Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Administrator instructions

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts:

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases

Contents

Draft:BuyAssociation[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) JamesDearsley (talk) 00:03, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:17, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • X mark.svg Not done The page is fairly promotional in tone and the way it's phrased, I wouldn't be surprised if it was directly copied from somewhere. You can make a new draft, but try to avoid WP:PEACOCK terms and phrases. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:30, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
    @JamesDearsley: I restored the page. It does need some editing for tone, but it was deleted under G13 (abandoned draft), not G11 (unambiguous advertising). In other words, it is fixable and doesn't require starting over. Please edit the draft to address the issues raised ASAP. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:38, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Ahmed Moataz[edit]

The Information in the first is like my Signature not to make person page but i continue down my article about cars -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahmed.Moataz7 (talkcontribs) 00:34, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. Note that A7 speedy deletions will not be overturned here, and that Wikipedia is not a social media site or a place to tell the world about yourself. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 02:23, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

One Click Download India[edit]

One Click Download is fastest increasing users it has jumped about 5,167,965 rank in Alexa. This site does not support adware and malware based advertisement. -Dkinred (talk) 03:56, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. Note that A7 deletions will not be overturned here. The userbase and Alexa rank of any website are irrelevant to whether or not it gets a Wikipedia article. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:17, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done Being the world's 5 millionth most popular website is far from notable enough for inclusion. Please see WP:Your first article for straightforward advice to writing on Wikipedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:42, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Rudra Infotech[edit]

because another person has mistakenly delete the content -Akchodvadiya (talk) 06:44, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done It looks like the content was not accidentally or mistakenly deleted, it was deleted per WP:A7 as an "Article about a company, corporation or organization, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject". As such, it cannot be restored through REFUND and you will have to ask one of the deleting admins (Verrai and Deb) if they would restore the content. If they refuse, you will have to go through deletion review to seek restoration. Offhand I can see why it was deleted, as the article did not show how the company passed WP:CORP. It also somewhat comes across like you were trying to create a LinkedIn or CrunchBase type database entry, given the slight promotional phrasing and the links to all of the company's social media sites. I do have to warn you that we're WP:NOTLINKEDIN in that we cannot have an entry on every company, only the ones that pass notability guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:49, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Magnetic_Gear[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Ozykiss (talk) 07:53, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Magnetic_Gear&action=edit&redlink=1

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:44, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Yilin zhong[edit]

please undelete the article after delete the advert part if there is any. -Emptynow (talk) 11:23, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

@Emptynow: - The page wasn't actually deleted (a previous version was under a different title), but was actually inappropriate (advert-like). I have moved it to draft space for you. You can now find it at Draft:Yilin Zhong. I'm afraid no one is going to do the cleanup work for you - you'll have to do itself. As a starting point: remove adjectives meant to compliment the subject, text that implies you should buy her works, and stick to what other sources have written about her, not your personal opinion. When you feel the article is ready, use the "submit your draft button" on the template at the top of the page and an experienced reviewer will take a look and either accept it or let you what need fixed. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:57, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Midasuno[edit]

The page met with WP:MUSICBIO and WP:GNG guidelines, unsure why it was deleted -188.164.228.38 (talk) 13:51, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - The article was deleted under the proposed deletion mechanism whereby an editor can nominate a page for deletion and if no one objects after 7 days it is automatically deleted. Pages deleted as such can be restored upon request, which I have now done. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:02, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Paulo César Silva Martins[edit]

A footballer who has made his debut for the national team and thus passes WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Have no idea why the author decided to blank the page, perfectly notable article Inter&anthro (talk) 14:01, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

@ThaddeusB I have contacted Paulo personally and he is not happy with my work. He wants someone else to do it for him. Alhosniomani20 (talk) 16:53, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

I thought this was an odd deletion request, as the article looked pretty good to me. However, it was a valid G7 request.--Mojo Hand (talk) 16:59, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
@Alhosniomani20 really? In that case I'll see if anyone else will be willing to re-start the article if possible. Inter&anthro (talk) 21:24, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
If Alhosniomani20 requests restoration, I'm happy to do so. Just ping me.--Mojo Hand (talk) 04:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

User talk:Mojo Hand No Sorry I don't want to restore the article. If anyone wants to then they are free to do so. But they must make sure that they don't copy the same content. Alhosniomani20 (talk) 10:48, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Cathedral School Student Council[edit]

I need help in editing the page, but people need to know about the council so we need to keep it up. -Tripple343 (talk) 15:34, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

@Tripple343:, the page cannot really be listed here. As it has not yet been deleted, you cannot request that it be restored. Also, if it is speedy deleted under WP:A7, the correct forum for apeall would be first taking it up with the administrator who did the speedy deletion and then adding it at Wikipedia:Deletion review. (Also notifying @C.Fred: of this discussion). --Samuel J. Howard (talk) 16:33, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Manchester Historic Association[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Dchauvette58 (talk) 16:09, 26 February 2015 (UTC) I was looking through a page that listed local historical societies in the US and noted that New Hampshire did not have any societies listed. Having worked at the Manchester Historic Association (MHA) before, I edited the page and included MHA in the list. When I searched for the MHA in Wikipedia I did not find any listing for it. I have created a page for the MHA so that when someone looks for it, they can find it. I intend to add the sidebars including name of director, website, etc. when I can figure out how to do it. I was attempting to figure out the process when i published the site.

