Wikipedia:Copyright problems

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This page has a backlog that requires the attention of one or more administrators.
This notice is automatically updated by DpmukBOT (talk) and will no longer be displayed when the backlog is cleared.
Noticeboards and related pages (Dashboard)
General
Content
User issues
Noticeboards
WP:CP redirects here. You may be looking for Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing, Wikipedia:Community portal, Wikipedia:Child protection, or Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
Wikipedia copyright
Policy
Guidelines
Processes
Resources
Shortcuts:

This page is for listing and discussing possible copyright problems involving text on Wikipedia, including pages which are suspected to be copyright violations. Listings typically remain for at least five days before review and closure by a copyright problems clerk or administrator. During this time, interested contributors are invited to offer feedback about the problem at the relevant talk page, to propose revisions to the material, or to request copyright permission. After the listing period, a copyright problems board clerk or administrator will review the listing and take what further action may be necessary.

Articles listed for copyright review appear in the bottom section of the page. The top includes information for people who have copyright concerns about articles or images, for those whose articles have been tagged for concerns, for community volunteers who'd like to help resolve concerns and for the clerks and administrators who volunteer here.

If you believe a Wikipedia article has infringed on your copyright, please see special note below.
If an article you created has been marked as a copyright problem and you own copyright in the original publication (or have permission from the owner), please see this section.

Contents

[edit] Handling previously published text on Wikipedia

For more details on this topic, see Wikipedia:Copy-paste.

Under the United States law that governs Wikipedia, copyright is automatically assumed as soon as any content (text or other media) is created in a physical form. An author does not need to apply for or even claim copyright, for a copyright to exist.

Only one of the following allows works to be reused in Wikimedia projects:

A) Explicit Statement. An explicit statement (by the author, or by the holder of the rights to the work) that the material is either:

B) Public Domain. If the work is inherently in the public domain, due to its age or source; or

C) Fair Use. United States law allows for fair use of copyrighted content, and (within limits) Wikipedia does as well. Under guidelines for non-free content, brief selections of copyrighted text may be used, but only if clearly marked and with full attribution.

Even if a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, material should be properly attributed in accordance with Wikipedia:Plagiarism. This is not only a matter of respecting local custom. When content is under a license that is compatible with Wikipedia's license, proper attribution may be required. If the terms of the compatible license are not met, use of the content can constitute a violation of copyright even if the license is compatible.

[edit] Repeated copyright violations

Contributors who repeatedly post copyrighted material (text or images) may be subject to contributor copyright investigations, to help ensure the removal from the project of all copyrighted material posted in contravention of policy. Contributors who repeatedly post copyrighted material after appropriate warnings will be blocked from editing, to protect the project; see 17 United States Code § 512.

[edit] Backwards copying: when Wikipedia had (or may have had) it first

In some instances, it is clear that two pieces of text (one on Wikipedia, and one elsewhere) are copies of each other, but not clear which piece is the original and which is the copy. "Compliant" sites that copy Wikipedia text note that they have done so, but not all of our re-users are compliant.

If you've found such a case, you might first check the discussion page to see if a note has been added to the top of the talk page allay people's concerns. If not, you can look for clues. Do other pages in the other website copy other Wikipedia articles? Did the content show up on Wikipedia all in once piece, placed by a single editor? If you don't see good evidence that Wikipedia had it first, it's a good idea to bring it up for investigation. You might follow the Instructions for listing below or tag the article {{copy-paste|url=possible source}} so that others can evaluate. If you confirm definitely that the content was on Wikipedia first, please consider adding {{backwardscopy}} to the article's talk page with an explanation of how you know.

If you see an article somewhere else which was copied from Wikipedia without attribution, you might visit the CC-BY-SA compliance page or Wikipedia:Mirrors and forks.

[edit] Instructions for listing text-based copyright concerns

Shortcut:
Copyright owners: If you believe Wikipedia is infringing your copyright, you may request immediate removal of the copyright violation. Alternatively, you may contact Wikipedia's designated agent under the terms of the Online Copyright Infringement Liability Limitation Act. You are also welcome to follow the procedures here. See the copyright policy for more information.

