Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion/Archive 70

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
← Archive 69 Archive 70 Archive 71 →

Contents

File:CBC Television 2009.svg

Logo seems to be eligible for copyright in its origin country, Canada. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 18:53, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Well, some pointer would have been be useful. Restored for now as {{keep local}} so you can verify whether {{PD-ineligible-USonly}} or something else applies. --Tikiwont (talk) 08:08, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Christopher Hall

article was wrongly deleted as Christopher Hall is a singer of note with multi-platinum records and singles to his credit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fofsanders (talkcontribs) 07:19, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Are we talking about the member of Stabbing Westward. If so, the relevant article is Christopher Hall (musician) · ( talk | logs | history | links | watch ) · [revisions] — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:54, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Tikiwont (talk) 08:38, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d9/TSU_Type_Logo.png

reasoning -Mjvs87 (talk) 13:41, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. It is also on commons, so you best go there. --Tikiwont (talk) 07:58, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

List of Cemeteries in Hudson County, New Jersey

This page is a well-referenced complete list of cemeteries in Hudson County, New Jersey with a substantial amount of photographic material and created as fork of List of cemeteries in New Jersey. Cannot review history, do not believe it has ever been reviewed for deletion or at this time fulfills the general critieria for speedy deletion (though it may have at a much earlier date, it no longer does). It is list that fulfills notably, is comprehensive, and encyclopedic -Djflem (talk) 16:28, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Speedy deletion discussed with and reverted by deleting admin. --Tikiwont (talk) 07:47, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Libyan maps

These are all maps that are GFDL-self. While they are orphaned here, some smaller wikis uses these maps (without source or license) so I want to replace those with these. I will work to move these to the Commons. The list of images are here:

  1. File:LibyaAjdabiya.png
  2. File:LibyaAlJabalAlAkhdar.png
  3. File:LibyaAlJufrah.png
  4. File:LibyaAlKufrah.png
  5. File:LibyaAzZawiyah.png
  6. File:LibyaBanghazi.png
  7. File:LibyaDarnah.png
  8. File:LibyaGhadamis.png
  9. File:LibyaGharyan.png
  10. File:LibyaMisratah.png
  11. File:LibyaMurzuq.png
  12. File:LibyaYafran.png -User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 17:45, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done --Tikiwont (talk) 17:24, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Timeline of the 2010 Pacific hurricane season

On the 2010 Pacific hurricane season main page, there is a big clutter of dates and times that are supposed to be in their own article. Each year, a hurricane season article gets cluttered with dates that delimit the periods in which a system formed, strengthened, weakened, or dissipated. To get rid of the mess and the clutter, we put it all into another article to free up space for the main article for the hurricane season. The users who edit these pages always make sure that that page comes into play when the season gets at least three or more systems, to relive the clutter. We would be very thankful if this page gets restored. -STO12 (talk) 16:27, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

The page is a redirect. Previous discussion is here. If there is consensus to have timelines for all seasons or if this season meets your criteria, all you need is to click on the history tag above, and undo. --Tikiwont (talk) 17:37, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

CloudStack

This has matured significantly since it was deleted, and last month entered the Apache incubator. There is now significant third-party coverage. -Superm401 - Talk 23:49, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Also, there was only one delete vote (not counting the nomination), and even that was hedged. Superm401 - Talk 23:51, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
We have an Incubator too. Shall I move it there or to your user space? --Tikiwont (talk) 19:52, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
I think it would be reasonable to simply undelete it. The Apache Incubator is not the only sign of notability. However, I'm fine with your user space proposal. I will undelete it, move it to my userspace, clean up and update it, then move it back to the main namespace. I don't expect to leave it in user space for long. Superm401 - Talk 01:15, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done. I've updated and expanded it, then moved it to the article namespace. Superm401 - Talk 03:11, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Ronnie Radke

Ronnie Radke is now significant enough to have a wiki article and is semi-famous in the music industry. The article was originally removed due to unsignificance of the character at that time. Please reconsider this deletion, thanks. -Miss.ravenflame (talk) 05:54, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done This isn't uncotroversial, and NawlinWiki already pointed you at Deltion review. If you're serious about you best start writing a short draft at User:Miss.ravenflame/Ronnie Radke before going there as it already been discussed a lot. As the previous versions were old and had issues, the article still needs to be written in any case. Review also WP:MUSIC, WP:BLP. --Tikiwont (talk) 08:48, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