I do not know of any references yet for the MHA that I could make. I liken the site to many that I have seen concerning say a local high school or college. It is my belief that at some point those who know more about the MHA will begin to edit and add. Let me know what I need to add to make the site acceptable and more importantly, add the specific links showing me how to do it and I'll be happy to comply.

Dave Chauvette

  • X mark.svg Not done - the page was blank. There is no reason to keep a blank page around. If you or anyone else wants to write about MHA in the future, they can create the article at that time. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:56, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
  • Dchauvette58: Actually the page wasn't blank and did contain content, but the issue was that it was a copyright violation of the official website. Please understand that we cannot accept copyrighted material at Wikipedia and in order to use the text you must file a ticket at WP:ORTS that gives us permission to use this material. However even if the MHA is willing to give permission the material would still need to be substantially re-written because of how it was written. Phrases like "Conscious that the achievements of its past leaders were becoming fast fading memories" do not fit the neutral point of view policy on Wikipedia and can be considered promotional. This is kind of the catch of using copyrighted material- in most cases the material was written in order to promote the topic on their/its own website and as such isn't considered to be appropriate for an encyclopedic entry. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 03:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

CardFlex,_Inc.[edit]

Thousands of companies have Wikipedia entries, and we created ours in the same format as these other entries. There is no marketing or promotional copy in the text - merely some basic history and background about what this company is and what it does. Please let us know specifically why we are not allowed the same privilege to be part of Wikipedia as the other companies now listed on the site. -71.170.193.227 (talk) 16:30, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

  • @71.170.193.227:, well the first problem is that you shouldn't be writing about your own company (see, WP:COI). I took a look at the article and arguably it didn't meet G11 (advertising), but it definitely did meet the other deletion reason, A7 (no indication of importance). CardFlex may be notable based on my search, but mostly because the FTC sued them. If you insist on creating an article, you can start over in draft space at Draft:CardFlex and submit it for review through the articles for creation process which reduces the problems with conflicts of interest by having a third party review the article for neutrality. However, any unbiased article on the company must cover the FTC lawsuit, so perhaps you would be better off not having an article. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:53, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Expressway Productions[edit]

I, Expressway, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Expressway (talk) 17:29, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

@Expressway: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Please also consider changing your username. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 22:33, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Houston Wrestling[edit]

Houston Wrestling was viewed and loved by millions and deserves a page -66.60.247.180 (talk) 19:33, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:08, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Nasty Little Man[edit]

This is a full-service public relations and marketing firm which represents some of the biggest names in music including Paul McCartney, U2, Foo Fighters, Beck, Radiohead, Arcade Fire and Jack White among others. Nasty Little Man's clients have landed coveted placements on Saturday Night Live, Rollings Stone, The Tonight Show, Billboard and many other high profile media outlets. -69.203.104.4 (talk) 21:19, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I do have to warn you that notability is WP:NOTINHERITED by the company having worked with notable persons (it's generally assumed that firms of this nature will work with someone who is notable), so it's still entirely possible that the page may be nominated for deletion in other formats. The best way to prevent this from happening is to find sources that focus on the company and not on the people they've represented. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 02:56, 27 February 2015 (UTC)


Romolo Del Deo[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Tatianajug (talk) 04:17, 27 February 2015 (UTC) A page with this title has previously been deleted.

If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below.

17:00, 17 February 2015 Mike V (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Romolo Del Deo (G13: Abandoned AfC submission – If you wish to retrieve it, please see WP:REFUND/G13) wish to make edits and resubmit -Tatianajug (talk) 04:21, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:30, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
  • I've removed a chunk of the article that was exceedingly promotional and that will need to be re-written to read more neutrally. Other than that, there was no issue with restoring the page. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:30, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Roundtop Mountain Resort[edit]

I'm presently typing up the history and contents in another window. Please do not delete. -Sam Krepps 12:26, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

@Saamhimself2: Hey Sam. This page is only for requesting undeletion, that is the restoration of article that have already been deleted; a request to not delete a page that exists but is tagged to be deleted has no place here. When you saw the speedy deletion template placed in the article, it had a button in the middle center that said "contest this speedy deletion" and linked to the article's talk page. That is where deletion should be contested and I see you actually used it. In any event, the speedy deletion was declined.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
This is a good opportunity to remind Flat Out and anyone else reading that it is not a good idea to tag articles with A3 within a few minutes of creation. Quite often, new users hit save to make sure it works and a quick tagging for deletion can discourage them finishing the article or even cause them to give up on Wikipedia entirely. There is no rush to delete a blank/near-blank page (it does no harm) - it is much better to wait for at least an hour of inactivity to make such a speedy nomination. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:36, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
@ThaddeusB: I created {{Uw-hasty}} for informing patrollers. It doesn't get enough use so since you (like me) are concerned with this issue, I thought I'd let you know about it, if you weren't already aware. (We also have in our arsenal {{hasty}}, which I created for use when a page has been tagged but has not yet been deleted, and {{CSD5}} which is for when you are going to possibly fix the initial entry yourself.) Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 18:40, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
I'm happy to take the feedback on hasty, equally we should be discouraging creation of articles with no content in mainspace. The article remains a mess. Flat Out let's discuss it 00:30, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Peak Saver[edit]

