Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Wikipedia:RFUD)
Jump to: navigation, search

Administrator instructions

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts:

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases

Contents

Copy of User:Leisure Pirate[edit]

Hello, I am requesting a copy of my recently-deleted user page as it went against Wikipedia's No Web Host rules. I simply want to copy the content I posted there- a dozen or so infoboxes I made for personal use, and put them elsewhere as required, probably my Sandbox. I'd be grateful for any assistance given, and I apologize for not abiding by one of the site's rules.

Many Thanks. -Leisure Pirate (talk) 23:21, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done Sorry, but I can't see what purpose restoring this would serve. Not only that, but a look at the information in the data boxes also shows that aside from the WP:NOTWEBHOST concerns, there's also a bit of vandalism there. I can't see what possible positive use it would be when you link the Adriatic Pact to cumshot. The only possible use I can see is for vandalism purposes and not only is that not allowable on Wikipedia, but it can actually lead to your account getting permanently blocked from editing. Your best bet here is to just accept that the material has been deleted and edit in a beneficial manner from here on out. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:02, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Even if this was going to be posted on an outside source, it is still inappropriate for you to create hoax/vandalism infoboxes in any context. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:08, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
  • @Tokyogirl79: I wouldn't be so harsh. The user's edit history does not show any sign of such vandalism, and the page itself really looks playful more than harmful from what I remember. Imagining virtual polities with different political regimes than historical ones is really a benign game, as is playing with wiki syntax. I'm the one who first notified the user that this did not fit user pages policies, and they acknowledged it immediately. I'd say let the kid have his toy back and play elsewhere, as he politely requested. All signs show this could be a future constructive contributor to Wikipedia, there's no use being too iron-handed here imho. Place Clichy (talk) 17:43, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
  • I for one can't see why it was deleted in the first place. I see that some of the templates included the user page into mainspace categories and that's how another user noticed the page itself, but other than that annoyance what's the problem? That a userpage has some templates and what-not which would've otherwise gone unnoticed until the end of time? @Leisure Pirate, to you have email enabled? If so, I'll just email you a copy of the page. The better path for all involved would've been to fix the transclusion/category issue and ignore the page. And @Tokyogirl79, don't you think "Your best bet here is to just accept that the material has been deleted and edit in a beneficial manner from here on out" is a bit extreme given the situation? They futzed around with their user page, they weren't generating hoaxes or vandalizing articles. Is this how we treat people who break a rule (under a broad interpretation, IMO) they probably didn't know existed? Protonk (talk) 18:52, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
  • I'm sorry, but I can see no good reason for someone to have a userbox created in that manner. The problem is that it's not that they did this once, but several times in the infoboxes. The infobox would show up as linking to various historical events, but would actually be linking to things such as the following: "fail, cumshot, anus, bum, cock, poo, willy" and so on. Why create that? Why create it at all? By most standards that'd be seen as vandalism. I didn't block him because there wasn't really a history of vandalism, but I can't see where he'd really be able to use that in any beneficial manner anywhere on Wikipedia or elsewhere. Maybe he didn't outright state that he was going to try to insert it into one of the articles here on Wikipedia, but it's hard to imagine that this would be used for anything other than vandalism somewhere. We've deleted stuff like this as vandalism and declined to restore them for less than this. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:49, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
    • I'm aware of the content of the page. I'm also aware it's a user page, literally the least important and least restricted set of pages on the wiki. And apart from a relatively narrow set of restrictions (which the page didn't really violate, if it was User:Leisure Pirate/Template testing nobody would've batted an eye), we shouldn't waste time policing userspace for venial sins. I wasn't convinced it violated NOTWEB and I'm even less convinced that the user is guilty of vandalism pre-crime. Obviously there's room for disagreement, but imagine that Leisure Pirate just wanted to play with templates. Someone came by and deleted their user page and in asking to have the content restored they were treated like a petulant child who broke a rule and needed to know why they were bad instead of an adult who didn't know we had these rules. If we assume LP is editing in good faith, that's a pretty awful introduction into the community. Protonk (talk) 13:27, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
    • More to the point, if you're right and LP was building up these templates in preparation for a spree of hoax edits to european countries, we can just revert the eventual edits to mainspace and block the account. Nothing is really lost by restoring the content and nothing is gained by keeping it deleted (with 570 some edits to infoboxes I bet they've got the hang of it). If they're merely experimenting with templates and linking to fail/cumshot/etc. because it's more fun than not, then all we've accomplished by asserting they're a vandal in training is piss off a member of the community. In the future when someone brings up Wikipedia in conversation, their experience will be "I broke some obscure rule, then got yelled at for making a contrite request to have my page restored." Protonk (talk) 14:25, 14 July 2014 (UTC)
      • I agree. If @Tokyogirl79: does not object, I will restore the content to a sub-page of the user's space. I will refrain from trouting, much as I am tempted. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:30, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
  • If you promise to watch it like a hawk, go ahead. I just see it as something that'd be inevitably used for trolling. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Imperator Online[edit]