K thanks anyway. Sorry I'm new to this so I'm still figuring out how this works. Miss.ravenflame (talk) 09:55, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

3rd world (film)

the copyright infringement from a different page is not correct, because i wrote the article in the third party site as well. So, i believe that erasing teh page is a MISTAKE, since there is NO copyright infringement at all thus i want to request to undelete the page. Best regards -Aglaia (talk) 10:14, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done. I presume you mean 3rd world (movie), and that you are perhaps the same person as user Annabilimic (talk). (If so, please choose one account and use only that one, to avoid any suspicion of "sockpuppetry").
We can't accept previously published material on the basis that someone on the end of a wire says they wrote it. See WP:Donating copyrighted materials for how to make a copyright release, though that is seldom worth doing because material written for other purposes is not often suitable for an encyclopedia article.
In any case, this article was deleted as a result of a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/3rd World (movie), so it cannot be undeleted here. (Annabilimic as the article author was notified of the discussion on her talk page). Read Wikipedia:Notability (films) to understand Wikipedia's inclusion criteria; then, if you consider the discussion was wrongly decided, or you have new information, you should approach user ItsZippy (talk), the administrator who closed the discussion. Then, if your concerns are not addressed, you can go to WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 12:15, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Ron shimshilashvili

reas -RonRafael (talk) 23:22, 27 May 2012 (UTC)


Hello, I beg you please don't delete this article :( My dream is to get an article on Wikipedia, i rather get an article here than a luxury car, ive worked so hard, you can type on google and check my stuff out i am all over, yesterday i saw my self at a tv commercial. If you can please re edit it and don't delete it you can edit some stuff and change whatever you want but dont delte it please i beg you so much, ill do anything you wish :( Thanks,

(non-admin closure) X mark.svg Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Dipankan (Have a chat?) 08:48, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Tonga National Tag Team

Article deleted as CSD A7 with a summary "tag20 rugby does not appear to be a notable sport" but CSD A7 applies only to persons, groups of people and web content, not to sports. -jfd34 (talk) 06:49, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done A team is a "group of people". They're a group of people who play a sport. A7 is a valid CSD for such a group of people. The article is not about "tag20" the variant of a sport, it's about a national team that plays it (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:13, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Tonga National Tag Team

reasoning -Sipooti 10:09, 28 May 2012 (UTC)


Please republish my article regarding Tonga National Tag Team. It is a notable subject. Reasons given to me for deletion were Tag20 is not a sport and the article is about a club?

1. Tag20 Rugby IS A variation and a notable sport of Tag. It is played in Australia, England and New Zealand. Perhaps that person shold do some research. (www.Tag20.com)

2. Secondly and most importantly - this article is about a Nations (Tonga) National Team. There are hundreds of similar or the exact article on Wikipedia.

I still had information and images to be uploaded.

I dont understand how this proceedure works like this that an article can be deleted without review first before doing so. Alot of work goes into writing.

Please republish, I know I have abided within the guidelines. I am new and Im still trying to find things and how to get onto the reference template etc? Some people have here have been great, some not so.

Thank you for your time!!! Sipooti 10:09, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done It would appear that just as Twenty20 is a variant of cricket, Tag20 is a variant of rugby. There is no master article about Tag20 - which, if you can prove its notability in more than just Tonga, could be a good place to start. If the sport is not notable enough for an article, then the team that plays it is far less notable. However, I would follow the same pattern as cricket: the national team for West Indies cricket team, for example, lists all formally-recognized variants of the game. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:18, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Tonga National Tag Team

reasoning -Sipooti 20:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC)


This article is about TONGA (A COUNTRY!!!!) TONGA'S NATIONAL TAG RUGB/FOOTBALL TEAM!!!!!! I HAVE REWRITTEN THIS ARTICLE AND THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH IT!!!! THE WEBSITES PROVIDED IS INFORMATIVE SITES FOR READERS PROVIDING OTHER LINKS TO THE SPORT OF TAG.

