Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files
This page is for listing and discussing files that are marked as available under a free license or public domain, but have disputed source or licensing information. Files are listed here for 14 days before they are processed. Files that are tagged with a non-free template should not be listed here.
To list texts with copyright issues, please use WP:Copyright problems.
[edit] Instructions
| Deletion templates (policy · log) |
|
{{copyvio}}Copyvios (howto · log) |
| Articles (howto · log) |
|
{{relist}} · {{subst:prod|why}} |
| Templates (howto · log) |
|
{{tfd|template}} |
| Categories (howto · log) |
|
{{cfdnotice}} · {{cfr-speedy}} {{subst:cfm| }} · {{subst:cfr| }} |
| Stub types |
| {{sfd-t}} · {{sfd-c}} · {{sfd-r}} |
| Mergers |
|
{{merge}} |
| Page moves |
| {{subst:move|Newname}} |
| Speedy |
|
{{db-author}} · {{db-web}} |
| Unfree files |
|
{{puf}} · {{Ffd}} |
| Transwiki (howto · log) |
|
{{Copy to Meta}} |
Before listing, remember that files which are already marked unfree and used under fair use should not be listed here.
To list an file on this page:
| I |
Edit the file page.
Add {{puf|date=23 February 2012}} to the file page. If the file is in use, also add {{pufc|File_name.ext|date=23 February 2012}} to the caption(s). |
|---|---|
| II |
Create its PUF subsection.
Follow this edit link and list the file using {{subst:puf2|image=File_name.ext|reason=reason}} ~~~~ (remember to exclude the File: prefix). |
| III |
Give due notice.
Inform the uploader by adding a message to their talk page using {{subst:fdw-puf|File_name.ext}} ~~~~
|
Unlike Wikipedia:Files for deletion the primary purpose of this page is to ascertain the source and/or copyright status of a file. Therefore it is not specifically a vote to keep or delete but a forum for the exploration of the copyright status/source of a file and contributions should not be added solely in those terms.
Listings should be processed by an administrator after being listed for 14 days. Files that are accepted following this fourteen-day period should have {{oldpuffull}} added to the file talk page. If no objection to the file's deletion is raised, or no proof that the file is indeed free is provided, the file may be deleted without further notice after the 14-day period.
Note: Files can be unlisted immediately if they are indisputably in the public domain or verifiably licensed under an indisputably free license (GFDL, CC-BY-SA, etc.—see Wikipedia:File copyright tags for more on these).
[edit] Speedy deletion
Blatant copyright violations or files missing source or license information may be "speedied"
If a file is unquestionably copied from another website and no assertion of permission or fair use is made, the file may be speedy deleted under criterion F9 (formerly I9). Such files do not need to be listed here. Please tag the file with {{subst:db-f9|url=source URL}} and warn the user with {{Nothanks-sd}}.
If a file is missing source, evidence of permission, or license information, place either use:
or
- {{subst:npd}} for No evidence of permission
on the description page to put the file in the appropriate category. After being tagged for 7 days, the file will be eligible for speedy deletion per criterion 4 or criterion 11 for images/media.
Please also notify the uploader so they get a chance to fix the problem(s). The templates {{subst:File source|File:file name}} and {{image copyright}} are made for this purpose, but feel free to write a message of your own. It is not necessary to warn the uploader about every individual file if they have uploaded several of such files, but at least one message telling them that files without source/license will be deleted should be given to each user.
If a file is indisputably non-free, and its possible use can comply with our non-free content policy, be bold and retag it as a non-free file with an appropriate tag instead of taking it to this page.
Please note that this page is not for disputing the fair use of already non-free media, but for the disputing if a freely licensed file really is free. Please take queries of this nature to Files for deletion or Non-free content review An archiving system was implemented July 2007. For older discussions, see the history pages. For all discussions from July 3, 2007 forward, see the Archive.
[edit] Holding cell
- These files have been listed for at least 14 days. Files that have been determined to be acceptable may be removed from this page.
[edit] New listings
[edit] February 10
[edit] File:Ghibli Susuwatari.jpg
- File:Ghibli Susuwatari.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Japan has no FoP for 3D or 2D artworks (Not sure if this image is 2D or 3D!) Ronhjones (Talk) 02:03, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- Since it's in an article about the character, we could use it as a non-free file. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:15, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:K2010 09 3277 v01 Col d'Aubisque, Pyrenees.JPG
- 3D artwork, No FoP in France - I see a date of 1948 - won't be PD until at least 2018 - longer if the creator can be identified. Ronhjones (Talk) 02:09, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- * I don't understand this fuss. I took the photograph at the Col d'Aubisque in September 2009 as it shows in the title. In the comments I clearly stated that I both created and uploaded the picture and that I release all copyright worldwide. 1948 is the date the memorial was erected, it has nothing to do with copyright. Chienlit (talk) 06:56, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- The underlying statue / memorial is also copyrighted. As such, a photograph of it is pretty-much automatically non-free for our standards. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:02, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- * I don't understand this fuss. I took the photograph at the Col d'Aubisque in September 2009 as it shows in the title. In the comments I clearly stated that I both created and uploaded the picture and that I release all copyright worldwide. 1948 is the date the memorial was erected, it has nothing to do with copyright. Chienlit (talk) 06:56, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Are you seriously saying that you cannot use any photograph of a sculpture in France until 70 years after the death of the sculpture? If so, what about images such as this, this or this from WP Commons? -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 07:25, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- When were those made? They should probably all be put up for deletion. France has essentially no FOP, so even a picture of only the glass pyramid at the Louvre would be non-free. There is de minimis, but it could not apply to any of the images you've linked to. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:36, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- Presumably, you will now go through the entire category on Commons and flag them as well in your passion for deletion. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 08:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- I suggest that you read commons:COM:FOP#France which tells what you can and can't do with French buildings and statues. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Presumably, you will now go through the entire category on Commons and flag them as well in your passion for deletion. -- Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 08:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- No, that would require taking the time to see which are PD and which are not. I'd much rather create content here. Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:54, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Infringes sculptor's copyright. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep The sculptor clearly wished his work to be freely viewed, all over the world, forever, commemorating a prisoner (probably a personal friend} whose maltreatment in a German prison meant that he never saw his homeland again. I may be one small voice crying for freedom and flexibility, but Reductio ad absurdum is no way to build an encyclopaedia, and does not reflect the spirit of 1948.Chienlit (talk) 19:41, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- Change to non-free: But alas, that does not affect its intellectual property status. ViperSnake151 Talk 19:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Efrancis.jpg
- File:Efrancis.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Doesn't seem to be any CC-licensed pictures on the website, so licensing information is doubtful. Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:58, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:OphthalmologyClinicBushmich.jpg
- Unknown copyright status. Description clearly implies that the uploader is not the copyright owner as claimed in the tag. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:50, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Fly-crop.jpg
- File:Fly-crop.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The source is claimed to be de:Bild:MZ-wikipedia fliege.jpg. The German file was deleted in 2009 because the file was moved to Commons:
- 2009-10-08T10:07:11 JuTa (Diskussion | Beiträge) löschte „Datei:MZ-wikipedia fliege.jpg“ (Eine identische Datei ist auf Commons verfügbar, alle Referenzen wurden ersetzt. Sämtliche Metainformationen wurden korrekt übertragen.)
However, File:A Fly by Matthias Zimmermann.jpg is a completely different photo. The correct one is neither in Commons:Category:Sarcophaga carnaria nor in de:Spezial:Dateien/Matthias Zimmermann as far as I can see. Stefan2 (talk) 13:20, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit]
[edit] File:MsJacko,dab.jpg
- File:MsJacko,dab.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- From the uploaders talk page, it looks like this has been uploaded multiple times so possibly this should have just been speedied. There is no evidence presented it was released under the licence specified as it doesn't appear the uploader is the copyright holder. Perhaps more importantly, and one of the reasons I'm bringing this here, from Plunderphonics#Plunderphonic (album) it appears likely it's a derived work (or at least the copyright status is disputed) so even the original author can't release it under a free licence. Nil Einne (talk) 14:13, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:F2.large.jpg
- File:F2.large.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Actually uses pprohibited licence CC BY NC. :Jay8g Hi!- I am... -What I do... WASH- BRIDGE- WPWA - MFIC- WPIM 14:41, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- My mistake. I'm contacting the corresponding author to request permission per WP:COPYREQ James Estevez (talk) 16:29, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Passes.jpg
- File:Passes.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:Hamidul hasan.jpg
- File:Hamidul hasan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The text "The photo comes from a personally owned album." does not necessary imply "own work". The text "File photo of Maulana Hamidul Hasan" suggests that it is someone else's work. Stefan2 (talk) 17:30, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Adam Putnam Official.jpg
- File:Adam Putnam Official.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image found on site of Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, which has a copyright notice at the bottom of the webpage Avi (talk) 19:30, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Cluj arena by dawn.tif
[edit] File:Cluj arena by night.tif
[edit] File:Cluj Arena ensemble.tif
- File:Cluj arena by dawn.tif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Cluj arena by night.tif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Cluj Arena ensemble.tif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Delete: These three images are clearly attributed with "All rights reserved" in the metadata and there is no evidence of permission from the copyright holder. The CC licence applied by the uploader is restrictive with no modifications permitted which is unacceptable to Wikipedia. Despite information given to uploader he does not appear to understand the copyright issues or what is necessary to verify permission. ww2censor (talk) 22:46, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Nippon Karate do Renshinkan.JPG
- Dubious own work. User has lots of copyvios and the like. Stefan2 (talk) 23:49, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Karate Poster.jpg
- File:Karate Poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] February 11
[edit] File:Randy Racing 5.jpeg
[edit] File:New WWC Logo2.jpg
- File:New WWC Logo2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Logo presumably copyright of the organisation it relates to, uploader appears to have been a role account for the organisation but we have no evidence that the person operating that account had authority to release their logo into the public domain. Logo also includes a montage of other images which may be separately copyrighted. January (talk) 11:10, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Antranig Fedayee.jpg
- File:Antranig Fedayee.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No Freedom of Panorama in Armenia per Commons:Commons:FOP#Armenia so why should this be free? Erected in 1999 per List of statues in Yerevan. Many of the other pictures on List of statues in Yerevan is also not free unless I'm wrong here. MGA73 (talk) 17:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- This isn't commons. Files do not need to be copyright free in the country of origin and the United States to be listed as free. Files just need to be free in the United States. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 19:12, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:IMGP2607.JPG
- File:IMGP2607.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The banner on the telephone pole is likely copyrighted. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 19:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:NEIU 3 (2).jpg
- File:NEIU 3 (2).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:Sam Sweeney, Cheltenham.jpg
[edit] File:Location of Vergadeika.jpg.jpg
[edit] File:Sam Sweeney and Hannah James.jpg
[edit] File:Lucretia - Rembrandt 1664 - Wash DC.jpg
- See commons:COM:ART#When should the PD-Art tag not be used?. There is a 3D frame at the bottom. There doesn't seem to be any English Wikipedia version of commons:Template:Non-free frame. Stefan2 (talk) 23:24, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:McNeeRanch-MontaraStateBeach-TrailheadSign.jpg
- No freedom of panorama for maps in the United States. See commons:COM:FOP#United States. Stefan2 (talk) 23:27, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- I think this is in the public domain for the following reasons:
