Wikipedia:Peer review/Viewtiful Joe/archive1

Viewtiful Joe[edit]

This article has been greatly expanded and sourced in the past several months. As Viewtiful Joe is considered a highly acclaimed game, I would like an idea on how to improve it further for possible Good Article status and/or for potential readers who want complete and concise information on the title. ~ Hibana 03:28, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, this is rather impressive. I haven't been around long, but it looks like you've covered all your bases, with every section fleshed out in detail and backed by extensive references. From a quick read-through, the only thing I can point out is in the Reviews section: "Gamespy notes that the bosses are too easy and that it would have been better to have given each one a specific weakness." This sounds contradictory... Anyway, it looks more like FA material to me! Nice work. BlazerKnight (talk) 03:26, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I think you should present it as an FA candidate, and any problems will be addressed by the FA reviewers.--_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 00:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]