RESTORE PLEASE!!!!! IT DOES NOT VIOLATE ANY POLICIES HERE!!

Sipooti 20:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done and will not be done As above, you have been given great instructions how to proceed. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:12, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

ted gambordella

reasoning -76.187.57.111 (talk) 22:50, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Please tell us how to undelete this page.

  • Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. GB fan 23:12, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

File:MoominsBjörkSingle.JPG

This was deleted as per orphaning after a merge, but now the article is restored and the image can be utilized again. -—Ryulong (竜龙) 00:15, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Skier Dude (talk) 02:31, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Rowdy Rathore

it was a undesired and an unintensional mistake which may have led to deletion of this page. so i kindly request you to restore the page. -122.176.6.135 (talk) 18:02, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Someone had merely removed the content, and it just needed to be undone by anyone - which it was (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:14, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

The Joanne Banks Dancers

This organisation is of valid historical and cultural importance to a region of the country where now at least three generations of family have taken part in projects and productions. I do not know why this article was deleted as the reason given seems to simply state that it is of no worth. It is not anyone's wish to use this site as an advertising tool, merely to acknowledge the existence of this organisation and am happy to be given easier to understand guidance as to how to better place this article, thank you -JBDStudio10 (talk) 20:05, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. The article is highly promotional in nature, does not meet basic requirements. Right now, you may attempt to "save" it before it is deleted by following the instructions on the article itself (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:29, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Justin Maillet

{{subst:refund|1= Justin Maillet |2= Because my name is Justin Maillet and i request to have my Article undeleted!!!Iuydf (talk) 20:27, 29 May 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iuydf (talkcontribs) 20:18, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

As you have already been told, X mark.svg Not done and will not be done (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:27, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Hot Rod's BBQ & Grill

Can an admin please move this article to my userspace so I can work on it? Thank you. -Candleabracadabra (talk) 15:27, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

  • It seems to me very unlikely that a local business like this can meet Wikipedia's notability requirement. Read WP:Notability, WP:CORP, WP:42 and WP:AMOUNT. Then, if you want to go ahead and ask again, I will userfy this for you; but I don't want you to waste a lot of time, as people often do, trying to make something appear notable which simply isn't. JohnCD (talk) 12:34, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
The business is notable based on very substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. I'd like to work on the it in my userspace using the article that was already started before being deleted soon after creation. Thank you for you assistance. Candleabracadabra (talk) 17:01, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done to User:Candleabracadabra/Hot Rod's BBQ & Grill. JohnCD (talk) 19:41, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Hungry Harry's Famous Barbecue

Could an admin please move this page to my userspace so I can work on it? Thank you. -Candleabracadabra (talk) 15:28, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

  • See reply above. JohnCD (talk) 12:35, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
The business is notable based on very substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. I'd like to work on the subject in my userspace using the article that was already started. Thank you for you assistance. Candleabracadabra (talk) 17:00, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Yes check.svg Done to User:Candleabracadabra/Hungry Harry's Famous Barbecue. JohnCD (talk) 19:46, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Foodservice Consultants Society International - The Americas (FCSI-TA)

To whom it may concern,

Please userfy this page so I may make the edits suggested by Cindamuse and resubmit it for review. Cindamuse asked for the page to be deleted because of one phrase that was used in the Membership description. That phrase: "FCSI-certified consultants possess expertise in all foodservice disciplines..." While this phrase is factual, Cindamuse believes that it is too promotional. I can understand that perspective and am glad to clarify it. However, it is also clear to me that editor Cindamuse does not understand that while membership in FCSI is open to any independent foodservice professional, the ability to achieve certification status in the group (i.e., the ability to add the letters FCSI after your name) is dependent on passing a series of tests that are regulated by the independent, not-for-profit FCSI Educational Foundation. Anyone who has achieved an FCSI certification really is a foodservice expert. This fact is also stated clearly in the description for this page.

Thx. -AuroraPete (talk) 15:58, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done by SkierDude. --Tikiwont (talk) 12:22, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Asteras Arfara

reasoning -94.68.252.69 (talk) 17:57, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

It is not an obscure football club. It has played to the Delta Ethniki .

Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. I will notify user Kosm1fent (talk), who proposed it, in case he wishes to consider nominateing it at WP:Articles for deletion, which would start a debate lasting seven days to which you could contribute. The article needs references to reliable sources. JohnCD (talk) 16:33, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Coordinates of Monaco

This page was deleted because it was considered a duplication of the Geography of Monaco section. However, it is clearly not a duplication of the Geography of Monaco section. So please look over this. Thanks, B-watchmework (talk) 04:42, 30 May 2012 (UTC) -B-watchmework (talk) 04:42, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Bev James

I will add some sources and re-write to make it unambiguous. This was not the intention when writing the content. -Bevjamesuk (talk) 08:37, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Ryan Maduro

He made his pro debut on 5/29/12 with NY Red Bulls in a US Open Cup match -Elop76 (talk) 13:37, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Please update the article and add a reliable source to confirm that he made his debut. JohnCD (talk) 10:00, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

IDT Telecom Asia Pacific

Article is not marketing promotion or advertising, is a write up of what IDT Telecom Asia Pacific is. This is link to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IDT_Corporation -Unitystar (talk) 07:51, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Well, two people considered it too promotional, so you best restart from scratch at User:Unitystar/IDT Telecom Asia Pacific or confirm to have the previous one restored there as basis. --Tikiwont (talk) 17:44, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
Note that "Unity Star" is a brand name of a product sold by IDT Telecom Asia Pacific. The Unitystar account has been blocked as a spamusername. --Orange Mike | Talk 18:00, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

briqz

The page was no different from other articles on musicians. The band is also very popular and has signification on the info of the band. The article was deleted for speedy deletion. If it needs more information it will be edited where necessary -Swaggyzebra (talk) 08:39, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Lets Go Maldives Pvt. Ltd.

The article was deleted already almost 5 minutes later after only one line of text was written! I was in the process of working on it and same day have edited it much more. If there are any mistakes there now, please, let me know, I will edit it shortly. -Letsgowiki (talk) 11:40, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

23 seafarers boat

reasoning -פארוק (talk) 18:55, 2 June 2012 (UTC)


it is historical article. please return it back. פארוק (talk) 18:55, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 19:16, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

thank you ! . פארוק (talk) 19:55, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Shenzhen & Hong Kong Bi‐City Biennale of Urbanism\Architecture

פארוק (talk) 19:00, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Ben_Sumpter

I've provided reliable sources when asked, and 10 days certainly did not pass as this article was only posted today.

I even posted video links proving the claims. (showing him performing with those artists, and producing in the studio with those artists) What more do you need? -Famousaudiopuppets (talk) 02:12, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

The article was deleted because you blanked the page. If the original and only significant author blanks the page that is taken as a request to delete the page. GB fan 02:32, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Nina Feric

notability established, see Google results for the query Nina Feric; see site: www.nina.feric.altervista.org -2.39.194.81 (talk) 10:04, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dreamies

My music Bill Holt's Dreamies LP from way back in 1974 still sells, receives a coveted 4 stars "ALL MUSIC PICK" was stamped "ESSENTIAL LISTENING" at MSM music, voted ONE OF THE 50 MOST OUT THERE ALBUMS OF ALL TIMES in a list including Pink Floyd and the Beatles, is written about in glowing terms at Pitchfork Magazine - and had a nice Wikipedia page - but now Dreamies has been deleted at Wikipedia!

Donald Albury initiated the Wikipedia deletion. I have used a number of the suggestions on WIkipedia to seek undelete - this message is one of them. Please help. Bill Holt's Dreamies deserves a place in Wikipedia. It is known worldwide from Japan to Germany. Help.-68.81.65.19 (talk) 14:09, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done Taking into account that a previous proposed deletion had already been contested and the review links don't make it a candidate for speedy deletion. Still it is possible that someone opens up a deletion discussion. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:35, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Happiest Minds

so many IT companies are already listed in Wikipedia, Also this one is funded by Intel Capital, Canaan Partners. This is next gen IT company Delivering Transformational solutions. If this is getting deleted why other IT companies still existing -Tituamitgupta (talk) 16:25, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done You've recreated it so the refund request is moot as is the reference to other IT companies.--Tikiwont (talk) 08:53, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Mariah-Carey-Mahogany.jpg