1. The 'billboard' is a map of a State Park in California.
2. There is no explicit copyright statement on the work.
3. Therefore it is assumed to be (a) in the public domain already, or (b) published by the state.
4. According to http://www.library.ca.gov/gps/docs/OCLCFIN.pdf (see top of page 20), works not explicitly claiming copyright protection may be inferred to be in the public domain.Calbookaddict (talk) 17:24, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Since I've never heard of this beach before, I read Montara as Montana. I need to remember to look more carefully. The map seems to be fine. Copyright notices are irrelevant for maps first published on 1 March 1989 or later and this map looks recent, but the California State thing looks enough. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:03, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:TonyHey-EducauseAU07.jpg
- File:TonyHey-EducauseAU07.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
-
- Is this a policy you're pointing to? I'm happy to crop it further if required. I took the picture, Tony knew what it was for - I'm not sure I understand the "unfree" complaint here? Natebailey (talk) 09:16, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- See commons:COM:DM for an explanation of de minimis. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:03, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Is this a policy you're pointing to? I'm happy to crop it further if required. I took the picture, Tony knew what it was for - I'm not sure I understand the "unfree" complaint here? Natebailey (talk) 09:16, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] February 12
[edit] File:Gruntgame1.png
- File:Gruntgame1.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears that the copyright owner is Grunt board game. Sumanch (talk) 03:40, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:07, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Shin packet.jpg
- File:Shin packet.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:KIMT Storm Team 3.png
- File:KIMT Storm Team 3.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I have searched the entire website for KIMT-TV (the television station associated with this image) and haven't found this image on that site. The user who uploaded this image claims he is the copyright holder (he released it under CC-BY-SA 3.0). If this was an actual image from KIMT-TV, he could not release it via CC. I feel this image was created by the user and not by the television station itself and as such should be deleted. Neutralhomer • Talk • 13:50, 12 February 2012 (UTC) 13:50, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:MaggiBoerewors Kitsnoedels 20100605.jpg
[edit] File:CupNoodle.jpg
- File:CupNoodle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of products/packaging Acather96 (talk) 13:53, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- Question: How is a photo of a product an "unauthorized derivative work"? This clearly qualifies as "fair use". The nominators other nominations seem similarly mistaken. 66.159.220.134 (talk) 22:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
-
-
- But the files are not claimed under fair use, they all use a free license tag (i.e. they claim that the file is in the public domain, or under a Creative Commons/GFDL license), when actually they are of copyrighted artwork/design. If a claim of fair use was made with an accompanying fair use rationale which explained how the file and it's use met Wikipedia's non-free content criteria, then the deletion rationale would be negated and the image could be kept. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 19:20, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- WP:SOFIXIT. 66.159.220.134 (talk) 07:00, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- But the files are not claimed under fair use, they all use a free license tag (i.e. they claim that the file is in the public domain, or under a Creative Commons/GFDL license), when actually they are of copyrighted artwork/design. If a claim of fair use was made with an accompanying fair use rationale which explained how the file and it's use met Wikipedia's non-free content criteria, then the deletion rationale would be negated and the image could be kept. Thanks, Acather96 (talk) 19:20, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- Delete The splash on the left cup might be copyrightable. Replace with (for example) the cup which was deemed to lack originality according to the Tokyo High Court. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:57, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:HEDGEHOG CRISPS.jpg
- File:HEDGEHOG CRISPS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:McCoys Crisps.jpg
- File:McCoys Crisps.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:Boost-old-new.jpg
- File:Boost-old-new.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:Cornetto box.jpg
- File:Cornetto box.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:Chimpmunkey.jpg
- File:Chimpmunkey.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
-
- What exactly is the contention here? As far as I am aware photos of an object do not constitute derivative works. If the subject of the photo were, for example, a painting then yes, it would be a derivative work, since it would essentially an unauthorised duplicate of the painting. A photo of a 3D item however is in no way equivalent to the item itself. There may be a case to be made concerning the logo on the t-shirt, since, like the painting example, it is 2D, but that aside it is perfectly legal (AFAIK) to photograph of an object. Alphathon /'æɫfə.θɒn/ (talk) 00:35, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Moonkey.jpg
- File:Moonkey.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:Comfort Fabric Conditioner 750ml Blue - Professional (Medium).jpg
- File:Comfort Fabric Conditioner 750ml Blue - Professional (Medium).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:Golden gaytime box.jpg
- File:Golden gaytime box.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:ManualCrown06-05-26b.jpg
- File:ManualCrown06-05-26b.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image source: [1] According to Wikipedia, "this is a photograph taken by a member of the Kudzu Coalition who allows it to be freely distributed without restrictions". Unfortunately, there is no OTRS number and I can't find any statement about this at the source web site (this page only says "All rights reserved"). Stefan2 (talk) 15:10, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Falkorvisit.jpg
- File:Falkorvisit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See commons:COM:FOP#Germany: freedom of panorama only appears at publicly accessible places (accessing a film studio probably requires special permission) and only applies outdoors as far as I understand. Besides, the thing here is unlikely there for permanent display. Stefan2 (talk) 15:18, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Mehdihuseyn.jpg
- File:Mehdihuseyn.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mixaylo.JPG (a different photo of the same statue). Stefan2 (talk) 20:01, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Old Boy's hostel.jpg
[edit] File:BoysHostel.jpg
- File:BoysHostel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Says "Taken By Friends" which conflicts with the license claim. Eeekster (talk) 22:19, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Lee Nguyen.jpg
- File:Lee Nguyen.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] February 13
[edit] File:JeremyLin.jpg
[edit] File:Lions XII Logo.png
- File:Lions XII Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unfree file with no article usage. Description page blanked by author. ScottSteiner ✍ 15:59, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep In use. I re-added the deleted things from the article page, requested deletion on Commons and requested resizing here. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:30, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:113px-RLballOrangeBlack.svg.png
- Based on the file name, this is a PNG version of an SVG file, but the SVG file isn't sourced, so I suppose that this means that the PNG file is improperly sourced. If the source SVG file is located, the PNG file should be deleted as redundant, since these kinds of images are supposed to be stored as SVG. Stefan2 (talk) 16:02, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- Comment - I looked threw the "Sources" uploadeds (see File list]: User:Crico). The image dose not appear anywhere, so Stefan2 is correct. However, I am not very familiar with the threshold where {{PD-shape}} comes into play. If this image qualifies, it wouldn't matter who created it, since no matter what it would be Public Domain, so the source could be changed to "Unknown". However, again, I'm not very familiar with the threshold, so I will leave it to others to decided if it should be kept.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 13:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Dan Liljenquist.jpg
[edit] February 14
[edit] File:Prairie Queen Hotel.jpg
- File:Prairie Queen Hotel.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Double licensing (both free and unfree). Unclear if it is free or not. No fair use rationale. Stefan2 (talk) 00:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:PosterLights.jpg
- File:PosterLights.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The permission reads: "The images (posters. photographs and graphics) on this page may be used freely according to the requirements of websites such a Wikipedia." It is not specified under which Wikipedia policy it may be used, so I assume that the fair use policy must be assumed. Stefan2 (talk) 00:18, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Stefan2, All of the pictures or graphics or posters I have uploaded (or will upload in future) are owned by me, I created them and own the copyright 100%. I am happy for these images to be made freely available, but obviously I am doing something wrong 'tag-wise' as they risk being deleted. Please advise the correct tagging for me to use for material I have created and which I own outright. Thanks.
81.155.97.130 (talk) 02:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:PosterMovingMemories.jpg
- File:PosterMovingMemories.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See #File:PosterLights.jpg above. Stefan2 (talk) 00:18, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Stefan2, All of the pictures or graphics or posters I have uploaded (or will upload in future) are owned by me, I created them and own the copyright 100%. I am happy for these images to be made freely available, but obviously I am doing something wrong 'tag-wise' as they risk being deleted. Please advise the correct tagging for me to use for material I have created and which I own outright. Thanks.
81.155.97.130 (talk) 02:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:PosterTheGlow.jpg
- File:PosterTheGlow.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See #File:PosterLights.jpg above. Stefan2 (talk) 00:19, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Stefan2, All of the pictures or graphics or posters I have uploaded (or will upload in future) are owned by me, I created them and own the copyright 100%. I am happy for these images to be made freely available, but obviously I am doing something wrong 'tag-wise' as they risk being deleted. Please advise the correct tagging for me to use for material I have created and which I own outright. Thanks.
81.155.97.130 (talk) 02:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Wmovie.jpg
- File:Wmovie.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:Citations-to-qchem-papers.jpg
- Sourced to Anna I. Krylov but tagged as the uploader's own work. No evidence of permission. Eeekster (talk) 03:12, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- I am the uploader. If I somehow tagged it as my own work, then I did so in error; it's Anna Krylov's work, and she is the copyright holder. I uploaded the image at her request. I have contacted her, and she will send an email granting permission to permissions-commons [at] wikimedia.org within the next 24 hours or so. —Jt512 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:32, 19 February 2012 (UTC).
[edit] File:Virtualbox logo.png
- File:Virtualbox logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This logo is unfree according to the deletion discussion on commons commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Virtualbox logo.png. And seeing as User:FleetCommand is too dim to understand the concept of the precautionary principle (commons:COM:PCP) and is willing to revert war in order to mark the image as free despite this principle, we have to go through this process. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- The discussion at Commons doesn't look like it's been finalized (two people weighed in so far, nom and "keep" !voter, essentially). Did you mean to say it might be unfree according to the nom? Also, calling someone "dim" is a personal attack. Please avoid those. Thanks! Killiondude (talk) 07:17, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I meant possibly unfree (as is the title of this project page). And I'm aware of what constitutes a personal attack, thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:23, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- Great, thanks. The way you worded it in the nom appears otherwise (see is unfree according to x). Killiondude (talk) 07:27, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I meant possibly unfree (as is the title of this project page). And I'm aware of what constitutes a personal attack, thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:23, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- The discussion at Commons doesn't look like it's been finalized (two people weighed in so far, nom and "keep" !voter, essentially). Did you mean to say it might be unfree according to the nom? Also, calling someone "dim" is a personal attack. Please avoid those. Thanks! Killiondude (talk) 07:17, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) Keep. The Commons discussion is not yet closed. Furthermore, it is an unfounded discussion based on the opinion of the nominator himself. Correct me if I am wrong: When a software license agreement designates its computer program as GPLv2 (free libre), then all its components are such, unless some other statements from the author excludes them from this scope. So, where is the proof that this component of a free software is non-free? And by the way, may I remind our dear admin that WP:NPA prohibits argumentum ad hominem as well as lying? The last reverts were all Magog the Ogre's own reverts, not mine.Fleet Command (talk) 07:24, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- More interestingly, where is the proof that this logo is included in the GPLv2 version of Virtualbox? See the Commons discussion. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- I supplied a download link there. Download it from here. Even the download page tells you what you are downloading is GPLv2. Then, you will have no trouble finding this logo in it. Fleet Command (talk) 16:00, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- More interestingly, where is the proof that this logo is included in the GPLv2 version of Virtualbox? See the Commons discussion. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Tugun Bypass northern.jpg
- File:Tugun Bypass northern.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Not the uploaders own work, rights would be held by the Government or PacificLink. OTRS would be needed but unlikely to be released as GFDL or CC-BY-SA. Bidgee (talk) 11:46, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Tugun Bypass southern.jpg
- File:Tugun Bypass southern.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Not the uploaders own work, rights would be held by the Government or PacificLink. OTRS would be needed but unlikely to be released as GFDL or CC-BY-SA. Bidgee (talk) 11:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Tally Koren.jpg
- File:Tally Koren.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It says: "Tally Koren author and owner of image". Is the uploader Tally Koren? The image also appears elsewhere, for example here. Stefan2 (talk) 13:06, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
I am Tally Koren's personal assistant and am updating the page on her behalf. This is her current PR photo and is therefore used on all her press on the internet. This is the photo she personally emailed to me to be used on this entry. What do I need to do to ensure it is not deleted? If it is uploaded with the incorrect tags or license please explain to me how to fix this. Summermoon123 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Summermoon123 (talk • contribs) 13:13, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:RM of La Broquerie Municipal Seal.jpg
[edit] File:Mihrab--Mashad-al-Sayyida-Ruqayya.jpg
- Unless the photo was taken in the 10th or 11th century, the licence might be wrong. Stefan2 (talk) 13:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- It's a photo of two-dimensional wooden tracery produced in the 10th or 11th century in a Fatimid memorial in Cairo. It's hard to know whether something of this kind, like an antique carpet or textile, is two-dimensional or not, but I assumed so at the time. Mathsci (talk) 13:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:La Broquerie Municipal Seal.jpg
[edit] File:Foltigo prosfiction large.png
[edit] File:Missouri-573-02.png
- File:Missouri-573-02.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work of maps by the State of Missouri. There is no Missouri template at Category:US State PD templates, so I take it that Missouri works are copyrighted. Stefan2 (talk) 13:53, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Punjabi tv channel hoarding.jpg
- According to commons:COM:FOP#India, Indian rules are similar to British rules, so this photo is probably not free. Stefan2 (talk) 14:09, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Princess X Hollywood HMMA 2011.jpg
- The source link is dead, so it is impossible to determine if the permission is valid. Stefan2 (talk) 14:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Franz Albert Rum.JPG
- File:Franz Albert Rum.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The licence statement has multiple issues. The source web site doesn't seem to list any date of publication for this photo, so there is no way to confirm that it was published before 1942. Some of the other photos on the web site are dated with a date of creation after 1941 (and those photos can impossibly have been published before 1942), so this might also be a recent photo. The photo may thus be copyrighted in the European Union. Additionally, there is no way to confirm that the photo was published before 1926, so it might have been copyrighted in the European Union on the URAA date, making it copyrighted in the United States unless published before 1923. Finally, there is no confirmation that the photo really is anonymous, so the anonymous statement might be wrong. Stefan2 (talk) 14:27, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Qyorkcityalbum.jpeg
[edit] File:Tryst B58Jwl.png
- File:Tryst B58Jwl.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:Qorkcityalbum.png
- File:Qorkcityalbum.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:One thousand naira.jpg
- File:One thousand naira.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Commons:COM:Currency has no entry for Nigeria. Stefan2 (talk) 14:42, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:One hundred naira.jpg
- File:One hundred naira.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Commons:COM:Currency has no entry for Nigeria. Stefan2 (talk) 14:46, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Kennedynixon.jpg
- File:Kennedynixon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The source claims that the licence is the "Creative Commons Public License", which doesn't exist. Stefan2 (talk) 14:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Luxo Jr. sculpture.jpg