I, User:Richard416282, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Thanks to the Auto-delete message getting lost in SPAM, from Jan 15, I was unable to act upon it earlier. I hope all editor will understand these things, even though, there is no good excuse for not following up sooner (talk) 13:53, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

@Richard416282: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:25, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
@Richard416282: One hopes you actually will work on it this time, as opposed to the last time you pledged to but did nothing. —Cryptic 18:22, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

dr y.srihari[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -101.63.189.213 (talk) 14:56, 27 February 2015 (UTC) dr y.srihari article is usefull , he is a famous doctor of andhra pradesh , it is good article .........sekhar ... This article usefull for doctors and patients,,,,,thanking you sir,,,,,,,aruna

X mark.svg Not done. This page is only for requesting undeletion, not asking for something nominated for deletion to not be deleted. If you want to contest this deletion, please visit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Y. Srihari, but please read Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. Please also note that if the article is ultimately deleted through that discussion, its undeletion cannot be requested here. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 15:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
You were told the same above. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:15, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Joe (Joseph) Brent[edit]

I, 96.250.17.120, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 96.250.17.120 (talk) 15:09, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

The page was not yet deleted. To stop G13 deletion, you just needed to edit the page. I have now done so for you. please continue your work on the article ASAP. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:39, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

MASTER KUMAR[edit]

THE ARTICLE WAS DELETED BEFORE I COULD PROVIDE A REFERENCE TO HIS NATIONAL AWARD WINNING -Saisundarlatha (talk) 17:26, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

  • @Saisundarlatha: The page (Master Kumar) hasn't been deleted, only tagged for possible deletion. If you edit it now to include the award, it might not need to be deleted. --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:45, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
@Saisundarlatha: Yes check.svg Done - restored to Draft:Master Kumar where you can work on it. The only claim of WP:Notability seems to be as an actor, and I doubt whether he meets the requirements of WP:NACTOR. A lot of the gossipy personal material and promotional language needs to be cut - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a social-networking or gossip site. Good referencing is required - see WP:Verifiability, summarised as "any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source". JohnCD (talk) 15:19, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for doing that I have added both the References for winning a state award and National award,and yes sure I will try to maintain its quality removing unwanted materials and will provide references more to verify the claim of his acting.Can you provide me some days of time before doing that??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saisundarlatha (talkcontribs) 03:56, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

  • @Saisundarlatha:, the article is in the draft space, which is beneficial since it will give you more time to fix any issues and it'll also keep the article safe from most of the common reasons for deletion. Typically the only reasons that a draft article will be deleted is if the article has a copyright violation, is exceedingly promotional, or is abandoned for at least 6 months without any edits. Offhand what I can recommend is to avoid using terms like "super hit" and "illustrious" since those are considered to be WP:PEACOCK terms and are considered to be promotional in nature. It's not the type of thing that would get the article deleted in draftspace necessarily, but it will keep the article from getting approved at AfC. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。)

File:Falls of the Ohio Museum.jpg[edit]

All revisions not properly transferred to Commons. -Kelly hi! 17:39, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

@Kelly: Do you just need the file revisions or the page (i.e. description) revisions too? I assume you only need the older ones and not the most recent. Is that correct? --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Just looking for the original versions uploaded by Bedford so that they can be moved to Commons as well - then they can be re-deleted under F8. Unless they were corrupted by the old image bug from a few years ago...in that case never mind. Kelly hi! 20:06, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done - I restored just the original version of the file. Let me know if you need anything else. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:15, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Copy complete - please re-delete both files under WP:F8 - thanks! Kelly hi! 21:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:37, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

plastidip[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... We are just starting this page and we plan to make it a full source of information for Plasti-Dip users world wide. The first sentence was just a test since we have never created a WiKi page before.

Please do not delete this page. I will keep updating the content as much as I can. "Save page" button below -PlastidipS (talk) 19:18, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done @PlastidipS: There are a number of problems here. First, the article declared it was aimed at helping users of Plasti Dips. That isn't what Wikipedia is for - this is an encylopedia, not a how to guide. Second, the article said where to buy the product - that will almost always be considering an attempt at advertising whether or not it was intended as such. Third, your username implies group ownership and will need to be changes. Finally, if you have a conflict of interest here, you should read WP:COI and strongly consider not proceeding. If you understand all of the above, I suggest you create a new draft article at Draft:Plasti Dip and use the articles for creation process to get input from experienced editors without the threat of rapid deletion. (I have verified the subject is likely notable; that is, it fulfills our requirements for inclusion.) See also WP:Your first article for straightforward advice about writing on Wikipedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:09, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
@PlastidipS: The article's content was also a blatant copyright infringement of the product's website. If you do create another article, you must not copy and paste copyrighted text again (yes, this is true even if you own the copyright – because we would require you to release the text to the world under a suitably free copyright license or into the public domain, before it could be used here, even if it was text that was appropriate for pasting here, which it was not).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 20:25, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

GRITtv[edit]

The article was well sourced, and there are locations to find information about the show without finding it from the website. -Cdemere (talk) 19:51, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:13, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Groundwork Milwaukee[edit]

Enter your I am trying to write this article and I did not mean to publish it yet only save it as a draft because I am not done with it. here and then click the "Save page" button below -Factfanatic3000 (talk) 20:27, 27 February 2015 (UTC)

