Wikipedia:Files for deletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Wikipedia:IFD)
Jump to: navigation, search

Files for deletion (FfD) is for listing images and other media files which are unneeded. Files that have been listed here for more than 7 days are eligible for deletion if either a consensus to do so has been reached or no objections to deletion have been raised. To quote the non-free content criteria, "it is the duty of users seeking to include or retain content to provide a valid rationale; those seeking to remove or delete it are not required to show that one cannot be created." For undeletion requests, first contact the administrator who deleted the file. If you are unable to resolve the issue with that administrator, the matter should be brought to deletion review.

If you have questions if something should be deleted, consider asking at Media Copyright Questions.

Examples of what you may request here


  • Obsolete – The file has been replaced by a better version.
  • Orphan – The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia.
  • Unencyclopedic – The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in any Wikimedia project.
  • Low quality – The file is of an extremely low resolution, distorted, or has other physical image quality concerns.
  • Copyright violation – The file might be used in violation of copyright.
  • NFCC violation – The file is used under a claim of fair use but does not meet the requirements.

What not to list here[edit]

  1. For speedy deletion candidates, do not use this page; instead use one of the speedy deletion templates. See the criteria for speedy deletion. These are: duplicates (where both files are on Wikipedia), thumbnails, broken files, non-existent files, non-commercial, "by permission" files and files which are not an image, sound file or video clip and have no encyclopedic use.
  2. Files that have no source, have an unknown copyright, are unused or replaceable non-free, or are non-free without rationale can be marked so that they will be deleted after a week, and should not be listed on this page. Add one of the following to the file page:
    1. {{subst:nsd}} if a file has no source indicated
    2. {{subst:nld}} if a file has a source but no licensing information
    3. {{subst:orfud}} if a file has a non-free copyright tag but isn't used in any articles
    4. {{subst:rfu}} if a file has a non-free copyright tag but could be replaced by a free file
    5. {{subst:dfu|reason}} if a file has a non-free copyright tag but the rationale isn't sufficient or is disputed
    6. {{subst:frn}} if a file has no non-free use rationale
    If the source or licensing information of an image marked as being freely licensed is disputed, please list the file on Possibly unfree files.
  3. Redundant or duplicate files do not have to be listed here. Please use
    1. {{isd|Full name of file excluding the "File:" prefix}} for speedy deletion if the other file is on Wikipedia, not on Commons
    2. {{now commons|File:NEW FILENAME}} if the file now exists on Commons, or {{now commons}} for files with the same name on Commons. (Don't nominate protected images, they are usually locally uploaded and protected since they are used in an interface message or in a highly used template, thus they are high-risk.)
  4. For blatant copyright infringements, use speedy deletion by tagging the file {{db-f9}}
  5. Suspected copyright violations shouldn't be listed here.
    1. If a file is listed as public domain or under a free license, but lacks verification of this (either by an OTRS ticket number or a notice on the source website), tag it as {{subst:npd}}.
    2. For other suspected copyright infringements or licensing issues, use Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files.
  6. Files that are hosted on Wikimedia Commons cannot be deleted via this process. Please use the Commons deletion page instead.
  7. Description pages with no local file, even though they are in the file namespace, should not be listed here.
    1. Redirects should be treated as in any other namespace: if no speedy deletion criteria apply, they should be listed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion.
    2. Local description pages for files hosted on Commons are usually speedy-deletable under criterion F2; use {{db-nofile}}.
    3. Local description pages with no associated file are speedy-deletable under criterion G8; use {{db-imagepage}}.
    4. Any other deletion of a description page with no local file should be listed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion.
  8. If a file is appropriately licensed and could be usable elsewhere, consider copying it to the Wikimedia Commons instead of listing it for deletion. Once copied to the Commons, it is eligible for speedy deletion per criterion 8 for files.
  9. If you are the uploader of the image, tag it with {{db-author}}.

Instructions for listing files for deletion

To list a file:

1
Edit the file page.

Add {{ffd|log=2014 July 23}} to the file page.

2
Create its FfD subsection.

Follow this edit link and list the file using {{subst:ffd2|File_name.ext|Uploader= |Reason= }} ~~~~

Leave the subject heading blank.

If the file has been replaced by another file, name the file that replaced it in your reason for deletion. Refer below for a list of other common reasons.

