Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Wikipedia:RFUD)
Jump to: navigation, search

Administrator instructions

Shortcuts:

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases

Green Earth Landscaping and Nursery[edit]

Yesterday you nominated this page for speedy deletion stating that it is not significant as an encyclopaedic content. But I would like to bring to your notice that Green Earth is the only Green Company in the region and has been working towards protecting the local people from various factors including pollution, poverty, educational degradation and political instability. This company has begun construction of 80000 sq ft Biodiversity park. It will be first of its kind in the area which will educate people about the flora and fauna of the region. There has been no such initiative since last 65 years. This is the reason I want to create a page to provide information about the company and its work. There are 3100 people which are associated with this project and are voluntarily helping to reach out to the people outside our sphere of influence. In order to accomplish this other people need to know the basis of this revolutionary work and there is no other place better than Wikipedia to share this knowledge. This company is also related to many of my recent edits and new pages related to temples, forts and clans in the surrounding area. I would like to see a page dedicated to such a work. Please make sure that this page is accepted as it will provide a common link to all the people and places in the area of its influence. By denying its presence on Wiki, you will deny 3100 people from coming forward for a better future. Abhishek Pujari (talk) 04:51, 6 September 2014 (UTC) -Abhishek Pujari (talk) 04:51, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. Please note that press-release material presented as an argument for undeletion will generally result in the request being declined out-of-hand as it shows that you either have no clue as to Wikipedia's purpose, or that you don't care. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 07:26, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
  • X mark.svg Not done I will say however that this was hastily tagged and deleted before the requester had a chance to say much at all, which was "A Green Company based in Mumbai, Maharashtra, India. mainly contributing towards Landscape designing and Garden Maintenance Services." Because of this you have permission to recreate the page, but this time add in the explanation about why it is important, with references included. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:27, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
It should be noted that Abhishek Pujari's userpage is an advertisement for the Green Earth company, of which he is director. It is being discussed for deletion as an advertisement. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:58, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
If Abhishek Pujari wants to create an article about his company, he will have to do so via WP:AFC, as required by the conflict of interest guidelines. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:27, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
The whole purpose of wikipedia is to provide an encyclopedia for people all over the world . I don't know whether you know it or not, but in India almost everyone seeks information first on wikipedia and then go for other references. You have a good reputation here. I am not trying to create some kind of revolution through this site. I wanted to create a page so that the region in which this company is based will get a global exposure. I would have done it by creating my own website but I would like to add it to an online encyclopedia of which Wikipedia is the largest and the most followed in our region. I am not trying to market my company or my products. The page was deleted even before I could enter a second line to it. FYI I am a reputed environmentalist and a professor on 2nd largest University in India. I agree that you won't allow first hand information, but you can't deny that information regarding such matters will be cannot be found in books or old articles. You have to start somewhere when you want to introduce a region who isn't highlighted anywhere on wikipedia. Its like they are being denied their existence by your moderators and admins. I have enough websites and marketing companies to advertise my company. The sole purpose of this page was to inform about the upcoming eco park (100,000 sq ft) as well as 2 world class ports that are being built near by. This information is merely geographic and developmental. Talking about references, if you won't allow press releases then I would like to ask why you should believe in government sites to verify my content. How much can one trust some other countries government. Will you call or mail them to ask about it? I am ready to provide LEGITIMATE references and articles from newspapers and books. I even possess documents that are 400 years old. For this to be done I need the page so that you can cross verify the content with those links. How am I supposed to provide links, references and whatever that you believe within that time limit? Abhishek Pujari (talk) 19:08, 13 September 2014 (UTC)Abhishek Pujari

User:Arlington row/sandbox[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Arlington row (talk) 07:18, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Arlington row/sandbox

  • @Arlington row: I'm sorry, but I do have to share in the declining editor's concern that this was a personal essay for a science class and falls under WP:NOT. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:43, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
  • @Arlington row: If you can show where this is the start of an article and not a personal essay, I'd be more inclined to restore it. It's just that it came across as a general sort of essay, so I couldn't really see where it was meant to be an article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:51, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

STUDIO architecure and urbanism magazine[edit]

