of the account, would like to do more. Over 4 years, have totaled 18,000 edits, 344 articles created, 4 Featured Lists, 5 Good Articles, and 18 DYKs. Typically edit articles in Wikipedia:WikiProject Universities, Wikipedia:WikiProject Pittsburgh and Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places. Future research interest is in fleshing out unique locales in Pittsburgh and expanding stub articles of historic places in Pennsylvania.--GrapedApe (talk) 22:04, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  23. Yoninah (talk · contribs) Renewal The service was very helpful for accessing archived articles on Jerusalem streets and architecture, and Jewish subjects and personalities from around the world. Another one-year subscription would be ideal. Thank you, Yoninah (talk) 22:23, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  24. Bbb23 (talk · contribs) Renewal. English Wikipedia. I use it often in sourcing issues when an Internet link is not used in the reference. I have over 50,000 edits.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:26, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  25. ssriram_mt (talk · contribs) New .English Wikipedia. I am part of wikiproject India and Hinduism and need higher reference sources. I have 18 GAs and more than 60,000 edits. I need the account for archived articles for either of the projects i am part of.Ssriram mt (talk) 22:29, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
  26. Khazar2 -- Renewal. One of the top 100 Wikipedians by edit count, have contributed to 40-50 Good Articles in the past year. I used Highbeam almost daily for its encyclopedias, reviews, and newspaper articles. -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:25, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
  27. Go Phightins! -- Renewal. Highly useful for research on sports articles ... would really appreciate a renewal on my account. Thanks! Go Phightins! 00:30, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
  28. OppidumNissenae -- Renewal -- I wrote about news 500 entries in some Italian VDQ is of medical interest and more, I think HighBeam is a valuable resource.OppidumNissenae (talk) 00:32, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
  29. DCDuring. Most active as admin at English Wiktionary. We constantly need to attest to usage in a wide range of subject areas. One of our particular weaknesses is in coverage of terms used in contemporary workplace, especially other than computing. That in turn is partially attributable to lack of access to trade press, not well covered at Google or other free sources. English Wiktionary is an important resource for other wiktionaries. DCDuring (talk) 00:53, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
  30. Roisterer (talk) 01:23, 28 October 2013 (UTC) Active member since 2004 with 22,000 & a bit edits, a couple of GAs and lots of article creation and editing, all of which would be greatly improved with a HighBeam subscription.
  31. Froid (talk) 08:05, 28 October 2013 (UTC). I meet the requirements and will fulfill expectations. Highbeam will enhance my contributions to Wikipedia; I've long wanted access, as when conducting research for the purposes of contributing or verification of preexisting content, I frequently encounter sources for which a subscription is required. My stats: # Froid (talk) 08:05, 28 October 2013 (UTC). First edit Sep 09, 2006 / Unique pages edited: 7,401 / Live edits: 20,734 / Deleted edits: 0 / Total edits (including deleted): 20,734.
  32. billreid -- Renewal as per my previous application. Thank you. --Bill Reid | (talk) 09:18, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
  33. KrakatoaKatie Active English Wikipedia admin with around 20K edits - I mainly work on biographies but I often find great articles to improve, in many different subject areas, while doing admin work. It would be a great help to have access to the Highbeam database. :-) KrakatoaKatie 10:29, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
  34. Harrias -- Renewal -- Very useful for sports articles research. Harrias talk 13:51, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
  35. Esoglou -- I think HighBeam would be very useful both for adding new material and for checking attributions. Esoglou (talk) 19:45, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
  36. User:Enric Naval. Renewal I have successfully used Highbeam to locate newspaper articles for Mother's Day, cold fusion, crop circles and others. I intend to use HighBeam to keep locating old newspaper articles as necessity arises. Enric Naval (talk) 16:01, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
  37. Rlendog. Renewal - 50,000+ edits, over 100 articles created. Work on a number of projects, including mammals, music and sports. Useful for looking up information in old newspaper articles. Rlendog (talk) 19:58, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
  38. Mayooranathan -- New --I am an active Wikipedian in Tamil Wikipedia for 10 years now. I started more than 3,500 articles and improved many more. Highbeam access will be very usefull for me in the above work. Mayooranathan (talk) 09:48, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
  39. Ryoga Godai -- Renewal --My subscription expired this August. I edit music articles and anime, manga articles. Highbeam is a really useful source for old newspaper articles that are not usually found on the internet. A renewed subscription would really help me. ごだい (会話) 12:12, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
  40. Ca$e (talk). Renewal. I found HighBeam very useful. I work - currently with > 40k edits - on a range of topics esp. in philosophy and religious studies and am, among other things, involved in the respective editors' forums in the german WP. Ca$e (talk) 17:26, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
  41. SchroCat. Renewal: great source, and I now find myself struggling without it. - SchroCat (talk) 03:34, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
  42. Queeste Mostly active on the Dutch Wikipedia, less on the English. Especially interested in the psychology and psychiatry journals, in addition also history and religion. --Queeste (talk) 08:33, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
  43. Amqui Contributor on several Wikimedia projects, but would use this access mainly to contribute on the French Wikipedia where I wrote more than a dozen Good Articles, created more than 1,000 articles, and have more than 20,000 edits in the mainspace. I write on a lot of different subjects, including but not limited to anthropology, botany, ethnology, geography, history, religions and zoology. Amqui (talk) 19:39, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
  44. Tyrol5 -- Renewal. Great resource. I've worked on several historical U.S. election articles and having access to historical news articles is invaluable. Great to have access to journal articles as well when I dabble into the U.S. space program, etc. Tyrol5 [Talk] 00:44, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
  45. User:Hack. Renewal. Used this mostly for researching biographies on historical sporting figures. Hack (talk) 14:00, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
  46. John M Baker. New. English Wikipedia. I work on articles about finance and about words and phrases, and I contribute to the Reference Desk and the Resource Exchange. Although I have access to some other databases that I use for the Resource Exchange, I do not have HighBeam access. John M Baker (talk) 20:46, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
  47. Doug Coldwell. New. English Wikipedia. I work on articles about colonial people of the United States. I have about 300 Did You Know articles and over 20,000 edits. I do not have HighBeam access and believe it would give good biographical information.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 19:16, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
  48. Acather96 - New. I've been an editor on Wikipedia for nearly four years with 29000+ edits, would find access to sources extremely useful(especially if they include information on plants). Acather96 (click here to contact me) 20:55, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
  49. User:HueSatLumNew. English Wikipedia. I write about just about everything and find paywalls extremely frustrating. I believe HighBeam would provide more and higher-quality sources for writing better and more accurate articles. Cheers, ~HueSatLum 18:42, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
  50. Spanglej Renewal Editing since Feb 2009, around 22000 edits, mostly literary biography content, 12 new biogs. I had Highbeam access for a year through WP and found it mighty useful for biog research and GA development. Span (talk) 16:00, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
  51. User:Sagaciousphil New English Wikipedia. I'm a fairly slow and ploddy editor in comparison to most but I like working on historical information; I do have access to some databases through my library card and I pay for Questia myself. I feel High Beam would greatly enhance the sources available. SagaciousPhil - Chat 19:24, 13 December 2013 (UTC)
  52. Diannaa Renewal; access would be useful for copyright investigations. Thanks, -- Diannaa (talk) 01:12, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
  53. Quadell (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia. I've been a Wikipedian for nearly eleven years. I am very active in reviewing Good Article nominees, Featured Article candidates, and Articles For Creation. I frequently spot-check sources given by content creators. It would be very useful for me to be able to check sources that HighBeam would provide access to. Quadell (talk) 21:09, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
  54. Ponyo (talk · contribs) My old account has expired and my access to prime library sources has ended; I'd certainly appreciate a renewal in order to carry on with BLP sourcing!--Jezebel'sPonyobons mots 16:41, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
  55. RL0919 (talk · contribs) Over 8 years and more than 21K edits. I've written and expanded a number of articles about people, books, and plays from the 20th century, topics for which HighBeam should have useful source material. I'm long past university, and my local library has several other databases but not HighBeam. --RL0919 (talk) 21:54, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
  56. User:Jack Greenmaven. English wikipedia. I have done a lot of copyediting and created several articles. I have been editing just over three years and have an edit count of 22,000. Greenmaven (talk) 05:53, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
  57. EMP (talk · contribs) Renewal; editing since Sept 2009. I've had Highbeam access for for the past year and have found it most helpful in my research to update and improve multiple articles.EMP (talk) 19:09, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
  58. Michig (talk · contribs) - frustratingly as I was about to use HighBeam to improve an article I find that my account appears to have expired and I'm now asked for payment - renewal would be much appreciated. --Michig (talk) 11:55, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
  59. VVVladimir (talk · contribs) - editing since 2007, mostly in the history and culture of the Balkans. I helped promote several FAs and GAs, and intend to continue this work. Vladimir (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
  60. Hobbes Goodyear (talk · contribs) - My initial one-year account has expired--I would like to renew. With Google News archive out of commission, I think that having Highbeam access has become even more important. I just created a new article on a subject where references are tough to come by, and there are two on Highbeam I'd like to include. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 13:38, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
  61. EricEnfermero (talk · contribs) - Renewal; on English WP for about two years, >11,000 edits. I focus largely on content creation, particularly related to biographies in sports, psychology and medicine. HighBeam has been helpful in expanding articles, including successful GA nominations. EricEnfermero HOWDY! 05:02, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
  62. Grolltech (talk · contribs) - Renewal; Have enjoyed using HighBeam over the last year, as I have found it to be very useful. I had a whole bunch of articles staged for use – I just added one the night before last, went to bed, but by morning the account had expired. Hoping all of that good research I've accumulated wasn't for naught.  Grollτech (talk) 12:21, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
  63. Jeremy112233 (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia. I have spent 2-3 years editing Wikipedia and focus most of my attention on content generation. All of my reference use full citation information, which helps users to verify the information I add to the encyclopedia even if they do not have access to the pay-site's articles. Most of my articles require a large amount of research as they deal with contemporary issues where the sources I need are often behind paywalls rather than available freely on Google's reference searches like Scholar or News. That said, they just changed the Google News search so the old Archive function is no longer available, providing even less good sources to create articles. My articles are largely on law, medical, or entertainment related people or firms, and Highbeam would make my articles better researched, and allow me to create articles on subjects I may otherwise not be able to. I do not currently have ready access to HighBeam through either a university or a library. Jeremy112233 (talk) 16:39, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