Development history for Mythic Entertainment; Partial history with Dark Age of Camelot; proposed MMO systems that don't work -Moonchips (talk) 23:30, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Marasmusine (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. The article needs references (a) to verify what it says, and (b) to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 14:01, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Msn classic sign in.png (and other MSN images)[edit]

This image was removed without discussion by a single user from the MSN article even though it had a valid fair use rationale, and then it was speedy-deleted because it wasn't used in any articles. I would like to add it back to the MSN article. -Samvscat (talk) 02:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

This image was removed without discussion by a single user from the MSN article even though it had a valid fair use rationale, and then it was speedy-deleted because it wasn't used in any articles. I would like to add it back to the MSN article. -Samvscat (talk) 02:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

This image was removed without discussion by a single user from the MSN article even though it had a valid fair use rationale, and then it was speedy-deleted because it wasn't used in any articles. I would like to add it back to the MSN article. -Samvscat (talk) 02:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

This image was removed without discussion by a single user from the MSN article even though it had a valid fair use rationale, and then it was speedy-deleted because it wasn't used in any articles. I would like to add it back to the MSN article. -Samvscat (talk) 02:24, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done and date extended for reuse. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:12, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Thomas Rathnam (2nd request)[edit]

1. This wiki page is hosted in Wikepedia more than a year. i.e for a long period, 2. It has more reliable web links. 3. Most of them are Third party web links 4. The person is already a popular figure. His films were released in theaters and run successfully in Tamil, kannada... 4. His English albums were released in MTV, SS music channel and so on.. 5. You may see it in video channels, news links.. 6. This pages were edited by many authors, may be due to interest to update the page. The edit itself shows the notability of the person. 7. May be few updates may be done by their own interest. If it don't have viable links that paragraphs only to be deleted not all. That is the whole page. 8. Wikipedia is keeping the records for reference to the public, to the honour.. 9. so, pl avoid the deletion and re host it -Praisewinner (talk) 04:23, 18 July 2014 (UTC)--Praisewinner (talk) 04:23, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done It was already explained to you above why this won't be restored. Requesting it again serves no purpose. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 04:30, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Youi Insurance[edit]

I, TrevorDev, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TrevorDev (talk) 05:28, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.@TrevorDev: I have restored it, (with reservations) but please take the concerns to heart. It does not simply need a little work, it needs a major rewrite. It does have some refs, so those may be useful, but if it not substantially rewritten, it will be rejected.--S Philbrick(Talk) 14:46, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Journal of Health Sciences[edit]

I, Pranggio, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Pranggio (talk) 07:58, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Pranggio: --S Philbrick(Talk) 14:41, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Ramakrishna Mission Shilpamandira Computer Centre[edit]

This page is about a very well known institute in West Bengal, please bring it back.

Note: Of the speedy deletions this article has, the most recent deletion is a A7. Articles meeting this criterion are generally not undeleted either because they require a complete rewrite or they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. The other deletion, a G11, also can't be restored for similar reasons. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 10:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. Also this had a promotional tone. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:07, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Krystal Boyd[edit]

Article was deleted for: (A7: Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject). I would like access to the most recent version of the page, possibly in my userspace (as a draft), so I can work on improving the article. -(Rovinemessage) 11:56, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Symbol declined.svg Unnecessary - Kelapstick has given the answer on his talk page.(Rovinemessage) 12:43, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Enigma.io[edit]

The page was deleted citing no evidence for notability. However, such evidence exists and I request that the page be restored so that sources establishing notability can be added. Notability evidence includes a New York Times Article about the company, an interview with one of its founders on NPR, and an an article which establishes it as the winner of TechCrunch Disrupt, a large national tech startup competition. -Dandelany (talk) 15:23, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

@Dandelany: Yes check.svg Done As a contested PROD, the article has been restored. The concerns about the content are still valid, and I've notified the original PRODer DGG (NYPL) (DGG) in case they feel an AFD discussion is merited. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:12, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Now at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enigma.io DGG ( talk ) 18:14, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Nate Thomas[edit]

The article had participation and comments on whether to be deleted or not. There was not a consensus to delete. Although considered marginal whether the article meets WP:Creative and WP: Bare there were two deletes and two keeps and a strong interest in contributing to the article to improve it. Biographee has produced and directed award winning television PSAs and theatrically released films, received national commendations from FBI director Robert Mueller, and won an Emmy Award, the msot coveted award in his field. He is referenced in other Wikipedia articles, and as a tenured film professor viewed as an expert in his field having been quoted various times in major newspaer articles and journals. Biographee, upon my research, is also a member of the Board of Directors for LA36 television station and President of the California Faculty Association- the collective bargaining unit for California State University faculty. Speedy deletion of articles like this one challenges the integrity of Wikipedia. -Prease (talk) 16:39, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done This is not a speedy deletion, and we cannot restore articles deleted via AFD. You'll need to request a deletion review, or (probably better) contact the deleting admin and ask if they will userify the content to a draft for you to work on. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:03, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tetryonics[edit]

