Wikipedia:Minors and persons judged incompetent
|This essay contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors on the policy on biographies of living persons. Essays are not Wikipedia policies or guidelines. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints.|
|This guidance essay contains comments and advice of one or more Wikipedia contributors. It is not a Wikipedia policy or guideline, though it may be consulted for assistance. A potential measure of how the community views this essay may be gained by consulting the history and talk pages, and checking What links here.|
|This page in a nutshell: In light of BLP, editing about minors and persons legally judged incompetent should be especially protective of their rights.|
If a person is below the age of minority in their nation or locality or has been adjudged (in the U.S., by a court of competent jurisdiction) to be incompetent, editing about that person should be done with even greater care, because privacy and publicity rights probably require even greater protection than they do for competent adults. These people typically have less ability to protect their own rights, so we need to be more careful.
To whom applicable or not
This is not about editors who are considered by other editors or the Wikimedia Foundation incompetent to edit. This is about persons who are written about or who might be.
This is not about persons whom someone believes to be incompetent by any standard, no matter how authoritatively, except that it is about persons who have been adjudged by lawful authority (in the U.S., a court of competent jurisdiction) to be incompetent generally to manage their major personal decisions without supervision.
Editing on a person who must be identified
This applies to, for example, a notable individual who is the main subject of an article.
Edit what is said about the person so that it is even less contentious than would be acceptable for a competent adult or not contentious at all. Do so not just by adding sources but by toning down the content in a way that remains consistent with sourcing.
Editing on any other person
This applies to, for example, someone who is incidental to an article, but significant enough to mention even without identifying them.
Do not name or otherwise identify the person, even if good sources do publish the name, when a more general description will suffice. Be careful of partial identifications, as a reader might assemble only a few facts and thereby use your information to identify the person who should not be identified.
Laws governing a person's rights and duties
A person who is a national or citizen of one nation but located or residing in another may be subject to either nation's set of laws. A person who holds nationality or citizenship of more than one nation may be subject to either nation's set of laws. Likewise, a person who is domiciled in one nation but located or residing in another may be subject to either nation's set of laws. Within a single nation, similar differences can govern a person who has a permanent residence at one address but is temporarily at another.
Where the laws applicable to a person might be those of two or more jurisdictions, apply the law that gives the person the most protection. For example, if the person is a minor until age 18 under one set of laws but 21 under the other and the person is age 20, assume they're still a minor.
- Commons essay on personality rights (right of publicity)
- Wikipedia:Competence is required (essay on editing)
- Wikipedia:Children's, adult new reader, and large print sources questionable on reliability (essay)