Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Administrator instructions

Centralized discussion
Proposals: policy other Discussions Ideas

Note: inactive discussions, closed or not, should be archived.

Miscellany for deletion (MfD) is a place where Wikipedians decide what should be done with problematic pages in the namespaces which aren't covered by other specialized deletion discussion areas. Items sent here are usually discussed for seven days; then they are either deleted by an administrator or kept, based on community consensus as evident from the discussion, consistent with policy, and with careful judgment of the rough consensus if required.

Information on the process[edit]

What may be nominated for deletion here:

  • Pages in these namespaces: Book:, Draft:, Help:, Portal:, MediaWiki:, Wikipedia: (including WikiProjects), User:, TimedText:, Module:, Topic:, and the various Talk: namespaces
  • Userboxes (regardless of namespace)
  • Any other page, that is not in article space, where there is dispute as to the correct XfD venue.

Requests to undelete pages deleted after discussion here, and debate whether discussions here have been properly closed, both take place at Wikipedia:Deletion review, in accordance with Wikipedia's undeletion policy.

Before nominating a page for deletion[edit]

Before nominating a page for deletion, please consider these guidelines:

Deleting pages in your own userspace
  • If you want to have your own personal userpage deleted, there is no need to list it here; simply tag it with {{db-userreq}}. If you wish your user talk page (or user talk page archives) to be deleted, this is the correct location to request that.
Deleting pages in other people's userspace
  • Consider explaining your concerns on the user's talk page with a personal note or by adding {{subst:Uw-userpage}} ~~~~  to their talk page. This step assumes good faith and civility; often the user is simply unaware of the guidelines, and the page can either be fixed or speedily deleted using {{db-userreq}}.
  • Take care not to bite newcomers - sometimes using the {{subst:welcome}} or {{subst:welcomeg}} template and a pointer to WP:UP would be best first.
  • Problematic userspace material is often addressed by the User pages guidelines including in some cases removal by any user or tagging to clarify the content or to prevent external search engine indexing. (Examples include copies of old, deleted, or disputed material, problematic drafts, promotional material, offensive material, inappropriate links, 'spoofing' of the MediaWiki interface, disruptive HTML, invitations or advocacy of disruption, certain kinds of images and image galleries, etc) If your concern relates to these areas consider these approaches as well, or instead of, deletion.
  • User pages about Wikipedia-related matters by established users usually do not qualify for deletion.
  • Articles that were recently deleted at AfD and then moved to userspace are generally not deleted unless they have lingered in userspace for an extended period of time without improvement to address the concerns that resulted in their deletion at AfD, or their content otherwise violates a global content policy such as our policies on Biographies of living persons that applies to any namespace.
Policies, guidelines and process pages
  • Established pages and their sub-pages should not be nominated, as such nominations will probably be considered disruptive, and the ensuing discussions closed early. This is not a forum for modifying or revoking policy. Instead consider tagging the policy as {{historical}} or redirecting it somewhere.
  • Proposals still under discussion generally should not be nominated. If you oppose a proposal, discuss it on the policy page's discussion page. Consider being bold and improving the proposal. Modify the proposal so that it gains consensus. Also note that even if a policy fails to gain consensus, it is often useful to retain it as a historical record, for the benefit of future editors.
WikiProjects and their subpages
  • It is generally preferable that inactive WikiProjects not be deleted, but instead be marked as {{WikiProject status|inactive}}, redirected to a relevant WikiProject, or changed to a task force of a parent WikiProject, unless the WikiProject was incompletely created or is entirely undesirable.
  • WikiProjects that were never very active and which do not have substantial historical discussions (meaning multiple discussions over an extended period of time) on the project talk page should not be tagged as {{historical}}; reserve this tag for historically active projects that have, over time, been replaced by other processes or that contain substantial discussion (as defined above) of the organization of a significant area of Wikipedia. Before deletion of an inactive project with a founder or other formerly active members who are active elsewhere on Wikipedia, consider userfication.
  • Notify the main WikiProject talk page when nominating any WikiProject subpage, in addition to standard notification of the page creator.
Alternatives to deletion
  • Normal editing that doesn't require the use of any administrator tools, such as merging the page into another page or renaming it, can often resolve problems.
  • Pages in the wrong namespace (e.g. an article in Wikipedia namespace), can simply be moved and then tag the redirect for speedy deletion using {{db-g6|rationale= it's a redirect left after a cross-namespace move}}. Notify the author of the original article of the cross-namespace move.

Please familiarize yourself with the following policies[edit]

How to list pages for deletion[edit]

Please check the aforementioned list of deletion discussion areas to check that you are in the right area. Then follow these instructions:

Administrator instructions[edit]

Administrator instructions for closing discussions can be found here.

Contents


Current discussions[edit]

Pages currently being considered are indexed by the day on which they were first listed. Please place new listings at the top of the section for the current day. If no section for the current day is present, please start a new section.

Purge server cache

December 27, 2014[edit]

December 24, 2014[edit]

User:Lancelottery/Donagh O'Leary[edit]

User:Lancelottery/Donagh O'Leary (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Stale userspace draft Ricky81682 (talk) 10:09, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete - The AFD on this subject would indicate that this wouldn't be viable as an article. -- Whpq (talk) 16:05, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Wabba The I/2012 FC Zonhoven season[edit]

User:Wabba The I/2012 FC Zonhoven season (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Stale userspace draft. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:37, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Wabba The I/Lovia[edit]

User:Wabba The I/Lovia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Per WP:HOAX. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:37, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Wabba The I/don't delete this[edit]

User:Wabba The I/don't delete this (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I can't find this person but it's a stale userspace draft for a WP:BLP, it may be a hoax? Ricky81682 (talk) 08:36, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Wabba The I/London F.C.[edit]

User:Wabba The I/London F.C. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Stale userspace stub of a draft. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:34, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Wabba The I/kladblad[edit]

User:Wabba The I/kladblad (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Stale userspace draft for Lenka discography. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:33, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Wabba The I/2013-14 UEFA Wabba League[edit]

User:Wabba The I/2013-14 UEFA Wabba League (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Stale userspace draft. Article currently at 2013–14 UEFA Champions League. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:31, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Wabba The I/2013-14 Belgian Pro League[edit]

User:Wabba The I/2013-14 Belgian Pro League (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Stale userspace draft. Article is current at 2013–14 Belgian Pro League. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:28, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Wabba The I/James Stanton[edit]

User:Wabba The I/James Stanton (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Stale userspace draft (well infobox really). Ricky81682 (talk) 08:27, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Global Obesity Prevention Center at Johns Hopkins Public School of Health[edit]

Draft:Global Obesity Prevention Center at Johns Hopkins Public School of Health (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Seems like a promo, not enough suspicion of a promo for me to tag for G11. Unlikely to ever become an article in its current form — kikichugirl speak up! 08:22, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:増税の春[edit]

User:増税の春 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Found one more. Another "list of oldest persons" draft, so again, WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:20, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Scarfaceflash/Negative Gain[edit]

User:Scarfaceflash/Negative Gain (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Stale userspace draft Ricky81682 (talk) 07:07, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Scarface1971/Phi Epsilon Chi[edit]

User:Scarface1971/Phi Epsilon Chi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Stale userspace draft for Phi Epsilon Chi Ricky81682 (talk) 07:05, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Phoenix B 1of3/Republic of Texas – Russian Empire relations[edit]

User:Phoenix B 1of3/Republic of Texas – Russian Empire relations (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Stale userspace draft. I can't find the original deletion discussion but it looks like the edit history is actually intact in case someone wants to do something with it for some reason. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:10, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Mancikutya/Homokozó[edit]