This image was removed unrationally. Some IP user removed the infobox from its main article, and I don't know how it got removed without anybody noticing. -George Ho (talk) 22:31, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. — ξxplicit 00:57, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

shy and the fight

significant increase in public profile including continued bbc 6 music and radio 1 airplay since article creation and also appearance at this years wychwood festival -Andyblack (talk) 22:01, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Andyblack/Shy and the Fight. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. I've userfied it since the deletion discssion asks for better sources which you do not mention here. Airplay and wychwood festival on the other hand seem to be mentioned alreayd in the deleted version. Just take your time. --Tikiwont (talk) 12:34, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

River Hills Mall

Belatedly contesting the prod of this article. I have found a few sources. -Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 11:25, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Tikiwont (talk) 12:28, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Lianne Morgan

she's released an album now -37.15.145.35 (talk) 16:50, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

The original article was deleted because Lianne was only known of having auditioned and been rejected from the Spice Girls. Now, she's released her first album "Resonance" and here's the links:

  • [www.liannemorgan.co.uk]
  • [www.cdbaby.com/cd/liannemorgan]
  • [www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00851EX36] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.15.145.35 (talkcontribs)
Self-published albums don't count. See WP:BAND. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:14, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Well, that seems indeed to be a self released album. To meet WP:MUSIC more is needed. Notability may eventually come by the fact that her story meanwhile has been picked by more than the daily mail article mentioned in the deletion disccsion.[1]. She was now on BBC wales[2] and in some tabloids. Maybe there's more of you search.
In any case it is a redirect with all the edit history present. Technically there is nothing to restore. If you've found enough material, you can give it a try if you click on above history link, edit and if people aren't convinced they can revert. --Tikiwont (talk) 20:21, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Homeless Situations Have Welcomed The Solution

reasoning -LaShisna (talk) 21:07, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

By: LaShisna Lature Brown (I have the information I need now to go along with the article, I just noticed the sandbox and that is where I should have first put that roughdraft before I added it to the talk page. So much is missing out of there and it won't make sense in it's rough draft state.

I'm sorry for the trouble, but I had to take a break from the computer so I used the talk page like a Word program. This is identify with the I.S.O. Model and How the token is received and acknowledge, sort of like a story that goes along with further explanation of what I have discovered that the I.S.O. Model entails.

Thank you,

LaShisna Lature Brown

LaShisna (talk) 21:07, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done your only contributions so far have been to your talkpage, which we almost never delete. However, what you wrote there is inappropriate for an encyclopedia...it was a blog. None of those edits should be repeated on this project (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:27, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Blanche Devereaux.jpg

This is a cheap screenshot. I will need it to replace the current image of Blanche Devereaux (File:Rue McClanahan Golden Girls Blanche Devereaux.jpg) because... it's dirty cheap and not owned by Getty Images. -George Ho (talk) 04:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. — ξxplicit 01:18, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Rose Nylund.jpg

This screenshot is dirt cheap. It is not owned by Getty Images, so I want this image re-inserted into Rose Nylund, please. -George Ho (talk) 05:30, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done. — ξxplicit 01:18, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Knox-Metropolitan United Church (Regina, Saskatchewan)

This was deleted when I was about to save the considerable amount of documented content I had drafted. Masalai (talk) 10:13, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done. There is nothing worth restoring - the deleted article contained only the name of the church. You are welcome to re-create it with content. If you want to take your time over creating an article, you can avoid the risk of premature deletion by making a draft in your user space - go to Help:Userspace draft, fill in the title, and it will create a draft page for you. Then you can develop the article there, and when it is ready either submit it to WP:Articles for creation or move it directly to the mainspace yourself. JohnCD (talk) 10:33, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

مهرداد رئیسی

There are links with contents which shows the credibility of the sources and the aforementioned page is about someone - Mehrdad Raissi - who is famous enough to be in Wikipedia. I do not know why the article has been deleted after it was proved to be credible. -SlimSlim (talk) 11:49, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done On the English Wikipedia, neither مهرداد رئیسی nor Mehrdad Raissi appear to have existed as an article. Please note that famous and notable are not the same thing (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 11:55, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
  • (edit conflict) You need to give either the exact title of the article you mean or the username of the account that posted it. JohnCD (talk) 12:00, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
  • No, requester says on my talk page that the page was deleted on the Farsi WP, so I have told him we can do nothing here. JohnCD (talk) 19:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Steve Obsitnik