Note that drafts have their own dedicated space. I can remove the speedy-deletion tag and move it to draft space for you (it would be at Draft:Groundwork Milwaukee), if you wish. Looks like it has already been done, and since A7 deletions cannot be overturned here, this is moot. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:48, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
@Factfanatic3000: X mark.svg Not done. I would have moved this to draft space, but it is a copyright violation from the organization's website. Wikipedia cannot hold copyrighted material without a formal copyright release, and in any case this is not a place for organizations to tell the world about themselves by posting copies of their own material. JohnCD (talk) 15:07, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Yandi Munawar[edit]

Article was deleted on the basis it failed WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL, which it did at the time but the player has made his debut in a competitive match (2015 AFC Cup) for a professional team Persib Bandung, so the article would meet the notability requirements. Source: 1 & 2 back up the fact that he played that competitive match for a professional team. Thank You -Inter&anthro (talk) 00:37, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G4, which means the page is a near-carbon-copy of a page previously deleted via deletion debate. Pages deleted via deletion debate will not be restored here; go to WP:Deletion review or contact the administrator who closed the deletion debate instead. You will need to either rewrite this article from scratch or argue for restoration at WP:Deletion review. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:47, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Droneward[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -AlikaJaff (talk) 02:56, 28 February 2015 (UTC) I was mid-editing the article to explain it's importance when it was flagged for deletion.

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Bbb23 (talk · contribs)) instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:49, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Yessine Farhat[edit]

Enter your Yessine Farhat is a well known musician in my town and i want to put his informations in this awesome website to show to my country what he can do , as a musician here and then click the "Save page" button below -Dis Pater 24 (talk) 04:04, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Bbb23 (talk · contribs)) instead. Note that Wikipedia is explicitly not for spreading the word about something; at best that's a (sometimes unintended, sometimes unwanted) side effect. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:51, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
@Dis Pater 24: X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.
Sorry, but it is much too soon - see WP:MUSICBIO for what he needs to have achieved before he can have an article. JohnCD (talk) 14:50, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

dr y.srihari, again[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -101.63.146.196 (talk) 13:06, 28 February 2015 (UTC) this article is very nice

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment: this article has not been deleted. Deletion is being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Y. Srihari, and that is where you should comment, but read WP:DISCUSSAFD and WP:Notability (people) first.
This is the third time you have been given the same advice. Please read the replies to your requests. JohnCD (talk) 15:26, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
Actually this would be the 6th time they have posted here, if I were online when the last 2 requests had been posted I would have reverted as Vandalism again. Warning have been left on all socks pages.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 15:31, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

National Forum for Biological Recording[edit]

The NFBR is the only organisation supporting biological recording in the UK and is referenced on the Biological Records Centre and National Biodiversity Network Wikipedia pages, but has no entry of its own, I was redressing this omission -Salticus (talk) 14:53, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

@Salticus: X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Bbb23 (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review.
Wikipedia's inclusion criterion is called Wikipedia:Notability, and is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." JohnCD (talk) 17:21, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Motorsports Park Hastings[edit]

I was hired by the track to make a wikipedia page for them, i was notified that it has been marked for deletion yesterday. I am new to this and have read somewhat of what to do, all i did was copied Barber Motorsports Park and changed the information to fit this race track. As i have said i am new to this and i did not know exactly what i did wrong for it to be flagged for deletion, please let me know or help me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbtran72 (talkcontribs) 16:58, 28 February 2015‎

@Bbtran72: X mark.svg Not done. Please read, carefully, Wikipedia:Conflict of interest and the Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use ("Paid contributions without disclosure" under section 4) to declare your interest in any edits where you have a COI, and should not edit directly but may submit a draft. Read WP:Your first article, WP:Notability and WP:Notability (organizations and companies for advice. JohnCD (talk) 17:10, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jozef Matejka[edit]

I, Nikoma 93, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nikoma 93 (talk) 20:50, 28 February 2015 (UTC) I wish to edit the article and re-submit it -Nikoma 93 (talk) 20:51, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

@Nikoma 93: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Jozef Matejka. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:51, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:The_One_Man_Band_Festival_(Montreal)[edit]

I intend to make the required changes -Lisarbaum (talk) 21:00, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

@Lisarbaum: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:54, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pocket Kid Records[edit]

Okko50 (talk) 02:27, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

@Okko50: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Pocket Kid Records. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 10:57, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Gurmeet Dhillon[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Gurmeet22 (talk) 03:46, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done and will not be done. You are not Gippy Grewal, and writing articles that claim his achievements as your own will get you nowhere. JohnCD (talk) 09:30, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

User:Metcalfep/sandbox[edit]

I, 86.182.125.123, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.182.125.123 (talk) 09:08, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Metcalfep, this really comes across like you took it from an obituary or memorial page (meaning that it seems like it's WP:COPYVIO), as this is written in a very, very casual tone- almost to the point where it's a little promotional. Try to avoid phrases like "died before his time" and "short but eventful life". If you can vouch that this is not a copyright violation I'll restore it, but I'll be honest- you will have to completely re-write the article to meet WP:NPOV. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 19:42, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Clarksville IN Town Hall.jpg[edit]

Not necessarily an undeletion request, but could someone look at the deleted history of this page and let me know what the license on the file was? Whoever moved the file to Commons gave it a GFDL license, but I suspect based on the uploader's other contribs that the license should have been {{PD-self}}. -Kelly hi! 12:31, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

