Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Hinduism

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcuts:

This is a collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Hinduism. It is one of many deletion lists coordinated by WikiProject Deletion sorting. Anyone can help maintain the list on this page.

Adding a new AfD discussion

Adding an AfD to this page does not add it to the main page at WP:AFD. Similarly, removing an AfD from this page does not remove it from the main page at WP:AFD. If you want to nominate an article for deletion, go through the process on that page before adding it to this page. To add a discussion to this page, follow these steps:

  1. Edit this page and add {{Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PageName}} to the top of the list. Replace "PageName" with the relevant article name, i.e. the one on the existing AFD discussion. When you save the page, the discussion will automatically appear.
  2. You should also tag the AfD by adding {{subst:delsort|Hinduism|~~~~}} to it, which will inform editors that it has been listed here. You may place this tag above or below the nomination statement or at the end of the discussion thread.
  3. Please indicate the title of the article in the edit summary, it is particularly helpful to add a link to the article in the edit summary.

Note that there are a few scripts and tools that can make this easier.

Removing a closed AfD discussion

Closed AfD discussions are automatically removed by a bot.

Other types of discussions

You can also add and remove links to other discussions (prod, CfD, TfD etc.) related to Hinduism.

Further information

For further information see Wikipedia's deletion policy and WP:AfD for general information about Articles for Deletion, including a list of article deletions sorted by day of nomination.


Relevant archived discussions (starting from September 2007) may be found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Hinduism/archive.
Purge page cache watch


Hinduism[edit]

Kori caste[edit]

Kori caste (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs|views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Kori caste" – books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

There is already an article Kori.Why do we need many articles for the same community? Mahensingha 20:07, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ///EuroCarGT 21:47, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:00, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete absent input from someone who knows more about the subject. Kori is a disambiguation page, leading eventually to Koli people. The Kori caste article has many severe issues, and I suspect some of its content would be rather surprising to archaeologists and historians. Most of it seems to be concerned with (I think mythical) ancient history of various Indian people groups - if this belongs anywhere in Wikipedia, it isn't here. GoldenRing (talk) 15:00, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete I am not convinced that the two Kori pages are about the same group of people. But that aside this article is an NPOV disaster, and I don't think it's fixable. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:15, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Agnivansha[edit]

Agnivansha (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs|views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Agnivansha" – books · scholar · JSTOR · free images)

Original research and unsourced claims , does not have reliable sources Shrikanthv (talk) 10:43, 31 March 2014 (UTC) Shrikanthv (talk) 10:43, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:38, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:12, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep It is poor, certainly, but it is one of the principlemythological dynasties of India from which groups such as the Rajputs claim descent. Similar to the Solar dynasty and the Lunar dynasty. It is capable of being expanded and otherwise improved. - Sitush (talk) 20:43, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:09, 16 April 2014 (UTC)


Categories[edit]

Templates[edit]

Miscellaneous[edit]

Proposed deletions (WP:PROD)[edit]