For listing additional files with the same reason, edit the first file section and use {{subst:ffd2a|File_name.ext|Uploader= }}

3
Give due notice.

Inform the uploader by adding a message to their talk page using {{subst:fdw|File_name.ext}}

  • Remember to replace "File_name.ext" with the name of the image or media
  • For multiple images by the same user, use {{subst:fdw-multi|First_file.ext|Second_file.ext|Third_file.ext}} ~~~~ (can handle up to 26)

If the image is in use, also consider adding {{ifdc|File_name.ext|log=2014 July 23}} to the caption(s), or adding a notice to the article talk pages. Consider also notifying relevant WikiProjects of the discussion.

State the reasons why the file should be deleted. Some common reasons are:

  • Obsolete - The file has been replaced by a better version. Indicate the new file name (often abbreviated OB)
  • Orphan - The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia. (If the file is only available under "fair use", please use {{subst:orfud}} instead). Please consider moving "good" free licensed files to Commons rather than outright deleting them, other projects may find a use for them even if we have none; you can also apply {{Copy to Wikimedia Commons}} . (often abbreviated OR, not to be confused with original research which generally doesn't apply to images)
  • Unencyclopedic - The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in this encyclopedia (or for any Wikimedia project). Images used on userpages should generally not be nominated on this basis alone unless the user is violating the Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not policy by using Wikipedia to host excessive amounts unencyclopedic material (most commonly private photos). (often abbreviated UE)
  • Low quality - The image is of an extremely low resolution, distorted, or has other physical image quality concerns. (often abbreviated LQ)
  • Copyright violation - The file might be used in violation of copyright. (often abbreviated CV)

These are not the only "valid" reasons to delete a file. Any properly explained reason can be used. The above list comprises the most common and uncontroversial ones.

Since abbreviated deletion reasons will not be familiar to most Wikipedians, especially newbies, please consider using full words. A few extra keystrokes now can save paragraphs of explanation to a panicked uploader wondering what's wrong with their image.

If you remove a file from an article, list the article from which you removed it so there can be community review of whether the file should be deleted. This is necessary because file pages do not remember the articles on which the file were previously used.

Administrator instructions

Contents

Instructions for discussion participation[edit]

In responding to the deletion nomination, consider adding your post in the format
* '''View''' - Reasoning ... -- ~~~~
where "Delete", "Keep", "Comment", or something else may replace "View". In posting their reasoning, many editors use abbreviations and cite to the following:

Remember that polling is not a substitute for discussion. Wikipedia's primary method of determining consensus is through editing and discussion, not voting. Although editors occasionally use straw polls in an attempt to test for consensus, polls or surveys sometimes impede rather than assist discussion. They should be used with caution, and are no more binding than any other consensus decision.

Also remember that if you believe that an image is potentially useful for other projects and should be moved to Wikimedia Commons, in lieu of responding '''Move to Commons''', you can move it there yourself. See Wikipedia:Moving files to the Commons for instructions.

Instructions for closing discussions[edit]

Nominations should be processed for closing after being listed for 7 days following the steps here.

Old discussions[edit]

The following discussions are more than 7 days old and are pending processing by an administrator:

For older nominations, see the archives.

Discussions approaching conclusion

Recent nominations[edit]

July 17[edit]

File:Zeek logo, the application to sell and buy vouchers.png[edit]

File:Zeek logo, the application to sell and buy vouchers.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Yofisimon (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File was previously deleted at Wikimedia Commons per commons:COM:ADVERT, see commons:Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2014-07#File:Zeek-app-buy-sell-gift-vouchers-logo.png Drm310 (talk) 02:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep as fair use, at least as long as the article exists. Valid use for a logo. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:09, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

File:JackDiamond.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. TLSuda (talk) 16:09, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

File:JackDiamond.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Joyson Prabhu (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