User:Mancikutya/Homokozó (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Stale userspace draft which is a Japanese language version of Akira Yoshizawa. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:41, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Randcs12/sandbox[edit]

User:Randcs12/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

A twist. A list of longest marriages. WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns like the oldest people ones. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:18, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:CalvinTy/Sandbox/Longevity/Main[edit]

User:CalvinTy/Sandbox/Longevity/Main (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:CalvinTy/Sandbox/Longevity/Guidelines (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:CalvinTy/Sandbox/Longevity/Recent (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:CalvinTy/Sandbox/Longevity/Tasks (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:CalvinTy/Sandbox/Longevity/Participants (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:CalvinTy/Sandbox/Longevity/Stats (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:CalvinTy/Sandbox/Longevity/Articles (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:CalvinTy/Sandbox/Longevity/TabsHeader (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Stale userspace test version of a project. Support deletion or at the very least, if appropriate, a move and merger to Wikipedia:WikiProject World's Oldest People. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:09, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

December 22, 2014[edit]

User:Scarface1812[edit]

User:Scarface1812 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Another "list of oldest persons" in userspace with WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns, in line with Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Scarface181268 and Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Scarface0475. Ca2james (talk) 22:19, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

That's the last one I had in my search results. There might be one or two still around but I think I found the majority of them. Ca2james (talk) 16:16, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Scarface0475[edit]

User:Scarface0475 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Another "list of oldest persons" in userspace with WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns, in line with Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Scarface181268 and Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:930310.Ca2james (talk) 21:44, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )/List of people who died on their birthdays[edit]

User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )/List of people who died on their birthdays (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Another userspace copy in line with Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Joseph A. Spadaro/Sandbox/Page62 and Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Buddy431/List_of_people_who_died_on_their_birthdays. All of these are copies of a twice deleted article. Suggest deletion due to WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns. Ca2james (talk) 21:38, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

  • delete being twice deleted means there is no reason to host this on WP. LibStar (talk) 13:12, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep - This is clearly preparatory to a future mainspace article assuming sourcing emerges. It is cost-free to hold this userfied piece until that eventuality. Carrite (talk) 17:11, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep As a place holder for a potential future article, this is exactly what userspace should be used for. Alansohn (talk) 18:10, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Ca2 makes an excellent point below, as per WP:STALEDRAFT,Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content LibStar (talk) 05:50, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep Just as consensus can change to delete, consensus can change to restore ... but only if people can see what needs to be restored. Once deleted it is not seen by 99.999% of readers. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 21:27, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment None of the three copies of this article in userspace had been edited since 2011. It's difficult to believe that any of these copies are for a future article when they hadn't been touched in well over three years - it's more likely that it's a WP:STALEDRAFT. Even if this was a future article, there's certainly no need to have three untouched copies of it in userspace. Ca2james (talk) 03:01, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete. Consensus can change but there's no evidence of a change in consensus. In fact, List of people who died on their birthdays was deleted again in 2012, after this article was last edited so it seems consensus remains deletion. There's an attribution failure here as well. The contents from this are precisely or substantially the same as what was deleted in 2012 at List of people who died on their birthdays without the proper attribution. G4 requires that content moved to user space must be "for explicit improvement (but not simply to circumvent Wikipedia's deletion policy)" which seems to be the case here. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:51, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
I have seen multiple AFDs that went into ten or more consecutive !votes for keep, only to be deleted on the 11th. There was "no evidence of a change in consensus" for them either, until consensus did in fact change. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 23:13, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
I'm confused. Aren't we discussing an article that was actually voted on before it was deleted? Twice in fact? How does that compare to something that does get deleted on the 11th vote? Aren't you proving my point, that there is no evidence on any change in consensus? The fact that you kept a version doesn't prove anything about a change, just that you kept a version of it. Look, what if all these versions were deleted and the contents (with all the edits) were restored into a single draft article at the Drafts space? Work on it together and list it at deletion review within the typical six months AFC kind of window (heck, list it immediately, it has been four years since the last discussion) and we all let the chips fall where they lie. I think Kitia had the best suggestion last time, make it a category not a list. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:32, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )/Death on Birthday seems related (well, it's the same). Can it be added here or are we going to wait and see how this one goes? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:20, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep. Reasonable leeway for a contributor. Original research is allowed in userspace. Reject the two example MfDs as precedent-forming. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:46, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Joseph A. Spadaro/Sandbox/Page30[edit]

User:Joseph A. Spadaro/Sandbox/Page30 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Another "list of oldest persons" article in userspace with WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns, in line with Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Hohho56oy and Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:930310. Ca2james (talk) 21:26, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete This is getting silly. How many longevity users insist on copying existing supercentenarian articles? Is it because they can add flags or something? This outdated list can be found in List of the verified oldest people. CommanderLinx (talk) 04:29, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:WEBHOST. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 06:26, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Joseph A. Spadaro/Sandbox/Page62[edit]

User:Joseph A. Spadaro/Sandbox/Page62 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This appears to be a WP:FAKEARTICLE or WP:NOTWEBHOST just like Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Buddy431/List_of_people_who_died_on_their_birthdays. This article has been deleted and then deleted again. Ca2james (talk) 21:20, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete. There's an attribution failure here as well as the contents from this version are stated as copied without providing the attribution to the source material. This version, like the above, is substantially the same as what was deleted in 2012 at List of people who died on their birthdays after this was last edited. G4 requires that content moved to user space must be "for explicit improvement (but not simply to circumvent Wikipedia's deletion policy)" which seems unlikely given that the article was again deleted after this version was last edited. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:51, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Scarface181268[edit]

User:Scarface181268 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Another "list of oldest persons" in userspace with WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns, in line with Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Hohho56oy and Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:930310 Ca2james (talk) 20:47, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete - Does not belong on a userpage. Perhaps the user could create a "List of Benelux supercentenarians" list using existing information from Belgium/Netherlands/Luxembourg supercentenarian articles or add to the Belgium/Netherlands articles. CommanderLinx (talk) 04:26, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete per the nominator. I advise the editors with interest in this to consider moving some of the sources to List of Belgian supercentenarians which is listed for deletion. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:03, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:CrazyCoyote100/sandbox[edit]

User:CrazyCoyote100/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Another "List of oldest people" article in userspace like Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:CrazyCoyote101/sandbox or Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:SuperHero2111/sandbox. WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns. Ca2james (talk) 20:39, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Buddy431/List of people who died on their birthdays[edit]

User:Buddy431/List of people who died on their birthdays (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This appears to be a WP:FAKEARTICLE or wP:NOTWEBHOST. This article has been deleted and then deleted again. Ca2james (talk) 20:33, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep - It is cost-free to keep this userfied draft for eventual return as a mainspace article should sourcing eventually emerge. Moreover, consensus can change, after all. Carrite (talk) 17:17, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment None of the three copies of this article in userspace had been edited since 2011. It's difficult to believe that any of these copies are for a future article when they hadn't been touched in well over three years - it's more likely that it's a WP:STALEDRAFT. Even if this was a future article, there's certainly no need to have three untouched copies of it in userspace. Ca2james (talk) 03:03, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
Actually this has been revised extensively over the years, but curiously enough never by the editor who's space it is in. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:13, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
For some reason I thought none had been edited since 2011 but I see that I was wrong - thank you for correcting me. I've stricken that part of my previous comment.
Since this page has been edited by numerous people over a period of years just as if it were a mainspace page, I'm concerned that the editors don't have a clear understanding of WP:USERPAGE policies. Ca2james (talk) 15:53, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete. Consensus can change but there's no evidence of a change in consensus. List of people who died on their birthdays was deleted again in 2012 and no one has attempted to discuss restoration. There's an attribution failure here as well. The contents from this are precisely or substantially the same as what was deleted at List of people who died on their birthdays without the proper attribution. G4 requires that content moved to user space must be "for explicit improvement (but not simply to circumvent Wikipedia's deletion policy)" which seems to be the case here. Also, isn't anyone curious why User:TexasAndroid chose to create a copy in someone else's userspace? The actual editor who's space this is in has never edited the page. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:51, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
I found the explanation but that doesn't help with the attribution issue. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:19, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Vijayganeshiyer2012/Jim Henry, Fisherman turned author[edit]