- File:Luxo Jr. sculpture.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See commons:COM:FOP#United States. Stefan2 (talk) 14:47, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Hpobama.jpg
- File:Hpobama.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The source claims that the licence is the "Creative Commons Public License", which doesn't exist. Stefan2 (talk) 14:49, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Hidden Character stone.jpg
- File:Hidden Character stone.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:ChhotuRam2.jpg
- File:ChhotuRam2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- There is no confirmation that this photo, taken in 1941, was published before 1941, so it might be copyrighted in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 15:07, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 22:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Ek ruka hua faisla.jpg
- File:Ek ruka hua faisla.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Date of death not listed on source page, so {{PD-old-100}} claim can't be confirmed. Stefan2 (talk) 15:11, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Fmlinedrawing2.jpg
- File:Fmlinedrawing2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The source claims that the licence is the "Creative Commons Public License", which doesn't exist. Stefan2 (talk) 15:11, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Bobbyseale.jpg
- File:Bobbyseale.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The source claims that the licence is the "Creative Commons Public License", which doesn't exist. Stefan2 (talk) 15:12, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sherine Wong.jpg
- File:Sherine Wong.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Really own work? Looks like something copied from an advertisement or something. Stefan2 (talk) 15:14, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Yes its 100% my won work. I even have the original file. You may dispute it if you are able to find any evidence that it is being copied from any Advertisement that you claimed chongqing777 (talk)
[edit] File:HWeeks.jpg
- File:HWeeks.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- There is absolutely no evidence that this single purpose account took this photo himself. (ie no metdate , etc.) I find it more likely that, since this appears to be a professional image, the PD-self tag was used since a proper source and license was not possible for this living person. This uploader has a history of bad copyrights.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs)
[edit] File:France 2012 commemorative2 euro coin.jpg
- Unusually many colours to be a real coin; coins are usually metal-coloured. Coin might be fake. Besides, there is no permission from the photographer. Stefan2 (talk) 15:17, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Brazilians 000.JPG
- File:Brazilians 000.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- One image is sourced to a book and its licensing status isn't mentioned here. See also Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 February 25#File:Brazilians 000.JPG. Stefan2 (talk) 15:26, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- I don't know exactly what is wrong here. Stefan wasn't able to be clear enough, something that I don't find too hard for anyone to be. If he is talking about Antônio Carlos Gomes' photo, it was made before 1882 by Alberto Henschel. This photograph has been long in public domain. --Lecen (talk) 16:24, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- When making a collage, you must always specify the licensing terms of all images. Gomes's photo doesn't have any licence specified, only the title of a book. If the photo was published before 1923 and taken by someone who died in 1882, it is in the public domain everywhere in the world, but this needs to be specified on the file information page. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:29, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- I don't know exactly what is wrong here. Stefan wasn't able to be clear enough, something that I don't find too hard for anyone to be. If he is talking about Antônio Carlos Gomes' photo, it was made before 1882 by Alberto Henschel. This photograph has been long in public domain. --Lecen (talk) 16:24, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
- I had asked the uploader on his talk page quite a while back to improve that sourcing, but apparently they never did. Kelly hi! 21:51, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Museo Larco 1.jpg
- File:Museo Larco 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It's also here but the image has been around on Wikipedia for years. Which one is older? Stefan2 (talk) 17:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Me With Hitler.jpg
- File:Me With Hitler.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unused user photo. Might also be copyvio since the Hitler image isn't sourced. Stefan2 (talk) 18:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Me Hangin Off Wikipedia-logo.png
- Isn't this violating the Wikimedia Foundation's copyright to the Wikipedia logo? Stefan2 (talk) 18:44, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Me SL Yes1 50x50.jpg
- File:Me SL Yes1 50x50.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unused user picture which might have been taken from an unfree game or something. Stefan2 (talk) 18:46, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Me huyuk!.JPG
- File:Me huyuk!.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:MEarth-1 b.png
- File:MEarth-1 b.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:BlueSwordCover.jpg
- File:BlueSwordCover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It says: "All content on Open Library is in the public domain [2][dead link]." But there is no working link confirming that anything on Open Library is in the public domain and there is no confirmation that the Open Library was allowed to release this cover to the public domain in the first place. Stefan2 (talk) 21:52, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Colonel Breytenbach.jpg
- File:Colonel Breytenbach.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- If Photographer untraceable we need to wait 70 years until copyright expires Ronhjones (Talk) 22:25, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] February 15
[edit] File:Candia overall AT 6.JPG
- File:Candia overall AT 6.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I think the problem is the word "restored"... Did the restoration result in a new copyright? Commons:COM:FOP#United States is a problem and there is no date. Stefan2 (talk) 00:38, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Tane Mahuta sign.jpg
- File:Tane Mahuta sign.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- commons:COM:FOP#New Zealand suggests that laws are similar to the United Kingdom, where photos of signs like this aren't allowed. Stefan2 (talk) 01:10, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Subicmoney.jpg
- File:Subicmoney.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Coins are not 2D items, so the licence is wrong. See Commons:COM:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet. Stefan2 (talk) 01:12, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- I could simply replace the photograph with an image used originally in 1866. (from http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/110727 , EGGER) The current image is seemingly from 1976. Is that ok? Er-vet-en (say) 09:55, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:MIR SAYYID HAYDAR AMOLI(AMULI).jpg
- Dubious own work. Lots of notices about speedy deletions on the uploader's talk page. Stefan2 (talk) 01:22, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Fakhr razi tabarestani.jpg
- File:Fakhr razi tabarestani.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Is this a statue or a painting? If it is a painting, own work sounds unlikely. Stefan2 (talk) 01:23, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Josh Samuels Match Attax.png
- See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 January 30#File:Josh Samuels Match Attax.png. The file was reuploaded shortly after deletion. Stefan2 (talk) 01:24, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Josh Cola.png
[edit] File:Imboden movement.png
- File:Imboden movement.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Is this really 100% own work and not based on some previous map? Stefan2 (talk) 01:28, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Question is moot. Please remove this file from the Wikipedia database.
However, discussion of Imboden_movement2 applies to Imboden_movement. (see below) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donaldecoho (talk • contribs)
[edit] File:Imboden movement2.png
- File:Imboden movement2.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Is this really 100% own work and not based on some previous map? Stefan2 (talk) 01:28, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Of course it's based on some previous map, a free Wikipedia file: File:Juniatamap.png
File:Imboden_movement2.png
As I've added to Stefan2's talk page, the underlying map of the Juniata River watershed is by Karl Musser. He permits adaptation and requests attribution as I have added to the caption at Colonel Jacob C. Higgins. To his original work I have added the cities of Gettysburg, Chambersburg, Mercersberg, McConnelsburg, Cumberland MD, Hanover MD, Bloody Run (Everett), the movement arrows for Imboden's cavalry, the position of Milroy at Bloody Run (blue circle), and the orange dots for Higgins' makeshift forts. I have also added the 'conflict' explosions around McConnelsburg and Gettysburg. All of this was done with MSWord shapes and text boxes.
Issues related to unclear attribution to Karl Musser have been clarified at File:Imboden movement2.png. Additionally, the topic this file addresses is sufficiently esoteric that the probability of someone further adapting Imboden_movement2.png is virtually 0. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Donaldecoho (talk • contribs)
- I see. So the map was really unfree (no attribution and wrong licence). However, since it is free now (your changes were listed as CC-Zero before you added the attribution which is compatible with the original CC-BY-SA 2.5), I have moved it over to Commons. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:23, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Nortus.jpg
- File:Nortus.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The design of the logo clearly exhibits originality; it is thus eligible for copyright and not in the public domain. ZZArch talk to me 03:49, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Saif Ali Khan.jpg
- File:Saif in 2011.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- From the exif data this appears to be scanned from a printed source. Eeekster (talk) 05:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- Note: The file was moved from File:Saif in 2011.jpg to File:Saif Ali Khan.jpg by AlexCovarrubias (talk · contribs) at 05:49, 15 February 2012 (UTC). AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Jewels 1.jpg
- File:Jewels 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Apparently scanned from The Royal Jewelry Museum, ISBN 977-305-350-4, and hence a copyright violation. He to Hecuba (talk) 10:37, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- Also nominating the following files with the same problems:
- Image:Jewels 17.JPG
- Image:Jewel 18.JPG
- Image:Jewel 19.JPG
- Image:Jewel 20.JPG
- Image:Jewel 21.JPG
- Image:Jewel 42.JPG
- Image:Jewels 43.JPG
- Image:Jewels 58.JPG
- Image:Jewel 30.JPG
- Image:Jewel 41.JPG
- Image:Jewels 16.JPG
- Image:Museum of jewels outside view.JPG
- Image:Museum of jewels Stairs.JPG
- Image:Interior museum of jewels.JPG
- Image:Walls of museum.JPG
- Image:Royal family.JPG
- Image:Muhammad Ali.JPG
- Image:King farouk.JPG
[edit] File:Parallel hexbus interface.png
- The summary reads "Peter Engels" but User:Polluks tells that the uploader is called Steven Hoodsdale. Stefan2 (talk) 10:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:BCGSlogo.jpeg
[edit] File:Piratepakjr.JPG
- File:Piratepakjr.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unused personal photo with a copyrighted ship which is hardly de minimis. Stefan2 (talk) 15:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Ehrlinger, Erich.jpg
- File:Ehrlinger, Erich.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} template tells nothing about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 15:13, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Bierkamp, Walter.jpg
- File:Bierkamp, Walter.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} template tells nothing about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 15:21, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Dubois, Werner 2.jpg
- File:Dubois, Werner 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} template tells nothing about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 15:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Schütt, Hans-Heinz.jpg
- File:Schütt, Hans-Heinz.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} template tells nothing about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 15:28, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Unverhau, Heinrich.jpg
- File:Unverhau, Heinrich.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} template tells nothing about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 15:32, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Jührs, Robert.jpg
- File:Jührs, Robert.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} template tells nothing about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 15:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Juhrs, Robert.png
- File:Juhrs, Robert.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} template tells nothing about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 15:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Ittner, Alfred.png
- File:Ittner, Alfred.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} template tells nothing about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 15:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Alfred Ittner 2.png
- File:Alfred Ittner 2.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} template tells nothing about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 15:36, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Bolender, Kurt.jpg
- File:Bolender, Kurt.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} template tells nothing about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 15:39, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Wirth, Christian in uniform.jpg
- Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} template tells nothing about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 15:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Münzberger, Gustav.jpg
- File:Münzberger, Gustav.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} template tells nothing about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 15:40, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Stadie, Otto.jpg
- File:Stadie, Otto.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} template tells nothing about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Suchomel, Franz.jpg
- File:Suchomel, Franz.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} template tells nothing about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Josef Oberhauser and Kurt Franz.jpg
- Not properly sourced: the page doesn't confirm that the photographer is anonymous and there is no date of publication, so there is no way to confirm that it is out of copyright in the European Union. Furthermore, the {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} template tells nothing about the copyright status in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Josef Oberhauser at his trial.png
- There is no explanation as to why this would be out of copyright in the source country on the URAA date. This photo appears to have been taken during some trials after WWII, so I can't see how it can be out of copyright in the European Union. Stefan2 (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Horn, Otto.jpg
- File:Horn, Otto.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The licence is obviously hoax; no European country has a copyright term of 15 years or less for photos. Stefan2 (talk) 15:41, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Femke halsema Political Statement & Feminism.jpg
[edit] File:Maryam Hassouni Anubis.jpg
- File:Maryam Hassouni Anubis.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:Maryham Hassouni.jpg
- File:Maryham Hassouni.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:220px-FemkeHalsemaMaastricht2.jpg
[edit] File:Femke halsema lr.jpg
- File:Femke halsema lr.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Mathonius (talk) 17:02, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- Comment - I can't find the original file through TinEye etc., but likely cropped from an image downloaded from "somewhere on the internet". EXIF data looks suspicious to me. --He to Hecuba (talk) 17:09, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Rochelle Perts Winner & Talent.jpg
[edit] File:Rochelle Perts Winner of X factor.jpg
[edit] File:The Genealogy of Bharata.png
[edit] File:Henk Jan Smit X factor.jpg
- File:Henk Jan Smit X factor.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:Aladdin3 DC.jpg
- File:Aladdin3 DC.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aladdin3 DC.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 18:56, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:SimpsonsXbox360.jpg
- File:SimpsonsXbox360.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Does this constitute an unauthorized derivative work? Acather96 (talk) 19:01, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- That's a difficult one. If it's being used to illustrate the console, perhaps the design can be treated as de minimis. Certainly use to illustrate the character would be infringing. --He to Hecuba (talk) 19:03, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Cup Noodle.JPG
- File:Cup Noodle.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of product/packaging, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 19:06, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Traditionalfootballorange.png
- Found some TinEye matches that are very close, wondering if the work could have been extracted from those and simply re-coloured. Possible that the works are coincidentally similar, or that the works TinEye found used this file in violation of the license terms. Orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 19:16, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Avetik-Issahakian gerezman.jpg
- Tomb of Avetik Isahakyan who died in 1957. Armenia has no freedom of panorama and uses 70 years p.m.a. so this is unfree in Armenia. It is also unfree in the United States. Stefan2 (talk) 19:18, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Twin Mill.JPG
- File:Twin Mill.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted product/toy/car. Acather96 (talk) 19:22, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- Nuisance deletion, can be used to illustrate the car just as photograph of full sized car is not copyviolation of rights of Ford or Toyota. Bachcell (talk)
[edit] File:Top Eliminator.JPG
- File:Top Eliminator.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted product/toy/car Acather96 (talk) 19:23, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Torino Tornado.JPG
- File:Torino Tornado.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauhorized derivative work of copyrighted product/toy/car. Acather96 (talk) 19:24, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Deora2.JPG
- File:Deora2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted product/toy/car, also seems to be licensed under a non-commercial use only license. Acather96 (talk) 19:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Seems to be licensed under two or three licences.