  64. Lwarrenwiki (talk · contribs). English Wikipedia. My first edit was in Aug. 2013, and I have been quite active since then, with over 500 edits. If you have any flexibility in your requirements, I would very much appreciate being able to access your resources with a free account. I am diligent in providing detailed citations to references, and it's clear to me that HighBeam can allow me to provide higher quality in my editing and will greatly enhance my research. My areas of interest are listed at User:Lwarrenwiki, and I have seen that HighBeam covers (for example) major city newspapers with reporting of music-related events, as well as music criticism. I fully expect that I would be using HighBeam regularly for greater quality. I do not have other sources of free access. I respectfully request your approval for a free account. Thanks for your consideration. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 22:51, 27 January 2014 (UTC) - updated 05:17, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
  65. CaroleHenson (talk · contribs) - renewal, per talk. Nikkimaria (talk) 20:20, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
  66. User:Tokyogirl79 - I'm a frequent flier at AfDs and other deletion type scenarios, but I frequently find myself in situations where I need to check older articles that are not visible on the Internet. I edit mostly film and book related articles, but I also edit articles on various other topics that could predate news coverage on the Internet. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 10:38, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
  67. User:Storye book. I've been an editor here for 9 years; I've created over 50 DYK articles including one GA, and a load more of created or expanded articles. A lot of the articles are on buildings, structures and people, plus other historical subjects; all are fully cited. I have contributed over 2000 own-work and archival photographs to WP and Commons, and am listed as an auto-patroller on Commons. I do have access to certain online databases, mainly via my local library membership, but this tends to be limited to UK databases, - so Highbeam, for example, would expand my research worldwide. I'm currently working on an article on a 19-century church, with associated biographical articles, including artists of the Arts and Crafts movement. --Storye book (talk) 09:50, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
  68. TheBigJagielka (talk · contribs) - I've been editing for about four years, I have made many edits and most of my edits are on historical association football competitions. TheBigJagielka (talk) 19:38, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
  69. Bearcat. Active in new article creation and referencing improvements, predominantly in the areas of Canadian politics, LGBT topics and Canadian and international film, TV, music and literature. For a long time I wasn't sure if this project would actually be useful to me or not, but nowadays I quite frequently run into HighBeam previews in the course of trying to track down sources, so I figure I may as well give it a shot. Bearcat (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
  70. User:Brianhe. Active Wikimedia project: WikiProject Motorcycling. Have added HighBeam to many articles (with credit of course), my account apparently just expired. HighBeam used for a variety of research on vehicles, biographies and miscellany. -- Brianhe (talk) 06:03, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  71. User:Kopiersperre. Active Project: de:Wikipedia:Redaktion Chemie. 6000 edits there.--Kopiersperre (talk) 12:07, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
  72. User:Krimuk90. Renewal. I have been the principal contributor to 3 featured articles on Indian film artists. The Highbeam tool enabled me to find a lot of references, something that is otherwise difficult due to limited sources available for older Hindi film articles. A renewal of my account would significantly help me continue editing other film-related articles. Thanks. --krimuk 90 04:04, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
  73. User:Aviados. Renewal (my access expired in 04/2013). I'm a 6-year editor with a significant contribution to the Hebrew Wikipedia. Active mainly in content generation and research. Created and/or substantially contributed to thousands of articles. Aviados (talk) 20:25, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
  74. I had HighBeam access for a year, before my user name change from user:Malleus Fatuorum, and I found it very useful. Eric Corbett 23:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
  75. User:TParis, I'd like to work on articles relating to Ford Island.--v/r - TP 21:54, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
  76. Seeking renewal,    C M B J   13:17, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
  77. User:Rhododendrites. English Wikipedia, Commons (but far less frequently). Plenty of experience adding substantial content to articles, checking references, adding references, etc. I'm an active Wikipedia user as well as a grad student researching Wikipedia and encyclopedias. Thanks very much. --— Rhododendrites talk |  02:55, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
  78. User:Gaurav Pruthi Had used Highbeam for citing various articles earlier. Hope to get my subscription renewed.Gaurav Pruthitalk 09:38, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
  79. User:ColonelHenry. Mostly on the English Wikipedia, although I do translate English content into Farsi for that project. As of March 2014, almost 17,000 edits, several FAs and GAs (listed on my userpage), I generally focus on content creation and improvement especially towards articles on poetry, literature, historical biographies, regional history and historical places/landmarks, looking to expand my work into theology and botany. Often I get an odd urge to edit an article I happen to come across randomly, and with access to more tools, I would do that more often. I would be honoured to have access and make good use of it and would gladly help other editors looking for certain journal, newspaper, or other resources.--ColonelHenry (talk) 07:34, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
  80. User:TransporterMan. English Wikipedia. I do dispute resolution and am the second most active volunteer at 3O, the most active at DRN, and a member of the Mediation Committee. Access to sources is useful in sorting out content disputes. This is a renewal application, my prior account having expired some time back and I not realizing that it was possible to so easily renew. — TransporterMan (TALK) 17:11, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
  81. User:Racconish. English and French Wikipedia (where I am an active mediator). Over 48,000 contributions to Wikipedia projects. This is a renewal application. Thanks, — Racconish Tk 18:40, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
  82. User:MrBill3. WP:WikiProject Medicine, WP:WikiProject Citation cleanup, WP:WikiProject Nursing, WP:WikiProject Skepticism. Formatting refs on hundreds of articles, adding archive versions of refs. Adding and improving refs on many articles. Verification of references on many articles. Adding content and refs to a significant number of articles. Top ten contributor to medical articles in 2013. Contribution of content to articles on scientists and skeptics. I am a very active editor. I use the resources I have access to extensively, the addition of HighBeam would help me verify references and improve my ability to contribute content and sources as well as provide sources for existing content. - - MrBill3 (talk) 05:04, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
  83. Dezastru (talk · contribs). English-language Wikipedia editor since January 2012, with 3,000+ edits. Most of my contributions involve American history, politics and current events, and biographies. My local library recently eliminated online access to archived news sources due to budget cuts, which has substantially limited my research options. Dezastru (talk) 17:05, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
  84. User:Shakehandsman Editor since 2006 with over 11,000 edits. Working on Wikiproject British Crime articles including creating a good article almost single handedly. Also work on politics, biographies, and football. I often add refs for unreferenced material. I intend to continue the same work into the future and would really benefit from access to additional sources that Highbeam provides.--Shakehandsman (talk) 08:44, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
  85. Frank Schulenburg. Editor since 2005 with more than 39,000 edits across languages and projects. Wrote 17 featured articles so far and a number of good articles. I'm mostly active on the German Wikipedia, but I'm doing my research in French, English, and German. Most of my featured work was on biographies (17th and 18th century). I agree to the conditions above. Thanks in advance, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:38, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
  86. User:Caponer. English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons (as Justin.A.Wilcox). I write biographies of notable West Virginians, and histories of West Virginia buildings and populated places. -- Caponer (talk) 01:58, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
  87. User:97198. English Wikipedia. I write biographies about, amongst other things, filmmakers and more recently mountaineers. I plan to continue creating and expanding biographical articles. 97198 (talk) 09:45, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
  88. User:Dainomite. English Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons. Biographies relating to modern United States military history. I plan on continuing to write/expand said biographies. A few of the biographies I am working on have key in-depth articles which seem to only be accessible through HighBeam. Thanks for your consideration, —  dainomite   19:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
  89. User:Dumelow. English Wikipedia. Applying for renewal of my previous account. It has proven useful on occasion in sourcing material for new articles - Dumelow (talk) 21:59, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
  90. Dank. 60k edits. I expect the journals listed here to be quite helpful. - Dank (push to talk) 17:02, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
  91. LuckyLouie. Editor since 2006, and would appreciate this very useful tool for sourcing article content. - LuckyLouie (talk) 17:58, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
  92. User:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz. 60K edits. Use for content verification, especially BLPs, and for creating/expanding articles about 1940-70s genre fiction, which has become much more difficult with the unavailability of the Google News archive functions (not that it was easy even with them.) Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:06, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
  93. User:Jamesx12345. Working at the moment on a variety of articles, many of which involve contemporary history. Jamesx12345 18:13, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
  94. Kober. I have been active since 2004, made nearly 40,000 edits on English Wikipedia, and wrote more than 1,200 new articles. My principal interests are the history, culture, and politics of Georgia, the Caucasus, and the Middle East. --KoberTalk 18:48, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
  95. Dom497. I have been active since 2011 and have made over 11,000 edits. I work largely with Amusement Park related articles. I used to be able to find news articles through Google Archives which provided articles from almost a decade ago. I used these article to get several roller coaster articles to the GA or FA level. Google has since removed the archive feature and is now hard to find news archives. I've done a few searches on some roller coasters through the database (you search without an account, just can't read them) and found lots of articles that would really help.--Dom497 (talk) 18:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
  96. Paul Benjamin Austin. I have been a registered user since July, 2002 and was an administrator until i resigned in frustration at POV pushers. I feel that i can source information that could improve articles. Paul Austin (talk) 19:05, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
  97. User:EtienneDolet. I have over 14,000 edits. I have made at least 200 articles. I really need new databases to sources. Étienne Dolet (talk) 19:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
  98. User:Samwalton9 I have over 5000 edits, been active for a little over a year, and would find this very useful for sourcing information for women scientist biographies which I am presently writing a lot of. Sam Walton (talk) 21:17, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
  99. User:Glane23 I have edited Wikipedia since 2008 and have made over 46,000 edits. I now work mostly on adding/improving references for articles across en:Wikipedia and this source helps immensely. Geoff Who, me? 21:27, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
  100. User:Demiurge1000 I have over 23,000 edits, have been active for nearly 4 years, and have made significant use of HighBeam references (including appropriate links) in a previous one-year use of the scheme. I would like to continue and enhance this usage going forward. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:27, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
  101. Justlettersandnumbers: Not had access to this before, so don't know exactly how useful it would be in the areas I'm interested in (Renaissance topics, music theory, art history, history and traditions of agriculture). I'd be pleased to have the chance to find out. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:47, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
  102. Epipelagic I have have been active for 8 years and have 50,000 edits. I mainly develop articles related to marine ecosystems. --Epipelagic (talk) 22:56, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
  103. Levdr1lostpassword 3 years, 13K+ edits. I focus mainly on radio. HighBeam would prove invaluable in sourcing content on this particularly volatile medium. Thank you for your consideration. Levdr1lp / talk 23:20, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
  104. magiciandude Editor since 2004. Main focus is on Latin music. Erick (talk) 23:38, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
  105. Mrschimpf re-application; have found Highbeam to be a valulable resource to source articles, especially among media and older television and radio programs. Nate (chatter) 23:39, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