I, 66.66.175.157, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 66.66.175.157 (talk) 22:19, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Unsourced paper/essay about a fringe topic with little to no coverage in mainstream scientific sources. Not even going there. If another admin wants to give it a chance, I'm good. But I don't think it's worth it. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:29, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done. Wikipedia does not publish original research or original thought. See the policy Wikipedia:No original research for further information. There is no point in restoring such content. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:11, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Council for Adult and Experiential Learning[edit]

I, Kacno1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kacno1 (talk) 22:33, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

@Kacno1: Yes check.svg Done You might want to review the citation guide when you start working on this again, as well as the notability guidelines. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:52, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Katch 22[edit]

I, Mike-eastman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mike-eastman (talk) 12:43, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Protonk (talk) 12:48, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Twelfth Planet Press[edit]

Substantial changes to the subject since deletion, including multiple notable events with significant coverage in reliable secondary sources such as mainstream media -Editormum (talk) 14:05, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done. I can't unilaterally overturn the deletion decision, however it's been 4 years and the deletion was undertaken because the article didn't make a claim as to the importance of the subject. You can recreate the article and add sourcing so it's apparent it meets the basic guidance for inclusion on wikipedia or you may start a new draft via articles for creation where you can work on it at your leisure. If you'd like me to start a draft page for you with the content that was on the page in 2010 I'd be happy to do so. Let me know here or on my talk page. Protonk (talk) 14:23, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Stacy Doris[edit]

I, Wattsirod, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Wattsirod (talk) 01:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

I would like to continue working on this. Can you let me access the text?

  • Yes check.svg Done It looks like it was restored back in April and there should be content currently on the page. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:00, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Digital Audio Notebook[edit]

I, 98.169.107.221, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 98.169.107.221 (talk) 01:49, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:04, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • On a side note, you'll need to edit the article to make it more neutral and encyclopedic. It's not promotional per se, but it is written a bit more like a casual blog or news entry than would be comfortable. Just small tweaks here and there should do it. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:04, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Neo-Catholic[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -208.59.156.220 (talk) 06:26, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neo-Catholicism (2nd nomination), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Dennis Brown (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:30, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Social_pyramid[edit]

There is a portal block for social media & this is the only red link on said box. A stub or poorly cited article makes a better placeholder than a complete blank. -23.116.49.179 (talk) 06:50, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Comment: Hmm... from looking at the deleted version, part of the big rationale for its deletion was that it was written with an WP:OR tone. I can kind of see where they're coming from. I don't mind restoring it, but it will need to be improved or it will likely inevitably be deleted again. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:13, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • I'm looking for sources to see if there's anything I can throw up there, but I'm not finding a lot to show that this term is very frequently used. There are a few hits, but mostly in self-published sources and it's almost exclusively mentioned in relation to ancient Egypt in specific. I'm just concerned that if restored, it'll just be a brief reprieve before deletion. Being mentioned in the portal doesn't always mean that something should be listed there- sometimes it just means that someone added it and it needs to be removed. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:17, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • It could also be seen as a content fork of hierarchy or social class in many ways, although this article mentions intimacy. I'm just more than a little concerned that none of the sourcing I'm finding really uses this term in this specific manner and that deletion of some sort would be inevitable. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:21, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • Basically all I really want is some reassurance that you will try to work on the article (or get someone else to work on it) after I restore it and that there is some sort of RS out there. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:57, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eclectica[edit]

I, Zoltan.devenyi, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Zoltan Devenyi 07:15, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:11, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Albasco.com[edit]

Hi, I had added an article about Albasco.com company, an Iranian online shop. Unfortunately this article is deleted. I request for an opportunity to edit the content of that article and remove the mistakes including too many links to the company's itself that makes these misunderstandings that is an advertising or copyright infringement. I will deeply grateful if it is possible to undelete Albasco.com content. -Barish.oxtay (talk) 08:37, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Barish.oxtay (talk) 08:37, 20 July 2014 (UTC)Barish.oxtay

  • The article was deleted at AfD in 2010, so it has that going against it as well. I'm also concerned that the article was written in a fairly promotional manner. Sentences such as " Albasco.com is trying to introduce online shopping to Iranian people as an easy and reliable tool to purchase a variety of goods with appropriate and reasonable costs and prices" comes across as an advertisement. What I recommend is that you try creating a new version of the article at WP:AfC, our articles for creation page. It won't be in our mainspace, but you would be able to work on creating a new version of the article and you'd have more time to work on it as well. We usually only speedy AfC articles if they are abandoned (6+ months without edits to the page) or violate our guidelines so severely that it cannot remain in the article space, which is usually pretty rare. (The types that do this are usually very extreme promotional articles, threats, copyright violations, and so on.) Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 10:02, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
  • On a side note, coverage does not have to be in English. Even if it is in say, a foreign language newspaper, that would still count towards notability. A good place to start for looking for sources would be Wikipedia:WikiProject Iran. Since most of the coverage would be in a foreign language, it would be best if you were to have someone who speaks/reads the language look over the sources and help show you the best places to look for coverage. You could get help at WP:RS/N, a noticeboard for reliable sources, but I have a feeling that you would inevitably be steered towards the Iran wikiproject because of the language barrier. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 10:06, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Thomas Rathnam (3rd request)[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Robypop2014 (talk) 13:14, 20 July 2014 (UTC) "I found 'Thomas Rathnam" article is genuine one.

