Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Administrator instructions

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts:


Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases

User:Hoops gza/Nazi bluelinks that need citation to prove they were Nazis[edit]

This was a subpage of a user who was permanently blocked for some reason in which I wasn't involved. However the information on this page was important to a project in which he and I were both involved and I would like to recover it for personal use (and the use of anybody else interested in the project). Given that the user is banned I'm not sure how it would work but if needs must I would be happy for it to be restored in my namespace rather than his. -Keresaspa (talk) 00:30, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. I will note, however, that G5 deletions will not be overturned here the best that can be done, possibly, is for an admin to send you the text of the page at time of deletion in the Bossanoven userspace (The Hoops gza userspace page was moved to the Bossanoven one). —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:15, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
An admin to send me the text would be perfect. I'm not bothered about the actual page being restored just having access to the contents and I didn't know how to request that. I can find a home for the contents on my sandbox or somewhere, no problem. Keresaspa (talk) 20:15, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Qatari Businessmen Association[edit]

I, Shadid200, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Shadid200 (talk) 13:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

@Shadid200: X mark.svg Not done - this page canot be restored, even temporarily, because it is a copyright violation from http://www.qataribusinessmen.org/support/aboutqba.htm. Wikipedia cannot accept copied text without a formal copyright release from the actual copyright holder.
In any case, even if the copyright issue were resolved, this is quite unsuitable for an encyclopedia article, written in the first person ("We are very proud... Our association..." and in a highly promotional tone, full of "peacock terms". An encyclopedia is not a place for the QBA to tell the world about itself. See User:JohnCD/Not a noticeboard for advice. JohnCD (talk) 16:57, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

THE FABULOUS DEE HARRELL[edit]

My Article page was deleted I believe by mistake can it be restored? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazzangel11 (talkcontribs) 20:36, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

See below. JohnCD (talk) 22:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

The Fabulous Dee Harrell[edit]

I was unaware that I could not use excerpts from Articles that were written about Ms. Dee Harrell. Any copyright infringement was truly unintentional. I was asked to write this article for Ms. Harrell, but there was no intentional misuse of copyright material on my part or on the part of Dee Harrell. Please restore the material that was deleted. We will delete any material unacceptable to Wikipedia. The Article written by Hoops McCann is in the possession of Ms. Harrell and can be submitted for verification should that be necessary. } — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jazzangel11 (talkcontribs) 21:06, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

@Jazzangel11: X mark.svg Not done. I can't trace any deleted article by that name, nor are there any deleted articles from your account. No matter: if the deleted article contained copyright violations it cannot be restored, even temporarily.
If you are writing on behalf of Ms Harrell you have, from Wikipedia's point of view, a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, and should carefully read that page and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. In brief, you need to be very careful, and should not edit directly about your client/employer, but may submit a draft using the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process, writing in your own words and not copy-pasting other people's work. Please understand that Wikipedia is not a social-networking site and is not for any kind of advertising or promotion. It requires a neutral point of view - no opinions, just plain facts about what Ms Harrell has achieved, cited to reliable sources. Read WP:Your first article for advice, and WP:MUSICBIO for the relevant WP:Notability standard. JohnCD (talk) 22:06, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Just thought I'd note that I was also searching and could find no trace, including going back in the deletion log to April 1 and looking for a partial title match.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:28, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
  • I can't find anything on the speedy deletion wikia site, so whatever it was it must have been deleted fairly quickly. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 03:34, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Kevin Harman[edit]

I, HamishMedia, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. HamishMedia (talk) 21:58, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

@HamishMedia: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 22:03, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

University of Limerick Debating Union[edit]

I'm completing this for an IP that contested the deletion on my userpage. They asked for the page to be sent to them, but since it was deleted via PROD I don't see any reason not to restore it to the mainspace so they can work on it from there. I've restored it, but I'm listing it here just for records' sake. -Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 03:30, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/MD Rabbi Alam[edit]

I, Michaeltleslie, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Michaeltleslie (talk) 04:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:50, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jayme Gutierrez[edit]

I, Truthless, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. The article was deleted from the Articles for Creation space, before I could review and make any necessary changes. -Truthless 08:01, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

@Truthless: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Jayme Gutierrez. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:00, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Aakash_Pandey[edit]

Genuine people are suffering coz of some selfish people. As far as i know Aakash Pandey is a genuine actor and a very nice human being. -Sahmed083 (talk) 10:15, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

@Sahmed083: the article has not been deleted, but deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aakash Pandey, and that is where you should comment. First, read WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:DISCUSSAFD. JohnCD (talk) 12:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Black Pearl Driftwood Sculpture[edit]