  106. DendroNaja I have been a member for over a year, have well over 1400 edits, have promoted at least 5 or 6 articles to GA status, I am mainly interested in venomous snakes, snake venom, toxinology, psychology and pharmacology. --Dendro†NajaTalk to me! 04:42, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
    • Note: user is blocked as a sockpuppet. Nikkimaria (talk) 15:01, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
  107. SMcCandlish (talk · contribs). Renewal. Wikipedian for 8+ years. I have a degree in anthropology and applied linguistics, but am not a professional academic so I don't have journal access any longer. My main journal needs are in life sciences (felinology, herpetology, commercial animal breeding, history of domestication), anthropology/archaeology/history (e.g. history of sport), and various other topics (I'm a major contributor to articles on albinism, linguistics, and other subjects that require citation of peer reviewed sources).  — SMcCandlish ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ʌ≼  13:02, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
  108. groupuscule. I'd be well pleased to get in on Highbeam, as my local library offers only limited news access and my typical contributions are detailed accounts of historical events from the semi-recent past. Aloha, groupuscule (talk) 01:41, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
  109. User:Anita5192. I correct, enhance, document and sometimes create mathematics articles. I will use the HighBeam resources as references to verify undocumented principles. – Anita5192 (talk) 02:54, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
  110. User:Anne Delong I review articles at Afc and frequently come across Highbeam articles that I can't see to check notability of the submissions. —Anne Delong (talk) 03:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
  111. Egghead06. 29k edits in nearly seven and a half years. Being in the retirement years (!) I focus a lot on sportspeople, sport and music not of current times. I believe Highbeam would be extremely valuable in providing references pre-internet or from the early years of the internet era.--Egghead06 (talk) 05:23, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
  112. Connormah - 50,000+ edits - frequently I write or edit articles on historical figures, and find myself digging up newspaper archives frequently. This would help a great deal. (I believe I had access a few years back, FWIW) Connormah (talk) 05:42, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
  113. Shoebox2 -- 2500+ edits, one FA, GA reviewer. Don't have access to HighBeam anywhere else, and given that I have several media/performance articles on obscure subjects that I'd like to expand, would find it immensely helpful. Shoebox2 talk 11:56, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
  114. This is Paul – 60,000+ edits, 10 GAs, 4 FAs. I had HighBeam access in 2012–13 and found it very useful, so thought I'd reapply. I mainly edit articles concerning UK media and politics from the recent past, as well as some crime-related stuff. This is Paul (talk) 14:08, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
  115. Toa Nidhiki05 - Just under 12,000 edits, as well as a fair amount of good and featured content. I had HighBeam access maybe a year back, and I didn't realize I could renew; I found it very useful for research, and would love to have access to it again. Toa Nidhiki05 15:33, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
  116. Valenciano (talk · contribs) I've made over 27,000 edits in total and created over 330 articles here and around 30 on other Wikipedias. My main interest is in creating and adequately sourcing articles related to politics and history. I live in a country without library access to Highbeam. Valenciano (talk) 17:23, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
  117. Emeritus (talk · contribs), global: since 2006 up to 22k/21k edits serving de:WP, german WP; generalist, long-term projects include history of academies and bio-bibliographies of academians, Pacific affaires, Brazil affaires, art, literature, ethnography. Positive experiences with HighBeam. --Emeritus (talk) 19:51, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
  118. User:JonRichfield. In the past four years or so I have done well over 3000 edits, and a fair proportion of my work has been on articles that I initiated. Most of the topics that I deal with are substantial, plus many RFCs (no groupie celeb touting for example). Most of my work is in a wide range of scientific and technical matters, particularly biological and computing, though I deal with a certain amount of historical and philological material as well. I am not familiar with HighBeam resources, but it sounds extremely valuable for some kinds of data search for up-to date citable material. A good proportion of my work is in dealing with "citation wanted" texts, so my requirements for reputable citations is atypically high. I am retired and cannot often reach the local university libraries and it is not clear to me that the HighBeam resources would be available there even if I could. I do not apply for any material benefit to myself nor to any third party, commercial or otherwise. In short, if I find that HighBeam resources are appropriate to my work, I not only would be able to put them to good use, but would in the process be publicising their value in good faith and without reducing their market value. I remark that I am thoroughly aware of my responsibilities in protecting the interests of the publisher. Thank you for your attention. JonRichfield (talk) 20:02, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
  119. KevinCuddeback (talk · contribs). 1600+ article edits since 2005. Recent edits have focused on adding sources by using NYTimes scanned archives and LATimes for example at Greyhound Lines (I'm most active in "corporate" and "transportation" themes). Would use a broader set of publications and would like better coverage of the 1980s and 1990s (pre-free-internet). KevinCuddeback (talk) 21:29, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
  120. User:Carriearchdale I have been on Wikipedia since 2007 and currently have over 2700 edits globally over all the wikis. I am interested in having access to Questia to help in my work to expand and verify articles in several different interest areas including biographies, linguistics, literature, classic antiquity studies, the arts, and education. I do not have access through local libraries since I live in a quite rural type setting. Thank you for your consideration.
    • This page is for applying for access to HighBeam, not Questia. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:32, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
      • So sorry for the mix-up. I am intending to apply for access to high beam for all the reasons as stated above. Thank-you for the note! ciao!!! Carriearchdale (talk) 19:03, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
        • Note: User:Carriearchdale is blocked with an expiry time of indefinite. Keri (talk) 15:26, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
  121. Cerevisae -- I would like to renew my High Beam account. I have 1460 edits over 4.5 years period. My subjects of interests are Malaysian politics and Bitcoin related subjects. High Beam database is extremely helpful to me because I can utilise the archived news sources for a more reliable citation for my edits. Cerevisae (talk) 21:45, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
  122. Siawase (talk · contribs) Editing since 2006, over 10 000 edits, mostly active in content generation/improvement in culture and biographies and would use Highbeam to that end. Siawase (talk) 07:18, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
  123. Carlstak (talk · contribs) I've made over 6,000 edits since August 2011 and have created about 15 articles, including some quite long ones, on historical subjects and biographies. I am especially interested in Spanish subjects, and in translating articles from the Spanish, Catalan, and Portuguese Wikipedias. I also spend much time adding quality sources to articles. Highbeam resources would be very useful to my research. Carlstak (talk) 12:26, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
  124. Dan arndt I've been editing since 2006, with over 23,000 edits in that time. I've predominantly been working on Australian related articles, covering topics such as Australian musical groups, Australian comic book artists, Australian architecture/heritage buildings and Australian architects. Numerous times I've been frustrated at the lack of credible and reliable sources to cite in articles, particularly newspaper references which can only be accessed with a Highbeam account. Having readily available access to Highbeam would enable me to verify numerous known but un-cited facts in many of the articles I've edited or would like to create.Dan arndt (talk) 13:56, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
  125. User:Peter Flass I have made over 5000 edits since 2008. One of my interests is computers and technology, and I believe Highbeam would provide an extra resource. Peter Flass (talk) 14:12, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
  126. Neonorange (talk · contribs) I've been an active user over the past year, and have begun to add content to articles in three areas: American novelists, the American Civil Rights Movement, and the American anti-war movement. I have paid access to The New York Times, The Economist, and Foreign Affairs. Better access to research materials would greatly strengthen my ability to contribute well cited Wikipedia content. I worked as a journalist and documentarist for many years. I no longer have access to a broad range of research tools. Though I live in a major metropolitan area, my local library is very small, and I have no access to academic libraries. I've worked in more than 35 US states and more than 35 countries and territories. With proper research material, through HighBeam, I can make use of my personal experiences to locate WP:RS to back up contributions to Wikipedia. - Neonorange (talk) 15:34, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
  127. User:Aditya Kabir I have been editing Wikipedia since 2006, and have made over 18,000 edits. The biggest problem I face is a lack of access to quality sources.
  128. FireflySixtySeven (talk · contribs) I am active in content creation; having access to more sources would be very useful when I write/translate articles. FireflySixtySeven (talk) 19:54, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
  129. Keresaspa (talk · contribs) I have made over 16,000 edits and am coming up on my tenth Wikipedia birthday. My main areas of content creation are the Northern Ireland Troubles, far right politics and, to a lesser extent, football and I believe my edits in all three areas would benefit greatly from access to Highbeam. Keresaspa (talk) 02:42, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
  130. Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) I have made over 25k edits in two and a half years on en WP, and have contributed to quite a bit of Featured content. I work in WWII Yugoslavia topics and there are a lot of resources accessible through High Beam that would make a big difference to the breadth of sources I could use to develop articles. Peacemaker67 (send... over) 03:25, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
  131. Clarityfiend (talk · contribs) Over 90K edits on anything that catches my fancy, but my main interest is films. I found my last Highbeam free access useful from time to time. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:49, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
  132. OscarLake (talk · contribs) I've made more than 2000 edits here on Wikipedia, mainly on film-related articles and biographies. With the help of Highbeam, I'd be able to provide high-quality sources for my work. OscarL 12:48, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
  133. SPECIFICO (talk · contribs) I will use this access primarily to improve content and reference citations in articles concerning and relating to economics. SPECIFICO talk 13:07, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
  134. Gene93k (talk · contribs) 26,000+ edits in article space since 2007. I would use Highbeam access for verification in the clean up of articles. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
  135. Funandtrvl (talk · contribs) I would like access to HighBeam because I frequently clean up refs and add refs to many articles. I have found that many of the news articles that are cited in WP require HighBeam access, since they are often older news articles, and are no longer in a free archive online. It would be very helpful to be able to read the whole article that is used for a reference. Funandtrvl (talk) 18:28, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
  136. Ceyockey (talk · contribs) This resource would come in handy in battling linkrot and in enhancing company articles, two areas I have been active in over the past couple of months. If there is a need to relinquish access to allow others to access after a period of time, like a month or two, I would be happy to pull back and allow another to 'have a turn'. --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 23:09, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
  137. Vejvančický (talk · contribs) This is re-application, my previous one-year account expired in April 2013, I guess. This is my 7th year of active editing on Wikipedia, I have more than 40,000 contributions (more here). I used HighBeam search mainly during my work at CAT:CSD, Special:NewPages and WP:AfD. It could be more than useful now, when Google News Archive is defunct. Thanks for your consideration. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 07:33, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
  138. Taketa (talk · contribs) - Writer since 2008 and started 6500+ new articles on the Dutch, English, German and West-Frisian wikipedia. 40.000 edits. I use alot of media as sources and I think access to Highbeam would be very usefull to me. I also work as bureaucrat for the Dutch Wikipedia and OTRS-member in general, and I can use sources during this work as well.