Although the article was originally flagged for deletion, I and another user worked to remove and POV controversies after which the article stood normally without the flag. The article was well sourced from the outset and nicely formatted. There was no discussion as to why it was suddenly changed into a link. Additionally, previous candidates who ran for the position have Wikipedia pages i.e. Dan Debicella and even candidates who dropped out of the race i.e. Chris Meek still have pages. Steve Obsitnik is both a public figure and the confirmed challenger Jim Himes for Congress. I hope you consider the validity of an article on him. At least would it be possible to have the text emailed to me?

Thank you for all your help and I hope I didn't mispeak too much with the new jargon of Wikipedia. -William.Sadock (talk) 15:30, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done. The article was turned to a redirect as a result of the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Obsitnik. Wikipedia is extremely resistant to being used for any kind of promotion, and by the policy WP:POLITICIAN it is normal practice for articles about unelected candidates to be redirected in this way: this avoids making value judgements about which of the many candidates should have articles, and also avoids edit-warring and vandalism by supporters and opponents. If you wish to challenge the decision you should first approach user Chip123456 (talk · contribs) who closed the deletion discussion, and then if not satisfied you may go to WP:Deletion review. Note that because there are many substandard articles the argument What about that other article? is not accepted - each is considered on its own merits. You can still see and copy the text of the article in the history at this version. JohnCD (talk) 20:12, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the response; I understand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by William.Sadock (talkcontribs) 21:03, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Pashto Academy

The reason for deleting the article was copyrighted material from http://pashtoacademy.edu.pk hence stated that i am the owner of this website. I have created the website for this academy and they stated that you must put our academy on Wikipedia. That's why if you need any verification for website i am ready for this. -Sokaniwaal (talk) 06:57, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Please visit Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions on donating the copyrighted material on your website to Wikipedia. After following the instructions then make your request here again with a link to the verification you provide. Blue Rasberry (talk) 12:37, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
I also strongly suggest that both Sokaniwaal and the "they" who have directed him to "put our academy on Wikipedia" review our guidelines on conflict of interest. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 13:23, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

:File:Suchitra Sen photo.jpg

After getting the deletion notice I added my reasoning in the file page, but it seems it has been ignored completely and the file has been deleted --Tito Dutta 09:26, 5 June 2012 (UTC) -Tito Dutta 09:26, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Bump! That was an infobox image and it is a popular article! Anyone, please? :-) --Tito Dutta 19:29, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Best way to find out whether your tag was considered and to what effect, would be to contact the deleting admin, Explicit (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log). If you can't settle your dispute, you can consider deletion review since this board here is for uncontroversial stuff only.--Tikiwont (talk) 19:51, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
I have contacted that admin! --Tito Dutta 19:56, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Pankaj Singh Tiwari

The article does not violate any of the provisions of wikipidea -59.177.42.130 (talk) 18:52, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done Actually it does. The article was either an unsourced biography of a living person or a copyright violation depending on whether or not india-forums.com (the only 2 sources) copied the text from Wikipedia or the article text was copied from india-forums.com. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:33, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Iva Keene

My page about Iva Keene was deleted on the basis of clause A7.

Here is why I believe the subject of Iva Keene is important:

She is one of the world-wide pioneers in her field (Natural Fertility). She has a proven record of helping countless couples overcome fertility problems naturally. Her work has been formally recognized by awards from Mom's Choice and APEX. She is a successful entrepreneur with a public profile in her field.