@Kelly: You are correct. It was {{PD-user|Bedford}}, so it should have been transferred as a public domain release. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:53, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Many thanks, I will correct the licensing at Commons. Kelly hi! 15:07, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Christopher Edward Howes[edit]

Hi I just discovered this page was deleted when I logged in to update it - it was deleted for lack of references, I will gladly add references to the page as I was not aware this was a policy, I was just taking my time to update it properly. I hope this isn't a problem -Chowes46937 (talk) 15:03, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: The article was deleted as the result of a biographical article proposed deletion ("sticky-prod"). Article deletions via sticky-prod will not be unilaterally overturned; reliable sources need to be provided in order to overturn the deletion. Please see WP:Notability (people) for our inclusion criteria with regards to people and WP:Identifying reliable sources for the kinds of sources needed in order to overturn the sticky-prod and create the article. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 19:30, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Jeremy I suggest that you update your template, this sort of request will be honored, as the requester has offered to supply references. They cannot add references if there is no article. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:55, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
I was under the impression that a sticky-prod could not be contested or overturned without the source being provided first. Had they linked to or otherwise provided what they would have used as a source with their request I would not have used the template message. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 08:27, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
From policy:
The biography may be undeleted when an editor is prepared to add a reliable source. The undeletion can be requested through an administrator or at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. Upon restoration, the {{prod blp}} template should not be removed, but needs to be replaced or resubstituted to reset the expiration date. Where the request has not gone through requests for undeletion, the admin carrying out the undeletion is expected to check that a reliable source has been added.
In other words, the page is to be restored immediately and the requester given a new 7 days to add sources. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:44, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Smart Games 1 (2008)[edit]

Hi I just found out the my article was deleted for lack references when I tried make a second page for it, I will happily add references for my article. I did not know about your policy and I hope it is not one problem about this. -Elijahmanning (talk) 15:31, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

  • This has also been speedied under Smart Games and Smart Games (2008), and there were also articles made for Smart Games 2 (2009), Smart Game 3 (2010), Smart Games 4 (2011), and Smart Game 5 (2012). I can't find anything to show that this event actually exists. The 2012 event supposedly had an attendance of 15,333 people. It's extremely unlikely that something with an attendance that large would have received absolutely no coverage and I'm inclined to believe that this is an attempt to perpetuate a hoax as well as an attempt to evade detection by opening up several different accounts since multiple accounts were opened to create various different versions of the articles. I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to block you for this. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 19:22, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Potawatomi Inn Pokagon State Park.jpg[edit]

Image with multiple versions; apparently only one version was transferred to Commons. -Kelly hi! 18:20, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done all other deleted version are corrupted or cannot be recovered. Nothing looks as if it would have been better than this over compressed image on commons anyway. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:50, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for checking! I've removed the references to the corrupted versions at Commons. Kelly hi! 20:57, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Deon Brown[edit]

Not posted for promotional reasons, informational only. and then click the "Save page" button below -Edmiller11 (talk) 19:59, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Acroterion (talk · contribs)) instead. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:19, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

works of Julius Evola mass PRODded by SPA[edit]

I noticed an SPA IP mass prodded the works of Julius Evola, a pretty well known writer in the world of esoterism/esoteric subjects. For those I checked out so far (those which hadn't yet been deleted), I've seen at least enough sources to contest a prod and in some cases more than enough to show notability. Looking at the names the IP removed from Template:Julius_Evola, I saw that I hadn't noticed them quickly enough. Requesting undeletion. Hopefully it's ok that I combine multiple into one section (with the same rationale). -— Rhododendrites talk \\ 21:07, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

see above -— Rhododendrites talk \\ 21:07, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

@Rhododendrites: no problem combining them, in fact I have combined them further to save space. As these are contested PRODs, I will restore them if you really want, but first please check out WP:Notability (books) and consider whether you can actually make anything out of an unreferenced sub-stub like:

"Synthesis of the Doctrine of Race is a work by Italian esoteric writer Julius Evola and was published in 1941 by Hoepli."

That's the complete "article", and others I have looked at are not much better. I can't see them surviving AfD. Would it not be better to list them, with some commentary, in the author's article? JohnCD (talk) 21:26, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
@JohnCD: Thanks. That one is pretty awful, to be sure. Others aren't great. But they were prodded based on notability, and being familiar with NBOOKS I saw that at least a couple of them are. That, combined with the fact that the editor's only edits were to prod books by this author with the same "non notable pamphleth" rationale, makes me think there wasn't enough thought behind the judgment. I wanted to have them restored so I could check them and then, if there's not enough substance or if it's not notable, I'll redirect them. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 21:46, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
OK, but it will be tomorrow before I get to them. JohnCD (talk) 21:52, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done - All pages restored. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:55, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
@ThaddeusB: thank you! It was a pleasant surprise to find these all blue when I eventually rolled up my sleeves and sat down to do them! JohnCD (talk) 18:39, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Roamer (Educational Robot)[edit]

SofOmar (talk) 21:52, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:07, 1 March 2015 (UTC)
@SofOmar: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Check out WP:Your first article, and note the need for references showing significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources to establish Wikipedia:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 10:53, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:SOURIAU[edit]