  139. Blarcrean (talk · contribs) - Contributed to Wikipedia as originator of pages mainly on Southern African subjects and editor of existing articles since 2009, modest 2300+ edits. Limited access to library resources in a remote region; would value access to HighBeam resources.
  140. ssilvers (talk · contribs) - Since 2006 I have created hundreds, and edited thousands of pages on Wikipedia, especially about musical theatre and comic opera, but also about the environment, the Victorian era and a variety of other topics; I come across HighBeam articles in my searches and would like to be able to access them. -- Ssilvers (talk) 20:21, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
  141. Fraggle81 (talk · contribs) Requesting renewal of HighBeam account, I use the resource for fact checking potential vandalism edits in combination with STiki. I am in my 7th year on Wikipedia and have over 58000 edits. Fraggle81 (talk) 21:05, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
  142. WilliamJE (talk · contribs) Editor since 2006 with over 40,000 edits. I fact check sports articles and actor biographies alot....William 22:05, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
  143. Jeff in CA (talk · contribs) Since 2005 I have been active in content generation, research and verification. I will use this access primarily to improve content and reference citations in articles concerning and relating to sports history, geography and border studies. I had formerly relied heavily on the lamented Google News Archive. Jeff in CA (talk) 23:54, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
  144. Hmlarson (talk · contribs) I've been most active on articles related to women's history and sports in the last few years. I will be using HighBeam to further develop articles in these areas. Thank you.
  145. User:HopsonRoad 02:28, 3 May 2014 (UTC) I've recently worked on pages for Bob Perelman and Laszlo Fejes Toth and see that High Beam offers sources for these people that would be valuable in these articles and for future and past projects. Special:Contributions/HopsonRoad
  146. CZmarlin (talk · contribs). I have been contributing to WP for several years with thousands of edits, as well as preparing some new articles and "Did You Know" nominations. My focus is on articles about automobiles and Poland. I frequently check and improve references in many WP pages in a variety of topics. I have also found WP articles with High Beam references that are not accessible. These most often refer to newspaper and magazine articles. I would use this service not only to check the validity of exiting citations within WP, but more importantly, to help improve WP articles and develop new ones. Thank you! CZmarlin (talk) 18:07, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
  147. Trivialist (talk · contribs) I have been an active editor since 2007 with over 60,000 edits. I edit articles in a variety of areas, and would use HighBeam for content generation, research, and verification work. Trivialist (talk) 23:29, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
  148. Ryūkotsusei (talk · contribs) Trying to complete List of million-selling game consoles. I'm not too pleased to find out some sales information is locked behind $1000 business reports so I need to try every other resource possible. « Ryūkotsusei » 02:14, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
  149. Alaexis (talk · contribs) I mostly work on the history of Caucasus (both recent and ancient) and medieval Russia so having scholarly sources would be very helpful. Alæxis¿question? 12:32, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
  150. Red Phoenix (talk · contribs) I'm an active contributor in the field of video game consoles and the video game industry predating the current era. My specialty area deals with Sega and its past consoles. These articles oftentimes have holes for which internet articles fall short and period-based sources archived through HighBeam would be useful in fleshing out these articles and generating more quality content. Red Phoenix let's talk... 13:23, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
  151. Gourami Watcher (talk · contribs) - Active since 2009 with 5,000+ article edits and created around thirty articles. I have strong interests in archaeology around the world as well as crime in the United States. With a lot of my subjects of interest, it is sometimes fairly difficult to find reliable if not any sources at all. With access to HighBeam, I will more than likely find enough suitable information.--GouramiWatcher(?) 19:12, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
  152. User:Matthiaspaul. Being a long-time proponent of the idea of building and sharing knowledge, I'm contributing to (mostly the English and German) Wikipedia since 2006, and since 2010 under this account, which has accumulated 19,000+ edits meanwhile. I have a broad scope of interests from arts, music, literature (passive and active) to philosophy, ecology, geology, journalism to various fields of sciences and technology. Professionally, I'm into hardware and software research & development. Therefore my main areas of expertise and consequently of activity here evolve around topics of computer sciences, electrical engineering, physics, and photography, including many history of technology themes, which I find particularly important to preserve for generations to come. While I have a large personal archive/library myself, it is still sometimes difficult to find suitable references, in particular for older and more special stuff. I am not familiar with HighBeam yet, but it sounds like it could help to conveniently fill this gap, therefore I apply. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 19:48, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
  153. Jerem43 (talk · contribs) - Been an active member of EN WP since 2006 with 36K+ edits. I often edit restaurant-business related articles, and several main sources such as Nation's Restaurant News use HighBeam as their archival source. These articles were at one time free, but are no longer. Access to HB would make my editing so much easier. --Jeremy (blah blahI did it!) 05:04, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
  154. Tucoxn (talk · contribs) I would like a Highbeam account if one becomes available. I've been editing on English Wikipedia since 2008, but I also edit on French Wikipedia, Fijian Wikipedia, and Simple Wikipedia. I am mainly a researcher and content creator. I currently have over 6,000 edits on English Wikipedia, with over 3,900 unique pages edited and nine non-redirect articles created. When I create a new article, I try to have it listed on the main page, at Did you know? I've also created several articles on Fijian Wikipedia. I write articles on plants, animals, and locations in the Pacific region and notable deceased Americans. I intend to continue a similar pattern of editing. Access to Highbeam would help me because it's difficult to find reliable sources on some of the topics and the libraries in Fiji, where I live, are difficult to access and not well stocked. Thanks for your consideration! - tucoxn\talk 09:47, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
  155. SnowFire (talk · contribs) - Active editor since 2006. Have used newspaper articles from Google News before for articles like Twenty-fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Would use the access for an eclectic range of articles. SnowFire (talk) 20:59, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
  156. Timmyshin (talk · contribs) - A member since 2008, I edit mostly pages on East Asian history and entertainment. I think an English-language news archive would help me greatly on some of the Asian entertainment articles that I'm interested in. Timmyshin (talk) 14:53, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
  157. Strike Eagle (talk · contribs) - Have been editing since 2011 and have ~10k edits including 5 GAs and 12 DYKs...mostly edit articles related to Indian military....older articles are rare to find usually and I see highbeam library seems to have many of em. Will be greatly helpful. Thanks, ƬheStrikeΣagle sorties 15:48, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
  158. Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) In four years of editing Wikipedia, I have contributed 28,000 edits, including a number of featured lists and good articles. I would use these resources to expand and improve coverage of sources used by articles in the field of military history - primarily those dealing with the breakup of Yugoslavia.--Tomobe03 (talk) 16:43, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
  159. Mkdw (talk · contribs) I already have access to HighBeam and place my name here only in the need of reaffirmation or renewal. I am active in the WP:AFD process and often use reference material in determining notability and improving articles that can be saved. My general areas of interest are biographies and neologisms though I have been known to write about other topics such as articles about cities, industries, or companies. I have a fairly lengthy history on Wikipedia as indicated on my account meta data. Mkdwtalk 19:06, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
  160. Edward321 (talk · contribs) I have been on Wikipedia since 2006 and have over 22,000 edits. While recent edits have been largely verification, I would add more content if allowed to use Highbeam. My areas of interest are history and historical biography, with specific interest in 15th Century Europe and western Asia, as well as the mid-19th century. Edward321 (talk) 00:15, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
  161. Star Mississippi (talk · contribs) user and admin. I work most frequently in museums and historic sites, whose values are frequently discussed behind scholarly paywalls. StarM 02:38, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
  162. Patrickneil (talk · contribs) since 2005 I've used High Beam for its historic articles, often to source topics like sports or academics from before 1980. Just this week I found an article from 1906 that I could only see a summary of, but might be able to get the full text with High Beam.-- Patrick, oѺ 14:53, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
  163. Atama (talk · contribs) User and administrator, editing since 2006 and an admin since 2009. My interests vary widely, I often get involved at articles where there is a dispute or some other controversy. HighBeam's articles make it easier to find sources for articles when I'm trying to determine if they are eligible for deletion (through WP:PROD usually, but I do WP:AFD discussions on occasion). I also help out with conflicts of interest issues (especially at WP:COIN) and being able to find independent sources can be challenging. -- Atama 21:04, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
  164. Mike Searson (talk · contribs) User and coordinator of the knives and firearms projects. I have been active since 2006 and have 26000 edits. I am always looking for high quality source material.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 22:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
  165. GaryColemanFan (talk · contribs) Editor for 7 years with just under 20,000 edits. I have been primarily active in professional wrestling, with quite a few edits to other topics. In wrestling, it can be hard to find reliable sources, so this would be a very valuable resource. I would also like to expand into some baseball biographies and would find this a very helpful resource. GaryColemanFan (talk) 05:44, 8 May 2014 (UTC)
  166. ChrisGualtieri (talk · contribs) 440,000+ edits, 40+ GAs - High Beam would be great for gathering more information on historic properties. Previously used it to add many citations and built out some key pages through its sources. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 02:18, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