I, Mr. Sinistar, took this picture and I have licensed it under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 license.
-
- Quite clear: the licence is CC-BY-SA 3.0. But:
Here is the link to the license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
-
- So is CC-BY-SA 3.0 sourced to the CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0 licence or is it licensed under both of them? Further down, it says {{cc-by-sa-2.5}}. One could interpret this to mean that it is licensed under all three mentioned licences... --Stefan2 (talk) 00:48, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Hot Wheels 2005 130.png
- File:Hot Wheels 2005 130.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted product/toy/car/package Acather96 (talk) 19:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:BossMustangSizzler.JPG
- File:BossMustangSizzler.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted product/toy/car Acather96 (talk) 19:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- Nuisance deletion, no copyright violation, same as photo of actual automobile as long as used to illustrate the car or toy in question Bachcell (talk)
[edit] File:Sizzler Cal8 set.jpg
- File:Sizzler Cal8 set.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Does this constitute an unauthorized derivative work? Acather96 (talk) 19:27, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:I-185.jpg
- File:I-185.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:Parajanov kev.jpg
- File:Parajanov kev.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Parajanov kev.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 19:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Tomy Hootbot.jpg
- File:Tomy Hootbot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted product/toy. Orphaned, also claimed to be 'used with permission', the GFDL self claim may not be valid. Acather96 (talk) 19:34, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Be-2.JPG
- File:Be-2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:BV222V-2.JPG
- File:BV222V-2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:TombMig17.JPG
- File:TombMig17.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted model, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 19:38, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:MaistoBoss302.JPG
- File:MaistoBoss302.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted product/toy/car, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 19:42, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Bellowhead - Toy.jpg
- File:Bellowhead - Toy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of presumably copyrighted toy Acather96 (talk) 20:19, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Duros-toy.jpg
- File:Duros-toy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:CivicSiSemaEdition.jpg
- File:CivicSiSemaEdition.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted toy/product, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 20:24, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Hot Wheels 001.jpg
- File:Hot Wheels 001.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted toy/product/packaging, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 20:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Hot Wheels 002.jpg
- File:Hot Wheels 002.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted toy/product/packaging, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 20:25, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Hot Wheels 004.jpg
- File:Hot Wheels 004.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted toy/product, orphaned, awful quality also makes this unencyclopedic. Acather96 (talk) 20:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Hot Wheels 005.jpg
- File:Hot Wheels 005.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted toy/product/packaging, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 20:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Hot Wheels 007.jpg
- File:Hot Wheels 007.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted toy/product, orphaned, awful quality Acather96 (talk) 20:29, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Hot Wheels 008.jpg
- File:Hot Wheels 008.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted toys/products/packaging, orphaned, awful quality. Acather96 (talk) 20:30, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Hot Wheels.jpg
- File:Hot Wheels.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted toys/products/, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 20:31, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:PDRM3148.JPG
- File:PDRM3148.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative work of copyrighted toy/product/packaging, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 20:31, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Maisto Cars.png
- File:Maisto Cars.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorized derivative works of copyrighted toys/products, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 20:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- Cars are usually considered utilitarian objects and thus only separable elements (flames painted on the side, for instance) can be copyrighted. I don't believe the fact that these are scale models negates that. This argument applies equally to other files you nommed except those with product packaging in the photo. Powers T 02:25, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Supercat Video.jpg
- File:Supercat Video.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] February 16
[edit] File:The Green Hornet- 2010 film.jpg
- No evidence that the logo for the 2010 film meets WP:NFCC conditions for use at Green Hornet; the non-free use rationale appears invalid. The image does not provide information that is necessary for the interpretation of the article about the character or various adaptations. The article on the 2010 film already contains an image of the film poster with a proper rationale. The image is also of poor quality and contains significant artifacting. Kinu t/c 00:24, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Tony lucca.jpg
- File:Tony lucca.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No indication that the author / manager / artist has released the image under a free license. Just says "image used by permission from Rock Ridge Music, the artist's manager and label" Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:30, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
- I have changed the entry to reflect that Rock Ridge Music is the owner of the image and that I have their permission to post it. If I selected the wrong licensing option, please let me know. I'm not sure how to change that portion. Thanks. LeaveDogLights (talk) 17:24, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
- To allow Wikipedia to use the image, the label also needs to allow everyone to use it under a free license. Actually, just saying "permission from record label" renders the file able to be speedily deleted under WP:F3. An outline of the proper content donation process is at this page. Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:35, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Odessmntg.jpeg
- File:Odessmntg.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:Communication Culture Critique.GIF
- Dubious own work. Unclear if it is above or below the threshold of originality. Stefan2 (talk) 01:16, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hello! I work for the International Communication Association, which publishes the text and created the cover artwork. Our executive director approved its release on Wikipedia via the Creative Commons License. I am new to uploading images; if should be licensed a different way, just let me know. Ica cbrady (talk) 8:42, 16 February 2012 EST
- I think that this confirmation should be sent by e-mail to permissions-en
wikimedia.org for confirmation. See WP:CONSENT for instructions. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:51, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
- I think that this confirmation should be sent by e-mail to permissions-en
[edit] File:AubreyMcCormick Wiki.jpg
- File:AubreyMcCormick Wiki.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious own work. Uploader appears to have uploaded a lot of copyvios. Stefan2 (talk) 01:18, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
- Doesn't the image's metadata suggests that the uploader was in possession of the original digital photograph file which was then altered on the day of the upload? That would seem to make it more likely that it is an "own work". or am I getting this wrong? Meowy 00:31, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- The metadata state that the photo was taken in 2007 and photoshopped in 2012. The uploader may have found an old photo on the Internet, done some change in Photoshop (e.g. cropping) and then uploaded it here. The uploader has three images (this one taken with a Nikon camera, one taken with a Kodak camera and one without EXIF). People usually use few cameras. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:20, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- I guess the photoshoping will be the reduction in size and/or adding the vignette. But, family photos aside, you don't usually find large photos on the internet complete with full exif data - and tineye reveals no other versions (though that isn't conclusive of course). Having a past record of vopyvios might be an important decider - but only if those copy violations were definately for the use of the work of others. Meowy 15:49, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
- Following the copyright information in the Exif data leads me to Synergii1 photography, which seems to be owned by a woman named Susan Shek, based out of New York. A check user could see where the editor is uploading from to help figure out if this is a copyvio. Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:57, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
- I guess the photoshoping will be the reduction in size and/or adding the vignette. But, family photos aside, you don't usually find large photos on the internet complete with full exif data - and tineye reveals no other versions (though that isn't conclusive of course). Having a past record of vopyvios might be an important decider - but only if those copy violations were definately for the use of the work of others. Meowy 15:49, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
- The metadata state that the photo was taken in 2007 and photoshopped in 2012. The uploader may have found an old photo on the Internet, done some change in Photoshop (e.g. cropping) and then uploaded it here. The uploader has three images (this one taken with a Nikon camera, one taken with a Kodak camera and one without EXIF). People usually use few cameras. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:20, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Savannah georgia globe off abercorn.jpg
- See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Savannah georgia globe off abercorn.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 15:06, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:SMKTS panorama.png
- File:SMKTS panorama.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:Descent JITD Character.jpg
- File:Descent JITD Character.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work of Descent: Journeys in the Dark. Stefan2 (talk) 15:26, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Descent JITD Table.jpg
- File:Descent JITD Table.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work of Descent: Journeys in the Dark. Stefan2 (talk) 15:28, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:20070107 Frealshakes.jpg
- File:20070107 Frealshakes.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Uploaded to English Wikipedia in 2010 but already used here in 2008. Stefan2 (talk) 15:54, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:22 Jose Ronaldo Jarabo.JPG
- File:22 Jose Ronaldo Jarabo.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:22 Jose Ronaldo Jarabo.JPG. Stefan2 (talk) 16:03, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Kev pic526.jpg
- File:Kev pic526.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kev pic526.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 16:31, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Laugarbrekka-Iceland-3.jpg
- File:Laugarbrekka-Iceland-3.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Laugarbrekka-Iceland-3.jpg Stefan2 (talk) 16:35, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Laugarbrekka-Iceland-1.jpg
- File:Laugarbrekka-Iceland-1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No freedom of panorama for signs in Iceland. See Commons:COM:FOP#Iceland. Stefan2 (talk) 16:36, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Vazgen kev24.jpg
- File:Vazgen kev24.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vazgen kev24.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 16:55, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Mother Armenia, Yerevan, Day.jpg
- Per List of statues in Yerevan, this is a statue from 1967. Per commons:COM:FOP#Former Soviet Union, it is unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 18:20, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- Under article 19 of the Armenian Law on Copyright it states that images of works protected by copyright are allowable for free use where "the use of lawfully disclosed works of literature and art and extracts thereof by way of illustration, in the publications, programs of broadcasting organizations, audio and video recordings of educational nature, to the extent justified by the purpose of illustration of education". Surely here the image illustrates the statue for the purpose of education and is an ILLUSTRATION of an art object (a statue), it is NOT a copy of the statue as defined in the Armenian copyright law. The copyright law defines a work as "a specific result of a creative work in the field of science, literature or arts, expressed in some objective form" and a copy of a work as "a duplicate of a work, made in any material form". A 2D-photographic image of a free-standing statue is not a duplicate the original statue under the Armenian copyright laws. Meowy 22:06, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
- The problem is article 16: "Without the consent of the author and another copyright holder and without paying the author's remuneration it is permitted to reproduce, broadcast works of architecture, photography or figurative arts which are located in public places, with the exception of the cases when the image of the work is the main object of such reproduction or broadcasting, and when the image of the work is used for commercial purposes." --Stefan2 (talk) 22:30, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, but this illustration of the original work is not being used for commercial purposes, so doesn't it falls under the remit of article 19? Article 19 must be there to include something, after all! Surely the "main object" here is the wikipedia article, a work of educational nature, and the image itself is not the "main object" (images on Wikipedia have to be placed in articles to be additions to the written content - they are not stand-alone things). I understand that this might mean that a more restrictive and proscriptive copyright note might be needed for the image, but that would be preferable to loosing the image. Meowy 00:09, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Wikipedia requires that images be reusable for commercial purposes. The "main object" is the main object of the image, not the main object of the Wikipedia article. The non-commercial clause means that you can freely take photos of houses or statues in Armenia and put them in your own personal photo album (unlike France where the police technically could arrest you for doing such things). --Stefan2 (talk) 10:10, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Your interpretation of the word "main object" is different from mine. I think "main object", under the Armenian law, is intended to mean the "main purpose" (the words used are "the main object of such reproduction" not "the main object IN such reproduction). So the law is saying that it is permitable to use an image of an object as long as the display of that image is not in a context in which the display of the image is the main purpose of the display. Because the image is being displayed in the context of a larger article, that display is not the main object (i.e., main purpose) of its display. I don't see a good reason why Wikipedia should require that images be reusable for commercial purposes, but if that is the way it is for the present then a lot of useful images are going to be excluded. Meowy 16:10, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- "Main object": see commons:COM:DM for an explanation. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:38, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- I can see that being true on Wikimedia Commons, where images are stand-alone items, but when used on Wilipedia they are never stand-alone items. You don't search for "Mother Armenia, Yerevan" on Wikipedia and get the choice of the article page and also separate pages for each photograph used in the article page, and also pages for any photographs of it on Wikipedia servers that are not being used on the article page. The use of images is always in articles, and the use within the article is always incidental and of secondary importance. Basically I'm trying to argue that things are not cut and dry here, and there is no need to consider things in the worst possible case and read copyright laws in the broadest of terms. It is the job of any alleged injured party do that (and common sense says that in this case there will be no injured party). Meowy 16:03, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