I, Unnisouriau, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Unnisouriau (talk) 04:26, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

@Unnisouriau: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Check out WP:Your first article and note the need for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to establish WP:Notability. JohnCD (talk) 11:05, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

User:Vega el mas Buscado(Rapper)[edit]

User:Vega el mas Buscado (Rapper) Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Vega el mas Buscado(Rapper) 05:46, 2 March 2015 (UTC) 1=user:Vega el mas Buscado(Rapper)2= I am working on this page as an artist page and is my own personal page.IM trying to take out the word User: before the artist name and I am having difficulties doing it if you please explain me how to finish this project. Its all me and everything is Copyrighted , I make my own songs, beats, recordings and publishing.--Vega el mas Buscado(Rapper) 05:46, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Bluntly, that is not what Wikipedia is for. We are not an artist profile site, and anyone using Wikipedia for this purpose may be blocked as a result. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 08:19, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bodhtree (company)[edit]

I, Mahi kapoor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mahi kapoor (talk) 08:04, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

@Mahi kapoor: already Yes check.svg Done, a month ago, after your last request here. As explained there, the page is now at Draft:Bodhtree (company). Please stop making requests here, read our replies, edit the draft to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it. JohnCD (talk) 10:30, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Jennifer Abbott, War of The Gods[edit]

This page was Edited under malicious circumstances. the facts stated for the deletion were not correct and seem to be personal attacks from someone with a hidden agenda -24.68.137.198 (talk) 08:51, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

the Post was deleted and changed under malicious circumstances. The facts given for deletion were false and seem to be more of a personal attack on the author. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.68.137.198 (talk) 09:00, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done Please read WP:AGF. I can't find any deleted page with that title, or any variation that I have tried. Please give the exact title (spelling and capitalisation are important}. It would also help to know the username of the page's author, or a link to any notice about the deletion. JohnCD (talk) 10:45, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
  • JohnCD, it looks like they were trying to get Jennifer Abbott (director) restored. However as it was deleted at AfD, it cannot be restored here. As far as the allegations of personal attacks go, they're entirely unfounded (considering who the nominator was and some of the people participating in the AfD, one of whom was myself) and looking back, I have to concur on the nominator's suspicion that there was some sockpuppetry (or at least meatpuppetry) going on with the article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:38, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Abbott (director), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Guerillero (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 10:47, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Suraj Gowda[edit]

I did editing in Article through Sandbox and now wants to review it again. All the information provided is genuine. -Nakulmehra (talk) 10:23, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done A copy exists at Draft:Suraj Gowda already. Please address the concerns raised in the AfC reviews and resubmit. --ThaddeusB (talk) 17:01, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Arthur & George (TV Series)[edit]

Hi I created the page Arthur & George (TV Series) and was first making a minor edit on it to create it and I was in the process of adding more information as it got deleted if you see the edit summery I stated more info will be added. Thank You JohnGormleyJG (talk) 14:46, 2 March 2015 (UTC) -JohnGormleyJG (talk) 14:46, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done The page was not deleted and is not currently facing speedy deletion. Thank you for adding content. I will leave a notice discouraging the patroller from making such hasty taggings in the future. --ThaddeusB (talk) 17:03, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

fayyazg[edit]

sir my parsonal details why u delete my wikipedia article -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fayyazg (talkcontribs) 15:32, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - The page was deleted Fayyazg because Wikipedia is an encyclopedia documenting things that have attracted significant attention by reliable sources. It is not a place to write about yourself. --ThaddeusB (talk) 17:09, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Neel Kamal Chongdham[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Neelkamal05 (talk) 21:03, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

@Neelkamal05: X mark.svg Not done. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a place for people to write about themselves. For that, you want a social-networking site like Facebook or LinkedIn. See Wikipedia is not about YOU and Wikipedia:Autobiography. JohnCD (talk) 21:24, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

Jamie Herrell Miss Earth winner.jpg[edit]

reasoning -Jamie:Herrel (talk) 01:05, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

The file that I uploaded has been nominated to deletion due to my statement in my own account, I didn't mean to have restrictions, I clearly stated that Everyone is able to use image or files that I upload , just because of the little mistakes of mine, the file has been nominated for deletion. I've already changed the description of my account, stating:

This Wikimedia account of Jamie Herrell is handled by herself and to her Manager from the Miss Earth Organization. Every photos that are uploaded using this account may be use from any of this article: Miss Earth, Miss Philippines Earth, Jamie Herrell etc... The photos are free-licensed, which means, everyone is free to use these images for any purpose.. Thank you.


There are no restrictions already, please, remove the deletion and cancel it, this file is free use and is worthy to be saved with. As I say, this image is free-licensed which means, Everyone is free to use it. Thank you

X mark.svg Not done this appears to be in response to this request, which is on Commons, not on English Wikipedia. I will handle it there. Magog the Ogre (t c) 01:17, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you so much sir... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamie:Herrel (talkcontribs) 01:24, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

International Alchemy Guild[edit]