  167. Kmzayeem (talk · contribs) I have been editing in Wikipedia since May 2012 and made over 9000 edits so far with almost 80% of them being in the mainspace. My prime interests have been the articles related to culture, arts, music, history and economy of Bangladesh and South Asia in general. Apart from content creation, I have actively participated in the verification of numerous existing articles as well as saving several articles from deletion. A free access to Highbeam's online resources would help me a lot to do the works more effectively.--Zayeem (talk) 08:30, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
  168. Fleetham (talk · contribs). Most active writing about Chinese car firms but also have an interested in economic- and foreign policy-related pages. I would use Highbeam as a complement to news searches though Google News and to gain access to material that's behind paywalls. Fleetham (talk) 21:28, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
    • Hi Fleetham, you don't have email enabled - could you either do so or email me directly? Nikkimaria (talk) 15:01, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
      • @Nikkimaria: Ooops. That's what I get for not reading everything! I activated the feature. I'd email you too if I could figure out how to do so... Fleetham (talk) 05:29, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
  169. Aichik (talk · contribs). Been an editor since 2007, and looking to increase edits on Asian American figures and American women artists.--Aichik (talk) 21:44, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
    • Hi Aichik, you don't have email enabled - could you either do so or email me directly? Nikkimaria (talk) 15:01, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
      • Okay, enabled. thanks so much!--Aichik (talk) 16:05, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
  170. Ἀλήθεια (talk · contribs) I have been an editor for more than 6 years with over 1,100 edits int he mainspace. I am actively involved in creating pages for notable theologians and biblical scholars. Since many of these people pre-date the internet, a lot of this information is locked away in academic journals. Having access to Highbeam would help locate better sources. Ἀλήθεια 14:43, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
  171. Ehrentitle (talk · contribs) I have been on Wikipedia since 2005 and currently have nearly 2000 edits and created two dozen articles globally over all the wikis. I am interested in having access to HighBeam to help in my work to expand and verify articles in several different interest areas including military biographies as well as US and German Military history. Ehrentitle (talk) 17:24, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
  172. Pokey5945 (talk · contribs) I have over a thousand edits since 2005 (and more under my previous user name). My Wikipedia work focuses mainly on American social movements and their leaders, some music articles, and various other random articles that catch my interest. I've created five articles across my two user names. Highbeam is a first-rate source for accessing journalistic and scholarly sources, and would be very useful in my editing endeavors.Pokey5945 (talk) 20:10, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
  173. Coretheapple (talk · contribs) I have over 8,000 edits in my two or so years at the project and have eclectic interests, ranging from the Chicano labor movement to early Broadway theater. Until recently I had ProQuest access and was happy as a stuck pig. Without it I could not have created Johnny Broderick. But that has ended so I now drift forlornly through the Internet, which inevitably fails me as much of what I seek is pre-Internet. HighBeam would be tremendously useful in my content endeavors. Coretheapple (talk) 22:25, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
  174. Iñaki LL (talk · contribs) Hi, I am an English wikipedia editor, occasionally on the Basque, French and Spanish ones also. Editor since January 2008 with 3,300 edits. I work on areas related to Basque language, culture, geography, and history—text, pictures, and maps. I also have a handful of worldwide and Basque specific pictures uploaded in wikicommons. I find little on English sources related to these topics, and often based on Spanish references. A good part of my contribution so far came down to bridging information gaps and fixing inaccuracies. While I have attempted to gain access to English language journals, I find many or most of the papers are (frustratingly) restricted. Iñaki LL (talk) 10:24, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
  175. Scalhotrod (talk · contribs) Hello, I am an editor for English Wikipedia active since 2007 with over 5,500 edits. My interests (along with the articles that I have edited) run the gamut from subjects such a science and technology, living and non-living historical and political figures, celebrities and other types of BLP articles, firearms and related subjects such as the History of Gunpowder and Gunsmiths, music and entertainment subjects, adult and human sexuality related topics, and the list goes on. I am also a subscriber to SuggestBot service and routinely expand into areas not in my regular patterns or habits. I am always in search of credible and quality references and request access to this tool. Best regards, --Scalhotrod - Just your average banjo playing, drag racing, cowboy... (talk) 21:46, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
  176. AntanO (talk · contribs) Hi, I have been on Wikipedia since 2011 and currently have over 1300 edits in English Wikipedia and over 16200 edits in Tamil Wikipedia. I'm interested in history, biography, science, etc. Online resources would be very helpful in order to improve the articles with reliable citations. --AntonTalk 00:58, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
  177. Makyen (talk · contribs) Editor since 2006; 5,800 mainspace edits. I am active in content verification. I routinely read/check references to verify that article text is consistent with the cited reference. I also perform a considerable amount of citation data verification (i.e. citations accurately describe the reference in a way that allows a reader to obtain the reference for verification. While my primary interest is technical, I do this on a wide range of articles. — Makyen (talk) 05:21, 11 May 2014 (UTC); add join date, # mainspace edits. 02:56, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
  178. Esoxid (talk · contribs) I am active in biology related articles, and would use access for paywalled journals/articles. Esoxidtalkcontribs 18:54, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
  179. FeralOink (talk · contribs) I have 1800 edits on en WP, also do content verification on others. I focus on business and technology, including BLP's and Afc review. I often find excerpts of HighBeam news stories when searching. I would really appreciate full access, not just tiny snippet previews! HighBeam is a great reference source, especially since Google News Archive is mostly gone.--FeralOink (talk) 02:15, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
  180. Iketsi (talk · contribs) Active editor on multiple Wikipedias since 2010 with over 3,000 edits on enWP. I would be thankful for an access to scholarly resources that would help me improve articles by adding reliable citations. --Iketsi (talk) 03:00, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
  181. Jax_MN (talk · contribs) Active editor on Wikipedia since 2009. I've made over 1,900 edits, often to biographies (living or deceased), to the Freemasonry project, to topics relating to fraternal groups and many more. I'd use the HighBeam resource for more accurate referencing. Jax MN (talk) 12:49, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
  182. Madalibi (talk · contribs) – I have over 11,000 edits on Wikipedia since 2008, mostly on East Asia. I lost access to all databases when I finished my PhD in 2010, and I have lived in China ever since, far away from accessible libraries. I buy a lot of books, but sorely lack access to academic journals, newspapers, and magazines. I would use the Highbeam database to find reliable content and keep building articles that last. Madalibi (talk) 13:49, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
  183. Judae1 (talk · contribs): I am an active editor and I enjoy research, and tend to look for references to enhance wiki articles in need of assistance. Access to this would be helpful to see the full articles and not just the initial graph to see whether it is a valid source for an article. Juda S. Engelmayer (talk) 18:26, 13 May 2014 (UTC)
  184. Kurator71 (talk · contribs): Active editor on German Wikipedia since 2011 with over 21,500 edits and 200+ articles. I focus on art, architecture and biographies and would use the access for new and existing articles. --Kurator71 (talk) 09:38, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
  185. Manxruler (talk · contribs): Active at en.wikipedia since 2005, more than 37,000 edits on the project since then, mostly on history-related subjects. 5 GAs and 68 DYKs. Manxruler (talk) 17:44, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
  186. Acabashi (talk · contribs): I have used Jstor, Project Gutenberg, and over the past 7 years, and I believe that Highbeam would be a useful adjunct for my mainly church, place and biog (historic) article creation and additions. Thanks.
  187. MichaelQSchmidt (talk · contribs), Project Film coordinator with 49,000+ edits over 6+ years, will use highbeam archives to source articles on older films per WP:NOTTEMP. Schmidt, Michael Q. 06:12, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
  188. WAVY 10 Fan (talk · contribs): I have been actively editing since 2006 in multiple areas with over 6000 edits; mainly focusing on everything from sports, pop culture, media, religion among other topics while creating 44 articles. My goal with HighBeam access would be mainly to improve articles pertaining to various media articles; especially improving media articles for the Hampton Roads region. -- WAVY 10 Fan (talk) 16:47, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
  189. RashersTierney (talk · contribs): Interested particularly in Ireland and Romani-related topics. Would like to renew to check references, especially archived articles from the Irish Times ('paper of record') which is subscription. RashersTierney (talk) 21:10, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
  190. Matty.007 (talk · contribs): I am a fairly regular creator of articles, some historical ones, some more recent ones. I feel that both these needs would be satisfied by using HighBeam (as an aside, can this get The Times?). Thanks, Matty.007 16:48, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
  191. Carlstak (talk · contribs) I've made over 6,000 edits since August 2011 and have created about 15 articles, including some quite long ones, on historical subjects and biographies. I am especially interested in Spanish subjects, and in translating articles from the Spanish, Catalan, and Portuguese Wikipedias. I also spend much time adding quality sources to articles. Highbeam's resources would be very useful to my research. Carlstak (talk) 00:16, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
  192. Oceanflynn (talk · contribs): I've made 6925 edits in 5 projects since 2006. I often contribute to articles related to Canada, including Canadian history, First Nations, human geography, physical geography, etc. I created articles such as Caribou and Boreal woodland caribou in 2013. (There was an attempt at creating an article entitled caribou, years ago but it had been merged with Reindeer which then became overburdened with North American content. The article I created included much content, some new images and many new references with inline citations.) Because of paywalls. etc, I am often unable to access robust online references that would be invaluable in a Wikipedia article to which I am contributing. My academic background includes graduate studies and sessional lecturing in the Social Sciences. Highbeam was recommended to me by Dianna (talk · contribs). oceanflynn 19:24, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
  193. Mion (talk · contribs) - Editor since 2005, 17 k edits, article creation, updating and fact checking mainly, dentistry and energy related articles.