[edit] Blatant infringement

Blatant copyright infringements may be speedily deleted if:

  • Content was copied from a source which does not have a license compatible with Wikipedia, and the content was copied from that source to Wikipedia and not the other way around (Wikipedia has numerous mirrors);
  • The page can neither be restored to a previous revision without infringing content, nor would the page be viable if the infringing content were removed.
  • There is no credible assertion of public domain, fair use, or a free license.

To nominate an article for speedy deletion for copyright concerns, add one of these to the page:

Both of these templates will generate a notice that you should give the contributor of the content. This is important to help ensure that they do not continue to add copyrighted content to Wikipedia. An administrator will examine the article and decide whether to delete it or not. You should not blank the page in this instance.

[edit] Suspected or complicated infringement

If infringement is not blatant or the speedy deletion criteria do not apply:

  • Remove the infringing text or revert the page to a non-copyrighted version if you can.
    The infringing text will remain in the page history for archival reasons unless the copyright holder asks the Wikimedia Foundation to remove it (unless it is tagged for {{copyvio-revdel}}. Please note the reason for removal in the edit summary and at the article's talk page (you may wish to use {{subst:cclean}}). When possible, please identify and alert the contributor of the material to the problem. The template {{Uw-copyright}} may be used for this purpose.
  • However, if all revisions have copyright problems, the removal of the copyright problem is contested, or reversion/removal is otherwise complicated:
  • Replace the text with one of the following:

    {{subst:copyvio|url=insert URL here}}

    {{subst:copyvio|identify non-web source here}}

  • Go to today's section and add

    * {{subst:article-cv|PageName}} from [insert URL or identify non-web source here] ~~~~

    to the bottom of the list. Put the page's name in place of "PageName". If you do not have a URL, enter a description of the source. (This text can be copied from the top of the template after substituting it and the page name and url will be filled for you)
  • Advise the contributor of the material at their talk page. The template on the now blanked page supplies a notice you may use for that purpose.

[edit] Instructions for special cases

  • Probable copyvios without a known source: If you suspect that an article contains a copyright violation, but you cannot find a source for the violation (so you can't be sure that it's a violation), do not list it here. Instead, place {{cv-unsure|~~~|2=FULL_URL}} on the article's talk page, but replace FULL_URL with the full URL of the article version that you believe contains a violation. (To determine the URL, click on "Permanent link" in the toolbox area, and copy the URL.)
  • Instances where one contributor has verifiably introduced copyright problems into multiple articles or files and assistance is needed in further review: See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations.

[edit] Instructions for handling image copyright concerns

For more details on this topic, see Wikipedia:Guide to image deletion.

Image copyright concerns are not handled on this board. For images that are clear copyright violations, follow the procedure for speedy deletion; list images that are suspected to be copyright violations at possibly unfree images and images with disputed fair use rationales at Non-free content review. To request assistance with contributors who have infringed copyright in multiple articles or files, see Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations.

[edit] Responding to articles listed for copyright investigation

Copyright owners and people editing on their behalf or with their permission, please see below.

Any contributor is welcome to help investigate articles listed for copyright concerns, although only administrators, copyright problems board clerks, and OTRS team members should remove {{copyvio}} tags and mark listings resolved.

Assistance might include supplying evidence of non-infringement (or, conversely, of infringement) or obtaining and verifying permission of license. You might also help by rewriting problematic articles.

[edit] Supplying evidence of non-infringement

Articles are listed for copyright investigation because contributors have reason to suspect they constitute a copyright concern, but not every article listed here is actually a copyright problem. Sometimes, the content was on Wikipedia first. Sometimes, the article is public domain or compatibly licensed. Sometimes, the person who placed it here is the copyright owner and this simply needs to be verified.

If you can provide information to prove license or public domain status of the article, please do. It doesn't matter if you do it under the listing for the article on the copyright problems board or on the talk page of the article; a link or a clear explanation can be very helpful when a clerk or administrator evaluates the matter. (As listings are not immediately addressed on the board, it may take a few days after you make your note before response is provided.)