Please update it and re host it."

and past those article...

You have been told multiple times, Praisewinner, that we will not restore it and why we will not restore it. Repeatedly asking for it after having been told no repeatedly is disruption and it will get your sock and main accounts blocked. Please stop. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:05, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Montgomeryshire Society[edit]

I, Montgomeryshire, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Montgomeryshire (talk) 14:25, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Monty845 15:53, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Warp Drajv[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click theAXAXA "Save page" button below -WarpDrajv (talk) 18:15, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Here is the entire contents of that page: "WDWQDFW" --S Philbrick(Talk) 19:08, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi Philbrick! Just to be pedantic, was that the G2 page PxaXAXAre or the A7 page Warp Drajv? This might be read as a request to restore either. :) Frieda Beamy (talk) 19:17, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
It's good to be pedantic, I think you are right. I haven't handled an A7 before, and am busy, so will leave it for someone else.--S Philbrick(Talk) 19:30, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
We don't restore A7s, actually. At best we provide the text to the requestor. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:01, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done for Warp Drajv. We might restore if the nomination or deletion was invalid. However in this case the contents are not suitable as an encyclopedia article, it is not in English, and there is no claim of importance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:55, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

AFC Mansfield[edit]

Club is now a notable one as has won promotion to the Northern Counties East League -Kivo (talk) 18:36, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted as a result of a deletion debate. Admins will not undelete pages that were deleted with discussion here; go to WP:Deletion review instead. We likewise will not restore G4s as those are dependent on an existing XfD debate. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:59, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sfakian cross[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 216.70.176.61 (talk) 21:11, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:16, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robert Elwes Victorian Traveller Painter 1819 - 1878[edit]

I, 109.158.102.194, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 109.158.102.194 (talk) 21:40, 20 July 2014 (UTC) ,

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:16, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joe (Joseph) Brent[edit]

I, 96.250.11.12, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 96.250.11.12 (talk) 23:38, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:18, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Alison Valerie Hart[edit]

Content is valid -71.122.125.155 (talk) 23:48, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

User:Stevenmg/sandbox/Sheila Alexander-Reid[edit]

I, Stevenmg, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Stevenmg (talk) 00:57, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:48, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/NearTree[edit]

I, Yayahjb, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Yayahjb (talk) 01:23, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

This is an article about a heavily used package that outperforms the packages for which you already permit posts. We will be adding additional uses and citations in the hope that you will eventually accept this article. It is important.

 -- H. J. Bernstein

We are adding more citations and recent uses of the package -Yayahjb (talk) 01:28, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done you had this restored for 6 months at the end of last year and did not touch it. If you wish you can try to persuade us here by listing your new citations you plan to use below. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:51, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

GetSmarter[edit]

Content has been updated and changed to be more encyclopedic and less promotional -KJSlack (talk) 08:51, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done. This title has been protected against creation because of repeated re-creation. What you should do is: click on Help:Userspace draft and fill in the title. That will create a draft page in your "user space" where you can work on an improved article. When it is ready, contact the deleting administrator, user Secret (talk) with a link to your draft. If Secret does not accept it, you can appeal at WP:Deletion review. Before you start, read WP:Notability, WP:Notability (organizations and companies) and WP:Notability (summary). JohnCD (talk) 11:39, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

User:CD33/Zenon Software[edit]

I, CD33, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CD33 (talk) 08:51, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:53, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

MAULANA mir baaz khan[edit]

the Historical Personality- Leading Maulavi of Deobandi Section "Save page" button below -Chimpazi (talk) 09:13, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Possibly this person is notable, but there was no clear claim of importance. All I saw was "collection of spiritual revelations" that might mean this person was important. However if you had some references saying where your information came from it could also show notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:17, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Dawley Court, Middlesex in 1929.jpg[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Rodolph (talk) 10:21, 21 July 2014 (UTC) copyright is ok Photograph is in a family album. I made a digital photograph copy of the 1929 image and gave it to Wikipedia. The house belonged to my great-grandfather. My father was the only son of his eldest surviving son. [Rodolph de Salis] (appointed representative of what was the Dawley estate/exors. of Cecil Fane de Salis, etc.)] [07 July 2014]

  • X mark.svg Not done the photographer is still unknown, also since Wikipedia is the first publication, a suitable license will have to be granted. You could do it CC-0 or attempt to release all rights in the US (public domain) but as per the deletion discussion it does not qualify by itself to be public domain. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:13, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
it was published, public published, made public, in 1929, so Wikipedia is not the first publication.Rodolph2 (talk) 00:22, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
anonymous, unknown, enough years have passed for an unknown work to become public. Anyway there is a high chance that it was taken, made, published, by my great-grandparents, ergo rights, estate photo rights, passed dwon and released.00:26, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Where was it published in 1929? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Kshitij Tarey[edit]