This image does not have a full enough fair-use rationale, specifically looking at WP:NFCC#10. I would further go to say that this image fails WP:NFCC#8 in both articless and worse in List of American mobsters of Irish descent where it also fails WP:NFLISTS. This image should not be included in either the article. TLSuda (talk) 03:25, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep - There is a long-standing consensus that representations of deceased persons with fair-use images is acceptable, except where free images already exist. Hence fair-use files in articles such as H.D.. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:11, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Yes there is, but the appropriate fair-use rationale must be included. I could've tagged it with WP:CSD#F6 where it would likely simply be deleted after a week to 10 days. I figured this route would be easier to give someone who is interested the chance in fixing it. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 13:32, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
  • What's so hard about doing it yourself? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
  • I personally believe that it fails WP:NFCC#8, even if we have a longstanding consensus for this situation. It also has a terrible source with no author, and no evidence that it is for sure created by the New York Police Dept. He's been arrested in Germany by the German secret service, and by the Philadelphia PD. He was also arrested by local authorities in Catskill, New York. There are too many unknowns for me to comfortably fill out an appropriate fair-use rationale. If you are interested in keeping it, why can't you do it yourself? TLSuda (talk) 14:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
  • "I personally believe that it fails WP:NFCC#8", in which case you'd rather sacrifice useful images rather than follow consensus that images of a dead person pass NFCC#8 by showing us how a person looked (something one would expect from a historical biography?). Fine. I hope that's never your only reason for actually nominating images for deletion.
I agree with your sourcing concerns and have already taken measures to replace the image with something defendable. I fail to see how I would have been required to to "do it [my]self" while waiting for an answer from you to my question about why you didn't do it. I never said I wasn't interested in doing it; I just expressed concern that you were too quick to hit delete when the fix is obvious. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:39, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
And it's done, in less than 10 minutes. Less time would have been wasted if it had just been done from the beginning. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:50, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Launch ceremony USS JFK May1967 (2).jpg[edit]

File:Launch ceremony USS JFK May1967 (2).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Enkyo2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Does not pass WP:NFCC#8 in any of the articles in which it is used. Both uses are explained well enough by words alone.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep - This is an image of a unique historic event for which a free equivalent is unlikely to exist and cannot be created. "The 10 year old daughter of John F Kennedy launches a ship" really isn't an appropriate alternative to this image. --AussieLegend () 13:52, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

4 Ultimate Fighter Images[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Nomination is not formatted correctly. TLSuda (talk) 16:11, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

The four images in the infoboxs on these pages should be deleted as non free images should only be used when needed and in this case are not, there are about 20 seasons of the ultimate fighter and these are the only 4 seasons to have an image on the page. Lukejordan02 (talk) 08:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

@Lukejordan02: This nomination is not set up properly. You need to include a list of the actual photos that you are nominating for deletion including following the instructions at WP:FFD which includes placing a tag on the image description page so that the uploader and other editors can see the file has been nominated for deletion. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 13:35, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Venkatarao.jpg[edit]

File:Venkatarao.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Platonic Guardian (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

not useful ScarletBrow 12:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  • delete The file is not linked to any article nor is useful.Solatido 17:54, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Rvrp.jpg[edit]

File:Rvrp.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Platonic Guardian (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

not useful ScarletBrow 12:11, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  • delete The file is not linked to any article nor is useful.Solatido 17:54, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Framgang splashscreen.jpg[edit]

File:Framgang splashscreen.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Smallman12q (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free decorative image uploaded in violation of WP:NFCC#8 Codename Lisa (talk) 15:29, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  • delete Is taken from another site. So, not screenshot taken by uploader.Solatido

File:Splash registered.png[edit]

File:Splash registered.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Smallman12q (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Non-free decorative image uploaded in violation of WP:NFCC#8 Codename Lisa (talk) 15:29, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  • keep The image is a screenshot and helps the article Frame-IT! linked to it.Solatido 17:54, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Durruti-muerto.jpg[edit]

File:Durruti-muerto.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by HCPUNXKID (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFG. It is also inappropriate to upload files like this with EXIF GPS coordinates as it may reveal private information. Stefan2 (talk) 22:06, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

  • keep The photo is an historic document of an important international anarchist revolutionary, so I think important enough to be included on the article. There are several photos of corpses of international leaders, for example J.F. Kennedy or Che Guevara. And about the claim that EXIF GPS coordinates may reveal private information, I found it difficult, as that Durruti's corpse photo was taken in 1936! (so what private info could reveal nearly 70 years before?).--HCPUNXKID 22:27, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
    • See WP:NFCC#8: there is no sourced critical discussion about the photograph.
You are misunderstanding what the EXIF GPS coordinates do. This image obviously comes from a book. In 2011, someone took a photograph of the photograph using a Samsung camera. The EXIF GPS coordinates tell where the Samsung camera was located in 2011 (possibly in the camera owner's home). --Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Melos Quartet, 1972 touring Southern Africa.png[edit]