If the article is tagged for {{copyvio}}, you should allow an administrator or copyright problems clerk to remove the tag. If the article is tagged for {{copy-paste}} or {{close paraphrasing}}, you may remove the tag from the article when the problem is addressed (or disproven), but please do not close the listing on the copyright problems board itself.

[edit] Obtaining/verifying permission

Sometimes material was placed on Wikipedia with the permission of the copyright owner. Sometimes copyright owners are willing to give permission (and proper license!) even if it was not.

Any contributor can write to the owner of copyright and check whether they gave or will give permission (or maybe they in fact posted it here!). See Wikipedia:Example requests for permission. In either case, unless a statement authorizing the material under compatible license is placed online at the point of original publication, permission will need to be confirmed through e-mail to the Wikimedia Foundation. See Wikipedia:Confirmation of permission. If a compatible license is placed online at the point of original publication, please provide a link to that under the listing for the article on the copyright problems board or on the talk page of the article.

Please note that it may take a few days for letters to clear once they are sent. Do not worry if the content is deleted prematurely; it can be restored at any point usable permission is logged.

[edit] Rewriting content

Any contributor may rewrite articles that are or seem to be copyight problems to exclude duplicated or closely paraphrased text. When articles or sections of articles are blanked as copyright problems, this is done on a temporary page at Talk:PAGENAME/Temp so that the new material can be copied over the old. (The template blanking the article will link to the specific temporary page.) If you use any text at all from the earlier version of the article, please leave a note at the talk page of the article to alert the administrator or clerk who addresses the listing. The history of the old article will then have to be retained. (If the original turns out to be non-infringing, the two versions of the article can be merged.)

Rewrites can be done directly in articles that have been tagged for {{close paraphrasing}} and {{copy-paste}}, with those tags removed after the rewrite is complete.

Please review Wikipedia:Copy-paste and the linked guidelines and policies within it if necessary to review Wikipedia's practices for handling non-free text. Reviewing Wikipedia:Plagiarism is also helpful, particularly where content is compatibly licensed or public domain. Repairing these issues can sometimes be as simple as supplying proper attribution.

[edit] Copyright owners who submitted their own work to Wikipedia (or people editing on their behalf)

Policy shortcut:

If you submitted work to Wikipedia which you had previously published and your submission was marked as a potential infringement of copyright, then stating on the article's talk page that you are the copyright holder of the work (or acting as his or her agent), while not likely to prevent deletion, helps. To completely resolve copyright concerns, it is sufficient to either:

See also Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.

Please note that it may take a bit of time for letters and e-mails to clear once they are sent. Do not worry if the content is deleted prematurely; it can be restored at any point usable permission is logged. Your e-mail will receive a response whether the permission is usable or not. If you have not received a response to your letter within two weeks, it is a good idea to follow up.

One other factor you should consider, however, is that content that has been previously published elsewhere may not meet Wikipedia's specific guidelines and policies. If you are not familiar with these policies and guidelines, please review especially the core policies that govern the project. This may help prepare you to deal with any other issues with the text that may arise.

Should you choose to rewrite the content rather than release it under the requisite license, please see above.

[edit] Information about the people who process copyright problems listed on the board

[edit] Copyright problems board clerks

For a more complete description of clerks and their duties, as well as a list of active clerks, please see Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Clerks.

Copyright problems board clerks are experienced editors on Wikipedia who have demonstrated familiarity with Wikipedia's approach to non-free text and its processes for dealing with them. They are trusted to evaluate and close listings, although their closures may sometimes require completion by administrators, when use of administrative tools is required. Clerks are periodically reviewed by the administrators who work in copyright areas on Wikipedia.

[edit] Copyright problems board administrators

For a more complete description of administrators on Wikipedia, please see Wikipedia:Administrators.

Any administrator may work the copyright problems board. Working the copyright problems board may involve evaluating listings personally or using tools as necessary to complete closures by clerks. Clerks have been evaluated in their work, and their recommendations may be implemented without double-checking, although any administrator is welcome to review recommendations and discuss them with the clerks in question.

[edit] Closing listings

Pages should stay listed for a minimum of 5 days before they are checked and processed by copyright problems board clerks, 7 days before they are checked or processed by administrators, who close the daily listings. OTRS agents who verify images may close listings at any time.