Dear Sirs, why the page "STUDIO Architecure and Urbanism magazine" has been deleted, for what reasons? I'm very amazed at this, being "STUDIO Architecure and Urbanism magazine", well known and followed all over the world. See exhibitions from its official website in the world, Shanghai, Tokio, Hong Kong, Instambul, Lisbona, Chicago, Venece …. you don't know? You are not Artist or Architect? and the press http://www.rrcstudio.com/studiomagazine_exhibition http://www.rrcstudio.com/studiomagazine_press

The monograph, born in December 2011, reached its number 7, is well known and discussed in the world of architectural theory. They wrote on it with their articles, artists, writers, philosophers and architects very popular available on wikipedia. They talk about a lot of magazines and blogs all over the world as it was listed in the bibliography of his page deleted.

And "STUDIO Architecure and Urbanism magazine" is a very useful discussion on wikipedia:

I am waiting for a response, and recovery of the page please. Mirtilla45 (talk) 12:17, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

Annex page on wikipedia:

<Content of deleted page removed--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:30, 10 September 2014 (UTC)>
The page has not been deleted but has been redirected to Romolo Calabrese.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:40, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

LEHREN-LOGO.PNG[edit]

ITS THE CORPORATE LOGO OF LEHREN NETWORKS PRIVATE LIMITED AND WAS BEEN USED FOR THE SAME CAUSE ON WIKI'S LEHREN OFFICIAL PAGE -Pandey Mritunjay (talk) 15:19, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

@Pandey Mritunjay: X mark.svg Not done. This file was uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, which is a separate organization, and deleted there for copyright reasons. Commons does not allow non-free images, but this site, Wikipedia, does allow them in some circumstances, and logos are one of those exceptions. You need to upload the image file to Wikipedia (not Commons) using the Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard, but first read Wikipedia:Logos for advice on the copyright issues and how to add the necessary image copyright tag and fair-use rationale. JohnCD (talk) 17:01, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Joseph Llambias Clatworthy[edit]

Hi, hope you're well and business is good. I was hopping you'd reverse the deletion of my deceased fathers web page. He was an artist with much following from the press. One of his painting is part of the Imperial War Museum's permanent collection. http://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/42996 They are uploading images to all their entries, but this has been a huge undertaking as I'm sure you can understand. I do realise some of the details might be out of date and would love to help correct any erros and perhaps even update with more images of his works and history. Many thanks for your time and consideration. Best Regards Oliver

Please se links: (there's many more I need to find)

http://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/42996 http://www.lincolnshireecho.co.uk/Legacy-pioneering-artist-live-sons/story-14971806-detail/story.html http://newarkadvertiser.co.uk/news/viewletters.asp?id=6af821e2-98b8-102f-ad62-73917bb4195d https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hP7C3yiGxr0 http://www.signedoriginalprints.com/collections/joseph-llambias — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.170.129.192 (talk) 15:31, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify the three users who proposed it, users Boleyn (talk), Sionk (talk) and Bearian (talk). One of them may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. What the article needs, if it is to be kept, is references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject," see WP:ARTIST. It is also important to avoid any hint of promotion - please read the WIkipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. JohnCD (talk) 16:42, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

David P. Hyner[edit]

I made the necessary changes and I correct all the mistakes that was in the previews one -هيثم الصعب (talk) 17:14, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. If you're asking for the previous article to be undeleted, G11s can't be undeleted here. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:47, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
I suggest you talk to Orangemike about this as there does seem to be some importance claimed. But notability is unclear. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:35, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Nathan Brimmer 2013 Sanford Street Productions Rising Actors Sessions.jpg[edit]

Please undelete and insert {{OTRS|2014083010011757}} & {{cc-by-sa-3.0}}. Thanks. - +Prince Willy 21:25, 12 September 2014 (UTC)

As it take too long, please ignore the request (I don't know if I can blank the page); I will wask the copyright's holder to upload on commons via OTRS. Thanks anyway.