  194. MrLinkinPark333 (talk · contribs) - I edit articles across the board, whether it interests me or not. Highbeam would be useful to me when locating sources for articles that are nominated for deletion. --MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 21:23, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
  195. PresN (talk · contribs) - 33000+ edits since 2006, active in video games and literary awards, will use highbeam to look up articles in newspapers, newswires, and magazines for content creation/improvement in those areas. --PresN 21:25, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
  196. Kaldari (talk · contribs): ~50,000 edits over 10+ years. I work a lot on history-related articles and a Highbeam account would be extremely useful for digging up obscure sources. Kaldari (talk) 22:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
  197. Geo Swan (talk · contribs): I have been active on the wikipedia for almost ten years, and I have started over 2,000 articles, on a wide variety of topics. If I am granted access to high-beam I'll start by going through those 2,000 articles, and bringing all references to high-beamed versions of articles up to current citation standards. Geo Swan (talk) 23:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
  198. Sturmvogel_66 (talk · contribs) Former MilHist coordinator, editor since 2006, over 300 GAs and 50 featured articles and lists. I would like access to fill out my articles on ships, battles, and airplanes.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:36, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
  199. EuroCarGT (talk · contribs) I edit tech related articles, access to tech-related resources that HighBeam offers would be very useful. ///EuroCarGT 03:57, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
  200. Bagumba (talk · contribs) Renewal requested, as it's been a wonderful resources for researching sports subjects.—Bagumba (talk) 07:07, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
  201. Gordo (talk) 07:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC) Would use for historical research, through newspapers.
  202. Dolovis - I am active in researching mostly biographical articles (sports bio and others) and am often looking for newspaper articles to support biographical information. Access to HighBeam resources would be extremely helpful. Dolovis (talk) 13:55, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
  203. Dream Focus I used my Highbeam account quite a lot when I had it previously, before it ran out. I would like to have that sort of access again to be able to reference articles in need, as I did quite a lot of before. I have edited Wikipedia for 7 years, 11 months and made over 26,000 edits. I am active in the Article Rescue Squadron helping find sources for articles before they get deleted for lack of having them. Dream Focus 15:10, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
  204. These days I've been mostly writing articles about topics of local historical interest. Having access to old newspapers would greatly help me out with this. If given access I would also be willing to be active on Resource Exchange. (Since everyone else is giving it, I've been an editor for about 7 years now, my edit count isn't high, though high enough for the requirements, but I do a lot of public outreach these days). Just recently I had a new Wikipedian ask me to help him verify a paywalled resource. I would love to be able to check Highbeam for these sorts of things as well. Zell Faze (talk) 20:29, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
  205. Ravenswing (talk · contribs) Editor for nearly ten years and 39,000+ edits. I had Credo and Highbeam accounts last year, which proved very useful in sourcing for articles in threat of deletion, and in expanding biographical articles. Ravenswing 21:07, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
  206. Fuhghettaboutit (talk · contribs) Been bouncing around about 9 years. I spend a lot of time hunting sources for my own work and on behalf of others, for origination, expansion and for verification and have had to make requests at WP:RX for material this would allow me to access directly. Approaching 80K edits (by X's counter) and just had my third featured article promoted. I do not have access to this database through my local library or otherwise.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:42, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
  207. Smerus (talk · contribs) - can I renew please (after a gap)? I mainly edit articles dealing with music, history, and countries of the former Soviet Union.--Smerus (talk) 18:26, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
  208. Technical 13 (talk · contribs · count · email). I'm fairly well known as a templateFu/JavaScript guy, but I also spend a fair amount of time reviewing AfC drafts and being able to save some of the drafts I come across that are short a reference here or there using this resource would be a great benefit to the project. — {{U|Technical 13}} (etc) 03:56, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
  209. X96lee15 (talk · contribs) – I have been active on Wikipedia for 8 years and have over 40,000 edits. I'm focused on sports and also cities and other subjects in the Midwest. I'm excited to potentially have access to newspaper archives for historical topics. I've recently been interested in adding references, cleaning up and and resurrecting dead links. — X96lee15 (talk) 19:22, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
  210. Correogsk (talk · contribs) I am a psychologist interested in doing sleep research (insomnia, specifically: I tried twice to obtain a PhD in that area: I will try it for the third time soon); I am also a certified English-Spanish-English translator of official documents and vicepresident at Wikimedia México, A.C., and am doing research about the history of science in Mexico and about some specific institutions: El Colegio de México, A.C., UNAM and Consejo de la Crónica de la Ciudad de México, A.C.--Correogsk or Gustavo 06:12, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
  211. Sky Harbor (talk · contribs) I'm a long-time Wikipedia editor with over 12,000 edits on the English Wikipedia, and a further 6,500 on the Tagalog Wikipedia. HighBeam has a good archive of Philippine newspapers, which will be be very helpful while working on Philippines-related articles. :) --Sky Harbor (talk) 07:38, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
  212. Loginnigol (talk · contribs) Active editor for a couple of years on English and Dutch language Wikipedia. Over 7000 page edits. Contribute editing in many areas but particularly arts, science, religion, music and sports, all of which are areas that I very much need such a high quality resource archive like HighBeam. —Loginnigol (talk) 12:53, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
  213. TGCP (talk · contribs) I often want to reference special information only found in restricted access articles. HighBeam can provide me with that access to magazines like Design News, The Engineer, and Rotor & Wing. I have created a few well referenced articles such as Paul Bevilaqua and Slowed rotor, and my contributions number over 3,000, mostly related to aviation and energy. TGCP (talk) 16:20, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
  214. Auric (talk · contribs) I often use Highbeam to reference news articles that cannot be found any other way. Having access to the full articles would really help me.--Auric talk 18:49, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
  215. FormerIP (talk · contribs). I had highbeam access through WP previously, but it has lapsed. I used it less than I expected to in content creation, but used it quite a bit on noticeboards and talkpages, for example by providing people with improved cites for info they wanted to add but didn't have a good enough source. Formerip (talk) 21:50, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
  216. I have been an active editor since November, 2006 and have 992 edits as of the time of this note. I do not have access to JSTOR through my local library or University and frequently write or edit on topics which are covered in these journals.My areas include classical music, sociology, psychology, literature and related topics.Canticle (talk) 09:41, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
  217. kvng (talk · contribs) I work in audio, networking and other technical articles. Also in WP:AFC, WP:AFD and WP:ORPHANAGE where search is required to establish WP:N. Had HighBeam before and used it regularly but it expired. ~KvnG 18:04, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
  218. codrinb (talk · contribs) I frequently contribute to archaeology and history articles, and having access to HighBeam would allow me to source these articles using academic papers and books on the mentioned topics.--Codrin.B (talk) 21:18, 22 June 2014 (UTC)
  219. Dwpaul (talk · contribs) No current access to HighBeam. As reviewer/rollbacker, would use to verify citations and/or add them to uncited edits to articles on a variety of topics. Dwpaul Talk 02:39, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
  220. User:Trident13 (talk) 8years active, 100k+ edits, 700+ new articles, UK based and in constant need of new sources for both new articles and improving the quality of existing articles. Previously had access which was an excellent and immediate improvement source for creating far better articles, but let it lapse on (incorrect?) assumption that it just ran out. Since the pay walls keep going up and the resultant free access sources going down, this is a great initiative and a huge bonus for article quality. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 10:27, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
  221. In ictu oculi (talk · contribs) I would find Highbeam useful for use sourcing references in religion, classics, Judaism, classical music and Polish history articles. In ictu oculi (talk) 12:10, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
  222. ג'יס (talk · contribs) I mainly contribute to judaism, music and history articles on the HE wikipeida where i have been activr for 4 years. Thanks.
  223. Designate (talk · contribs) 10 years active, largely American politics and history. —Designate (talk) 17:01, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
  224. Hamiltonstone (talk · contribs) editing about 8 years, 20K edits. Mostly working on art-related subjects; would benefit from access to recent newspaper review articles.hamiltonstone (talk) 12:00, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
  225. Orser67 (talk · contribs) edited for the last couple years and have made over 3k edits. I'd like to use High Beam to work on US politics-related articles, esp. articles from the 20th century (and earlier, if possible). Orser67 (talk) 19:08, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
  226. NinjaRobotPirate (talk · contribs) I would like access to HighBeam to expand obscure or older film-related topics that freely available sources do not study in depth – in particular, older film reviews, especially for direct-to-video and limited releases. I have about 6K edits and created 75 articles since 2007 (mostly in the past 1.5 years). NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:20, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
  227. Harryzilber (talk · contribs) Editing and writing on a variety of articles I tend to concentrate on technical and historical subjects, including biographies of scientists and inventors, both distinguished and obscure. My toughest project was on Matthew Piers Watts Boulton, inventor of the aileron, due to a paucity of information on the scientist, resulting in a research period of over a year. I'm currently over 11,000 edits. Best: HarryZilber (talk) 17:06, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
  228. SteveStrummer (talk · contribs) I've had HBR before and I'd be very grateful to be able to continue. I've linked HBR resources in many articles: the newspaper and journal references are particularly good for contemporary topics. SteveStrummer (talk) 02:47, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
  229. EMP (talk · contribs) I had Highbeam last year and found it very useful in my work with articles on holistic health, finance, sports, and used quite a few refs from it. Would appreciate having it back again. EMP (talk) 17:34, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
  230. Syfuel (talk · contribs) I have been here for more than six years, with more than 2000 edits to my name, mostly on Malaysian music scene and artists. I would like an access to HBR because most of articles that I have created created depend so much on online sources, and HBR appears to have many articles that I found to be useful as references. SyFuelIgniteBurned 08:13, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
  231. John Cline (talk · contribs) I had HighBeam, found it quite useful, and miss having it.—John Cline (talk) 05:37, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
  232. AmateurEditor (talk · contribs) I have been active since 2009 with about 3000 edits. I am interested in Highbeam for sources on political science and history. AmateurEditor (talk) 17:53, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
  233. CycloneIsaac (talk · contribs) I have been here for slightly more than one year, with 3,800 edits. I will use HighBeam for finding and adding impact for hurricanes, and history for Mississippi and Ohio roads.—CycloneIsaac (Talk) 00:43, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
  234. 12george1 (talk · contribs) I could really use HighBeam. I registered as a user almost six years ago and I have made nearly 21,000 edits. Primarily, I am an active member of the WikiProject Tropical cyclones and research information for hurricanes, both contemporary and historical.--12george1 (talk) 00:52, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
  235. Orangemike (talk · contribs) - Renewal after inadvertent lapse; editor for about a decade, admin in the English-language version; find you invaluable for historical articles (my specialty).