User:Vijayganeshiyer2012/Jim Henry, Fisherman turned author (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Stale userspace draft. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:06, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

User:CBDunkerson/Sandbox[edit]

User:CBDunkerson/Sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Robert Young (longevity claims researcher) was deleted back at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Young (longevity claims researcher) in 2007. Admins can review but it looks like User:CBDunkerson saved his version from this page (which seems older) to there but it was still deleted. Ricky81682 (talk) 19:02, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Why? What possible reason could there be to delete a sandbox page in someone's user space? --CBD 21:12, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
WP:WEBHOST. Wikipedia isn't for hosting articles, especially articles that were deleted years ago. If you were actively working on this for possible re-inclusion to the encyclopedia with a potential request at WP:Deletion review, then it looks like you're actively working on the page. - Ricky81682 (talk) 22:40, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete - Article was deleted and no effort has been made to improve it. Appears to be an attempt to get around the deletion process. CommanderLinx (talk) 04:21, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Ca2james (talk) 15:34, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep And trout those posting here who fail to AGF. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:26, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Wabba The I/Robert Young[edit]

User:Wabba The I/Robert Young (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Stale userspace draft. Was never a part of Articles for Creation so I don't think G13 applies but WP:BLP could instead. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:46, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Comment If I could see a BLP violation I might delete it as such, but I don't see anything negative there. It is an unsourced article. If what it says is true and verifiable then it may be the basis of an article. It has established notability but not verifiability. Robert Young shows multiple Bob and Robert Youngs involved with football, not sure if any of those are the same person. I am not giving an opinion on deletion until I have had a better look. Chillum 19:02, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Well, Young is not listed FIFA_Ballon_d'Or#Winners or List_of_Liverpool_F.C._records_and_statistics#Top_goalscorers so I suspect WP:HOAX is more appropriate. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:25, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Kitia/Muzzy Mueller[edit]

User:Kitia/Muzzy Mueller (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Not particularly well-source article for possibly a non-notable individual. Editor blocked years ago. WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:43, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Tim Thomason/List of living former United States Representatives[edit]

User:Tim Thomason/List of living former United States Representatives (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns along with possible WP:DOB within WP:BLP. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:38, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Hohho56oy[edit]

User:Hohho56oy (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

In line with Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Deaths in 2013/My OR stuff and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bensonfood, WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns. Ricky81682 (talk) 17:57, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

And the page was blanked. - Ricky81682 (talk) 22:42, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete - All available in Lists of centenarians or WW1 deaths by year. I wonder if the user noticed the tag states the userpage cannot be blanked... CommanderLinx (talk) 04:20, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Ca2james (talk) 15:35, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:ZHypnoZ[edit]

User:ZHypnoZ (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

In line with Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Deaths in 2013/My OR stuff and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bensonfood, WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns. Ricky81682 (talk) 17:55, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Ca2james (talk) 15:36, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Brendanology/Sandbox[edit]

User:Brendanology/Sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

In line with Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Deaths in 2013/My OR stuff and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bensonfood, WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns. Ricky81682 (talk) 17:54, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Ca2james (talk) 15:36, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Brendanology/Supercentenarians[edit]

User:Brendanology/Supercentenarians (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

In line with Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Deaths in 2013/My OR stuff and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bensonfood, WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns. Ricky81682 (talk) 17:53, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete - Tables 1 and 3 are just the top ten oldest living at a certain point in time which goes against WP:OR and WP:TRIVIA. Table 2 is also WP:OR. CommanderLinx (talk) 04:11, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Ca2james (talk) 15:36, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • OR and "Trivia" are not sufficient reasons for deletion of other's userspace pages. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:48, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Longpat/sandbox[edit]

User:Longpat/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

In line with Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Deaths in 2013/My OR stuff and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bensonfood, WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns. Editor has been inactive for almost a year now. Ricky81682 (talk) 17:51, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Ca2james (talk) 15:37, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Rfinca1[edit]

User:Rfinca1 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:FAKEARTICLE that duplicates Richard Feldman (songwriter). Appears to be the userpage of Feldman himself, and the user has not edited in over a year, nor has the userpage itself been edited since 2011. Everymorning talk 15:54, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

  • I have striked my comment because the user has made an edit to my talk page. Also, I wanted to clarify that this duplication was not done knowingly by the user. Everymorning talk 22:56, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete No harm though. I'd direct the editor to the conflict of interest information. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:44, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:SiameseTurtle[edit]

User:SiameseTurtle (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:SiameseTurtle/Twins (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:SiameseTurtle/Oldest (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:SiameseTurtle/British supercentenarians (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

More WP:FAKEARTICLE or WP:NOTWEBHOST concerns with these "oldest people" lists in userspace, similar to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:NickOrnstein and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Verne2000. Ca2james (talk) 15:40, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Exactly. It just goes to show how useful these userspace lists have been in developing many of the reliably sourced articles in Wikipedia today (you're welcome). These pages were used as a base to create several articles, and many of the other userspace articles are pages that are being developed. As for the lack of reliable sources, well there are many reliable sources that can be cited. Unfortunately, it seems that many editors are not interested in constructively improving articles by adding sources - but rather interested in destructive editing by mass deletion. Here are your many reliable sources, which could have been added, even by yourself: [1] [2] [3] [4]. There is no particular need for these sections of my page anymore, but the destructive attitude against a multitude of editors who have contributed to dozens of articles is against WP:POINT - "Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point". SiameseTurtle (talk) 17:15, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Totally, COMPLETELY KEEP ALL - As per SiameseTurtle; all of his defending statements apply to Wikipedia's 'Founding Fathers' Guidelines', such as "WP:USER states that they can be used for "organizing and aiding the work users do on Wikipedia"". The lists I have on my page are in relation to Oldest people and the rules state that as long as information on my page relates to articles on this website than it is permitted. Nick Ornstein (talk) 01:38, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete. WP:WEBHOST. If editors want to make up their own lists, they can do it somewhere else. If they want to work on names for the articles, they should be directed to Wikipedia:WikiProject World's Oldest People/Future supercentenarians or wherever else the project for this is doing it. There needs to be a central location for all this. There is zero purpose to have user versions of lists other than to create their own forks of the material. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:33, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment I pity all of you wanting to be like a bunch of Chiefs over this great website. I will pray for all of you. God Bless all of you and please spend some Christmas Time with your family and more time away from the computer. Nick Ornstein (talk) 02:22, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete all As per nom and CammanderLinx, with no bias against the user resurrecting their Userpage with the opening paragraph and Userboxes which are appropriate for such a page. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 21:32, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Gabe A[edit]

User:Gabe A (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:Gabe A/Historical Claims (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

More WP:FAKEARTICLE or WP:NOTWEBHOST concerns with these "oldest people" lists in userspace, similar to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:NickOrnstein and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Verne2000. Ca2james (talk) 15:29, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

User:CGT dk[edit]

User:CGT dk (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:CGT dk/Ældste (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:CGT dk/Ældste/105 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:CGT dk/Ældste/Langeland (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:CGT dk/Ældste/Fo-Gr (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:CGT dk/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