This page is about an artist who is doing pretty well in the feild of music, i wrote this article since i feel he should be known for his work globally. All singers have such pages therefore even he should have one. Do let me know if there is some issues with the article i wrote for him. -223.223.153.80 (talk) 13:29, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion G11. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. You cannot use the existence of other articles to argue for the existence of yours. Please see WP:Notability. We also don't unilaterally overturn A7 deletions, either. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:16, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done I will declare the G11 reason invalid, but a BLP prod still applies, but if the requester, who may be the subject, can nominate two or more independent, reliable and substantial sources in publications about the subject, it could be recovered. Facebook is unsuitable. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:54, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Gallery Homeland[edit]

Gallery Homeland page was flagged for speedy deletion without discussion. GH was formed in Portland Oregon over 15 years ago as a grass-roots, community based orgation. It was instrumental as an incubator for many now well-known Northwest artists. Please restore the GH page so that we can add additional content stating the significant impact that this organization has had on growing Portland Oregon into the flourishing artist community that it is now recognized for. -Nerdletta (talk) 18:14, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. We do not permit shared accounts, and your writing above makes me think you've got a vested interest in the content of the article. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:12, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
  • X mark.svg Not done But I will restore this if you can find some independent references as the deleted version had no references at all. There should be some artworks, newspapers or magazines that talk about this if it had a significant impact. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:48, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kevin Grey (silversmith)[edit]

I, Phild66, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Phild66 (talk) 19:06, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:44, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Black_Heart,_photo_from_CoS,_Sep_2013.jpg[edit]

I, Skylar3214, request undeletion for the file I uploaded for Black Heart (Stone Temple Pilots song) of the Articles for Creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please note that I uploaded a file for "Black Heart" by Stone Temple Pilots, and it also came from a source that was posted on the CoS website by Michael Roffman. I've worked on the article just until at 23:41, 21 July 2014. Skylar3214 7:29, 21 July 2014

X mark.svg This page has not yet been deleted. Please visit the page to find out how to object to the deletion request. The file is nominated for deletion and is an issue for multiple reasons. 1) The CD cover's copyright has not been released by its owner into the public domain. If it has been release, (which would be one of the first times in the music industry) we have no evidence. 2) The file could be kept as fair-use, but it has no fair-use rationale nor the appropriate copyright tag. And the file would need to be reduced in resolution. To be kept, these things will have to be done to the file. (Basically, the file description page should look like File:Out of Time, photo from Google Play, July 2014.jpg, the file you uploaded just before. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 02:34, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Now I saw where you were at with this. I've done the same thing, like I did for the last one I uploaded for Out of Time (Stone Temple Pilots song). Skylar3214 9:37, 21 July 2014
Good job @Skylar3214:, everything looks good now! TLSuda (talk) 14:29, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Bodybagstyle Productions[edit]

The article wasn't completed yet, I saved the article so I wouldn't lose its content. It was deleted because of notable significance. Bodybagstle Productions is using technology infused in their music to create a binaural audio effect. More research is being done, but the page was deleted before it was complete. If there is any way I can keep that page while it is being edited, I can prove why it is notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by D420world (talkcontribs)

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. That said, admins could probably move it into a userspace draft for you. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dwight Shellman[edit]

I, Sharrson, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. skh 04:11, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:48, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

==Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Powermaster[edit]

I, Sheerine, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sheerine (talk) 05:27, 22 July 2014 (UTC) , ==

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:44, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

World Class Arena[edit]

World Class Arena is an initiative devised by British Government Department of Education in 2000. It aim to assess gifted and talented children among 8-11 year olds.

X mark.svg Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/World Class Tests[edit]

I, 103.26.123.222, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 103.26.123.222 (talk) 06:54, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:41, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

World Class Tests[edit]

The article is useful for public -103.26.123.222 (talk) 06:56, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Heiko Bleher[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -93.147.180.185 (talk) 08:17, 22 July 2014 (UTC) Dear Sirs,

I always supported, respected and used Wikipedia to inform our many contributors to your site, also on our www.aquapress-bleher.com and www.aqua-aquapress.com websites, but I just came aware that some one, for no reason I can see – WHATSOEVER – has deleted my profile page HEIKO BLEHER (there is only one in the world with this name) completely.

You state that there it has been deleted because of a copyright infringement, which is impossible, as there is none. This texts were inserted by someone who knows my life and what I have done 100% and I never saw any infringement whatsoever. Everything stated was 100% correct and in no case any violation to any copyright. You can also see this on the websites above mentioned and elsewhere on the www (ir Goggle).

I expect a immediate answer how such a thing could happen. I can only imagine, that some jealous people (jealous of my life-time work) have eliminated it, as there is nothing of an copyright infringement on my site.