- "Main object": see commons:COM:DM for an explanation. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:38, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Your interpretation of the word "main object" is different from mine. I think "main object", under the Armenian law, is intended to mean the "main purpose" (the words used are "the main object of such reproduction" not "the main object IN such reproduction). So the law is saying that it is permitable to use an image of an object as long as the display of that image is not in a context in which the display of the image is the main purpose of the display. Because the image is being displayed in the context of a larger article, that display is not the main object (i.e., main purpose) of its display. I don't see a good reason why Wikipedia should require that images be reusable for commercial purposes, but if that is the way it is for the present then a lot of useful images are going to be excluded. Meowy 16:10, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Wikipedia requires that images be reusable for commercial purposes. The "main object" is the main object of the image, not the main object of the Wikipedia article. The non-commercial clause means that you can freely take photos of houses or statues in Armenia and put them in your own personal photo album (unlike France where the police technically could arrest you for doing such things). --Stefan2 (talk) 10:10, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, but this illustration of the original work is not being used for commercial purposes, so doesn't it falls under the remit of article 19? Article 19 must be there to include something, after all! Surely the "main object" here is the wikipedia article, a work of educational nature, and the image itself is not the "main object" (images on Wikipedia have to be placed in articles to be additions to the written content - they are not stand-alone things). I understand that this might mean that a more restrictive and proscriptive copyright note might be needed for the image, but that would be preferable to loosing the image. Meowy 00:09, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- The problem is article 16: "Without the consent of the author and another copyright holder and without paying the author's remuneration it is permitted to reproduce, broadcast works of architecture, photography or figurative arts which are located in public places, with the exception of the cases when the image of the work is the main object of such reproduction or broadcasting, and when the image of the work is used for commercial purposes." --Stefan2 (talk) 22:30, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
- Under article 19 of the Armenian Law on Copyright it states that images of works protected by copyright are allowable for free use where "the use of lawfully disclosed works of literature and art and extracts thereof by way of illustration, in the publications, programs of broadcasting organizations, audio and video recordings of educational nature, to the extent justified by the purpose of illustration of education". Surely here the image illustrates the statue for the purpose of education and is an ILLUSTRATION of an art object (a statue), it is NOT a copy of the statue as defined in the Armenian copyright law. The copyright law defines a work as "a specific result of a creative work in the field of science, literature or arts, expressed in some objective form" and a copy of a work as "a duplicate of a work, made in any material form". A 2D-photographic image of a free-standing statue is not a duplicate the original statue under the Armenian copyright laws. Meowy 22:06, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Robert Goldston01.jpg
- File:Robert Goldston01.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It's not known if Robert Goldston is still alive. If so, this is reproducible and therefore this is not acceptable for fair use Mblumber (talk) 18:23, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- "My father, Robert Goldston, was a renowned historian, and author." - Max Goldston (his son) http://www.maxgoldston.com/ It's pretty obvious he's no longer alive. Paul venter (talk) 05:53, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- I think that the past tense on the linked web page (click on "bio" to see the statement) justifies fair use here. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:12, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sahak Mesrop kev.jpg
- File:Sahak Mesrop kev.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Per List of statues in Yerevan, this is a statue from 2002. Per commons:COM:FOP#Former Soviet Union, it is unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 18:23, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:EquestrianAndranik.JPG
- File:EquestrianAndranik.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Per List of statues in Yerevan, this is a statue from 2002. Per commons:COM:FOP#Former Soviet Union, it is unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 18:24, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:VahagnVishapakagh.JPG
- File:VahagnVishapakagh.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Per List of statues in Yerevan, this is a statue from 1967. Per commons:COM:FOP#Former Soviet Union, it is unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 18:31, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Movses Khorenatsi Matenadaran.jpg
- Per List of statues in Yerevan, this is a statue from 1965. Per commons:COM:FOP#Former Soviet Union, it is unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 18:36, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
- This is a photo I took. Take a look at the Metadata section on the file page - the information and time stamp of the photo confirm that it was taken back in 2007.--Marshal Bagramyan (talk) 20:20, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Under article 19 of the Armenian Law on Copyright it states that images of works protected by copyright are allowable for free use where "the use of lawfully disclosed works of literature and art and extracts thereof by way of illustration, in the publications, programs of broadcasting organizations , audio and video recordings of educational nature, to the extent justified by the purpose of illustration of education". Surely here the image illustrates the statue for the purpose of education and is an ILLUSTRATION of an art object (a statue), it is NOT a copy of the statue as defined in the Armenian copyright law. The copyright law defines a work as "a specific result of a creative work in the field of science, literature or arts, expressed in some objective form" and a copy of a work as "a duplicate of a work, made in any material form". A 2D-photographic image of a free-standing statue is not a duplicate the original statue under the Armenian copyright laws. Meowy 22:03, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
-
-
- See #File:Mother Armenia, Yerevan, Day.jpg above. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:31, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
-
[edit] File:Tumanyan1 kev.jpg
- File:Tumanyan1 kev.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Per List of statues in Yerevan, this is a statue from 1957. Per commons:COM:FOP#Former Soviet Union, it is unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 18:38, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- Under article 19 of the Armenian Law on Copyright it states that images of works protected by copyright are allowable for free use where "the use of lawfully disclosed works of literature and art and extracts thereof by way of illustration, in the publications, programs of broadcasting organizations , audio and video recordings of educational nature, to the extent justified by the purpose of illustration of education". Surely here the image illustrates the statue for the purpose of education and is an ILLUSTRATION of an art object (a statue), it is NOT a copy of the statue as defined in the Armenian copyright law. The copyright law defines a work as "a specific result of a creative work in the field of science, literature or arts, expressed in some objective form" and a copy of a work as "a duplicate of a work, made in any material form". A 2D-photographic image of a free-standing statue is not a "duplicate of the work" under the Armenian copyright laws. Meowy 22:09, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
- See #File:Mother Armenia, Yerevan, Day.jpg above. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:31, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
- Under article 19 of the Armenian Law on Copyright it states that images of works protected by copyright are allowable for free use where "the use of lawfully disclosed works of literature and art and extracts thereof by way of illustration, in the publications, programs of broadcasting organizations , audio and video recordings of educational nature, to the extent justified by the purpose of illustration of education". Surely here the image illustrates the statue for the purpose of education and is an ILLUSTRATION of an art object (a statue), it is NOT a copy of the statue as defined in the Armenian copyright law. The copyright law defines a work as "a specific result of a creative work in the field of science, literature or arts, expressed in some objective form" and a copy of a work as "a duplicate of a work, made in any material form". A 2D-photographic image of a free-standing statue is not a "duplicate of the work" under the Armenian copyright laws. Meowy 22:09, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:DaveShadoeStevensEddieMoneyAStarrMarkusSchulz1990.jpg
- Claims GFDL-self by attributes source to Source Dave Rajput. Eeekster (talk) 22:18, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] February 17
[edit] File:Gaede.jpg
- File:Gaede.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Image appears to be taken from his website or somewhere on the internet. There is no proof that he released it with a Creative Commons license. Royalbroil 03:54, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence of permission. Tagged with {{npd}}--GrapedApe (talk) 13:10, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Health Sciences Building at East Carolina University.jpg
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:29, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Cape Point on Hatteras Island.JPG
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:32, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:East Carolina Pirate Football entrance.JPG
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:32, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:South Tar River Greenway Trailhead.jpg
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:CH-46 Sea Knight landing at Pitt County Memorial Hospital.jpg
- File:CH-46 Sea Knight landing at Pitt County Memorial Hospital.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Warren Life Sciences Building.JPG
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Greenville North Carolina Town Commons.JPG
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Tar River at Greenville North Carolina.JPG
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Pitt-Greenville Airport building.JPG
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Greenville, North Carolina downtown.JPG
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Pitt-Greenville Airport sign.JPG
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Messick Theatre Arts Center.JPG
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sonic plaza.jpg
- File:Sonic plaza.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Pitt County Memorial Hospital.jpg
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Wright circle.jpg
- File:Wright circle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Lights of Love at PCMH.jpg
- File:Lights of Love at PCMH.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:EastCare.jpg
- File:EastCare.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:41, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:East Carolina University Chancellor Residence.jpg
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:43, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:East Carolina University Environmental Health and Safety Building.jpg
- File:East Carolina University Environmental Health and Safety Building.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:East Carolina University Building 165.jpg
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:East Carolina University Administrative Support Annex.jpg
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:East Carolina University Willis Building.jpg
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Greene Hall.jpg
- File:Greene Hall.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:West End Dining Hall.jpg
- File:West End Dining Hall.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Student Recreation Center.jpg
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:East Carolina University Howard House.jpg
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Biotechnology Building at East Carolina University.jpg
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Clement Hall.jpg
- File:Clement Hall.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:East Carolina University Building 141.jpg
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:East Carolina University NRC Field House.jpg
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University.jpg
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Leo W. Jenkins Cancer Center at East Carolina University.jpg
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:East Carolina University Building 159.jpg
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:East Carolina University Building 127.jpg
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:White Hall.jpg
- File:White Hall.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:East Carolina University Cotanche Building.jpg
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:East Carolina Heart Institute at PCMH.jpg
- Suspicious image from well-documented copyright violator. Legitimacy cannot be ascertained. See Wikipedia:Contributor copyright investigations/PGPirate#Analysis by GrapedApe. GrapedApe (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Cyril and Methodius Klykov.JPG
- As far as I can see, this is a 1991 statue by Vyacheslav Klykov (1939-2006) in Moscow. Per commons:COM:FOP#Russia, the statue is unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 12:40, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:ODea-coat-of-arms.png
- File:ODea-coat-of-arms.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The source is claimed to be http://www.heraldry.ws/ and the terms on the webpage says "Copyright and summary terms of use.