More WP:FAKEARTICLE or WP:NOTWEBHOST concerns with these "oldest people" lists in userspace, similar to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:NickOrnstein and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Verne2000. Ca2james (talk) 15:18, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Paul Stephens (cricketer)[edit]

Draft:Paul Stephens (cricketer) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

IP created unreferenced article on an CSD:A7 non-notable subject (nowhere near meeting WP:CRIN standard for notability), but according to Wikipedia:Drafts#Deleting a draft, articles in the Draft namespace can only be speedily deleted under the general rules, not the article rules. The-Pope (talk) 12:47, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

User:SuperHero2111/Anne D'Evergroote[edit]

User:SuperHero2111/Anne D'Evergroote (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This article was PRODDED and deleted in November last year. Also nominating in line with Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Deaths in 2013/My OR stuff, WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE. CommanderLinx (talk) 04:25, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

IPA for X[edit]

IPA for X (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This is a multiple-page nomination (sorry if the title is incorrect). The pages under scrutiny are:

Help: IPA for Berber
Help: IPA for Colognian
Help: IPA for Gujarati
Help: IPA for Judaeo-Spanish
Help: IPA for Klingon
Help: IPA for Laz
Help: IPA for Kashmiri
Help:IPA for Luxembourgish
Help: IPA for Marshallese
Help: IPA for Mingrelian
Help: IPA for Nguni
Help: IPA for Punjabi
Help: IPA for Quechua
Help: IPA for Svan
Help: IPA for Walloon

The IPA for X pages are designed to provide utility to readers and editors in understanding and transcribing language-specific transcriptions at Wikipedia. They are not to be a resource for language learners or simplified coverage of a language’s phonology compared to the phonology section of a language's Wikipedia entry. When an IPA for X page is created, it should be there to cover an unmet need. I believe that the above pages do not qualify for this unmet need. Most of them are not linked to at all and the rest are only used a handful of times. In certain cases, the pages have only been recently created, but the need for the page should exist before it is created. Here is the breakdown for each:

Help: IPA for Berber – created July 2010. 7 articles link here, 4 of these are language-related articles that explain transcription within article space.
Help: IPA for Colognian – created November 2010. 3, articles link here, 2 of which are language-related.
Help: IPA for Gujarati – created November 2014. No pages link here.
Help: IPA for Judaeo-Spanish – created October 2014. No pages link here.
Help: IPA for Klingon –created December 2014. No pages link here.
Help: IPA for Laz – created October 2014. No pages link here.
Help: IPA for Kashmiri – created October 2014. No pages link here.
Help:IPA for Luxembourgish - created May 2014. 6 pages link here.
Help: IPA for Marshallese – created April 2011. No pages link here.
Help: IPA for Mingrelian – created April 2014. No pages link here.
Help: IPA for Nguni – created December 2012. No pages link here.
Help: IPA for Punjabi – created December 2012. No pages link here.
Help: IPA for Quechua – created December 2013. No pages link here.
Help: IPA for Svan – created October 2014. No pages link here.
Help: IPA for Walloon – created March 2014. 2 pages link here. — Ƶ§œš¹ [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 00:21, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Oh, thanks. I believe I've fixed it now. I wasn't as sure about Luxembourgish, but since I've tagged it we can discuss it. So it's in both lists now. — Ƶ§œš¹ [lɛts b̥iː pʰəˈlaɪˀt] 03:18, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

User:930310[edit]

User:930310 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

More WP:FAKEARTICLE or WP:NOTWEBHOST concerns with these "oldest people" lists in userspace, similar to Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:NickOrnstein and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Verne2000. Ca2james (talk) 15:25, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete - I'd also add WP:OR as it seems the user has researched these cases to try and verify their ages. CommanderLinx (talk) 03:53, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

December 21, 2014[edit]

User:CrazyCoyote101/sandbox[edit]

User:CrazyCoyote101/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Another "List of" oldest people page in userspace like Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Verne2000 or Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Luathos. WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns Ca2james (talk) 20:16, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

There are more, unfortunately. I don't know how many there will be at the end of the day but I've got four or five more to add. I'm still not finished looking at the search results, either, so there could be more. Ca2james (talk) 05:40, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

User:SuperHero2111/List of the verified oldest men[edit]

User:SuperHero2111/List of the verified oldest men (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Another page in the same line as Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Verne2000 or Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Luathos. WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns Ca2james (talk) 20:09, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

User:SuperHero2111/sandbox[edit]

User:SuperHero2111/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Another page in the same line as Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Verne2000 or Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Luathos. WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns Ca2james (talk) 20:09, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Mtsepana[edit]

User:Mtsepana (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:Mtsepana/Mtsepana (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT Whpq (talk) 19:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete per nominator. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 08:47, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:NickOrnstein[edit]

User:NickOrnstein (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Another page in the same line as Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Verne2000 or Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Luathos. WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns Ca2james (talk) 19:26, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

  • ABSOULETLY, totally Keep - This is my page; I don't understand why that after SIX YEARS that all of a sudden a random nobody wants to shut my page down. I have had lists on my page for years. Aren't there more important issues to tackle, in regards to vandalizers to pages, besides my page that is absolutely no burden. This is NOT an article; no harm is being done to anybody except yourselves. TONS of other users from WikiProject: Oldest People have lists of the oldest people in the world on their page. I don't care about how high you rank (whether general or private) on Wikipedia; worry about yourself, pal. It is a website with information about older people, not a Hit List. Leave us fantastic contributors to the Oldest people articles alone. Thank you. --Nick Ornstein (talk) 21:07, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
This was one of many other pages in userspace that contain content that violates WP:NOTWEBHOST. We aren't allowed to keep whatever we want; there are guidelines about what's acceptable on userpages over at WP:USERPAGE. Ca2james (talk) 02:44, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep It's quite clear from the giant notice at the top of the user page that it is not a real article, so WP:FAKEARTICLE does not apply. It's also clear that the users proposing these changes have a vendetta against the several users who are interested in developing articles on human longevity. WP:POINT states that people should use common sense and not disrupt Wikipedia to make a point - and this is exactly what is being done by the desructive attitude against people's userpages. WP:USER states that they can be used for "organizing and aiding the work users do on Wikipedia", which is precisely what this page does. Secondly, the nominator has not used correct procedure since they have not been advised first on the talk page as stated by WP:USER. This appears to be a personal vendetta to me and I would refer the above users to WP:EQ to learn more about the principles of Wikipedia etiquette. SiameseTurtle (talk) 17:28, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment User:NickOrnstein has twice removed the mfd tag. I have replaced it both times with an edit summary asking them to not delete the tag until this discussion has finished. Ca2james (talk) 02:44, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Luathos/Table G[edit]

User:Luathos/Table G (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Another page in the same line as Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Luathos. WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns Ca2james (talk) 19:16, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete - Per above policies and WP:TRIVIA and WP:OR. This is just the top ten oldest living people as of a certain date. It's useless trivia that will never have reliable sources to support it. CommanderLinx (talk) 03:45, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Luathos[edit]

User:Luathos (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Another page in the same line as Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Deaths in 2013/My OR stuff or Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Verne2000. WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns. Ca2james (talk) 19:08, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Verne2000[edit]

User:Verne2000 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Another page in the same line as Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Deaths in 2013/My OR stuff. WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns. Ca2james (talk) 18:58, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Go ahead and delete it. I have abandoned this page months ago anyways… Verne2000 (talk) 20:45, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

User:AlwaysUnite[edit]

User:AlwaysUnite (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:FAKEARTICLE. We already have Russia–Ukraine relations, and this sitting as a user page is not a good thing. Whpq (talk) 18:41, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Hltarr01[edit]

User:Hltarr01 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT / WP:FAKEARTICLE for National Home for Disabled Volunteer Soldiers, Marion Branch Whpq (talk) 18:38, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Hanovete/Khan Wars[edit]

User:Hanovete/Khan Wars (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT Whpq (talk) 18:32, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Rm pr philly[edit]

User:Rm pr philly (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:FAKEARTICLE Whpq (talk) 18:27, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Aquaticweedharvester[edit]

User:Aquaticweedharvester (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:FAKEARTICLE Whpq (talk) 18:19, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

I received notification regarding consideration for deletion. I ask that you please keep this site open. I would definitely like this page to remain and would like to make it public in the future. As our company turned 50 this year, we are finding it more and more important to rely upon the internet as a valuable source of information for our company. Most of our past clients did not rely upon the internet for a source of information, they would call, but as new generations are becoming involved in the decision making of purchasing our product line we realize a larger presence will be necessary. I will continue to work on the page in order to create a valuable source of information.