  236. Hell in a Bucket (talk · contribs) Apply, I've written almost 100 hundred articles focusing on history, geographical locations and notable places of interest. This will also help in afd and new page patrol as I can help check adequacy and verifibility of claims. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 18:24, 6 July 2014 (UTC)
  237. khamar (talk · contribs) - Apply for use in Todays Articles for Improvement. I am also active in recent changes patrol and improving articles related to scientific method and skepticism. Kyle(talk) 04:48, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  238. iantresman (talk · contribs) First application. Have edited for about a decade with 20,000+ edits, and contributed to good articles such as Bradwall, Cerne Abbas Giant and Lobster (magazine). Tend to edit articles in science, politics, and biographical. Would like help to do more.--Iantresman (talk) 16:39, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
  239. The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) - Renewal with apologies. I have a serious need for contemporary news reports on my ongoing series of The Boat Race articles. I have pre-1959 covered and post-1999 covered, but have a massive gap in the middle. I've made over 100k edits over 9 years. Any further queries I'd be happy to respond to, any time. The Rambling Man (talk) 22:06, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
  240. jodosma (talk · contribs) I'm a WikiGnome, continually coming across dead links and want the process of finding good links less time consuming. I'm sure that Highbeam would be a very useful resource which I might use to get rid of a lot of dead links. Jodosma (talk) 07:41, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  241. Keithbob (talk · contribs) Renewal I'm a content driven editor with 40,000 edits. I like to create, expand and save articles. I use High Beam almost daily. Last time I let my HB account expire and I took several months to get it back, so I'm being proactive this time. -- KeithbobTalk 13:24, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  242. SounderBruce (talk · contribs) - Apply for first-time subscription. 6 years of experience with over 11,000 edits, mostly for use with WP:USRD/WA SounderBruce 03:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
    Hi SounderBruce, you don't appear to have a valid email enabled - could you please do so? Nikkimaria (talk) 02:27, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
    @Nikkimaria:, I've enabled email from other users. Sorry for the delay. SounderBruce 07:37, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
  243. TheAustinMan (talk · contribs) – This is my first application for HighBeam. I have been a content editor since June 2009 and would like to use HighBeam research to help research news articles for past tropical cyclones to help create, expand, and refine articles on these subjects. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 15:42, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
    Hi TheAustinMan, you don't appear to have a valid email enabled - could you please do so? Nikkimaria (talk) 02:27, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
    @Nikkimaria: - I've enabled email from other users. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 16:16, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
  244. Ealdgyth (talk · contribs) - mainly active in history and equine articles. While I do tend to work mostly in medieval topics, I also dabble in many other local history type articles and this would be helpful for me. Ealdgyth - Talk 14:13, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
  245. Wtmitchell (talk · contribs) - I'm an active editor in a wide range of topical areas -- probably most active in articles about or mentioning the Philippines. I also do a lot of anti-vandal work using WP:Huggle. All of that often involves to looking for sources to support or refute unsupported content added to articles. I'll use HighBeam as a tool for locating sources. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 07:46, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
  246. User:Mabalu Mabalu - my main focus is fashion and textiles articles, incluidng biographical articles, but I do edit generally across Wikipedia depending on what I come across, focused on both creating new articles, and verifying & sourcing existing ones. Often it is difficult to find material due to the nature of fashion writing online (many blogs, bumft, and non-RS) so I think Highbeam would be VERY helpful for me here with providing good sources and citations. Mabalu (talk) 15:34, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
  247. User:The Drover's Wife The Drover's Wife - I'm primarily interested in Australian history, and there's a number of journals on HighBeam in particular that I'd love to get my hands on. I don't have journal access by any other means, so on a number of topics (labour history being one I just found a thrilling amount of content on) I could do much more work with this access. The Drover's Wife (talk) 15:38, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  248. User:BsBsBs Active for years, mainly on car-related topics. BsBsBs (talk) 17:12, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  249. User:Davewild Would like to get HighBeam access again, which I had from 2012 to 2013 when it was very useful. Mainly active in elections and also on AFDs. Davewild (talk) 18:38, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  250. User:Imzadi1979, active for over 6 years in content related to highways and road transportation in the United States, specifically Michigan (Highbeam has a lot of Michigan newspapers since the parent company is based here.) My account through the Wikipedia Library has apparently expired. Imzadi 1979  23:14, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  251. User:JackofOz: When researching articles, I have often been frustrated to find a tantalising High Beam first page online but am unable to read further. I am very active, mainly in the the area of classical music. I have well over 100,000 edits and have initiated many hundreds of articles. Thanks. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 23:23, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
  252. User:SL93 I would like HighBeam access to research content for expanding and writing articles, as well as search for sources in AfD. I'm active in AfD, DYK, and article creation/expansion. I had to take a break for a while for my education with only edits here and there, but I am now able to contribute like I used to. I have thousands of edits and my account has been open for a few years. Edit- I might have add account assess Wikipedia before. SL93 (talk) 00:19, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
  253. User:MeegsC I'd like to renew, please! Active since 2007, primarily writing about biological topics. MeegsC (talk) 01:24, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
  254. User:BlackCab: I have written and edited many articles related to Jehovah's Witnesses in terms of sociology and their beliefs and activities, including corporate business activities. I am also contributing to a food-related article, which relies extensively on scientific papers to which I would like access. I have been active on Wikipedia since 2006 with almost 10,000 edits. BlackCab (TALK) 02:47, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
  255. Torchiest: I'd had access to HighBeam from September 2012 to August 2013 and used it to reference a huge number of borderline BLPs. I'd love to renew after a year break. I anticipate referencing more BLPs, as well as old media like music and video games from 1980s and 1990s, for which online sources are scant, and some science-related articles here and there. Thanks! —Torchiest talkedits 04:16, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
  256. User:Wifione I am active in AFDs and would like to spruce up articles that can be saved from AFD with reliable sourcing. HighBeak would be helpful in that. Thanks. Wifione Message 08:32, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
  257. User:GliderMaven I am active in technical areas relating to flight, motors and electric motors, and I wish to better reference and expand these types of articles. HighBeam should help with that quite a bit.GliderMaven (talk) 16:49, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
  258. User:Laszlo Panaflex I've been editing for several years, especially active the past two years, about four thousand edits. Most of my work concentrates on medieval history pages, as well as on figures from the University of New Mexico administration and sports. A broader research resource would be most helpful to my work. Laszlo Panaflex (talk) 16:55, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
  259. User:Anupmehra - Well, my Wikipedia user account is more than a year old, and it also has more than 10,000 edits. I'd love to have free access to HighBeam, because it'd be helpful in multiple ways, as such, in saving notable articles from afd, adding citations and creating new articles, all in turn to expand horizons of encyclopedia. Regards, Anupmehra -Let's talk! 20:46, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
  260. User:Calidum - Having access to high beam would allow me to find references for articles I'm interested in, particularly for topics related to U.S. politics and New England. Calidum Talk To Me 22:13, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
  261. The Whispering Wind - Google News is becoming increasingly ineffective for identifying sources relating to schools and other education articles and such articles risk being deleted not because the sources do not exist but because they are not accessible. HighBeam has good coverage of the relevant articles and access would assist me in developing articles. The Whispering Wind (talk) 22:29, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
  262. User:Lfstevens - Hi. I have edited more than 10k articles. I am a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors. My substantive edits focus on batteries, materials science, genetic engineering, marine subjects and Hawaii. Many of these are poorly cited - Highbeam would be a big help. I have started 50+ articles on such subjects. Thanks!