The coat of arms graphics I create are copyright © Eddie Geoghegan, are subject to legal protection worldwide and may be used for non-commercial, personal purposes only. " MGA73 (talk) 18:52, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Mercaz HaRav massacre.jpg
- File:Mercaz HaRav massacre.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The terms on the source
http://www.theisraelproject.org/site/c.hsJPK0PIJpH/b.3943337/k.DB3F/Photographs_of_Terror_Attack_at_Jerusalem_Yeshiva_Mercaz_Harav.htm is "Royalty-free photographs". That is not a very clear license. Do they allow derivative works for example? MGA73 (talk) 18:56, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
- A 1998 version of the Israeli Government Press Office, the original source, license can be seen here (see also). It is long and is not WP friendly, so unless a newer license can be found (I can't) we should probably delete. On derivatives it is contradictory saying a) in the intro "You are prohibited from ... Creating derivative works", b) but in the body "provided the user does not distort, damage, alter or use it in any other fashion, including in any context, which diminishes the value of the work or which may – in the opinion of the Original Author or of the Licensor –cast aspersion on the Original Author or of the Licensor." Royalty free is limited by: "apart from use in the framework of commercial advertising of any kind, including the promotion of goods, services or anything whatsoever, and apart from use in the framework of political activity". User must "Indicate – next to the photograph – the name of the photographer and the Government Press Office". Rwendland (talk) 01:42, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
- delete That 1998 version license I mentioned above appears to be the current English version of the Israeli Government Press Office license - clicking "English verion" at http://www.gpo.gov.il/ gets you to that license. So I think that license is incompatable with any WP license, other than fair usage perhaps. Rwendland (talk) 02:18, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Jetheader.gif
- File:Jetheader.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Based on the description, this is a logo. If so, the "own work" statement might be wrong. Stefan2 (talk) 20:37, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] February 18
[edit] File:Mariska Hargitay in 2011.jpg
- Copyvio. Numerous other occurrences online. Considering editors image contribution history, I have to assume bad faith here unless that can send proof to WikiMedia. Dismas|(talk) 03:49, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy delete The image at http://www.bestcelebritydress.com/mariska-hargitay-celebrity-dress-at-sag-awards-2011-red-carpet appears to be identical. Eeekster (talk) 02:48, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Lake of No Return.jpg
- File:Lake of No Return.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Copyrighted mark - Jayanta Nath (Talk|Contrb) 04:41, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Tomharmon.jpg
- File:Tomharmon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:Gig Machine EDITED.JPG
- File:Gig Machine EDITED.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The file name indicates that this is a derivative work, although it is not clear which image it is a derivative work of. Stefan2 (talk) 13:37, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:UP Carillon.jpg
- File:UP Carillon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Is this a building ({{FoP-USonly|the Philippines}}) or an artwork? Even if it is an artwork, it might be possible to keep it: the image is heavily used and it is likely that at least some article would allow fair use of it. Stefan2 (talk) 14:31, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Barrel barbecue 3.jpg
[edit] File:Barrel barbecue.jpg
[edit] File:Barrel barbecue 2.jpg
[edit] File:Barrel barbecue 4.jpg
[edit] File:CTJLogo.jpg
- File:CTJLogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The file/logo is taken from a website. Uploader added "The copyright holder of this work allows anyone to use it for any purpose including unrestricted redistribution, commercial use, and modification.". I find no basis for that on the website. However the logo may qualify for {{PD-textlogo}}. MGA73 (talk) 15:59, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] All images uploaded by User:Lyndsayruell
- File:AjiMochica.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- And all other images uploaded by User:Lyndsayruell.
The text at this file page says "Larco Museum Collection. Free Use.". Do we have permission of that? Other files have a similar text. The uploader does not seem to be active anymore. A few of the uploads by this user has been deleted as copyvios - I did not check why.
I think a few of the files uploaded as own work should be safe to keep. MGA73 (talk) 17:39, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Images uploaded from Larco Museum Collection
[edit] Images uploaded as own work
[edit] Images uploaded from Larco Museum Collection - now on Commons
[edit] Images uploaded as own work - now on Commons
[edit] Discussion
I also made a notice on Commons: Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:AjiMochica.jpg. --MGA73 (talk) 17:50, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
I suggest that the discussion take place on Commons since the files should all be moved there if the result is keep. --MGA73 (talk) 17:54, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:ADVL.JPG
- File:ADVL.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:Barbie through time.JPG
- File:Barbie through time.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Photo of toys. Counts as a derivative work according to commons:COM:VPC#Dimension of derivative works and commons:COM:DW#I know that I can't upload photos of copyrighted art (like paintings and statues), but what about toys? Toys are not art!. Stefan2 (talk) 21:05, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Number 1 Ponytail Barbie II.jpg
- Photo of a toy. Counts as a derivative work according to commons:COM:VPC#Dimension of derivative works and commons:COM:DW#I know that I can't upload photos of copyrighted art (like paintings and statues), but what about toys? Toys are not art!. Stefan2 (talk) 21:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Vintage Number 3 Ponytail Barbie I.JPG
- Photo of a toy. Counts as a derivative work according to commons:COM:VPC#Dimension of derivative works and commons:COM:DW#I know that I can't upload photos of copyrighted art (like paintings and statues), but what about toys? Toys are not art!. Stefan2 (talk) 21:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Vintagebarbie.jpg
- File:Vintagebarbie.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Photos of toys (file overwritten). They count as derivative works according to commons:COM:VPC#Dimension of derivative works and commons:COM:DW#I know that I can't upload photos of copyrighted art (like paintings and statues), but what about toys? Toys are not art!. Stefan2 (talk) 21:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Number 6 Ponytail Barbie red hair.jpg
- Photo of a toy. Counts as a derivative work according to commons:COM:VPC#Dimension of derivative works and commons:COM:DW#I know that I can't upload photos of copyrighted art (like paintings and statues), but what about toys? Toys are not art!. Stefan2 (talk) 21:07, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Vintage Swirl Ponytail Barbie Brunette.jpg
- Photo of a toy. Counts as a derivative work according to commons:COM:VPC#Dimension of derivative works and commons:COM:DW#I know that I can't upload photos of copyrighted art (like paintings and statues), but what about toys? Toys are not art!. Stefan2 (talk) 21:07, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Paul Huson (Headshot).jpg
- File:Paul Huson (Headshot).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious "I, the copyright holder of this work" (web resolution), without exif, user with a single upload - probably mistake Bulwersator (talk) 21:08, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Arad Israel.jpg
[edit] File:WilliamofWarenne.png
- File:WilliamofWarenne.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This image cannot date to the "1000s". I doubt the actual stained-glass windows dates over a century - who knows. Since it's a fairly good-quality coloured image I suspect it is not out-of-copyright due to age. Considering the uploader's talkpage of about one hundred deleted images, I'm certain this image was just pulled off the net without much thought. Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 21:49, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- Following a chain of guesses, this may be the glass of William de Warenne from the Gundrada Chapel of the Church of St John the Baptist, Southover, Lewes, which would be on the east wall, and here attributed [3] to Jessie Mary Jacob, 1930 (died 1933). (But we really need something better than a chain of guesses to determine copyright status and if in doubt, better safe . . . ). Agricolae (talk) 16:35, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Gulf Oil Corporation Small.png
- "Date Unknown" but tagged as PD due to expired copyright. Unused. Bulwersator (talk) 23:31, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:William Weightman.jpg
- File:William Weightman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious "I, the copyright holder of this work" Bulwersator (talk) 23:32, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Daniel Willis James.jpg
- File:Daniel Willis James.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious "I, the copyright holder of this work" Bulwersator (talk) 23:33, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Elias Hasket Derby.jpg
- File:Elias Hasket Derby.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious "I, the copyright holder of this work" Bulwersator (talk) 23:33, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:James J. Stillman.jpg
- File:James J. Stillman.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "Date circa 1910" and "This file is in the public domain because its copyright has expired in the United States and those countries with a copyright term of no more than the life of the author plus 100 years." Bulwersator (talk) 23:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
- Comment {{PD-old-100}} is unlikely for a photo from "circa 1910"; the author would have had to die very soon after taking the photo. There is no proof of any pre-1923 publication (as stated by the other template). A 1927 publication is given. 1927+28 = 1955, so the copyright would have had to be renewed in 1955 (if I've understood the copyright system correctly). I've tried searching [4][5] for "Stillman" and "Robeson" without finding anything. I've searched [6] (which searches through all years) for "James Stillman" and "Anna Robeson Burr" without finding anything. Thus, I would guess that the 1927 publication is {{PD-US-no renewal}}, but copyright renewals are tricky and I think it's hard to know if I'm searching the records in the correct way, so it would be nice if someone else could comment my searching. Amazon suggests that the publication is a hardcover book. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:37, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] February 19
[edit] File:44 Cl round recovered from seat.JPG
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 00:21, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
- Comment, also goes for all the other cases below: I wouldn't bother. Just because an uploader doesn't know exactly what "fair use" means and that it is different from "free use", doesn't mean their free license is invalid. The files all have a valid free tag in addition to the phrase you cited, and it was clearly the uploader's intention for them to be released freely ("This is free content. The image can be used for any purposes permitted by law.") "Released for fair use" means, strictly speaking, nothing. Even if we were to take it seriously and construed it as something like an invitation to use the file as a non-free one, then the situation would still be that of a "double license": the "fair use" notice, plus the PD-self release. Just like with a double licensing under CC-BY-SA plus GFDL, any user would be free to pick which of the two they like better, so I really see no problem here. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:57, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
- "Just because an uploader doesn't know exactly what "fair use" means and that it is different from "free use", doesn't mean their free license is invalid" - but it is obvious sign that uploader is confused by copyright, so maybe PD-user is not valid in this case. Unfortunately "Source = Self-made" is also sometimes quite dubious - File:Downwind leg Harris.jpg "Author = Lieutenant Commander Roger William Harris Permission = This is free content. The image can be used for any purposes permitted by law. The photo shows an F-4 Phantom piloted by Roger Harris abeam USS Midway during the aerial war in Vietnam." Bulwersator (talk) 19:18, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Bullet retrieved LCDR Harris seat.JPG
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 00:22, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Captain Harris.jpg
- File:Captain Harris.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 00:22, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Captain Roger Harris TWA Wings gold.jpg
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 00:22, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Downwind leg Harris.jpg
- File:Downwind leg Harris.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 00:23, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:LCDR Harris decorations.jpg
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 00:24, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:LCDR Harris receiving award.jpg
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 00:24, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:NAVY Phantom.jpg
- File:NAVY Phantom.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 00:24, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit]
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 00:24, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Photograph (25).jpg
- File:Photograph (25).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 00:24, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Pukin dogs partch Roger Harris.jpg
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 00:24, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Roger Harris Decorations 2.jpg
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 00:24, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit]
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 00:24, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit]
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 00:25, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Roger Harris in Puerto Barrios Guatemala.JPG
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 00:25, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Roger Nancy Harris skiing.jpg
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 00:25, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit]
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 00:25, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Thebutcherboys front.JPG + 2 others
- File:Thebutcherboys front.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:THeButcherBoys Left.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Thebutcherboys sideback.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- 3D artwork, South Africa location. No Freedom of Panorama exists for artworks of any type. Issue raised at OTRS 2012021910000072 Ronhjones (Talk) 01:32, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Beit Shemesh railway station.jpg
- Unable to verify license, original source file has been deleted from he wikipedia. Kelly hi! 09:00, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Goldstar Mothers Statue 2012.jpg
- Photograph of copyrighted modern statue; derivative work. No "freedom of panorama" in US. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:48, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Roger William Harris gunnery award.jpg
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Roger and Nancy Harris.JPG
- File:Roger and Nancy Harris.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa USA0001.JPG
- File:Sabula Iowa USA0001.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa USA0002.JPG
- File:Sabula Iowa USA0002.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:03, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa USA0003.JPG
- File:Sabula Iowa USA0003.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:04, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa USA0004.JPG
- File:Sabula Iowa USA0004.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:04, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa USA0005.JPG
- File:Sabula Iowa USA0005.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:04, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa USA0006.JPG
- File:Sabula Iowa USA0006.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:04, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa USA0007.JPG
- File:Sabula Iowa USA0007.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:04, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa USA0008.JPG
- File:Sabula Iowa USA0008.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:04, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa USA0009.JPG