Thank you in advance and see foreword to you soon answer and re-in-statement of that page,

Sincerely Heiko Bleher President of Aquapress Publishers Italy

New Jagannath Sadak[edit]

Its not a promotion page , its a map page giving information on the road and then click the "Save page" button below -Newjagannathsadak (talk) 10:05, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done I have restored this to Draft:New Jagannath Sadak and removed the promotional facebook bit. Facebook is not a suitable source. By having a username the same as the page you were writing makes it also sound promotional. Anyway work on the draft, find the additional citations, and please consult me or User talk: Seraphimblade before moving this back as an article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:35, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Tam Goossen[edit]

No reason for the page to be deleted -she is a prominent community member in Toronto. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.113.230.3 (talkcontribs) 10:29, 22 July 2014

X mark.svg Not done The reason (no importance asserted) was valid, although of course the subject might meet the notability guidelines. That said, the deletion was in 2006 and the article was completely unsourced, so either way it would qualify for a deletion as an unsourced biography. I'd recommend just recreating it, again if they meet the notability guidelines. If you are associated with the subject in any way this is required reading as well. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:57, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gabriel Shaoolian[edit]

I, 24.189.138.232, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 24.189.138.232 (talk) 13:08, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--S Philbrick(Talk) 21:40, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Happy Socks[edit]

I, Ilea79, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I need the text I created in order to change it! And I also need the info I had added for a diffrent purpose within our company.Ilea79 (talk) 13:09, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

@Ilea79: When you say within our company, are you associated with Happy Socks? If so, have you read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest?--S Philbrick(Talk) 21:46, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

@Sphilbrick:Not within Happy Socks, within the company I work for.

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Ilea79: --S Philbrick(Talk) 17:14, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

The PyppöMærdah[edit]

The PyppöMærdah is an experimental music band active from 2009 to 2012 in Sardinia. We have tracks on Youtube to prove it -Bandos11 (talk) 23:49, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Orthotropics®[edit]

Dear admins, I am writing regarding the undeletion of our wikipedia page about Orthotropics®. Orthotropics® is a treatment developed over 40 years ago by Prof. John Mew. (http://orthotropics.org/Education_and_Events/indexf.php?ACT=History_of_Orthotropics_Education )This treatment basically aims to correct the facial development and teeth alignment together with improving the facial growth (http://www.facefocused.com/bioorthotrop.html) This treatment prevents unnecessary dental extraction and major surgeries (http://www.lsfo.co.uk/orthotropics) There are three Orthotropics organizations including International Association - http://www.orthotropics.com,North American Association - http://www.orthotropics-na.org and Asian association- http://www.orthotropicsasia.com and over 100 Orthotropics Practitioners worldwide http://www.orthotropics.org/Discover_Orthotropics/find-an-orthotropist & http://www.orthotropics-na.org/public/NAAFO_Find_A_Member_Map.cfm , There are also a number of published articles in the peer reviewed Dental and Orthodontic journals about Orthotropics treatment including: 1. Mew JRC. 1999. A New form of Orthodontic Treatment Tested on Identical Twins. European Journal of Orthodontics. 21: 605. 2. Mew, J.R.C. “Facial form, head posture, and the protection of the pharyngeal space” The clinical alteration of the growing face. J.A.Macnamara, K.Ribbens, R.P.Howe. Eds. Monograph 14. Crainiofacial Growth Series. Center of Human Growth and Development. Ann Arbor. Michigan. 1983. (see also papers published by John Mew)

3. Mew, J.R.C. “Suggestions for forecasting and monitoring facial growth” American Journal of Orthodontics and Dento-facial Orthopedics. 104: 105-120. 1993Faces 1993. (see also papers published by John Mew)

4. Mew J R C. 2004. The Postural Basis of Malocclusion: A philosophical Overview. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. In press July or August. Finally I would like to request undeletion of this page as a it is a helpful reference for parents and practitioners considering an alternative non-extraction treatment.

Kind regards, Kian Morteza Fazeli Niaki, DMD, MClin Pros - Academic director of London School of Facial Orthotropics -86.149.175.233 (talk) 09:07, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done. First, let me make clear that, although originally written by Prof Mew, this was not your article, it was Wikipedia's article. Wikipedia is not a "notice-board" site like Facebook for people to tell the world about their own concerns or inventions, and is extremely resistant to being used for any kind of promotion. As you are concerned with "Orthrotropics", you should read the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide.
The article was the subject of a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Orthotropics®, although that was cut short when it was speedily deleted as an advertisement. If you disagree, you should first apprach the deleting administrator, user Orangemike (talk); then, if your concerns are not addressed, you can make a request at WP:Deletion review.
Most, if not all, of the references you cite seem to be by Prof Mew, or from sources connected with the Orthotropics movement. Wikipedia's inclusion criterion, known as WP:Notability, looks for evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 17:25, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

NiCE IT Management Solutions[edit]

Enter your reasoning here Hi I would like to contest the deletion of the NiCE IT Management Solutions page because Wikipedia already has many company profiles and this company profile is no different. It was written in the same way that the Coca-Cola or Accenture pages were written for example, where they talk about the history of the company and the products/services that it offers. The NiCE IT Management Solutions page is no different. It's just a smaller company but the content therein is similar. Why not delete the Coca-Cola and Accenture pages too then? -Nonthando (talk) 09:09, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done I was going to leave the standard response regarding non-notable businesses, but your wording shows that you have some fundamental misunderstandings. First, there is no such thing as a "company profile" on Wikipedia - we have encyclopedia articles about notable topics. Wikipedia is not a business directory, it is instead an encyclopedia that includes only notable businesses. Surely you're not compating NiCE IT to Coca-Cola or Accenture in terms of notability? There are billions of businesses in the world, but less than 1% of them will ever meet the notability requirements, and that's intentional. the panda ₯’ 09:20, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Green coast[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Gimicom (talk) 12:59, 23 July 2014 (UTC) green coast is a seaside coast in the south of Albania, in the Palasa village. it is not a company. it is a geographic position. in Albanian is Bregu i Gjelbert (like cape verde).