+Prince Willy 14:28, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

@Willy Weazley: I can do it, but I don't always know the best way to do these OTRS things. Are you an OTRS volunteer or is there one that can say definitively that record matches this file? Sorry if you are but it wasn't explicitly noted. Protonk (talk) 14:30, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
@Protonk: I'm a volunteer from the portuguese otrs team, but usually I only respond wikimedia Commons tickets/Permissions-PT/Info-PT. Anyway, the picture must be loaded at commons; you can undelete, but the file must be moved later. +Prince Willy 22:37, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done but left on en-wikipedia for attribution. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:21, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

TFBOYS[edit]

source:[1][2][3][4][5][6][7] -GZWDer (talk) 04:43, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Roland Habisreutinger[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 24.36.180.158 (talk) 18:38, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done The page hasn't been deleted. It's at the link above. Protonk (talk) 21:16, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

User: Jackie Gladfelter Devereaux[edit]

User:Jackie Gladfelter Devereaux · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions]

This is not a webpage but a reference for people. This page was initially posted by the publisher of the Desert Star Weekly newspaper, a publication I founded. Since the newspaper sold and that publisher resigned, I took over maintenance of the page including editing and reposting. If that is improper, then I sincerely apologize. I have my own website/webpage at www.jackiedevereaux.com where my photography, creative writing briefs, resume and other articles are posted. I humbly ask that undelete this page and give me another chance to conform to your guidelines. Thank you in advance. -Jackie Gladfelter Devereaux 19:38, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done Please take a look at our guidance on user pages. Basically your user page is supposed to be about you as an editor here, not a stand in for a wikipedia article or a page elsewhere. I don't see the benefit of restoring the page but you are free to recreate it though you are not required to (many editors don't have user pages, whether or not to have one is your decision). Protonk (talk) 21:19, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jackie Gladfelter Devereaux[edit]

I, Jackie Gladfelter Devereaux, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jackie Gladfelter Devereaux 19:48, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

I did not originally create a Wikipedia page but one was created by the former publisher of the Desert Star Weekly newspaper, a paper I co-founded. When we sold the newspaper and that publisher resigned, I stayed on for 18 months to help with the company transition over to the Sun Newspapers and Community Media Corporation. It was at that time that I took over maintenance of the page and it edited and reposted it under a different email address. If this is improper, I apologize for the error. Please reconsider and undelete the page. If you need to have another party post the page, like the newspaper, I can accommodate that, but I will need a copy of the page. Max Lieberman is the new Publisher and Editor of the Desert Star Weekly, and he will be happy to post the information under their name. Thank you in advance for your time and consideration.

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 23:31, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Lock Yue Chew[edit]

I have updated the links, I think sufficient information is there "Save page" button below -Sijothankam (talk) 15:41, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done page is not deleted, or proposed to be deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:20, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Snatch Magnet[edit]

I, 23.241.206.168, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 23.241.206.168 (talk) 19:13, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

  • This page has been restored once before (in January of this year) and hasn't seen any edits since February of last year. What changes do you plan to make in order to bring it into the main article space? Protonk (talk) 19:19, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Central European Journal of Mathematics[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Mtibar (talk) 10:18, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Reason: this is the page of a mathematical journal created 11 years ago. Its history must remain inviolated. Someone redirected this page to another one called "Open Mathematics" which is a different journal, run over the model "the author pays for publishing" which is totally opposite to the origila scope and dedication of the Central European journal of Mathematics. The Board of CEJM resigned in protest against this radical change and created a new journal "European j of Mathematics" which inherits the principles of the old CEJM.

To check the validity of my request, please verify the Boards and Editors in Chief of the journals in the following links:

1. The Board of the Central Eur J of Mathematics before March 2014 when it resigned

http://archive.today/OUyXI

2. The board of the new journal European journal of Mathematics

http://www.springer.com/mathematics/algebra/journal/40879?detailsPage=editorialBoard