Maxentius (talk) 11:20, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

@Maxentius: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Black Pearl Driftwood Sculpture. This page has never been submitted for review: please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material not reviewed for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:07, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

User:Jinanez/Josiane el zir[edit]

I, Jinanez, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jinanez (talk) 11:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

@Jinanez: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Crimes Against Humanity Initiative[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 128.252.33.1 (talk) 17:57, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Crimes Against Humanity Initiative. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 18:09, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

The North Bay Hootenanny[edit]

The page I was working on was deleted because I did not finish it in time. I now have all of the sources I need prepared to finish the article very quickly. Thanks so much! -— Preceding unsigned comment added by Speedlimit76 (talkcontribs)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:33, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
@Speedlimit76: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review: please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material not submitted for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:42, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law[edit]

I, 92.21.160.249, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 92.21.160.249 (talk) 14:53, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 20:48, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Gene Amoroso[edit]

Gene Amoroso is an American film and television actor, known for such films as Mystic Pizza and Spotlight. -Geneamoroso (talk) 14:53, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

@Geneamoroso: X mark.svg Not done - there is nothing useful to restore, the article deleted in 2009 was a piece of silly vandalism. Any article would need to be created from scratch; if you are Mr Amoroso, please read Wikipedia:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 20:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Elizabeth Lennox[edit]

I, 74.96.69.97, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. I have external references now - two books made the USA Today Best Sellers list and I can point to those usatoday.com pages -Whwright87 (talk) 19:59, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:11, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

Sylvester Rivers[edit]

Please undelete (OTRS) and please insert on talk page {{ConfirmationOTRS|source=https://plus.google.com/+SylvesterRiversMusic/about|otrs=2015041710028645|license=CC-BY-SA-3.0}} @RHaworth: -Willy Weazley 20:41, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done but you will have to apply the template correctly yourself as an edit filter prevents me from straight forwardly adding this. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:55, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks; didn't know there was a filter for this kind of editing.Willy Weazley 03:10, 23 April 2015 (UTC)
"An automated edit filter has identified that you are trying to add or modify an OTRS permission template but do not have the global OTRS members user right." JohnCD (talk) 09:51, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

Mojos Wings Burgers Beer[edit]

The page was not done being edited I was in the process of making changes to keep it from breaking any copyright issues. The websites that the information was taken are ours to use, but I still wanted to make the wikipedia page unique. Please put it back up so I can fix the copyright issues. -James.JNEInc. (talk) 20:50, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done Not only was it a copyright infringement, but it was hopelessly promotional. I've also blocked your account - per this guideline, the username must read "James at JNEInc", and you also breached the terms of use because you have a conflict of interest. Wikipedia is not an advertisement platform. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 21:09, 22 April 2015 (UTC)

William Buckels[edit]

This article was deleted as vandalism, but I think it was a misunderstanding. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bill_Buckels#Not_a_joke -Olivier Diotte (talk) 01:10, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

@Olivier Diotte Yes check.svg Done. I knew the admin who deleted this (whose been inactive since 2010) and he was a careful fellow but I see how he made the error. The user name was also "Bill Buckels", it read a bit fantastically, and we often see joke articles take that form. I've added the 1886 Pall Mall story as an image.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:24, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

The Gettysburg Address (film)[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -JackSmall (talk) 05:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)


The film is legit. The tie-in projects are legit. Check the links. The websites of the renowned companies that are affiliated with the film and the tie-in products all have pages for the projects of this initiative: Oxford University Press (https://global.oup.com/academic/product/the-gettysburg-address-9780190227449?q=conant&lang=en&cc=us), Milan Records (http://www.soundtrack.net/album/the-gettysburg-address/), Hachette Book Group (https://www.hachettebookgroup.com/titles/none/the-gettysburg-address/9781478961062/), etc.

Furthermore, there are links that validate the film: Boston Globe article (http://www.bostonglobe.com/arts/movies/2013/08/17/four-score-and-two-guys-from-new-hampshire/F8SGFY1pXKn3Mxb7QYXHrL/story.html), other articles (http://www.seacoastonline.com/article/20130706/NEWS/307060333), many of the actor's official websites/resumes (http://www.hamiltonhodell.co.uk/cv/client_michael-c-hall_id_100169.htm), IMDb (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt3066808/), etc. Also Publisher's Weekly for the tie-in book (http://www.publishersweekly.com/9780190227456).

The user that deleted this page failed to do his due diligence--but when you average one deletion every 30 seconds it's hard to do good work.