- File:Sabula Iowa USA0009.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:04, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa USA0010.JPG
- File:Sabula Iowa USA0010.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa USA0011.jpg
- File:Sabula Iowa USA0011.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa USA0012.jpg
- File:Sabula Iowa USA0012.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa USA0013.jpg
- File:Sabula Iowa USA0013.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa USA0014.jpg
- File:Sabula Iowa USA0014.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa USA0015.jpg
- File:Sabula Iowa USA0015.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa USA0016.jpg
- File:Sabula Iowa USA0016.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa USA0017.jpg
- File:Sabula Iowa USA0017.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa USA0018.jpg
- File:Sabula Iowa USA0018.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa USA0019.jpg
- File:Sabula Iowa USA0019.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa USA0022.jpg
- File:Sabula Iowa USA0022.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:06, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa USA0026.jpg
- File:Sabula Iowa USA0026.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:06, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sabula Iowa map.jpg
- File:Sabula Iowa map.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:06, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:TWAMD80 Painting.jpg
- File:TWAMD80 Painting.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:06, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:TWA 727 Painting.jpg
- File:TWA 727 Painting.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:06, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:TWA Hat emblem.jpg
- File:TWA Hat emblem.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:06, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:The Hook Magazine Fall 2001 Roger Harris article.jpg
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:06, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:The Hook Magazine Fall 2001 Roger Harris article page.jpg
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:06, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Ticonderoga Officers 1.jpg
- File:Ticonderoga Officers 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:07, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Ticonderoga Officers 2.jpg
- File:Ticonderoga Officers 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:07, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:USS Midway Painting.jpg
- File:USS Midway Painting.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "The photo is hereby released for fair use" Bulwersator (talk) 15:07, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:ASBlacksmith.jpg
- File:ASBlacksmith.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unused, without useful description (similar situation: Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2012_January_31#File:ASMoorlandFlight.jpg - "this has a somewhat complex history. It was upload about 5 or 6 years ago, along with several others, for Ásmundar Sveinsson. Then someone said that they were copyright protected, (though they are my pictures) so I took them out of the article, but did not remove them from wikipedia. I did not know how to do that. Now looking at our Freedom of panorama article I see that Iceland has freedom of panorama for non-commercial purposes") Bulwersator (talk) 15:17, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
-
-
- This file was used in an article, but was removed by me years ago because I felt that there might be a copyright violation. I now believe the Iceland is a Freedom of panorama nation and that this picture is NOT a violation. let me know what you think and if it is okay, I will return them to their article. Should I add a useful description, ie. a name and add it to the Ásmundar Sveinsson article from whence it came? Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 21:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
- Unfortunately "Icelandic "freedom of panorama" images are free only for non-commercial uses." - what is not enough to keep as free photo in Wikipedia/Commons :( Bulwersator (talk) 06:35, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- This file was used in an article, but was removed by me years ago because I felt that there might be a copyright violation. I now believe the Iceland is a Freedom of panorama nation and that this picture is NOT a violation. let me know what you think and if it is okay, I will return them to their article. Should I add a useful description, ie. a name and add it to the Ásmundar Sveinsson article from whence it came? Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 21:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
-
Well, I guess as The Moody Blues sang all those years ago, "If you got to go, go now". Thanks for looking into it. Carptrash (talk) 00:27, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:ASMotherEarth.jpg
- File:ASMotherEarth.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unused, without useful description (similar situation: Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2012_January_31#File:ASMoorlandFlight.jpg - "this has a somewhat complex history. It was upload about 5 or 6 years ago, along with several others, for Ásmundar Sveinsson. Then someone said that they were copyright protected, (though they are my pictures) so I took them out of the article, but did not remove them from wikipedia. I did not know how to do that. Now looking at our Freedom of panorama article I see that Iceland has freedom of panorama for non-commercial purposes") Bulwersator (talk) 15:17, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- See discussion at File:ASBlacksmith.jpg Carptrash (talk) 21:10, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:ASSisters.jpg
- File:ASSisters.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unused, without useful description (similar situation: Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2012_January_31#File:ASMoorlandFlight.jpg - "this has a somewhat complex history. It was upload about 5 or 6 years ago, along with several others, for Ásmundar Sveinsson. Then someone said that they were copyright protected, (though they are my pictures) so I took them out of the article, but did not remove them from wikipedia. I did not know how to do that. Now looking at our Freedom of panorama article I see that Iceland has freedom of panorama for non-commercial purposes") Bulwersator (talk) 15:18, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- See discussion at File:ASBlacksmith.jpg Carptrash (talk) 21:11, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:ASSaemundar.jpg
- File:ASSaemundar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unused, without useful description (similar situation: Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2012_January_31#File:ASMoorlandFlight.jpg - "this has a somewhat complex history. It was upload about 5 or 6 years ago, along with several others, for Ásmundar Sveinsson. Then someone said that they were copyright protected, (though they are my pictures) so I took them out of the article, but did not remove them from wikipedia. I did not know how to do that. Now looking at our Freedom of panorama article I see that Iceland has freedom of panorama for non-commercial purposes") Bulwersator (talk) 15:18, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- See discussion at File:ASBlacksmith.jpg Carptrash (talk) 21:11, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:ASRescue.jpg
- File:ASRescue.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unused, without useful description (similar situation: Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2012_January_31#File:ASMoorlandFlight.jpg - "this has a somewhat complex history. It was upload about 5 or 6 years ago, along with several others, for Ásmundar Sveinsson. Then someone said that they were copyright protected, (though they are my pictures) so I took them out of the article, but did not remove them from wikipedia. I did not know how to do that. Now looking at our Freedom of panorama article I see that Iceland has freedom of panorama for non-commercial purposes") Bulwersator (talk) 15:18, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- See discussion at File:ASBlacksmith.jpg Carptrash (talk) 21:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Artpres1jacobs.jpg
- File:Artpres1jacobs.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "took picture of paintings hanging on the wall." - picture may be copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 15:29, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Artpres2gardner.jpg
- File:Artpres2gardner.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "took picture of paintings hanging on the wall." - picture may be copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 15:29, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Artpres3hoslett.jpg
- File:Artpres3hoslett.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "took picture of paintings hanging on the wall." - picture may be copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 15:29, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Artpres5evarts.jpg
- File:Artpres5evarts.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "took picture of paintings hanging on the wall." - picture may be copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 15:29, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Artpres6ohara.jpg
- File:Artpres6ohara.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "took picture of paintings hanging on the wall." - picture may be copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 15:29, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Artpres7ronmac.jpg
- File:Artpres7ronmac.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "took picture of paintings hanging on the wall." - picture may be copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 15:29, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Artpres7trueheart.jpg
- File:Artpres7trueheart.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "took picture of paintings hanging on the wall." - picture may be copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 15:30, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Shahrdari Ilam.png
- File:Shahrdari Ilam.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- dubious "I, the copyright holder of this work" Bulwersator (talk) 15:31, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Shahrdari Hamedan.jpg
- File:Shahrdari Hamedan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- dubious "I, the copyright holder of this work" Bulwersator (talk) 15:31, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Baguio Midland Courier.JPG
- File:Baguio Midland Courier.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work of copyrigted images Bulwersator (talk) 15:34, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:75Buckle.jpg
- File:75Buckle.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "Photograph of 1975 Max I. Silber buckle" - therefore it is derivative of copyrigted work, so this file is unfree Bulwersator (talk) 15:56, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Alan Bean art Hall of Fame.jpg
- Derivative of copyrighted work (note c symbol on the right of earth) - but maybe it can pass as PD-NASA? Bulwersator (talk) 15:59, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
- I took the photo. I don't know if it can go under PD-NASA or not - I'll leave that for others to decide (it is at the United States Astronaut Hall of Fame). Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 16:08, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
- "I took the photo" - but unfortunately this photo is a derivative of (probably) copyrighted work Bulwersator (talk) 16:11, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
- I took the photo. I don't know if it can go under PD-NASA or not - I'll leave that for others to decide (it is at the United States Astronaut Hall of Fame). Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 16:08, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Does anyone know how to contact him? If so, I might try. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 18:54, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
-
-
-
[edit] File:Albertosaurus statue.JPG
- File:Albertosaurus statue.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No FOP for statues in USA Bulwersator (talk) 16:00, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Jasmine-kalaripayatt.gif
- File:Jasmine-kalaripayatt.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious "I, the copyright holder of this work," - web resolution Bulwersator (talk) 16:32, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:PSlogo.jpg
- File:PSlogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious "I, the copyright holder of this work" Bulwersator (talk) 16:33, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Toy sonic screwdrivers.png
- File:Toy sonic screwdrivers.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Both files are photos of copyrighted objects Bulwersator (talk) 16:34, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Lucas Piazón Chelsea.jpg
- File:Lucas Piazón Chelsea.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Claimed as pd-self by uploader but other pd-self uploads by user have been copyright violations from Getty Images MilborneOne (talk) 17:23, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:BMP-1 ZU-23-2.jpg
- File:BMP-1 ZU-23-2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dead source, unable to confirm that this was published in Afghanistan. Kelly hi! 19:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:BradHunstable.jpg
- File:BradHunstable.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence that the uploader is copyright holder of these works. Kelly hi! 20:47, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:The Myth.jpg
- File:The Myth.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Watermarked image that appears to a commercial band photo. Eeekster (talk) 23:39, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] February 20
[edit] File:Malta Music Awards 2011.jpg
[edit] File:Freeman Field Mutiny.jpg
- File:Freeman Field Mutiny.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Library of Congress shows that this photo comes from the NAACP, not the US Air Force. Kelly hi! 02:12, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- LOC description page at [7] states: "No known restrictions on publication." -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 21:25, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
- The only surviving pictures of the arrest were taken surreptitiously by Sgt. Harold Beaulieu who was in charge of the USAAF photo lab at Freeman. His images eventually became part of the NAACP collection donated to the LOC. The problem is: 1) The picture wasn't exactly taken as "part of his official duties;" and 2) The NAACP colletion (unlike the Bain Collection) probably includes some images not owned by the NAACP. Does anyone think that a "fair use" tag would be more appripriate? -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 15:40, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Jake lamotta 240x230 021005.jpg
[edit] File:325px-lamotta joey (2).jpg
- File:325px-lamotta joey (2).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:Huac.jpg
- File:Huac.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Library of Congress states this is an AP photo. No evidence that it was published without a copyright notice as claimed. Kelly hi! 04:29, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- But there are links to copyright renewal records without hits, so it might be fine. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:43, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm, perhaps, but the AP is generally pretty conscientious about its copyrights, and we usually avoid using any of their stuff per WP:NFCC#2. Kelly hi! 22:08, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
- See also the similar request Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima.png (about a different AP image). --Stefan2 (talk) 23:17, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
- Hmm, perhaps, but the AP is generally pretty conscientious about its copyrights, and we usually avoid using any of their stuff per WP:NFCC#2. Kelly hi! 22:08, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
- But there are links to copyright renewal records without hits, so it might be fine. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:43, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Raifordredcross.jpg
- File:Raifordredcross.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:BlufordBust.jpg
- File:BlufordBust.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Photograph of copyrightable modern statue, no "freedom of panorama" (US). Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:35, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- learn something new every day! (no "freedom of panorama"). I'll see about a pic with a person viewing the display, or something. For now, the photo is not publicly displayed, and since it is not a panoramic shot per se, possibly arguable that it should be speedily deleted. Judge Dred Scott (talk) 13:50, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- Actually, maybe you misunderstood the term "freedom of panorama" a bit (I should have given a link right away; it's explained here). It has nothing to do with being a "panoramic shot", and having a picture with people standing around the artwork wouldn't help much either, I'm afraid. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:56, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