  • The above is incorrect, there has been no deletion. Open Mathematics is the new name for the journal formerly known as Central European Journal of Mathematics. The complete history is still described in the article and the old name now redirects to the new name, as per usual procedure. The fact that the previous editor and (part of?) the editorial board have moved to a different publisher to start a new journal is also mentioned, so I really don't see the problem here. --Randykitty (talk) 10:55, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
  • X mark.svg Not done. The journal is correctly listed under its current name, and its history including its previous name is described in the article, with a redirect so that anyone searching for the previous name will be taken to the article. If you disagree with this, make your case on the article talk page and try to reach WP:Consensus for a change. The European Journal of Mathematics is probably too new to meet the requirements of WP:Notability (academic journals), but can have an article when it does. JohnCD (talk) 16:36, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Vandana (Kannada actress)[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Kannadacinema (talk) 10:58, 15 September 2014 (UTC)

Please I request you for un-deletion of Article Vandana (Kannada actrss). I think the contents are true to best of my knowledge. Though I've given three references the article is deleted for the reason that the article has same title and same content as the earlier deleted article on Same person. What I feel is the same title is good because there are many actresses with same name so that she can easily be identified from others. And even more I only created the old deleted article with the same name. I don't have anything to gain from this article. What I thought was this might be kind of respect to an actress and can be a reference to a future generation of people. If possible re-create the article with meaningful changes.

thanks

Articles:
- Vandana(Kannada Actress)
- Vandana (actress)
- Vandana (Kannada actress)
Relevant AfD:
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vandana(Kannada Actress)
A quick and dirty tidy up of this request. --Shirt58 (talk) 11:23, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vandana(Kannada Actress), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mark Arsten (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 16:39, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
I have to say, that AFD consists of one non-value-added "delete per nom" comment. Zero discussion. I would either treat that AFD as a PROD, or userfy it with instructions to submit to WP:AFC. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:30, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
Yes, that's reasonable, and I will do it (userfy) tomorrow unless Mark Arsten has any objection. JohnCD (talk) 22:22, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
No objection, that's fine with me. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:58, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
@Kannadacinema: - following the discussion above, I have userfied the article for you - restored the most recent version and moved it to User:Kannadacinema/Vandana (Kannada actress) where you can work on it. When it is ready, do not post it directly but click the green "Submit" button at the top to send it for review. Read WP:Your first article and WP:Notability (people), particularly WP:NACTOR. You will need better references - the first one only mentions her in passing, and the second does not mention her at all. JohnCD (talk) 21:30, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

আধুনিক: আমরা ধুমপান নিবারন করি (ADHUNIK: We do Prevent Smoking)[edit]

I, Razonklnbd, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Razonklnbd (talk) 08:21, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:40, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HellermannTyton[edit]

I, Paul HT, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Paul HT (talk) 08:54, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:42, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lazy Dog Adventures[edit]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by CricketDesmarais (talkcontribs) 13:57, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

@CricketDesmarais: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 21:32, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Hólmbert Aron Friðjónsson[edit]

The original article was deleted as the player had not yet played a fully professional game yet. That has now been resolved and a new page created at Hólmbert Friðjónsson without any of the original content which was deleted, it might be useful to add this deleted research to the talkpage of the new article. -nonsense ferret 19:15, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. @Nonsenseferret: No need to add anything to the talk page. You're actually asking for a history merge. I have restored the old history from Hólmbert Aron Friðjónsson and merged this history into the new article. Feel free to browse the history of Hólmbert Friðjónsson and you will find the old content in the entries from 2013. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:42, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Sari Mercer[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -sushrut_mi 04:38, 17 September 2014 (UTC) Sari Mercer is the girlfriend of 12 years a Slave actor - Chiwetel Ejiofor. She is also a model and actress starring in "Jatt and Juliet".

  • Yes check.svg Done history restored, article was already recreated. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:47, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 165.139.152.101 (talk) 17:53, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - if you mean Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ben Burman, that will not be restored, for reasons which will become clear if you read WP:Biographies of living persons. JohnCD (talk) 19:15, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/OutOfRegs.com[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Nafogel (talk) 18:52, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

The page was still being edited and was deleted for being "abandoned".