@JackSmall: X mark.svg Not done For now. Please take a moment to read through WP:PSCOI and m:TOU first. Then please disclose what is your relationship to the film or the people who produce and/or market it, specifically to RisingPictureCo (now blocked) and Seanconant, who seems to have spammed the film across Wikipedia last year. Apparently this film has not been released, and in most cases such articles are incubated until they meet WP:NFILM, however in this case the correct course of action would be to have you submit a draft for review. Until you follow our conflict of interest guidelines however, we will not restore the article. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 05:31, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

It is absolutely NOT Wikipedia's policy to only include pages for films AFTER they've been released. One needs only to search most actors' personal pages to see that most of their filmographies include projects years away from completion. This is precisely why thousands of movie pages on wikipedia use the "pre-production" or "filming" status in the production year column. It is not right to discriminate against and delete wikipedia movie pages about legitimate projects. As such, The Gettysburg Address film and cast information needs to become undeleted immediately. People go to wikipedia for information such as this. Businesses and movie studios understand this, and, as such, they load the details of their projects on wikipedia for consumers and movie-goers to find. Who will tell me that The Gettysburg Address film---which releases "spring 2015" and includes a cast of 20 name celebrities--- is any less eligible for inclusion on wikipedia than a film with no confirmed cast and in pre-production and slated for release in 2017 or 2018? There are hundreds of such projects out there already with pages on wikipedia. So please don't stand on policy or COI claims. The citations and references on The Gettysburg Address film page all check out. Everything checks out. It's a desperate reach to say "the film isn't yet released so the page needs to be deleted here". If that's the case, then wikipedia must delete hundreds of its pages for movies yet to be released. It can't be both ways. We can't pick and choose by alternating criteria whose yet-to-be-released films are worthy of wikipedia pages. This is the definition of discrimination. Any user who deletes pages on these grounds should be censured at least. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JackSmall (talkcontribs) 18:37, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Whether the article is kept or not does not depend on other articles but on whether it meets the notability guidelines, and whether the article meets the notability guidelines depends of course on whether it is actually there to begin with. So instead of arguing with us about that, please disclose your conflict of interest. If you are not prepared to do so or simply don't want to, then please have the courtesy to step away and wait until someone else creates it if they believe it is notable. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:11, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

AdvaCare Pharma[edit]

There is no unambiguous advertising in this page, and it has been deleted for this reason. I think the page respect all wikipedia encyclopedic canons. Please let me know what to do to restore the page. Thank you --RedBud (talk) 05:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC) -RedBud (talk) 05:52, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

  • I have moved this to Draft:AdvaCare Pharma. Some language is a bit promotional, but I think it can be fixed. Also the whole article is written to describe the products to a buyer, so it should be a bit more balanced. Check with Shirt58 first to see if promotional tome has been removed, before moving it back to an article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:14, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/GEC Anderson Limited[edit]

I, Mart1tin, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mart1tin (talk) 14:42, 24 April 2015 (UTC)


Would like to make several changes and resubmit please

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:25, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Trapped In Static, 2013.jpg[edit]

Permission received via. OTRS (Ticket:2015021910012385) -Mdann52 (talk) 16:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

@Mdann52: Yes check.svg Done §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:01, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Fresh[edit]

I, CDanes23, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CDanes23 (talk) 22:02, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:27, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

The University of Bologna Law Review[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -SocratesAndLaw (talk) 12:16, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

The University of Bologna Law Review is a newborn student-run law review officially sponsored by the Department of Legal Studies of the University of Bologna. Our official website is still under construction. Our firs issue will be published on Spring 2016. I wrote the article under a merely objective point of view. I did not write that the University of Bologna Law Review will be the most important European student-run law review. No personal judgments, no personal predictions. Only facts. We would be glad to add our official domain as soon as possibile.

SocratesAndLaw

@SocratesAndLaw:X mark.svg Not done. This page is for articles that i) have already been deleted; and ii) to request undeleton (or userfication) where the deletion was on an uncontroversial basis and so can be undeleted on an uncontroversial basis. That's a bit of an oversimplification but what this means is that since the article has not been deleted, this page has no applicability whatsoever, and because the article is being considered for deletion on the merits at a deletion discussion (at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The University of Bologna Law Review), even if your request was after it was already deleted through that debate, this page would have no no applicability whatsoever. If you wish to avoid deletion, I suggest you go to the deletion debate I linked and provide policy/guideline-based reasons for why the article should be kept, maybe after first reading arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Better yet, go to the article and expand it by writing prose that you cite to multiple, reliable, secondary sources that are entirely independent of The University of Bologna Law Review and discuss it in detail. After you've done that, go the the debate and explain that the basis for the nomination has been addressed.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 12:36, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Jacuzzi[edit]