File:Melos Quartet, 1972 touring Southern Africa.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Aldercraft (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The letter fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:54, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Renato Fasano 1971 and his Virtuosi di Roma Orchestra Touring Southern Africa.png[edit]

File:Renato Fasano 1971 and his Virtuosi di Roma Orchestra Touring Southern Africa.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Aldercraft (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

There's no reason to believe that there aren't any PD images of this group, considering the short term in {{PD-Italy}}. Stefan2 (talk) 22:55, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Raymond Lewenthal 1971, touring Southern Africa.png[edit]

File:Raymond Lewenthal 1971, touring Southern Africa.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Aldercraft (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The letter part fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:55, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

July 18[edit]

File:Polish man found guilty of Rassenschande "race defilement", 1940.jpg[edit]

File:Polish man found guilty of Rassenschande "race defilement", 1940.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Policja (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Unencyclopedic, with no reasonable proof that the photograph shows what is being claimed by the illegal repository of found objects used as the online source. Poeticbent talk 16:44, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

  • delete. Actually the photo is originally from Historisches Centrum Hagen (foto 25) and does show what it says, but I failed to find its copyright status. Staszek Lem (talk) 20:03, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Note: The caption at the above address reads in German: Abbildung 25 – Öffentliche Anprangerung eines polnischen Fremdarbeiters in Eisenach wegen "Rassenschande", 15. November 1940 (Stiftung Topographie des Terrors, Berlin), however, the visible cardboard sign does not say "polnischen". The photograph could be showing a prisoner of any other ethnic group from German occupied territories amounting to the staggering 30% of the Poland's population before World War II. They included Ukrainians, Jews, Czechs etc. The caption is alleging what is not in the photograph itself. Poeticbent talk 21:37, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
I understood your concern even earlier. However IMO when a photo comes from a reliable source, he have reasons to believe that it was captioned correctly. If a photo caption says it is shows blue tits, we don't argue. Still, I continue to agree with you that lacking better context if is easy to contest the match of caption to image. A possible confirming context would be if the photo was part of "Polnische" collection, or a book, or etc. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:49, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Sankyo Super 8 Film Camera.jpg[edit]

File:Sankyo Super 8 Film Camera.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by H.Brian Griffin (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Either this image is missing permission for a free license, or it is replaceable fair-use. Either way it has no place here. Peripitus (Talk) 12:04, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

File:World-news-now.jpg[edit]

File:World-news-now.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pmartinez (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Old logo used without discussion in violation of WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8. RJaguar3 | u | t 14:49, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Infomercial Guide Description.jpg[edit]

File:Infomercial Guide Description.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Mrschimpf (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Multiple WP:NFCC violations:

  • The large amount of legible text, essential for the image's purpose, violates WP:NFC#UUI #15
  • A mock description of an infomercial could easily be written by a Wikipedian, so this image fails WP:NFCC#1
  • The nontext nonfree elements (the picture-in-picture and the EPG interface) are gratuitously included in the image, in violation of WP:NFCC#3
  • The text next to the picture already describes how infomercial advertisers can submit program listings to EPGs, so this image fails WP:NFCC#8. RJaguar3 | u | t 14:54, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
    • Delete, uploader-endorsed You know, if you just removed images without any comment/FD noms and let the bots do the talking it's never a problem and I can address it. I uploaded this when UUI didn't exist and we had less strict NFC guidelines, and yes there's text to the side now so it's duplicative. No need to make a long NFC deletion example of a file uploaded six years ago to make a point you could've just addressed by removing the image and letting it delete through the orphaning process. Nate (chatter) 01:27, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Kadavul paathi Mirugam paathi.jpg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Ronhjones (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 01:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Kadavul paathi Mirugam paathi.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kailash29792 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The poster of a different film with the same title, which failed to enter production. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:57, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wciu-tv.png[edit]

File:Wciu-tv.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Wdjt (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Old non-free logo not discussed in the article violates WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8 RJaguar3 | u | t 15:09, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete, uploader-endorsed Again, as above, remove it and let the orphan process play out. Was logo at time I uploaded, isn't any longer, nobody's stopping anybody from removing it under our non-free guidelines. Nate (chatter) 03:53, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