Yes check.svg Done. It was abandoned because it was a draft that hadn't had a single edit in over 6 months. In any case, it's restored now, but a second abandonment will make it less likely that it will be restored again. Wikipedia isn't an indefinite hosting service for draft articles. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:18, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Howard Kaminsky[edit]

Elisebrandenburg (talk) 01:35, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 04:43, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

RJ Amuthan[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Karthik1450 (talk) 08:54, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

@Karthik1450: this page has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RJ Amuthan, and that is where you should comment, but read WP:DISCUSSAFD first. See also WP:MUSICBIO for the relevant notability standard, and note that better sources will be required - Youtube is not a reliable source, because anyone can post anything there. JohnCD (talk) 13:58, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Roman Saini[edit]

He is an IAS officer, Guide and inspiration to thousands of students like me. He has helped lots of students and also helping students by Un Academy Videos and by his Facebook page for upliftment of downtrodden.This page will help upcoming aspirants to get to know about him more. Please Do not delete this page as it will be a loss for poor aspirants of India and hard working aspirants who prefer Self Study.Please do understand the importance and consider the reason and remove deletion notification on the page and I would like to work on Improving the Article. -Kottee (talk) 09:06, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

@Kottee: this page has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Saini and that is where you should comment, but read WP:DISCUSSAFD and WP:Notability (people) first. JohnCD (talk) 14:03, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Articles for creation/SmartMark Communications[edit]

I, 71.224.65.55, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. We were unable to re-write the content in time, we would like to rework the content and have this page reinstated 71.224.65.55 (talk) 13:59, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 14:08, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Lulu's Chocolate[edit]

It's a crime to erase the truth from history, why are you doing that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramadog2369 (talkcontribs) 21:03, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Lulu's Chocolate[edit]

Enter your reasoning here This article should not be deleted because...it is very clearly true, simply look at the chocolate section at whole foods market and you will see it sitting there in plan sight just as it has been, or look at the company website http://www.luluschocolate.com to verify the story!!!!!!! and then click the "Save page" button below -Ramadog2369 (talk) 21:20, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Traxon Technologies[edit]

Traxon Technologies should be an independent page instead of redirect to OSRAM -Rimsky.cheng (talk) 01:08, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Lybbie Lewis[edit]

I, Zatby, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Zatby (talk) 01:43, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:09, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

redress to the deletion of said page is required from administrators.[edit]

I would like to submit the following explanation for reconsideration request:

1. I would like to mention that the said page is a very old page and we have not copied any content. Instead the web links mentioned hereunder have copied pour content and is the reason behind CorenSearchBot searching the same.

2. Promotional Content:  The content is written to explain about the institute, campuses and Programs offered with relevant references. 

Its an old content and is there since last many years. You can check the web archive version of the same as under:

https://web.archive.org/web/20120426100056/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Lakes_Institute_of_Management

We respect your authority and would like you to reconsider and let us know what changes should we make in the content  to have the page up and running.


The page just had the information about one of the Business School and was categorised into its Accreditation, Campus with some external links as per the references. I dont think there was some advertising of promotion done through the page.

Also, there are multitude of pages like the one I posted and they look to be having much more promotional content. e.g. of such pages are: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Management_Development_Institute, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kellogg_School_of_Management.

Please let us know what kind of content should I write to ensure that the page stays there

Thanks. Dsachdeva123 (talk) 05:15, 19 September 2014 (UTC) -Dsachdeva123 (talk) 05:15, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

==Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mark Daniels[edit]

I, Mrbasslo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mrbasslo (talk) 06:20, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

==

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mark Daniels[edit]

I, Mrbasslo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mrbasslo (talk) 06:20, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Mark Daniels[edit]

{Mark Daniels

The Page is well written adn relevant to the Fashion history of united Kingdom — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrbasslo (talkcontribs) 06:22, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Magnus Wahlstrom[edit]

I, Gzy84c, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gzy84c (talk) 07:20, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Magnus Wahlström[edit]

This article I have written to give people a chance to see who my uncle was. I have personal experience of him and that I have downloaded the data in the form of eg newspaper clippings, etc. that are at my house. Although data from the birthplace, I have been using. Wishing therefore to this article should be left as a solid article. This article is also available in a Swedish version. Thank's in advance, Lars T. Wahlstrom -Gzy84c (talk) 07:32, 19 September 2014 (UTC)