Thank you, Aquarius Systems Aquaticweedharvester (talk) 15:04, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Junglecat/marriage[edit]

User:Junglecat/marriage (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Per WP:POLEMIC. Gamaliel (talk) 17:08, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Keep: Just like I stated in the abortion discussion, this is another neutrally worded personal opinion infobox, like any other. This user is just stating his side of the sexual preference table; Is Wikipedia now "heterophobic"? Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral, not "pro-gay" or "pro-straight". So if users want people to stop talking about sexual preference opinions, you might as well start nominating every sexuality related infobox, like this one. Or better still, personal opinions shouldn't be given on our userpages anymore....thereby eradicating the use of userbox, since that's what it is for anyway (for personal opinions). Bottomline is, this userbox isn't attacking any group of people...therefore, not Polemic.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:49, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Keep: Nominating this and not User:GlassCobra/SameMarriage at the same time suggests to me this is a politically-based nomination. That's wrong-headed.—Chowbok 00:01, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • I was not aware of the other userbox, but thanks for the evidence-free accusation! Also, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Happy holidays. Gamaliel (talk) 04:14, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Keep: per abuv kip votes. I won't say mre dan dat cuz it mit jst b my lst on Wikipedia. Darreg (talk) 21:17, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

User:SonPraises/ubx/Prolife[edit]

User:SonPraises/ubx/Prolife (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Per WP:POLEMIC. Gamaliel (talk) 17:07, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Keep: This is just a neutrally worded personal opinion userbox, like any other. It is not attacking any group of people; anyone who finds this insulting has his own personal issues. There are userboxes about users disliking acts, music genre, hair colour etc...so what's the issue here? I have userboxes that's about disliking hip hop music, does that mean I'm attacking hip hop artistes? or infact hip hop lovers? This user dislikes abortion.....so who is he attacking? People who's had abortions? c'mon! This is in no way polemic!--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:34, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Keep It's cleverly worded, and is not an attack on any person, therefore it fails WP:POLEMIC. KoshVorlon Rassekali ternii i mlechnye puti 11:54, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Keep. Hardly a polemic.—Chowbok 01:16, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Feriz Omar[edit]

User:Feriz Omar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:FAKEARTICLE, self-promotion in user space, etc. Can't judge content--Crisco 1492, maybe you have advice to offer. Drmies (talk) 15:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete - CV, looks to be for personal advertising. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:03, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. Brandmeistertalk 11:24, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Mamaharriet[edit]

User:Mamaharriet (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Wikipedia is not LinkedIn Whpq (talk) 13:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Bjtalley2[edit]

User:Bjtalley2 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT of Exelis Inc. Whpq (talk) 13:49, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Gregcrumpton[edit]

User:Gregcrumpton (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Wikipedia is not a press release service. Whpq (talk) 13:45, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Grwolf98[edit]

User:Grwolf98 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT Whpq (talk) 12:24, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Kassey Kalleichelven B[edit]

User:Kassey Kalleichelven B (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Wikipedia is not LinkedIn Whpq (talk) 12:23, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

December 20, 2014[edit]

User:AMK152/2ndLady[edit]

User:AMK152/2ndLady (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Per WP:FAKEARTICLE, looks like to the editor's alternative version of Second_Lady_of_the_United_States#List_of_wives_of_the_vice_presidents. WP:BLP concerns as well since no sources are provided. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Comment: Although this and the following nominations are obviously in good faith, I note that AMK152 is still an active editor. It is good practice to discuss concerns about an editor's userspace pages with that editor before nominating them for deletion. Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:20, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Thank-you, Newyorkbrad. — AMK152 (tc) 00:45, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
So should it be a redirect and history-merged? Ok I see. You were working on a table as part of the article and it's now been merged in. I think our general practice is to merge in the edits but if there's a policy rationale to keep it, I'm fine with that. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:48, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Yes. Perhaps the closing admin can do this. — AMK152 (tc) 02:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

I guess I should withdraw this. This history I think references this page which is what's required. - Ricky81682 (talk) 08:17, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

User:AMK152/2000s[edit]

User:AMK152/2000s (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Per WP:FAKEARTICLE, looks like a fork of List of sovereign states in the 2000s. Suggest deletion and that the editor work with others at the mainspace article. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:58, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep and close Actually, it doesn't. It is a draft to make the article into a table, but it should look good, so I create a sandbox to work on so as to test how it could look. It is not complete and I think a half-created table doesn't look good. I did the same thing for the table for Second Lady of the United States at User:AMK152/2ndLady, which took me from July 2011 to February 2013 to complete. Not only that, but the 2nd Ladies table is now a part of the main article. I didn't want the table to be half complete on the article, so I created a sandbox until it was ready. I really don't understand why you are putting these subpages up for deletion instead of asking me about them. You seem to not know the purpose of some of these articles. — AMK152 (tc) 00:18, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
It wasn't edited for almost four years. If you wanted to insert the table now, there's be four years at editing at the article that would have be redone. Otherwise, you'd have to incorporate four years of editing into this table before inserting it in. Also, I don't see a single comment by you at Talk:List_of_sovereign_states_in_the_2000s so that other would know what you're doing. What is you plan, at some point in the future, adding a table in and saying "here's the text from 2010, let's go re-do years of the contents now"? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:04, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
What you are describing could be done with template:inuse. Put up that template and work on the article. It took you a very little bit over a day to finish it and then it sat there for years. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:07, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
It's not yet finished. It still needs work. — AMK152 (tc) 02:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
And yes, it is years old, but it took me almost two years to complete the table for the Second Ladies of the United States article. — AMK152 (tc) 02:17, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

I'll withdraw this. - Ricky81682 (talk) 08:14, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

User:AMK152/ChildrenCivilWar[edit]

User:AMK152/ChildrenCivilWar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Per WP:WEBHOST, I'm not sure this could be a notable list. It seems like a list of sons and daughters of all veterans from the American Civil War which seems too broad and indiscriminate a grouping (it also would be inherited notability based on their parents). I'm not even certain a listing of all veterans from the Civil War would be a good list, let alone a list of their children (dead or alive). Ricky81682 (talk) 22:40, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep and close - no, this is not used as a web host. It is a draft for a future article. It's a list of living sons and daughters. It is still a draft and not ready to be an actual article as I need to collect sources so that it meets Wikipedia's criteria. List of last survivors of historical events and related articles are similar in content type. Why are you nominating subpages for deletion without getting a clear idea to it's purpose? My talk page is only a click a way! — AMK152 (tc) 00:39, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
I get the purpose. It's a userspace draft for an active editor; however there's still BLP issues here and I'm not certain how a list of (I presume) the current list living descendants of civil war veterans could be an article. I see that List of veterans of World War I who died in 1999 means that you could in theory make a series of lists based on them as they died (and I'd still say the veterans are notable, the children are inherited notability) but I don't know why a list of the ones who are living is appropriate. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:00, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Hence, it is not yet an article as it is not yet ready. That is why it is in userspace. — AMK152 (tc) 03:16, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