For the aforementioned reasons I ask you to please reconsider your decision to remove the article. Many thanks. -Arabelasmith (talk) 12:29, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - You've already contacted the administrator who implemented the deletion request, user Jinian (talk · contribs). If unresolved you can either write a fresh draft or take your concerns to deletion review. --Tikiwont (talk) 17:34, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Jay Kumar

The article was based on a Pastor in Chennai and was unbiased,there was no superior motive than just creating a Wikipedia article.He has conducted many concerts and evangelical programs.He heads a business wing which creates funds for an international organization The Victory Churches International.His philanthropist acts were rated as 3 all over Asia under the name Rakshak by Joyce Mayer Ministries.I hope you consider our Request.Thank you -The Ark VCI (talk) 05:32, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Patharlapahad

My own article -Sreeni.kaki (talk) 05:41, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Rakakshi Chinthamani

the reason for deletion was given to be Unsourced, confusing, unencyclopedic when I have given source as www.astroved.com, there is no confusion at all, as its a very small discription. I cannot pirate firther information about temple. But when I will visit the temple I will upload my taken snap and much more details and its history. Please do not delete it for now -Clear soul me (talk) 06:03, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Please see WP:PROD for the instructions for responding to a proposed deletion. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:44, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Gatineau Police

This article was deleted because there wasn't anything terribly spectacular about their past. Thing is, the redirect is to Gatineau, in which there is no mention at all about the force. They've been accused of causing a death in a high-speed chase, shot a man, have been criticized over a murder case with no leads, which now they feel may be connected to Luka Magnotta, a recent Canadian murderer featured in an INTERPOL search. I'm sure there's other interesting notes in their history. -Zanimum (talk) 00:41, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Oh, and they defended their choice to shoot a cow. -- Zanimum (talk) 00:42, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
There's no deletion to review here. The AFD in question was closed more then 3 years ago as "redirect" and the history's still intact. Even if it wasn't the entire text of the article was Gatineau Police is the police force of the city of Gatineau, Quebec. If you wish to revert the redirect and expand the article then go for it. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:45, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks. I've tried to restart an article that was AfD'd before, and being scolded, so I was wanting to make sure that my reasoning at least held up in summary. Should this have been raised on Deletion review? -- Zanimum (talk) 18:20, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
If you're able to be WP:BOLD and make something that doesn't resemble the AFD'd one so that it meets notability, etc, then go ahead and try and create a new one. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 18:23, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:CarmeloLisciotto

reasoning -CarmeloLisciotto (talk) 15:50, 7 June 2012 (UTC)


My page was marked for deletion? This page is a reference on a Historian and public individual. His history in his field of expertise and his current works as a Holocaust historian are listed. If there is something written that appears promotional, we are happy to make the required edits. However we are not clear as to why the content/page should be marked for deletion?

Is it intended to be an article? It was deleted as a copyright violation. You should see WP:FIRSTARTICLE it it's intended to actually be an article. If it's autobiographical, you have WP:COI. I also see you have recreated it ... (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 17:39, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

This account name is an impersonation of a living person, Carmelo Lisciotto, and has been used to create a "userpage" which was actually an attack page about that person. I have blocked the username as such. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:58, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

I was mistaken. The account does seem to be Lisciotto; the attack page was the product of a persistent vandal. The userpage has been restored and the editor unblocked, with my apologies. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:22, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Gérard Gertoux

I'm surprised by the delete of the page Gérard Gertoux only on two votes and without real debate. Many informations are incorrects :

- First, his book is published in France at the editor account, after validation by a reading committee, and is included in a collection directed by two specialists on religious history and sociology.

- Secondly, his book translated in english is cited in various books. We find some of them on Google books, for exemple in bibliography of The Encyclopedia Of Christianity (Volume 5, page 824). A commentary in the Religious Studies Review (Vol. 29:3, 2003, p. 285) explains the interest of these researchs : « This detailed treatment of the Name is useful for those who are interested in the history of its translation over the centuries[9]. »

- At last, the author has been invited to participate at international conferences with See for exemple the program of an International Conference on the Archaeologie, History and Reception of Persepolis, Edinburgh University, Octobre 14h-16th 2011.

The page about Gérard Gertoux could be supplemented from the french page. DroitTJ (talk) 10:03, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

  • Please note: you did not file this report properly, which makes it a challenge to review. X mark.svg Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Gérard_Gertoux, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:32, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

lil dough

fat dough is a rapper who is signed to the label koch g -LILDOUGH95 (talk) 00:00, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

he has sold over 30 thusand in records. been on 3 local magizenes, and got rado play from 2 radio stations a lot of acomplishements! — Preceding unsigned comment added by LILDOUGH95 (talkcontribs) 00:08, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

In other words, he might be famous some day? See WP:UPANDCOMING. X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles concerning music. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning musicians or music groups will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject. --Orange Mike | Talk 02:24, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Six Figure Adsense Code

First I believe this could help people create income for themselves, this course works and has already been prove to work comment are coming in very day about income being improved.