Green coast is not an company. green coast is called the beach near palasa beach in Albania. green coast in Albanian is bregu i gjelbert and is one of the most beautiful beaches in the Albanian riviera. what is here wrong that should be deleted? at leas some information why someone deleted it? sounds very strange to me. please undelete this article so I can work on it with the references. -Gimicom (talk) 14:04, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done. This article would need a complete re-write, because it was written in wildly promotional language: "an oasis of calm... offers a host of activities... a land to be loved... warm hospitality... clean and pristine beaches, spectacular mountains, scenic river valleys... a truly unique blend of Mediterranean flavors... " etc, etc. That is not an encyclopedia article, it is a tourist-office brochure, full of "peacock terms" and written to "sell" the area and encourage visitors. Anything like that is deleted from Wikipedia at sight. We require a neutral point of view, no opinions, no glowing adjectives, just plain facts, neutrally stated and backed up by reliable sources. JohnCD (talk) 16:39, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

I agree with your statement but I think it is a bit immature to delete it and not giving some time for editions. it was canceled in just a second right after the publishing. give to people some time to improve. Unedelete it so I can work on it... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.78.71.201 (talk) 09:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Have you tried creating a draft in WP:Articles for creation yet? An AfC draft is generally safe from most forms of speedy deletion compared to just putting it in mainspace. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:41, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
That's good advice, with the proviso that anything as promotional as what you wrote will be speedily-deleted at sight even in draft or AfC space. For that reason, I will not restore the article - you need to start from a clean sheet and a completely different point of view. Think of yourself not as a tourist-office copywriter trying to attract customers, or an enthusiast encouraging other people to come and share your passion, but as a geographer or an intelligence officer reporting on the area. The reader should have no idea whether you personally think the Green Coast is good or bad. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and then use the WP:Article Wizard to help you. JohnCD (talk) 21:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Don M. Winn[edit]

I, Sylviamerrick, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sylviamerrick (talk) 15:26, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 17:28, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Armchair Committee[edit]

I, Matthewreading, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Matthewreading (talk) 20:06, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

@Matthewreading: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:16, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

NetBrain Technologies, Inc[edit]

I submitted article for review and it mentioned 916 articles were ahead of me, it would seem quite impossible that on the same day after submitting my hard work would be deleted so promptly, when after submitting it mentioned that it would take over a week or more for review...please put article back into sandbox. I thought submitting an article would also mean getting help to correct any issues 'wiki' has, not tigger happy moderators waiting to delete people's hard work. Very unprofessional! thank you very much. -Turner Paige (talk) 20:15, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg@Turner Paige: Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Turner Paige/NetBrain Technologies, Inc. There is some misunderstanding. Any article part of the Articles for Creation (AfC) process should not be deleted immediately (except for copyright violation and some other rare situations), but I do not see that this was developed through the AfC process. It was developed in Main space, and articles in that space can be speedily deleted. I glanced at it and it is not close to ready, but I have userfied it so you can work on it and submit it for review.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:30, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Aaron Joseph Collins[edit]

I, 74.138.110.114, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 74.138.110.114 (talk) 20:23, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @74.138.110.114: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --S Philbrick(Talk) 16:50, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shoptech[edit]

I, Jayccooper, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jayccooper (talk) 20:33, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shoptech — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jayccooper (talkcontribs) 21:01, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. (already done, just noting it here) --S Philbrick(Talk) 16:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Bheems Ceciroleo[edit]

please do not delete this article he is new music director and i am still adding info and giving reference too -Chandooo (talk) 02:00, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Kelsey Lee[edit]

I have always refered information to reliable sources and will do so again. I added a reference to watchxhit.com, and, originally, Lee's pages (YouTube, Facebook, Twitter). I know YT, FB, and Twitter aren't reliable sources, but I only included those as Lee's pages. XHIT-loving teen boy (talk) 03:49, 24 July 2014 (UTC) -XHIT-loving teen boy (talk) 03:49, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Shreekumar Vakkiyil[edit]

I, NitashaPinjani, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. NitashaPinjani (talk) 05:23, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @NitashaPinjani: --S Philbrick(Talk) 17:12, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Andrew Kojack Kojackton[edit]

Before deleting my page you should tell where to correct myself instead of just deleting it. Let me know where I went wrong so that I can make corrections. Wikipedia should be able to give me a guideline how to make things right. Since I have not offended anyone or made any bad remarks you should be able to guide me.

I wait for your guidance!