I am the President of the International Alchemy Guild. I am not plagiarizing my own page -Mxgnrtnx02 (talk) 02:12, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done Mxgnrtnx02, even if you are the President, Wikipedia still cannot accept copyrighted text unless you file a ticket through WP:ORTS that gives Wikipedia permission to use the text. The reason for this is that in the past Wikipedia has had people claim to be the copyright holders of copyrighted materials, only for it to happen that they weren't. However, even if you do this you will still have to re-write the page because the text was ultimately too promotional to remain on Wikipedia and if re-added, the article would very likely be deleted through WP:G13, unambiguous promotion. That's the catch with using copyrighted text- most of the time it was written with a specific bias that wouldn't be an issue on the original site, but it would not be acceptable in an encyclopedia. As a point, try to avoid WP:PEACOCK words and buzzwords like "remarkable" and try to write in a more WP:NPOV. The text on the club's website was just too casual to really be appropriate on Wikipedia. Now that said, there are two other things I need to mention. The first is that Wikipedia discourages writing with a conflict of interest because it's so easy to insert promotional/non-NPOV material without noticing it unless you're very careful and also because it's very easy to see more notability than there might otherwise be. This leads me to my second point: I did a search for this guild and I can't really see where it's received enough coverage to pass notability guidelines for an organization. Other than some passing mentions in the contact section of a few books (being listed in this fashion is considered to be a WP:TRIVIAL mention at best), I don't really see where the IAG has received any coverage and even if the copyvio and promotional terms weren't an issue, this probably would not pass the speedy deletion criteria for WP:A7 (notability for organizations) or the articles for deletion process. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:20, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/St.Yesterday[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) JPanic15 (talk) 02:23, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:21, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Main Page/CSS[edit]

This was moved (without redirect?) to Wikipedia:Main Page/CSS, which still exists. When it was still at Main Page/CSS, some of its content was copied to the Main Page with a link to Main Page/CSS for attribution. Basically, the history of the Main Page depends on WP:MP/CSS, and we need this redirect for history searchers to be able to find WP:MP/CSS. -Nyttend (talk) 07:09, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Twelve Gauge Valentine[edit]

Requesting Userfication of the article history. Some years ago, I edited this article, and I remember it being in somewhat respectable shape, but did not add it to my watchlist. The 2014 deletion discussions speak of it as if it were exceedingly poorly referenced and written, which makes me think it may have been bombed by a novice editor in the intervening time, and all of its references erased. My memory may be imperfect here, but I wanted to make sure. -Chubbles (talk) 07:34, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Guess my memory wasn't up to snuff on this one. There's some referencing for this band out there in the world, still deciding whether I will attempt a resurrection... Chubbles (talk) 02:13, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Dorkinian Football Club[edit]

I, Vincebaldwin, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Vincebaldwin (talk) 08:11, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:37, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Kamran Zahid[edit]

I, Poetawan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kamran Zahid 10:58, 3 March 2015 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Poetawan (talkcontribs)

  • @Poetawan:The page you are looking for Draft:Kamran Zahid is not actually deleted, it was moved into the draft space as this is now the preferred area for articles to worked on prior to being place in the main space.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:00, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Just to clarify, it was deleted at one point, but was restored per a request here in January. Please work on the article at its new location, as Draft space is not for the indefinite holding of not-ready-for-mainspace articles. --ThaddeusB (talk) 16:21, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Ellington Lee Ratliff[edit]

I, R5family16, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. i would really like to work harder and have another shot at making this page happen. As Ellington Ratliff DOES NOT have his own individual wikipedia page. Yes if you go to the bands wikipedia page he is stated below but that is not his own page. I would really like to create Mr Ratliff's page if given the opportunity. R5family16 (talk) 15:07, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pat Miller[edit]

I, Kutters1975, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kutters1975 (talk) 15:10, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Desperate Preacher's Site[edit]

I did not create this page, but I have had a link to it on my website, which is ClergySecrets.com, for some time. I am still in process of editing a book that makes several references to the "Desperate Preacher's Site." I would definitely appreciate having the article restored. Thank you. Sincerely Warren Vitcenda, author of "Clergy Secrets - They Don't Want You To Know!" -----Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -2601:2:5B80:60C9:D012:2377:486A:F330 (talk) 18:13, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

One source does not an article make. You need multiple reliable sources (such as newspapers, magazines in the subject's industry/topic area, or books) with no connection to the subject and editorial oversight that discusses the website in depth. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:22, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Ok. Well, is there a way that I can still get a copy of what was in the article so that I may perhaps work on it per your instructions? I did not create the page, but I would like to at least personally preserve what was there and add to it if I can. Thanks. Warren Vitcenda (Lectionary Lite, ClergySecrets.com) — Preceding unsigned comment added by LectionaryLite (talkcontribs) 18:44, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Question for "Administrator" Here: I found the deleted "Desperate Preacher's Site" on one of the "mirror" sites that copies Wikipedia's pages, so I have the information and links that Wikipedia deleted. Perhaps the "parameters" need increasing, instead of being just about the "Desperate Preacher Website"???? If a Wikipedia page were called something such as "Sermon Plagiarism," then perhaps all of the information from the deleted "Desperate Preacher's Site" Wikipedia page as well as the external links provided there could help make a new Wikipedia page with an expanded focus?? Expanding the subject would make the deleted "Desperate Preacher's Site" info just another source that would go along with the external links previously provided - as well as whatever other information/links that could be added as well. Any thoughts/comments/advice?? Thanks.