If I did follow the guide line it was because I never seen the ones that were shown to me now. How might I improve upon this to meet the the guide lines. In what way do I need to present it to make it fit -Don Minor (talk) 22:50, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

ted gambordella

reasoning -76.187.57.111 (talk) 14:36, 11 June 2012 (UTC)


One of the reasons this page was deleted as that no one seemed to be able to find any books I have actually written. Please, I know it might not be appropriate for the actual author to reply, but since no one else seems to have even done a search on Amazon.com to see a listing of all my books, I thought I would simply ask that someone at WIKI or a 'reader' just go to Amazon.com, and search my name. I have written 42 books, over 34 DVD's and they are really in print, online and in many books stores. I do not understand why people are allowed to remove my page...after saying they couldn't find any of my books. Just type my name Gambordella on Gooogle, go do Amazon, and you will see them. Is that really so hard? Ted Gambordella

  • X mark.svg Not done - As announced at the top of the page, this process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially and has no applicability to articles deleted after any deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted Gambordella, it cannot be undeleted through this process. Nevertheless, if you believe that the consensus found at the discussion was in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Ron Ritzman (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. GB fan 15:26, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

JFA article should be restored

Wikipedia rules notwithstanding, removing an entire article about a notable topic merely due to lack of "independent sources" being cited seems unreasonable. JFA was and is well-known and influential in the punk genre, and I think the deletion of the page is unjustified. -75.162.14.123 (talk) 01:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:32, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Nikesh Thapaliya

I don't think this page needs to be deleted. Nikesh is not just a multiple world records holder. If he was only a world record holder, I am sure he wouldn't be qualified to be in Wikipedia. He is also a writer, journalist, activist and has achieved quite a lot at his young age. So, his biography doesn't need to be deleted from Wikipedia. Thank you. -Ath.Sn (talk) 04:55, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. & Please note that removal of deletion templates can lead to your being blocked from editing. Skier Dude (talk) 05:15, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Nikesh Thapaliya

This biography is not just about what world records he has made. In fact, records are only a part off his biography. He has been writer, freelance writer, journalist, activist, UN Volunteer. There are still many pages in Wikipedia which simply exist due to the person's single win in any beauty pageant and even playing role in any one film has automatically given someone a place in Wikipedia. But yes, this article may be improved but not deleted. Thanks! -202.52.235.145 (talk) 05:08, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. & note that the contributions of 113.199.144.131 and 202.52.235.145 & Special:Contributions/SamKns & Special:Contributions/Ath.Sn starts looking a lot like the misuse of multiple accounts Skier Dude (talk) 05:23, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Nikesh Thapaliya

*This biography can be improved but not necessarily be deleted! There are still many pages in Wikipedia which exist here simply because a person has won one beauty pageant and also if someone has played role in one film. This biography is here not because the person is just simply a world record holder. -202.52.235.145 (talk) 05:34, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:04, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Nikesh Thapaliya

Let's not delete this article entirely but it can be improved. I don't think the person has been mentioned in this biography is here because of having those records but like as written in the bio and sources mentioned, he has also been writer, journalist, activist. There are still many poorly written articles on Wikipedia which have been there due to some overnight transformation of an individual. We need to look on that too. Let's not make this one article a subject matter of controversy. User:Gsdan012 -Gsdan012 (talk) 05:50, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Please note that removal of deletion templates can lead to your being blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:02, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Nikesh Thapaliya

Additionally, simply talking about the world records of this person also, these are really worth noting. The mention of these world records here is like mentioning the wins of an athlete and films of an actor. But again, it doesn't seem that the person is here in this biography just for the world records but his other contribution too. Here it seems world records of him are good to be mentioned but not the main part of the article. Wikipedia has no article of any individual just for being solely a world record holder. -Gsdan012 (talk) 06:01, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - this page has not yet been deleted. Please note that removal of deletion templates can lead to your being blocked from editing. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:02, 12 June 2012 (UTC)