I question this still but I'll withdraw it as well. - Ricky81682 (talk) 08:15, 22 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Kushal one/Gakhars[edit]

User:Kushal one/Gakhars (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

A fork of Gakhars which this user has been maintaining for seven years clearly with no intention of incorporating it into mainspace. A clear case of using Wikipedia as a free host. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:40, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

User:82.69.111.100/Micheal Verhaag[edit]

User:82.69.111.100/Micheal Verhaag (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT: Has not been edited since February 2013. NorthAmerica1000 11:51, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

User:86.22.202.38/Impekkable[edit]

User:86.22.202.38/Impekkable (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:NOTDIC. WP:STALEDRAFT: Has not been edited since April 2013. NorthAmerica1000 11:42, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

User:99.46.154.137/NORTH CAROLINA[edit]

User:99.46.154.137/NORTH CAROLINA (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT: Has not been edited since July 2013. NorthAmerica1000 11:39, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

User:12.164.168.194/Snoring Group[edit]

User:12.164.168.194/Snoring Group (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT: Has not been edited since September 2013. NorthAmerica1000 11:26, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

User:218.248.7.18/hemanth jannu[edit]

User:218.248.7.18/hemanth jannu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT: Has not been edited since September 2013. NorthAmerica1000 11:24, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

User:PK2/3ZZZ[edit]

User:PK2/3ZZZ (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:FAKEARTICLE. An article already exists at 3ZZZ. WP:STALEDRAFT: Has not been edited since November 2012. NorthAmerica1000 11:17, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

User:15ajad/Ajad Parmar[edit]

User:15ajad/Ajad Parmar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT: Has not been edited since April 2012. NorthAmerica1000 11:12, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

User:176.123.65.5/Babak Azarian[edit]

User:176.123.65.5/Babak Azarian (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT: Has not been edited since June 2013. NorthAmerica1000 11:10, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

User:182.189.113.56/Info Tech[edit]

User:182.189.113.56/Info Tech (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT: Has not been edited since August 2013. An article already exists at Info-Tech Research Group. NorthAmerica1000 11:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

User:37.232.122.218/FC Meeqvse Tbilisi[edit]

User:37.232.122.218/FC Meeqvse Tbilisi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT: Has not been edited since October 2013. NorthAmerica1000 11:00, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

User:195.221.123.215/The Palmashow[edit]

User:195.221.123.215/The Palmashow (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT: Has not been edited since November 2013. NorthAmerica1000 10:59, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

User:2yangk23/Crypton[edit]

User:2yangk23/Crypton (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT: Has not been edited since December 2012. An article already exists at Crypton (particle). NorthAmerica1000 10:55, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

User:72.51.81.34/sweet water tea/ hot water tea[edit]

User:72.51.81.34/sweet water tea/ hot water tea (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT: Has not been edited since October 2013. NorthAmerica1000 10:52, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

User:4interior/Bumbac[edit]

User:4interior/Bumbac (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT: Has not been edited since May 2013. NorthAmerica1000 10:45, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

User:197.253.96.206/Stephenson Adjei Boateng[edit]

User:197.253.96.206/Stephenson Adjei Boateng (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT: Has not been edited since August 2013. NorthAmerica1000 10:37, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Kikiebsen[edit]

User:Kikiebsen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Per WP:FAKEARTICLE — kikichugirl ? 05:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Green mile committee/Green mile project[edit]

User:Green mile committee/Green mile project (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT; user has not edited since September 2008. RJaguar3 | u | t 04:42, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

December 19, 2014[edit]

User:FemmeMetalFan[edit]

User:FemmeMetalFan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:FAKEARTICLE Whpq (talk) 18:26, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

User:RustyDodge77[edit]

User:RustyDodge77 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:FAKEARTICLE Whpq (talk) 18:26, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

User:METHANOL (musical group)[edit]

User:METHANOL (musical group) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:FAKEARTICLE Whpq (talk) 18:23, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Tidiaztv[edit]

User:Tidiaztv (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Wikipedia is not for publishing your biography / hosting your resume Whpq (talk) 18:22, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Creativeindieartists/sandbox[edit]

User:Creativeindieartists/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT Whpq (talk) 18:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

User:20villains10[edit]

User:20villains10 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:FAKEARTICLE. Some of the material appears to have been copied or paraphrased closely from http://www.thevillainsband.com/debut-review/ Whpq (talk) 18:17, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Donnageeee/roslynncobarrubias[edit]

User:Donnageeee/roslynncobarrubias (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT. There is a an article for DJ Rose that could use expansion. However, this draft reads like a series of press releases so would not be suitable for merging. Whpq (talk) 18:13, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Leenerny[edit]

User:Leenerny (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT / WP:FAKEARTICLE - assumed to be same as deleted AFC draft. Whpq (talk) 18:10, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Old business[edit]

December 18, 2014[edit]

User:Mirno/Supercentenarians by country[edit]

User:Mirno/Supercentenarians by country (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

In line with Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Deaths in 2013/My OR stuff and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bensonfood, WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:16, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Delete - Per WP:FAKEARTICLE. Userpage contains information already present in either longevity claims, list of living supercentenarians or the List of <country> supercentenarians pages. User:Mirno is currently blocked for copyright violations. So I don't believe he is able to participate in this discussion. CommanderLinx (talk) 05:02, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a webhosting service. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:36, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST Ca2james (talk) 01:03, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Mirno/Supercentenarians[edit]

User:Mirno/Supercentenarians (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

In line with Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Deaths in 2013/My OR stuff and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bensonfood, WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:16, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a webhosting service. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:37, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST Ca2james (talk) 01:04, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Kotahirauaerima[edit]

User:Kotahirauaerima (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

In line with Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Deaths in 2013/My OR stuff and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bensonfood, WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:10, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Delete There's an existing article about New Zealand supercentenarians. Any salvageable information should go there and not stay on a userpage. CommanderLinx (talk) 05:23, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

As I pointed out on the List of New Zealand supercentenarians talk page, that article is almost entirely OR and the remainder can easily be found elsewhere. If someone else doesn't get around to it, I'll be nominating it for deletion. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 09:32, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a webhosting service. AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:37, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST Ca2james (talk) 01:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject World's Oldest People/Future supercentenarians[edit]