- learn something new every day! (no "freedom of panorama"). I'll see about a pic with a person viewing the display, or something. For now, the photo is not publicly displayed, and since it is not a panoramic shot per se, possibly arguable that it should be speedily deleted. Judge Dred Scott (talk) 13:50, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Missori newmadridsign.jpg
- File:Missori newmadridsign.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be a sign by State Historical Society of Missouri which is not a federal organisation, so this would appear to be unfree per Commons:COM:FOP#United States. Stefan2 (talk) 10:30, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:RSMedia.jpg
- File:RSMedia.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be some kind of doll or robot or something. See Commons:COM:DW#I know that I can't upload photos of copyrighted art (like paintings and statues), but what about toys? Toys are not art!. Stefan2 (talk) 10:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:27 Jenniffer Gonzalez.jpg
- File:27 Jenniffer Gonzalez.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:27 Jenniffer Gonzalez.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 12:40, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Edison Misla.jpg
- File:Edison Misla.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be a work of Cámera de representantes in Puerto Rico: [8] As this is not part of the federal government, it is not covered by {{PD-USGov}}. Stefan2 (talk) 12:45, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:19 Angel Viera.JPG
- File:19 Angel Viera.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:19 Angel Viera.JPG. Stefan2 (talk) 12:49, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Carlos Vizcarrondo.jpg
- File:Carlos Vizcarrondo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carlos Vizcarrondo.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 12:51, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:20 Luis Ramos Yordan.JPG
- File:20 Luis Ramos Yordan.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:20 Luis Ramos Yordan.JPG. Stefan2 (talk) 12:53, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Maldives2-756161.jpg
- File:Maldives2-756161.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Nice photo. But it has no source and meta data. There is a few hits on tineye but they could perhaps be copied from here. MGA73 (talk) 18:17, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Sokil white.png
- File:Sokil white.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- I think that this logo is copyrighted Bulwersator (talk) 19:44, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- Would it not qualify under non-free logo? here is the logo. --Львівське (говорити) 19:46, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- Keep with the addition of a valid fair use rational. -DJSasso (talk) 19:54, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Felix Soto Toro.JPG
[edit] File:Yale-library-stained-glass2.jpg
- Photo of copyrighted art (see more pictures on G. Owen Bonawit) - maybe may pass as fair use Bulwersator (talk) 19:48, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Spirit of France Maiden Arrival in Dover.jpg
[edit] Remaining uploads by User:Sean1290
- File:Fox terrier snowy.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:KENTA wrestler.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:KENTA puro.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The user has uploaded many copyrighted images according to his talk page. These images are the only ones left and I'm quite suspicious. Only one of them has any EXIF data at all and two of them are in a web resolution. Image quality seems to differ quite a bit. Stefan2 (talk) 21:18, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:PNervi2.jpg
- File:PNervi2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This might be unfree in both the United States and Italy. There are two copyrights involved: the photo task and the derivative work (freedom of panorama). The picture was taken in 1960, and if English Wikipedia's interpretation of the Italian photo law is correct, it would mean that the copyright expired in 1980. However, there is still the derivative work part: as the building remains copyrighted until 2050, I assume that the architect would still be able to claim copyright to the parts of the photo displaying the building. And since those parts presumably were copyrighted in Italy on the URAA date, I would guess that copyright might have been restored. But I'm not really sure. Stefan2 (talk) 22:09, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
- File:Pirelli T0.png, File:Gio Genova.jpg and File:Pirelli T1.png have the same problem, by the way. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:11, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] February 21
[edit] File:NGC3982 Supernova 1998aq.jpg
- Permission links to site where Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License is not mentioned, my email was ignored Bulwersator (talk) 10:56, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:PYS Tariq Imran 2.jpg
- File:PYS Tariq Imran 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This has a dubious source ("This is a Public image of the Pir Syed Yaqoob Shah i have this image cince long time back but still all the copyrights belong to Pir Syed Yaqoob shah's family Thanks"). It seems that it was previously deleted as F4: File:Pir Syed Mohammad Yaqoob Shah by Tariq Imran 1.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 15:43, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
- By the way, the other uploads at Special:ListFiles/Tariq.Imran should probably be checked. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:48, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:SalakaySalilingMling.JPG
- File:SalakaySalilingMling.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- How can the person on the photo be unknown to the uploader if the photo is own work by the uploader? Stefan2 (talk) 16:13, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:OldestPersoninthePhilwithPresJoseph.jpg
- Dubious own work: no EXIF, web resolution and lots of copyright-related notices on the uploader's talk page. Stefan2 (talk) 16:14, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Lolad.jpeg
- File:Lolad.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:AMU LOGO.jpg
- File:AMU LOGO.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Dubious {{PD-ineligible}}. Stefan2 (talk) 16:20, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Joey Contino.jpeg
- File:Joey Contino.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Likely copyvio from [9] based on the text on the image. Stefan2 (talk) 16:34, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Bergamot - Weldon Kees - 1951.jpg
- Owning the physical painting does give a license to copy it. Eeekster (talk) 23:50, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
- That's what I thought. There is no artist's estate for Weldon Kees and his heirs gave his unpublished literary copyrights the public library in Lincoln, Nebraska. I get permissions from them for text. But I don't think this jpg, which should be fair use, would qualify. What do you think?--Logatorial (talk) 00:28, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] February 22
[edit] File:EFRicejr.jpg
- File:EFRicejr.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Not an own work, permission missing. Leyo 00:48, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Eberhard Fraas.jpg
- File:Eberhard Fraas.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- 1922 is not 100 years ago (as claimed by the license). Leyo 00:50, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:D4 Business Center.jpg
- File:D4 Business Center.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Not an own work, permission missing. Leyo 00:51, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Bathing beauties no. 29.PNG
- No evidence this file is in the public domain as claimed. Published in US after 1923. Kelly hi! 01:59, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Bathing beauties no. 30.PNG
- No evidence this file is in the public domain as claimed. Published in US after 1923. Kelly hi! 01:59, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:TOPIO 3.0.jpg
- File:TOPIO 3.0.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The robot might be an artwork. See Commons:COM:FOP#Japan. Additionally, the photo currently doesn't have any licence. Stefan2 (talk) 09:04, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:ASIN Mirinda.jpg
[edit] File:Joseph W Musser.jpg
- File:Joseph W Musser.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Joseph W Musser.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 10:00, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
- Stefan2 is correct. The image should not have been changed from "fair-use" to "Pubic Domain" version (see [10]). It was an error on my part, but I'm not sure what I was thinking at the time, so all I can say is "Sorry". I have reverted it back to the "fair-use" version.--ARTEST4ECHO (talk/contribs) 13:30, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Katherine Dunham LC-DIG-ppmsca-05795.jpg
- Professional studio portrait not made by New York World-Telegram staff.[11] Kelly hi! 18:43, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- All I can offer here is that there are some Vandamm Studio photos at Commons. Personally have uploaded some of those with backs and the only marking on the back is the stamp for the studio and its NYC location. The photographer appears to have done a lot of work with various theatrical productions in New York City. FWIW, any that I've seen which I didn't upload had no copyright markings on them either. We hope (talk) 23:45, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] Nazi poster
[edit] File:Vote number 1.jpg
[edit] File:Vote number 1b.jpg
- File:Vote number 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File:Vote number 1b.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence that this image is in public domain in US as claimed. Also applies to derivative work File:Vote number 1b.jpg. Kelly hi! 19:44, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
Kelly has nominated a featured picture for deletion. Please see discussion at User_talk:Durova#Possibly_unfree_File:Vote_number_1.jpg. Durova412 00:57, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- This is the page where possibly unfree files normally are discussed, so why should this file be an exception? --Stefan2 (talk) 09:29, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- I've asked there if we could centralize the discussion at this page. Also, I'd appreciate it if no accusations of personal motivations were thrown my way, really my only concern is copyright issues, which is what I spend virtually all of my Wikipedia time on. Kelly hi! 01:11, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
- On her talk page, Durova cited Price v. United States as the reason this image is public domain in the US...is there any evidence that this image was a part of that case? Kelly hi! 01:17, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:WJSloaneDiningRoomDisplay.jpg
- Works from this LOC collection may be restricted as "work for hire".[12] Kelly hi! 20:01, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:John Bull at the Smithsonian, 1920.jpg
- Works from this LOC collection may be restricted as "work for hire".[13] Kelly hi! 20:03, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
-
- Granted, but there isn't anything that says this particular photograph was a work for hire. The same rights page says that other photographs in the same collection are in the public domain. But, that being said, I don't see any statement either way on this specific image in the rights pages as they appear today. Although the reason for removal is sound due to the uncertainty, I'm disappointed that this image might be deleted soon. Slambo (Speak) 23:35, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Gadsarlake jpg.jpeg
- File:Gadsarlake jpg.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Flickr says CC-BY-NC-SA which is incompatible with Wikipedia. I considered using a possibly unfree files process instead of an F9 request because the uploader contacted me on my talk page after I requested F9 deletion of one of his other uploads, complaining that he had "contacted [the Flickr user] for the license issue". If that is true, and if he has permission from the Flickr user, the permission should be sent to OTRS per the instructions at WP:CONSENT or Commons:COM:OTRS. Stefan2 (talk) 20:46, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Vishansar Lake.jpg
- File:Vishansar Lake.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Flickr says CC-BY-NC-SA which is incompatible with Wikipedia. I considered using a possibly unfree files process instead of an F9 request because the uploader contacted me on my talk page after I requested F9 deletion of one of his other uploads, complaining that he had "contacted [the Flickr user] for the license issue". If that is true, and if he has permission from the Flickr user, the permission should be sent to OTRS per the instructions at WP:CONSENT or Commons:COM:OTRS. Stefan2 (talk) 20:47, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Helocentrism origin.jpg
- File:Helocentrism origin.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The book was published in the 16th century, but the left portion of the file shows some 3D stuff for which no licence is given. Stefan2 (talk) 23:38, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] February 23
[edit] File:ARSHentry1.jpg
- File:ARSHentry1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:Historic West Martin Street in Raleigh.jpg
[edit] File:Concord 1930s.jpg
- File:Concord 1930s.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:Minolta Logo.svg
[edit] File:Dakota Marker.JPG
- File:Dakota Marker.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:M. E. Church, Frederick, SD.jpg
[edit] File:Standingbearlake.jpg
- File:Standingbearlake.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:Zorinsky.jpg
- File:Zorinsky.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
[edit] File:Civil tur .tif
- File:Civil tur .tif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The text says "Photograph of Miguel Civil, taken in the early 1960s. Anonymous photographer and unknown source." Therefore it is NOT PD-self and there is no good arguments that is should be PD. MGA73 (talk) 09:21, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:San Isidro History.jpg
- File:San Isidro History.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This is a scan of a document. The source is stated to be "Philippine National Archive" so I doubt that uploader wrote the document. Same with
- File:San Isidro History 02.jpg and
- File:San Isidro History 03.jpg
So who created the original document? When? MGA73 (talk) 09:40, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Nadone - Deperimento dell'ambiente.jpg
[edit] File:Maxxxband.jpg
- File:Maxxxband.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It says "own work by uploader", "work by someone other than the uploader" and "used under permission", although no evidence of permission is provided. Stefan2 (talk) 10:47, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Blogscope-front-page.jpg
- File:Blogscope-front-page.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Print screen from a website / program. No proof that it is free. MGA73 (talk) 12:54, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Flavour-nabania.jpg
- File:Flavour-nabania.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- There used to be a link to https://hiphopsouth.wordpress.com/2011/09/16/leak-flavour-nabania-baby-oku/ so it seems that this is not own work. MGA73 (talk) 13:08, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:IWATriState.jpg
- File:IWATriState.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It seems to be a logo and it is too complex to be PD-ineligible so I doubt it is free. MGA73 (talk) 13:18, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:GSRakovskiAcademyBadge.jpg
- File:GSRakovskiAcademyBadge.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative work of (probably) copyrighted badge, therefore probably unfree. Bulwersator (talk) 13:35, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:City of Columbia Heights Public Library 1953.jpg
- "Obtained from the public archives of the Columbia Heights Historical Society." + PD-user Bulwersator (talk) 13:35, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Inside the Centre for NSQI.jpg
- "and the image is owned by the Centre for NSQI" Bulwersator (talk) 13:36, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:MPonsot.jpg
- File:MPonsot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No proof of permission. Not sure uploader is active so take it here instead. MGA73 (talk) 13:38, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit] File:Вид на комплекс Москва-сити.jpeg
- Probably copyvio. The uploader lists this site as source, but I can't find it there. Stefan2 (talk) 14:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
[edit]
Today is February 23 2012. Put new nominations in Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 February 23 -- (new nomination)
If the current date's page has been started without the header, apply {{subst:puf log}} to the top of the day's page.
Please ensure "===February 23===" is at the very top of the new page so that internal page links from the main Possibly unfree files page (the one you're on now) work.