For advice for resolving listings, see:

The templates collected at Template:CPC may be useful for administrators, clerks and OTRS agents noting resolution.

[edit] Listings of possible copyright problems

[edit] Very old issues

[edit] Older than 7 days

Below are articles that have been listed here for longer than 7 days. At this point, they may be processed by any administrator (see WP:CPAA). When every ticket on a day is clear, the day may be removed.

[edit] 16 February 2012

[edit] Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Out of date clock icon.svg User was not notified, relisting under today's entry. Have converted this to a copyvio tagging and have notified the user. Copying is obviously rife but I think it's not impossible that we may get permission if the user returns. --Dpmuk (talk) 05:34, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Items from User:DpmukBOT/Backlog:

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Dpmuk (talk) 05:09, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Some fo what's left has some phrases taken from elsewhere but I don't think any of it's bad enough to be a concern --Dpmuk (talk) 05:04, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Text had been removed at same tame as tag was added. I'd have presumptively removed given the apparent source and the editor having a history of copyvio problems (and a CCI). --Dpmuk (talk) 04:47, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Dpmuk (talk) 05:20, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Dpmuk (talk) 04:40, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Article redirected to a non-infringing target. --Dpmuk (talk) 04:34, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

End. MER-C 03:03, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] 17 February 2012

[edit] Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. And a huge amount of revdeling. --Dpmuk (talk) 05:49, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Out of date clock icon.svg User was not notified, relisting under today's entry. Permission doesn't seem impossible given the similarity between the user name and the author of the source. Clear copyvio delete if no permission is forthcoming (website is CC-BY-NC-ND) --Dpmuk (talk) 21:23, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
Note. The website may grant permission for their content and the pdf, but I highly doubt the book (Marketing Metrics: The Definitive Guide to Measuring Marketing Performance) will be given a CC-BY-SA 3.0. It's copyright to Pearson Education. Many articles edited/created by the editor who created this one now contain or consist almost entirely of lengthy quotes from this book. All these probably need to be checked for not complying with the Non-free content criteria if the book permission isn't forthcoming in the OTRS. Voceditenore (talk) 12:05, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg OTRS Ticket received, article now licensed and compatible with CC-BY-SA. --Voceditenore (talk) 13:34, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
    But note that the book contents (see above) which are extensively used in other articles does not appear to be licensed yet. Those articles need to be checked (see link above). Voceditenore (talk) 13:34, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg No source found; copy-paste tag removed and cv-unsure tag placed at article talk. I've also boldly redirected this as a normal editor. Seems to be primary intended to promote one person and their theory and had many problems, including being inaccessible --Dpmuk (talk) 22:01, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Voceditenore (talk) 15:43, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] 18 February 2012

[edit] Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

Items from User:DpmukBOT/Backlog:

End. MER-C 01:20, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] 19 February 2012

[edit] Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

Torture during the 2011–2012 Bahraini uprising (history · last edit) from http://files.bici.org.bh/BICIreportEN.pdf. Extensive and foundational. Duplication Detector won't work (times out) as the source is a 500+ page pdf. The above source is from a website clearly marked Copyright 2011 © Bahrain Independent Commission of Inquiry. This source is the most prevalently copied, but there may be infringement from other sources listed. Voceditenore (talk) 16:45, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

  • There has been a re-write at Talk:Torture during the 2011–2012 Bahraini uprising/Temp. However, it needs to be carefully rechecked in toto before using and probably needs rev-del as well. The creator continued to add verbatim or virtually verbatim material into it in the process of re-writing [2], [3] (I spotted yet more yesterday), only attempts repair it when it's pointed out., and then uses very close paraphrasing of the original. Voceditenore (talk) 08:05, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Public_Security_Forces (history · last edit) from http://files.bici.org.bh/BICIreportEN.pdf. See above: same contributor, same source. Nikkimaria (talk) 17:39, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting wait red.svg Article cleaned, still needs a history purge to remove original copyvio. --Nikkimaria (talk) 18:05, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
    Nikkimaria (talk) 18:05, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Article redirected to a non-infringing target. --Dpmuk (talk) 23:28, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Items from User:DpmukBOT/Backlog:

  • Pictogram voting support.svg Backwardscopy. Tag and explanation placed at talk page. Explanation by User:Dbachmann --Dpmuk (talk) 23:12, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Dpmuk (talk) 21:25, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Article redirected to a non-infringing target. --Dpmuk (talk) 21:14, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg OTRS Ticket received, article now licensed and compatible with CC-BY-SA. --Dpmuk (talk) 21:03, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

End. MER-C 01:20, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] 20 February 2012

[edit] Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Symbol redirect vote.svg Article redirected to a non-infringing target. --Dpmuk (talk) 03:33, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Dpmuk (talk) 03:44, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Dpmuk (talk) 03:47, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] 21 February 2012

[edit] Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Pictogram voting support.svg No copyright concern. Material PD or appropriately licensed for use. In short the answer is no, there's no concern here. Facts and ideas are not copyrightable (see Copyright law of the United States#Idea/expression dichotomy and User:Moonriddengirl/Copyright in lists for more on this), although the way they're expressed often is. In this instant these lists bear very little resemblance to the source - there's different information in the list, different people included, we have our own criteria for inclusion for those lists that are subjective etc so there's no concern there either. --Dpmuk (talk) 19:53, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Dpmuk (talk) 22:55, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting question.svg No vio found, claim cannot be validated. Tag removed from article. natural evolution of the text. One single edit from August 2006 could possibly be at issue, but without a source, no conclusions can be drawn. --MLauba (Talk) 09:48, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Items from User:DpmukBOT/Backlog:

End. MER-C 02:31, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] 22 February 2012

[edit] Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • I think it's clear that one has used the other as a basis for their description but it's far less certain what way round it is. In my opinion, however, if we based our article on theirs I don't think we have a copyright concern as a) there is enough evidence there that the editor started with the facts and wrote their own sections and b) I don't think the paraphrasing is close enough. However I'm still not that confident in making paraphrasing calls so would appreciate a second opinion. Dpmuk (talk) 20:27, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Dpmuk (talk) 20:06, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Dpmuk (talk) 19:58, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] 23 February 2012

[edit] Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

Items from User:DpmukBOT/Backlog:

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. --Dpmuk (talk) 16:24, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article cleaned by investigator or others. No remaining infringement. Manually listed on 15 Feb by user noticing it had not yet been dealt with --Dpmuk (talk) 16:29, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

End. MER-C 06:17, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] New listings

Entries in this section are newer than 7 days and should not be closed by an administrator. This gives time for the original authors of the article to deal with the problem.

[edit] Older than 5 days

Below are articles that have been listed here for longer than 5 days. At this point, they may be processed by a copyright problems board clerk. After 7 days, they may be closed by an administrator.

[edit] 24 February 2012

[edit] Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg OTRS Ticket received, article now licensed and compatible with CC-BY-SA. --— madman 22:22, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Items from User:DpmukBOT/Backlog:

End. MER-C 03:51, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

  • Clerk note: User:Madman is now running a mirror of CSB as of today. Please check the above section. MER-C 10:52, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] 25 February 2012

[edit] Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

[edit] Recent listings

Below are articles that have been listed here for 5 days or less. Anyone in the community may help clarify the copyright status on these. See the section on responding for more information.

[edit] 26 February 2012

[edit] Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

[edit] 27 February 2012

[edit] Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

Items from User:DpmukBOT/Backlog:

End. MER-C 02:40, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

[edit] 28 February 2012

[edit] Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

[edit] 29 February 2012

[edit] Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)
  • Pictogram voting keep.svg OTRS Ticket received, article now licensed and compatible with CC-BY-SA. --— madman 20:36, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] 1 March 2012

[edit] Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

Helena Kadare (history · last edit) from [13]. was prevously tagged by search bot, author changed a few words and removed the tag. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:50, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

[edit] 2 March 2012

[edit] Copyright investigations (manual article tagging)

[edit] Footer

Wikipedia's current date is March 2, 2012. Put new article listings in Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2012 March 2. Images should be handled by speedy deletion, possibly unfree files or Wikipedia:Non-free content review.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Copyright_problems&oldid=479738464"
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export
Languages