Wikipedia:WikiProject World's Oldest People/Future supercentenarians (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This isn't the typical WikiProject list for potential articles. It's instead a list of BLPs that could become articles. If the editors wanted to start drafts of all these articles, that's one thing but this is not necessary. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:08, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep as I said on a similar MfD, this is a project page. "A list of BLPs that could become articles" is merely PART of the use of the project page, although it is something I never even considered the list to be. Primarily, I considered the list what it mainly is: it is used to help keep the List of living supercentenarians and related articles up to date by having an organized list of information to seek out sources for that article and related articles when such persons reach supercentenarian status. By having an established list of those who are approaching that age, it makes it easier for project members to see which persons are reaching the age of 110, while looking to past sources and seeing if the source has an update to that person's age, being 110 or beyond. Seeking out the same news source for a person's 109th birthday announcement one year later is much easier when you have the link to that article, when searching to see if the 110th birthday was reached. Again, this is a project page, not an actual article. It has more uses than a list of potential articles. In fact, not all supercentenarians have articles. A previous nomination for deletion resulted in keep. — AMK152 (tc) 02:40, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep - As a hypothetical, if I had a list of players currently signed to association football teams in fully professional leagues, that were simply waiting to play in a game to meet WP:NFOOTY, I don't think that'd be a problem. The same is true here. This is a list of topics that may need to be covered, by a specific WikiProject, hosted by that specific WikiProject. This seems like a totally legit use of WP: space. Also, you mention that if this was a list of draft articles, instead of just a list of articles to write, that it would be okay. I really don't see how that argument has any internal congruence. Achowat (talk) 07:19, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete This article has little functionality as a means to an end (tracking possible future supercentenarians as claimed) and is instead being used as an end in itself (there being no apparent standard for inclusion, multiple BLP failures, and no attempt at weeding out out-of-date entries). If this does not exist off-wiki in some for m or other it would not seem difficult for any user(s) to maintain a copy. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 09:39, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment. I can see the rationale for the list, but it clearly needs substantial trimming to comply with policy. For a start, per WP:BLP, all entries must cite a source, and unsourced entries need to be removed. And why does a list of 'future supercentenarians' need to include people who have already been included in our list of living supercentenarians article? AndyTheGrump (talk) 18:44, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
I agree. I'd rather it be deleted and then organized as a proper series of redlinks with names and external links alone with zero details like any project's 'wanted articles' page. That would be the appropriate use of the page for the project. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:32, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Comment Actually, I don't see any problem in trimming it. We are talking about a project page here and not an actual Wikipedia article. — AMK152 (tc) 00:51, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Comment Additionally, it is in table form like List of living supercentenarians because it sorts all needed information. Then, when the needed source is found, the content can be copied and pasted to the List of living supercentenarians article. — AMK152 (tc) 00:54, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
The problem with this approach is that not having reliable sources for information about living or recently-dead people is a BLP violation. Ca2james (talk) 15:57, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
There's still Wikipedia:WikiProject World's Oldest People/Future supercentenarians/Incomplete cases which is really problematic and Wikipedia:WikiProject World's Oldest People/Oldest (known) living people per country which is merely duplicative. I'm waiting to see if the discussion at WP:BLPN goes anywhere about the non-verified names. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:53, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete I sort of see why the list exists but there are a bunch of BLP violations and it isn't clear that the rest are reliably-sourced. A project like this should be for discussing how to generate this type of list, not for including the list itself. If being this age is notable then the list should be in mainspace, not in project space. Also note that the links at the bottom are to the lists on userpages which are all up for deletion. Ca2james (talk) 01:00, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep This list might not be entirely reliable, but that's exactly why it's in the project namespace- it's a source of useful information for editors which, once verified, is added to Wikipedia mainspace. It would be absurd to destroy such a valuable resource on the grounds of notability- for it exists in order to make the main encyclopaedia more reliable!Chessrat (talk) 01:54, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment I have removed all unsourced individuals from the list. — AMK152 (tc) 02:52, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
That is better, although it is difficult to know whether the remaining entries are reliably-sourced. If they are reliably-sourced, why aren't they in an article? I also still have grave concerns about the page linking to pages in userspace. Ca2james (talk) 02:53, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
They can be moved from user space to project space. — AMK152 (tc) 03:12, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Also, they are not in the actual article because the article is for supercentenarians. — AMK152 (tc) 03:13, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep This is an excellent project page that I often refer to. As a project page people ought to be aware of its purpose and not just another article. Alan Davidson (talk) 07:55, 25 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Craho[edit]

User:Craho (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

In line with Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Deaths in 2013/My OR stuff and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bensonfood, WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:07, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST and possibly WP:NOTHERE. Since 18 December 2011, not counting three edits to the Future Supercentenarians page, this user has made ZERO edits outside of their userpage. CommanderLinx (talk) 05:32, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST Ca2james (talk) 01:05, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

User:AMK152/107[edit]

User:AMK152/107 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

In line with Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Deaths in 2013/My OR stuff and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bensonfood, WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:05, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep because first of all, WP:NOTWEBHOST is not relevant. It is not a personal web page or anything else listed under WP:NOTWEBHOST. Additionally, WP:FAKEARTICLE is not relevant. I would be in favor of bringing it over to a project page, but there was a discussion stating that it was not favorable, so I put it on my user page. It is not a fake article, it is not intended to look like an article, nor is it a draft. To say what the page really is, is basically, a sandbox. It is a place to store information in preparation for the List of living supercentenarians article and for those involved in the project to seek out sources for such individuals, so as to keep List of living supercentenarians article up to date more easily. It is not hurting anyone at all, but rather, it is helping WikiProject World's Oldest People, so I don't understand the problem nir the rationale. — AMK152 (tc) 02:29, 19 December 2014 (UTC)
Webhost doesn't mean it's a personal page, it means using Wikipedia to host content. Second, one of the biggest problems I see if that all the people doing this are hindered from actually learning to work and collaborate with others: it becomes a "I disagree with you, I'm copying this into my own page and you can't change it" routine. There's no other reason why there would be so many different versions. If there was a single page and people were actually working to build consensuses and create the articles based on what seems like the most reasonable neutral way to do it, fine, I'd leave you all alone but instead we're getting nothing but "I want my article written my way and no one should stop me." -- Ricky81682 (talk) 22:47, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
That's just it. This is a page for people to work together. It's not "my way" it's for everyone to contribute to. It is a single page. If there is another page like it where other people are working together, please let me know and we can collaborate — AMK152 (tc) 01:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Why isn't everyone working at the WikiProject one? Isn't that the point of creating the project, to centralize discussion? Why are there so many people who create their own userpage lists? This is precisely why I'm asking for that one to be deleted: it seems like people here are just looking to make lists for themselves. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:03, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
I am not really sure about why there is a misunderstanding, but if the Wikiproject page is "A" and this user page is "B," A and B are not overlapping; B is a continuation of A. It's all different information. I would not be opposed to merging the two pages. — AMK152 (tc) 14:53, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
Delete per WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST. If being this old is notable enough for an article then lists like this go in articlespace/mainspace, not userspace. Ca2james (talk) 01:12, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Yes, such an article exisits: List of living supercentenarians. This subpage is used to help keep that article up to date by making it easier to find information when it comes time for the person to be included in the article articlespace. It's not its own entity. It's a project page that supports the main article for reasons I have already given. — AMK152 (tc) 01:16, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Then the information must be merged into the article or deleted; this type of project page is not an appropriate or allowed use of user pages. Ca2james (talk) 01:20, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • The people in this list are not yet supercentenarians. This subpage isn't meant to be an article. It's meant to be a placeholder for content when the right time comes and the right sources are available. I do not yet see how this fails WP:FAKEARTICLE and WP:NOTWEBHOST. — AMK152 (tc) 01:25, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • In that case, the information must be kept off-wiki. Per WP:NOTWEBHOST, it isn't appropriate for project space or user space. Ca2james (talk) 02:50, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • A review of policies again, according to WP:UPYES, this type of subpage is allowed, in particular, what is in bold: "Drafts being written in your own user space because the target page itself is protected, and notes and working material for articles (Some content may not be kept indefinitely)." - that is what it is: "working material." And the content is not kept indefinitely. — AMK152 (tc) 03:13, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
@AMK152: You said above "I would be in favor of bringing it over to a project page, but there was a discussion stating that it was not favorable." Why was it deemed not favorable and can you point to that discussion? – JBarta (talk) 21:17, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
I looked back, and I don't believe there was a discussion, or at least I cannot find it. It was back in 2010, when this user subpage was created, I moved the content for those born in 1902 and 1903 to my userpage. See history link here. NickOrnstein removed a large chunk of the list. There appears not to be a discussion, or that I can find, so I must have moved the information to preserve it as many people have since retained the list. Eventually, it evolved into the "107" list and the Wikiproject page Wikipedia:WikiProject World's Oldest People/Future supercentenarians evolved into 108+. We just never put the two back together, but I wouldn't be opposed to that, it might make it easier as well. — AMK152 (tc) 03:25, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
What is the point of all this? This is a page of people who were born in 1907 (or very late 1906) based (in part, some have nothing) on articles that just state "someone was 107 years old" to me. That's still two years until they become a supercentenarian from today, assuming they live then. By definition, any name on this list will be stagnant for at least two years. That seems entirely unnecessary. Same with 108 and one year. Are any of these considered notable centenarians and added to those articles? If the goal is truly to have supercentenarians, why would you even need lists of people who won't be there for one to two years? Is it really that critical to be on the lookout for some secret hidden 110 year old? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 00:05, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