The page created is for a known Los Angeles Musician and Performance Artist. It was cleared once posted, then "Hadal" deleted it. I DO NOT understand how a user/volunteer who specializes in gems can make a decision regarding the validity of said musician? And secondly; there are several legitimate references noted; and that was only a small bit of the material, you can see the large amount of press coverage here: http://www.genevajacuzzi.com/_/Press_clipping_2014.html This has been one heavy reason why people don't like your system. It is a dictatorship, without heart. Rules and guidelines created to help people that get in the way of what they first intended = Bureaucracy! -DonTheJuan (talk) 23:16, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Hadal (talk · contribs)) instead. We MUST be hardnosed about sources, especially when it comes to biographies, since a poorly-sourced biography can invite a libel lawsuit from the subject. Lastly, an A7 is generally more about the article's content as opposed to the sources (though the sources, or lack of quality thereof, are contributory). Basically, an A7 deletion indicates that the article did not explain why the subject was notable. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:23, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
  • X mark.svg Not done The deletion was also checked by DGG. I would also have deleted this. WP:BAND describes what we expect for an article about a musical group. I suggest that you make a draft at Draft:Geneva Jacuzzi until you can include a claim of importance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:36, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Donovan James McCune[edit]

Please undelete, ticket 2015042410027507 -Willy Weazley 02:50, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Institute of Professional Investigators[edit]

Please undelete, copyrights issues solved. Ticket:2015040810016611. -Willy Weazley 03:33, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Elizabeth J. Duncan, Author.jpg[edit]

OTRS. Ticket 2015031710023044 -Willy Weazley 04:14, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Brendan O'Sullivan[edit]

I, Kelmoo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kelmoo (talk) 22:21, 26 April 2015 (UTC)


I feel with more links and references (which are available offline) the page has validity and will be useful on Wikipedia for other users. I feel it has been harshly edited as there is interesting and useful scientific breakthroughs from him that should be on Wikipedia. It just needs further editing. -Kelmoo (talk) 22:23, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:42, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

2014 AFC Challenge Cup Group A[edit]

I am requesting this and 2014 AFC Challenge Cup Group B, and 2014 AFC Challenge Cup knockout stage as well. I have found enough sources to make a detailed match summary so the articles will pass WP:NOTSTATS, which was the main reason they were deleted in the deletion debate a year ago.

Here is a quick example for the Kyrgyzstan - Palestine game which was the first match of the tournament:

In the first match of the final edition of the AFC Challenge Cup was an even affair until the last minute of stoppage time when substitute Abdelhamid Abuhabib struck from a corner to win the game.[1] It was a rather even game till then with Palestine having the best chances, with Hilal Musa having a shot just go over in the last minute of the first half as well in the 50th minute when he was completely unmarked in front of goal but he couldn't direct his shot on target. Palestine had an excellent chance with 20 minutes remaining when Ashraf Nu'man played a perfect pass to Tamer Seyam but Pavel Matiash made a fine save to deny the forward.[2] Kyrgyzstan's best chance came in the first minute of the second half when naturalized striker David Tetteh got his head to a cross but it wasn't the best connection and straight at Ramzi Saleh.[3] Afterwards Palestinian coach Jamal Mahmoud praised his players for never giving up at what he called a very even game, while Kyrgyz coach Sergey Dvoryankov prmossied that the best had yet to be seen from his players and blamed the tropic humidity and heat for his player's performance.[4]

  1. ^ Mohamed Sajid (19 May 2014). "ACC Cup 2014: Palestine 1 - 0 Kyrgyzstan". maldivesoccer.com. Retrieved 27 April 2015. 
  2. ^ Mohamed Sajid (19 May 2014). "ACC Cup 2014: Palestine 1 - 0 Kyrgyzstan". maldivesoccer.com. Retrieved 27 April 2015. 
  3. ^ Mohamed Sajid (19 May 2014). "ACC Cup 2014: Palestine 1 - 0 Kyrgyzstan". maldivesoccer.com. Retrieved 27 April 2015. 
  4. ^ Azuhaar Abdul Azeez (19 May 2014). "Last minute goal saves Palestine in Challenge Cup". haveeru.com. Retrieved 27 April 2015. 

-Inter&anthro (talk) 15:40, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

@Inter&anthro: X mark.svg Not done. These articles were deleted as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 AFC Challenge Cup Group A, so they will not be restored here. You should first approach the administrator who closed the discussion, user Joe Decker (talk); then, if you are not satisfied, you should apply at WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 16:32, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ohio College Personnel Association[edit]

I, Ulbricak, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ulbricak (talk) 20:29, 27 April 2015 (UTC)