@LectionaryLite: Yes check.svg Done. As this page was deleted by WP:Proposed deletion, it is automatically restored on request. I will notify user Vrac (talk), who proposed it, and who may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute. If that happens, you could propose any change of scope you have in mind and see whether there is WP:Consensus for it. JohnCD (talk) 20:57, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Hoshcof[edit]

I am Hoshcof, I am a person who records video games and theories on YouTube, and I wanted a Wikipedia page, because I knew Pewdiepie has one, so why not me? I may only have 32,000 subscribers, but they are growing fast. I know that you are a busy person, but please restore the page I created, and let me and my fans finish it. If not, then soon another will probably be created, probably by a fan, and it'll repeat the process. If you are not convinced, then you can check me out here. Thank you for your time, sir or madam. I hope you do the right thing. -Hoshcof (talk) 19:39, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user Versageek (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. That's the jargon, now the explanation in plainer English. The fatal problem to having an article about you is the lack of multiple and substantial sources to show that you are "notable" in Wikipedia terms - the sources have to be reliable and have to be independent of you, and mentioning you in passing isn't enough. Writing about yourself is a bad idea too, so please don't do it again. See also WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY. BencherliteTalk 19:57, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
I will add, @Hoshcof:, that you might also want to read about deliberately disrupting Wikipedia to make a point, which will get you blocked if you persist in your threat to keep recreating the article. Doing that will also cause the article to be permanently protected from being re-created. Do the right thing and work with the community, not against it. Because you have a WP:Conflict of interest about yourself, your best venue for submitting an article is Wikipedia:Articles for creation, but that is no guarantee that your article will be accepted if it doesn't comply with the basic requirements described in Wikipedia:Golden rule. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:58, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

50 Moves (magazine)[edit]

Page was deleted in order to change the page title, however it was not removed from google index so can be restored -60.240.20.124 (talk) 23:26, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

Google's cache does not instantaneously update. Give it a few days and the Google index should update to reflect the article's deletion/move. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:11, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
Google seems to be very quick about finding newly created articles on Wikipedia, but very slow about removing deleted ones from its cache, in my observation. In any case, it is not clear what is being requested here. We have no control over how Google chooses to index content. ~Amatulić (talk) 02:48, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Michelle Orpe[edit]

I, Kellineroman, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kellineroman (talk) 09:32, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:43, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

nitesh estates limited[edit]

Hello, I am intend to work on this page. So, Please allow me to do so. The company is notable enough to appear on Wikipedia and hence I want to work on this page. -182.68.91.108 (talk) 11:26, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Farman Nawaz[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Snehahurrain (talk) 18:58, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes I do remember that this page was previous deleted but is it necessary that if a page was deleted in the past so again the same rule of previous deletion is enough to decide the fate of the new page. Kindly compare the previous deleted page and now this one. There are hundreds of changes between them. I wish to raise few questions here ... 1. How many references were provided last time? 2. How much times is lapsed after the first deletion? 3. Do you feel that only the matching Titles of the previous and present pages are sufficient enough to delete this page? 4. Do you feel that the references provided here from Daily Global Times China, Daily Outlook Afghanistan, The Frontier Post, Daily Dawn, Express News TV Network, Express Tribune etc are fake? 5. What were the points of previous deletion discussion? 6. Are those points valid now to be applied on this new page? My more than 250 articles are published so far in the above mentioned newspapers. It can be confirmed from my webpage farmannawaz.wordpress.com and even the newspapers can be contacted to verify. Because of these articles Cardiff University UK has offered me an unconditional offer to admission to MA International Journalism. I am an emerging columnist and wants to contribute in the field if journalism. just type my email farmannawaz@gmail.com in any search engine and see the results. But here the the world most authentic encyclopedia has put the sword of deletion on my page. Is it justified to treat an emerging columnist in this way? sorry to say but I was not expecting this from the people who claim to belong to a free world. here I would like to give the example of Pakistani actor Hamza Ali Abbasi's account removal and then the apology of Mark Zuckerberg. Kindly see this link http://www.dawn.com/news/1156536 . I think the same name Charlie Hebdo is used in my page and twisting the arm of the Wikipedia to put the sword of SPEEDY DELETION on my page. I will wait for your response.

  • X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Farman Nawaz, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. This is also not the avenue to contest a CSD.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 19:39, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Cory Harding[edit]

Accidently deleted -YPMagic (talk) 04:50, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosphere_Technology[edit]

The Biosphere Technology and the Biosphere Process©™ System was a technology developed and successfully marketed by a company called Global Environmental for 15 years under license from the inventor Dr CA McCormack. The technology is the subject of 6 successful international patent awards beginning in 1978 and most recently updated in the Bahamian patent No. 2181 awarded in July 2009 extending the technologies protection for another 20 years. Global was founded and initially chaired by Dr Albert Reynolds the former Prime Minister of Ireland and the Architect of the Irish Peace Process in partnership with President Bill Clinton. As such the company and it enormously successful technology are an important part of Dr Reynolds legacy. Dr Reynolds died on 21st August 2014 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albert_Reynolds). The gasification technology embodied in the Biosphere and in its successor technologies was and remains true to the basis principals of gasification as developed in the early part of the 19th century in Europe. Clean air Gasification is a tried and tested environmentally friendly way to generate power from waste materials and play a significant part in the matrix of waste reduction and energy options for the future. Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Alb2015 (talk) 10:27, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biosphere_Technology[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Alb2015 (talk) 10:32, 5 March 2015 (UTC)