Similar age related lists also in userspace that may copy/overlap existing articles or other lists deleted/pending deletion:

– JBarta (talk) 22:38, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Michelangelo122/World's Oldest Living Men[edit]

User:Michelangelo122/World's Oldest Living Men (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

In line with Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Deaths in 2013/My OR stuff and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bensonfood, WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE concerns. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:05, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Why this version? Are you going to be asking for every person's single table to be moved there? Is the Wikia supposed to be a place where people can all make up various lists? I'm pretty that if it is deleted, it would be acceptable for me to send you the actual markup providing that Wikia acknowledge that the article came this Wikipedia page (I'm sure there's a template there for this licensing issue). -- Ricky81682 (talk) 19:11, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
Struck as unnecessarily argumentative. I believe the onus is on the person from the relevant Wikia project to ask for the content. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 18:17, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:FAKEARTICLE. Ca2james (talk) 01:13, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete Violates several policies (WP:NOTWEBHOST, etc) and possibly WP:NOTHERE. User has made little to no edits outside of other longevity userpages (all up for deletion). CommanderLinx (talk) 14:52, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete I had seen this earlier and meant to nominate on more or less the same grounds as CommanderLinx. Canadian Paul 23:54, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment If anyone else confused by the number of editors still working on this list during this discussion? A cursory glance at the prior discussions shows that this isn't likely to remain and I don't get why this list is favored over the ones at the WikiProject. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:03, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Tanough/SC Portal[edit]

User:Tanough/SC Portal (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:Tanough/Oldest relatives (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:Tanough/SC Portal/Oldest people/Spain (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:Tanough/SC Portal/Table A (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:Tanough/SC Portal/Table B (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User:Tanough/Top 10 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Inappropriate portal. Portal:Supercentenarians currently exists and a userspace version is not needed. This contains numerous possible BLP violations and should be deleted. Also listing the various subpages as they are all related. Ricky81682 (talk) 21:54, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

  1. SC Portal = Available in List of Spanish supercentenarians
  2. Oldest people/Spain = Blanked, but the information already exists in List of Spanish supercentenarians
  3. Table A = Copied straight from Oldest_people#Verified_supercentenarians_who_died_before_1955
  4. Table B = Available in List of the verified oldest people

Oldest relatives is trivia about the user and Top 10 is just the oldest top 10 living people in the world. Just a copy of the top ten from the List of living supercentenarians page but at certain points in time. Which pretty much fails WP:TRIVIA and WP:OR CommanderLinx (talk) 05:16, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete all as inappropriate use of userspace and BLP violations. Dougweller (talk)

User:Mathmo/October man sequence[edit]

User:Mathmo/October man sequence (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Editor using his userspace to make PUA pseudoscience guides. Bosstopher (talk) 12:33, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

December 17, 2014[edit]

User:Avradio/sandbox[edit]

User:Avradio/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT written in a promotional tone. Whpq (talk) 19:15, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Dicoogle[edit]

Draft:Dicoogle (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Repeatedly submitted, but remains non-notable, and essentially an advertisement. DGG ( talk ) 10:09, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Stevel5280/sandbox[edit]

User:Stevel5280/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:14, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete - Insufficient material to promote as an article, and is a stale draft. -- Whpq (talk) 12:19, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

December 16, 2014[edit]

User:Blueheart523[edit]

User:Blueheart523 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Stale draft of Su Ning. Whpq (talk) 16:04, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete. There should be no copies of existing articles. -- P 1 9 9   17:31, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Akilios/Skills of managers would differ in different managerial levels[edit]

User:Akilios/Skills of managers would differ in different managerial levels (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT / Essay. Whpq (talk) 15:05, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete as per nom. -- P 1 9 9   17:25, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Autofixing cites[edit]

Wikipedia:Autofixing cites (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Not sure how to classify this; a failed proposal perhaps for another approach to broken refs. But there was no interest in it, the templates were TfD and userfied, and without them it's a confusing mess with the examples broken and unlikely ever to be fixed. Could be marked as historical or a failed proposal but as it was never adopted or seriously considered probably deletion/userfication is best. JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 14:51, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Userfy, linked in several places. Graham87 04:15, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Userfy and mark as failed proposal We've decided that autofixing isn't a good thing. Jackmcbarn (talk) 16:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

December 15, 2014[edit]

User:Epiphanycastro[edit]

User:Epiphanycastro (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:FAKEARTICLE Whpq (talk) 14:34, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete as per nom. -- P 1 9 9   15:36, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Marc d[edit]

User:Marc d (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:STALEDRAFT. An article exists at Marc Danzeisen Whpq (talk) 14:32, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete as duplicate of existing article. -- P 1 9 9   15:35, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Sam Schwenneker[edit]

User:Sam Schwenneker (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:FAKEARTICLE Whpq (talk) 14:29, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Dejonpiere[edit]

User:Dejonpiere (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:FAKEARTICLE Whpq (talk) 14:27, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

User:Paradox Flow[edit]

User:Paradox Flow (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

WP:FAKEARTICLE Whpq (talk) 14:26, 15 December 2014 (UTC)


December 11, 2014[edit]

December 7, 2014[edit]

Wikipedia:Department of Fun/Word Association/Hardcore Ultra[edit]

Wikipedia:Department of Fun/Word Association/Hardcore Ultra (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Out of all the Word Association variants, this one crashed and burned like a white hot Blue Falcon falling off the track and into a building. The rest of the new variants are successful, so those should be kept. Although, Adamantine association may also need to be clipped if it doesn't go to Round 2 in a month or so. James1011R (talk, contribs) 10:10, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

  • Question. What would be the benefit to the project in deleting this page? Thryduulf (talk) 10:30, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Answer. To cull a variant that failed to catch on, so Word Associators can play more successful ones. James1011R (talk, contribs) 10:41, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
      • Is there any evidence that the existence of this page is preventing them doing that? Thryduulf (talk) 10:52, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
        • Actually, no. But this WA's idea was flawed. James1011R (talk, contribs) 11:02, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
          • So basically you just don't like it? Thryduulf (talk) 12:15, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment If it failed, why not just remove it from the template and mark inactive? SnowFire (talk) 19:01, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
    • Sounds like a plan. James1011R (talk, contribs) 21:29, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
      • Looking at the editing history of all the games, this one doesn't seem to be significantly out of step with the activity of the other grid games over the past ~18 months. Why do you say this particular one has failed? Thryduulf (talk) 22:58, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
        • It has never hit game 2, unlike all the other grid games except Adamantine (EG and Flatline are going especially well). James1011R (talk, contribs) 02:22, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete - There are game sites for a reason, "Fun" or not I see no point in this even being here, That said I even find "Wikipedia Adventures" to be utterly pointless. –Davey2010(talk) 08:31, 14 December 2014 (UTC)

Closed discussions[edit]

For archived Miscellany for deletion debates see the MfD Archives.