File:MESA "Passed out on the side of the wall" graffiti, Western Sahara, 2013.jpg[edit]

File:MESA "Passed out on the side of the wall" graffiti, Western Sahara, 2013.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ev160 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Fails WP:NFCC#1, this is the provided rationale: "Few people care to read about this subject to begin with. It is also not a controversial or sensitive image". eh bien mon prince (talk) 23:17, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

July 19[edit]

File:WLS-TV open.png[edit]

File:WLS-TV open.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bloonstdfan360 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Violates WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8; the news opening graphic is not discussed in the article, and the article already has a non-free logo. RJaguar3 | u | t 04:55, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Austria - Location Map (2013) - AUT - UNOCHA.svg[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT 21:17, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Austria - Location Map (2013) - AUT - UNOCHA.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by EdwardRech (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

map is misleading 88.116.211.94 (talk) 20:46, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

July 20[edit]

File:Mickey Smith.jpg[edit]

File:Mickey Smith.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Khaosworks (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Replaceable (replaced?) fair use image now that File:Noel Clarke2.jpg, Clarke, dressed in character, on the set of Doctor Who is available on Commons. No need for this fair use image. kelapstick(bainuu) 12:40, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep - I find the replacement image unsuitable; it portrays the actor, not the character (despite what the source may say). Even though he may be 'in suit' (which isn't much considering he is always dressed casually), he certainly isn't 'in character'. -- [[User:Edokter]] {{talk}} 14:20, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep per Edokter. File:Noel Clarke2.jpg shows the actor. File:Mickey Smith.jpg shows the character he played. There is a difference. —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 23:38, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Central and Eastern Europe around 950 AD.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:33, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Central and Eastern Europe around 950 AD.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hxseek (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

To much speculation, lack of source, unencylopedic Čeha (razgovor) 18:26, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Map of the Western Balkans around 814 AD.png[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. kelapstick(bainuu) 18:35, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Map of the Western Balkans around 814 AD.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Hxseek (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

To much speculation, lack of source, unencylopedic Čeha (razgovor) 18:30, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

July 21[edit]

File:Edward Timpson.jpg[edit]

File:Edward Timpson.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Billinghurst (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

The terms on the source website (see web archive version) disallow derivative works and commercial use so this image is certainly not freely licensed. Image of a living person so it fails WP:NFCC#1 Peripitus (Talk) 12:21, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Columba-Dominguez.jpg[edit]

File:Columba-Dominguez.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Billinghurst (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

File was uploaded with a blatantly fraudulent license. File currently has no license and no free use rational. Safiel (talk) 19:23, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Comment Also, file was deleted at Commons. Safiel (talk) 19:24, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Clarification I should clarify, that the person who uploaded the file to the English Wikipedia, did NOT add the fraudulent tag. That was placed by the original uploader on Commons. Safiel (talk) 19:29, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

July 22[edit]

File:Pig Child Fire Window.jpg[edit]

File:Pig Child Fire Window.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Osvaldo Valdes Lopez (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Photo is fair use. Article is used in Squat Theatre and is not needed in an article about a theatre. Bgwhite (talk) 06:34, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

File:AWseries1.jpg[edit]

File:AWseries1.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Danwanger (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

Not in use, not expected to be useful, and has a questionable license status. Peter O. (Talk) 12:53, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

July 23[edit]

File:BrentTheEmoKidUser.PNG[edit]

File:BrentTheEmoKidUser.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by BrentTheEmoKid (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File:BrentTheEmoKid Boxer Shorts Sagging Fad.PNG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by BrentTheEmoKid (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log)

These files are not in use in any articles, and only appear in the page of a user who became inactive more than seven years ago, and they otherwise appear not to be useful, especially the second file. Peter O. (Talk) 01:33, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Naked ai weiwei.jpg[edit]

File:Naked ai weiwei.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ohconfucius (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).

In none of the articles where this is used does it meet NFCC 8. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:27, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Footer[edit]

Today is July 23 2014. Put new nominations in Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 July 23 -- (new nomination)

If the current date's page has been started without the header, apply {{subst:Ffd log}} to the top of the day's page.

Please ensure "===July 23===" is at the very top of the new page so that internal page links from the main Files for deletion page (the one you're on now) work.