  263. User:Msnicki, Active in AfDs, often searching for sources to support notability. I have been active for just over 8 years and have a bit over 6,600 edits. Msnicki (talk) 05:07, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
  264. User:Sionk, almost 35,000 edits under my belt, I'm active in a variety of areas, including creating and improving articles, reviewing articles at AfC and participating in AfD's. I'd be delighted to have access to some of the quality paywall news sources, rather than the usual selection of tabloids! Sionk (talk) 11:09, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
  265. User:I am One of ManyI have been an editor since December, 2012 with over 20,000 edits and over 30 DYKs. I create a variety of articles ranging from NRHP articles to biographies, science, and documentary film articles, all requiring access to newspaper articles. I am One of Many (talk) 14:27, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
  266. User:IronGargoyle. 60,000+ edits. I hope to use this for articles on an assortment of DYKs, but my primary focus will be articles on amusement parks and roller coasters. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:38, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
  267. User:Paulscrawl Editor over 10 years, also reviewer, specializing in carefully adding high-quality citations to existing articles, though I've also created a few. Looking to add more articles as availability of reliable sources for local history permit. Interested in adding High Beam to repertoire for revitalizing dormant Project New Orleans, a city undergoing major structural and cultural changes post-Katrina, as well as adding newsworthy citations to assorted topical articles that pass my way. Thank you for providing this great resource! Paulscrawl (talk) 18:18, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
  268. User:Zambelo Zambelo - I'm primarily active in New Religious Movement-related articles, which suffer from a low amount of scholarly sources. I would improve these articles and increase neutrality by providing a greater range of quality references. Zambelo; talk 04:15, 20 June 2014 (UTC)
    Hi Zambelo, you don't appear to have a valid email enabled - could you please do so? Nikkimaria (talk) 20:16, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
  269. Oldbeeg (talk · contribs) I find myself creating and editing academic and writer articles. HighBeam information would be very useful. Best, Old Beeg ··warble·· 03:35, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
  270. Danimations (talk · contribs · count · email) I'm keen to use Highbeam's resources to expand and create content on natural history and industrial history subjects. I have done this to some extent already with freely available journals and Australian newspapers from Trove, and look forward to expanding my range of sources to include Highbeam texts. Danimations (talk) 14:34, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
  271. Rikster2 (talk · contribs · count · email) I had a Highbeam account but believe that it has lapsed. I have been a WP editor since 2006 with 55,000+ edits and have created over 400 full articles. I work primarily on basketball articles and have an interest in filling in historical figures that this access would greatly help. Rikster2 (talk) 17:44, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
  272. Prioryman (talk · contribs) I also had a Highbeam account from 2012-13 but it has lapsed. I've been an editor since 2004; I've made around 50,000 edits in that time and have created numerous FAs and GAs (see my user page for a list). Highbeam would be very useful in helping with my main areas of focus (mainly history, archaeology and related topics). Prioryman (talk) 20:21, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
  273. AB01 (talk · contribs) I'm active in Hindi film and Hindi film actors' articles. It is sometimes hard to find reliable sources to back up information, which is why I would like a Highbeam account :-) AB01 I'M A POTATO 03:22, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
  274. User:JRPG I have been editing since 2005 and read the on-line versions of the BBC + Daily Telegraph, Guardian and Independent UK newspapers -all wp:Suggested sources daily. My interests include astronomy, archaeology, geology and politics. Whilst Highbeam would be a useful addition for politics, it is essential for science topics where the free on-line sources aren't good enough. JRPG (talk) 15:26, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
  275. K8 fan (talk · contribs)I have previously had a Highbeam account, and have used it to add a number of references to Wikipedia articles. I would like to continue to do so. Thanks. K8 fan (talk) 03:38, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
  276. 28bytes (talk · contribs · count · email) I have edited here for several years, with around 25,000 total edits. I have created 100 or so articles, and access to HighBeam would be valuable for expanding those articles and building new ones. 28bytes (talk) 18:46, 4 August 2014 (UTC)
  277. Ohconfucius (talk · contribs · count · email) With nine Wikiyears and around 250k edits under my belt, I have significantly contributed to 400 or so articles including 20 GAs and 1 FA, access to HighBeam would be valuable for general sourcing of articles. -- Ohc ¡digame! 01:25, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
  278. Shrike (talk · contribs) I am active in middle eastern topics, the access needed for source verification and addition of new material --Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 04:18, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
  279. varnent (talk · contribs · count · email) Would like to utilize the access to find citations for otherwise difficult to cite information in LGBT articles. --Varnent (talk)(COI) 20:44, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
  280. Zeorymer (talk · contribs) I am looking to improve content development and reference citation on articles related to Portugal, a section of Wikpedia that is lacking in-depth exposition, or credible resources. ruben jc ZEORYMER (talk) 14:29, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
  281. Blackknight12 (talk · contribs) I am primarily active in Wikiproject Sri Lanka and currently working on historical political and judicial articles. I have come across useful articles in HighBeam, however I currently do not have access.--Blackknight12 (talk) 03:46, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
  282. دالبا (talk · contribs). I am an active contributor on Persian Wikipedia with nearly 29,0000 edits and over 400 articles. I hope that having HighBeam access will help me in finding reliable sources for creating, expanding, and improving articles on Wikipedia. Dalba 16:26, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
  283. Gareth E Kegg (talk · contribs) I found my HighBeam account extremely useful over the past year, and would greatly appreciate its renewal to help with sourcing of biographies.Gareth E Kegg (talk) 23:25, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
  284. 2T (talk · contribs) - I'm active since 2005 with +90000 edits in TH WP - 2T (talk) 22:13, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
  285. Bogger (talk · contribs · count · email) — I will use it for articles relating to Ireland (including Northern Ireland). Bogger (talk) 11:26, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
  286. Wolvesweb (talk · contribs) — I am active in sports editing - over 7,000 edits to date over 6 years - and finding good online references for related news events predating Year 2000 is always particularly tricky, and believe High Beam would prove a good resource in this. Wolvesweb (talk) 20:43, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
  287. Worldbruce (talk · contribs) My maintainence efforts bring me in contact with a wide variety of articles that need work on their verifiability and sources. A Highbeam account could make that work more efficient and allow me to help more articles more thoroughly.Worldbruce (talk) 04:41, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
  288. Prokaryotes (talk · contribs) I'm interested to look up various topics during researching content edits. I made like 5000 edits in the English and German Wikipedia. prokaryotes (talk) 14:18, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
  289. JGHowes (talk · contribs) Have created or significantly contributed to numerous FA and GA on a wide variety of topics. HighBeam access would help in utilizing additional reliable published sources.  JGHowes  talk 20:25, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
  290. The Discoverer (talk · contribs) I mostly edit topics related to India, Catholicism, and science. I hope to use these resources to improve the historical perspective of articles. The Discoverer (talk) 12:00, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
  291. Chewbacca2205 (talk · contribs) I'm mostly active in German Wikipedia with somewhat around 10,400 edits. There, I mostly write about video games. I would like to have such an account for finding reliable sources about older games and software. --Chewbacca2205 (talk) 21:09, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
  292. Themeparkgc (talk · contribs) As my username suggests, I generally contribute to theme park articles. Wikipedia articles on amusement rides, roller coasters and amusement parks that opened more than about a decade ago really don't have great sources (if any at all). I previously had access to a resource similar to HighBeam where I was able improve several articles on older rides to GA status. Themeparkgc  Talk  08:28, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
  293. OppidumNissenae (talk · contribs) In 2013 I was one of the top 300 medical editors across any language of Wikipedia. This is my: edit count; my interests are medical topics and other. Thanks! OppidumNissenae (talk) 09:21, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
  294. Farrtj (talk · contribs) I am currently ranked in the top 2500 most active Wikipedia editors and have created 16 Good Articles. I am heavily engaged in writing and researching business articles, and many of the sources I would like to use are on HighBeam. Tom (talk) 11:48, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  295. Masssly (talk · contribs) I am actively involved in several Wikimedia projects. My main interests include creating and improving Africa related content and the use of Wikipedia in Education in Africa. I am an M.Sc. Statistics candidate and my thesis is intended to assess the perceptions of professors and students in higher education and attempt to measure their confidence on the use of Wikipedia as a reference medium as well as a research or learning tool. (A case study of Ghana-West Africa). —Sadat (Masssly)TalkCEmail 14:14, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  296. Toohool (talk · contribs) I had a HighBeam account that expired, and I found it very useful for my work on articles about casinos and the gaming industry. Toohool (talk) 22:20, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
  297. Jacqke (talk · contribs · count · email) Such a common occurrence: I am pursuing a very relevant reference for an article online only to find it is JSTOR and I cannot read the reference. I write biographies and also musical history oriented articles. The article Mandore (instrument) is an example. Access to online academic research archives would help me by allowing me access to better quality references.Jacqke (talk) 20:18, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
    Hi User:Jacqke, this is to apply for HighBeam, not JStor. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:00, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
  298. درفش کاویانی (talk · contribs · count · email) 44,000+ edits over 5+ years. I'm active in Persian Wikipedia, Tajik Wikipedia, English Wikipedia and German Wikipedia. I start editing in wikipedia since 14 August 2008. i wrote 7 featured article and 3 good article in Persian Wikipedia. I write about History and Photography. Please renew my account. Thank you Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 18:50, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
  299. Softlavender. Senior editor, all kinds of subjects, focused on content creation, citing and research, so my wiki Highbeam account has proved invaluable over the past 2 years. My current wiki subscription expires on October 3, 2014, so can you please renew my subscription? Thanks so very very much. Softlavender (talk) 09:00, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
  300. Yamaguchi先生 (talk · contribs · count · email) I am an editor since 2005, and am interested in utilizing this service to help provide sources for articles that need them. Thank you for consideration. Yamaguchi先生 15:46, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
  301. Sp33dyphil (talk · contribs · count · email) Having been inactive during the last six months, I'm looking to renew access to HighBeam to source aviation articles. 38,000+ edits since 2010. Sp33dyphil (talk) 13:32, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
  302. AllyD (talk · contribs · count · email): My HighBeam account just expired. I make frequent use, both in locating and adding references to improve articles and in checking notability for discussions at WP:AFD. AllyD (talk) 17:01, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
  303. Neatnik (talk · contribs · count · email) Hi, my account has expired and I'd like to renew. I'm editing on frwiki. Neatnik (talk) 21:11, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
  304. Nikthestunned (talk · contribs · count · email) Account expired, still an active editor and page creator etc. Thanks, Nikthestunned 14:20, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  305. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk · contribs · count · email) Account Expired and I would like to renew it .It has been very useful resource. 62K edits Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:21, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
  306. Mendaliv (talk · contribs · count · email) I use a lot of newspaper resources in adding to and providing references for a variety of articles in numerous fields. I have made good use of in this vein. One of my growing areas of interest is in articles on legal cases and related articles. I have over 29,000 edits. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 14:47, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
  307. Arxiloxos (talk · contribs · count · email). HighBeam has been a valuable resource, especially in finding sources for article source improvement and for establishing the notability of topics brought to WP:AfD. My account has apparently just expired and I would like to renew it. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:42, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
  1. Philafrenzy (talk) 01:46, 14 October 2014 (UTC) Used to have this but it seems to have expired. Would like renewal for news section. Content creation.
  2. User:Liesel I would like renew of the account.
  3. Bloonstdfan360 (talk · contribs · count · email) I am active at the U.S. Roads WikiProject, where I mainly edit articles on highways in Oregon. Having access to HighBeam would help me on the history of highways. --BloonsTDFan360 (Park and Ride) 22:25, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  4. Wasted Time R (talk · contribs · count · email) I use Highbeam frequently for articles about U.S. politics and history, technology companies, and popular music. I have about 120 FA/GA/DYK credits. My account seems to have expired earlier this month and I would like a renewal. Thanks. Wasted Time R (talk) 12:37, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  5. Miyagawa (talk · contribs · count · email) Just realised that my account has expired. I'm involved in content creation, mostly television/pop culture topics. But I generally run a Highbeam search through any article I work on. Miyagawa (talk) 20:35, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
  6. Taty2007 (talk · contribs · count · email) My account expired recently. I usually edit articles on Spanish Wikipedia and HighBeam has been a very useful tool to do research, to verify content and to expand articles. Thanks Taty2007 (talk) 03:04, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
  7. Thibbs (talk · contribs · count · email) My account expired a few years ago and I didn't renew since I had gained free online access via my University, but I've graduated and I would like to use the service again. I mainly edit articles on video game topics and I plan to use HighBeam to find sourcing for obscure topics in this area. Thank you. -Thibbs (talk) 12:40, 21 October 2014 (UTC)