Kind regards,

Andrew Kojack Kojackton -— Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.202.240.12 (talk) 05:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - a deleted page with this name does not appear to exist. It is definitely our standard practice to provide an explanation, so if that did not happen, I want to see why. However, I cannot find the article.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:20, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
I've found it - it was a user page, User:ANDREW KOJACK KOJACKTON, and you were notified on your talk page here.
Mr Kojackton, I'm sorry that we don't make this clearer to new users at sign-up time, but Wikipedia is not another site like Facebook or LinkedIn for people to tell the world about themselves. It is a quite different sort of site, a project to build an encyclopedia, and user pages are for the users, who are here to help build the encyclopedia, to say something about themselves and their Wikipedia work, to assist communication within the project. Their use is explained at WP:NOTWEBHOST:

"Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they should be used primarily to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia. Limited biographical information is allowed, but user pages should not function as personal webpages or be repositories for large amounts of material that is irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia. If you are looking to make a personal webpage or blog or to post your résumé, please make use of one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet account."

JohnCD (talk) 20:32, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Haden Freeman[edit]

The page was created by the company Haden Freeman and was not meant to be an advertisement. The text was copied from the website to ensure everything followed the house style. Instead, we will give a summary of the company and will list the awards and memberships the company holds as well as a brief history. - — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.199.228.194 (talk) 08:26, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done There are two issues: number one, this is an encyclopedia, not a business directory - the company you wrote about does not meet the strict notability requirements for an article. Second, copy/paste from a website is a WP:COPYRIGHT violation, and can never be accepted, let alone undeleted. the panda ₯’ 08:57, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

User:Phoniker/Frido Ruth[edit]

I, Phoniker, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Phoniker (talk) 08:33, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg @Phoniker:Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:17, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Khaleel Abdul-Jaleel[edit]

I, Broadus-YRR, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Broadus-YRR (talk) 14:06, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg @Broadus-YRR:Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:15, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Customer_Service_System[edit]

The administrator deleted this citing several poor reasons such as "try listing on Craigslist instead". The administrator is now no longer part of Wikipedia. This article gave good information about BT CSS, a mainframe system that runs BT Wholesales infrastructure. It is a good example of a computer mainframe system that was important for business. Instead it was deleted for being a "blatant advert". -195.95.131.65 (talk) 14:39, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg @195.95.131.65: Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. It is a blatant advert, but you are welcome to make it acceptable.--S Philbrick(Talk) 15:13, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Happy Corner[edit]

It is a new article being translated and the game is popular in most regions of China. -杨肇峰 (talk) 14:59, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: A similar article, with the same illustration, was deleted (or rather, turned into a redirect) in 2009 at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Happy Corner. I have not time tonight to compare the articles in detail. I will do that tomorrow (unless any other admin likes to decide what to do). JohnCD (talk) 22:07, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

International Spiritist Council[edit]

The reason listed for deletion was: "Notability of this organization is not established. Apparent COI edits by User:Ssbaltimore". The International Spiritist Council exists: http://cei.spirite.org/ . It's site is mainly in portuguese. -177.135.231.5 (talk) 17:13, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. It may still be nominated at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. It does not matter that the website is in Portuguese, but for a Wikipedia article it is not enough that the organization exists and has a website: the test for inclusion is called Wikipedia:Notability and requires references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 19:35, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Peter W. Marty[edit]

I, 65.101.95.64, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 65.101.95.64 (talk) 19:30, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @65.101.95.64: --S Philbrick(Talk) 19:53, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Emerge Financial Wellness[edit]

I, 173.14.111.110, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 173.14.111.110 (talk) 20:22, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:56, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mato Homola[edit]

I, OndrejC2, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Dear Wiki admins, I have completely forgot to finish this article, it would be great if you could retrieve it for me. Thanks a lot. Ondrej OndrejC2 (talk) 21:19, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review: please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 22:11, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Arman Mkrtchyan[edit]

I, Aaaaa2300, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Aaaaa2300 (talk) 00:31, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. @Aaaaa2300: --S Philbrick(Talk) 01:16, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Glass Wave[edit]

Belated deprod. -– Arms & Hearts (talk) 00:35, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

@Arms & Hearts: Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I would agree with the IP's proposed deletion rationale, so I hope you fix the article. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 01:19, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Panther (watercar)[edit]

Belated deprod. -– Arms & Hearts (talk) 00:37, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. @Arms & Hearts: It needs a lot of work and probably qualifies as a speedy deletion at the moment, Consider requesting that it be moved to a user subpage or the Draft user space.--S Philbrick(Talk) 01:21, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Mount of Delta[edit]

Mount of Delta is Owned by Prince Ned Munir Nwoko, He added the name Munir recently when he got converted from Christianity to Islam. His name was mentioned on Arthur Okowa Ifeanyi's page here on Wiki because he lost to Arthur Okowa Ifeanyi in Delta State Nigeria. I am not related to him. I went to visit the mount and loved it, i felt i should let the world know too. I'm new to wiki and i am ready to learn -Listen2star (talk) 01:50, 25 July 2014 (UTC)