Wikipedia:Stub types for deletion/Log/2006/December/2
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
December 2[edit]
Rename of Climate / Meteorology stub categories[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the stub template and/or category above. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was rename
Both Cat:Climatology - Meteorology stubs and Cat:Climatologist and meteorologist stubs are inelegantly named and the first also breaks the naming convention with the hyphen-minus and the capital M. Suggest renaming the categories to Cat:Atmospheric science stubs (as a child of Cat:Atmospheric sciences} and Cat:Atmospheric scientist stubs (as a child of Cat:Atmospheric scientists). The former non-stub category has been around a while serving as a parent for Cat:Climatology and Cat:Meteorology and I just now created Cat:Atmospheric scientists to do the same for Cat:Climatologists and Cat:Meteorologists. Caerwine Caer’s whines 04:12, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong support. We should really have cleaned this up more thoroughly when it came up a while ago... Alai 04:42, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Yeah, I started this stub in Feb. 05 and wasn't really happy with the dual name thing at the time. Need to fix it. Vsmith 04:58, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Finally a name that makes sense. ~ Amalas rawr =^_^= 14:39, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, but see no need to change the current templates. Grutness...wha? 22:34, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Neither do I, which is why I only nominated the categories. Caerwine Caer’s whines 18:19, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the template's or category's talk page (if any). No further edits should be made to this section.