Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2007 April 20

< April 19	April 21 >

April 20[edit]

Template:Infobox Secretary of State (US State)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete ^demon^{[omg plz]} 01:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This template is unused and has been replaced by Template:Infobox US Cabinet official. — Philip Stevens 19:41, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Serves no purpose if replaced by a different Template. Jmlk17 21:26, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- obsolete Thunderwing 17:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Obsolete. --MZMcBride 19:40, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Infobox Chief Minister[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete ^demon^{[omg plz]} 01:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This template is unused and has been replaced by Template:Infobox Politician. — Philip Stevens 19:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- obsolete —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thunderwing (talk • contribs) 17:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]
Delete concur with assertion of deprecation. Gracenotes^T § 01:41, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not needed whatsoever. Jmlk17 06:42, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cite mailinglist[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Redirect ^demon^{[omg plz]} 01:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Obsoleted by {{Cite mailing list}}. grendel|khan 16:34, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If it's obsolete, delete :). Jmlk17 19:25, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I wonder why you created the other one - did you just not know about the first one? Anyway, redirect to whichever one is more comprehensive. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-04-21 08:46Z
Merge edit histories if necessary, then redirect. –Pomte 19:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect - I think that a redirect should be done for convenience, and frankly, why not? "Redirects are cheap"—my new favorite quote. And my other, more pressing question: why is {{cite mailing list}} needed, as it adds little functionality to {{cite web}}? Is it semantic? Does Grendelkhan intend on making it more unlike the latter soon, if that's possible? Gracenotes^T § 01:50, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't foresee any significant changes to the template that would distinguish it from {{cite web}}. However, not all mailing lists are published on the web, so this is a good semantic reason. All the other cite templates are similar enough anyway that I don't know why we don't combine them into one huge {{cite}}. –Pomte 00:02, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You mean {{citation}}. — Omegatron 03:04, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge — Omegatron 03:04, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:AD character[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete ^demon^{[omg plz]} 01:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

replaced show specific character infobox with {{Infobox character}} --TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 13:58, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete easily replaceable. Jmlk17 19:26, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unused/redundant. –Pomte 00:03, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Top Ten Films[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete ^demon^{[omg plz]} 01:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"personal top ten of films of "Alan Iverson" ??? I suspect User:Riverdepp is related in some way to this filmmaker, but i cannot know for sure of course. Clear example of what Wikipedia is not however. --TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 13:10, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree; completely useless. Delete it. Jmlk17 07:02, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete- does not meet a useful navigational template definition. Thunderwing 17:58, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Fair City1 Character[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete ^demon^{[omg plz]} 01:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No context, not used. — Punkmorten 08:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

note that this infobox has seen a range of different contents. The current content is that of Template:Top Ten Films, which i trust was an accident. --TheDJ (talk • contribs • WikiProject Television) 13:06, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this shape-shifting mess. The character infobox is redundant to {{Infobox character}}. The character navbox is full of red links and probably violates WP:FICT. –Pomte 19:36, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete far too many deadlinks in the end. Jmlk17 06:41, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Various WMATA templates[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete all ^demon^{[omg plz]} 01:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deprecated, replaced by s-rail and station infobox templates. — SchuminWeb (Talk) 14:02, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete deprecated and unused in mainspace. –Pomte 19:24, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - deprecated. I also thank the nominator for combining the nominations: thanks! Gracenotes^T § 01:51, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete useless templates. Jmlk17 06:43, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Routeboxca2[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete ^demon^{[omg plz]} 01:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Including {{routeboxca}} and subpages of both templates) Obsolete, unused except for on demo pages, now depracated — Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 01:59, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, there was a previous nomination. However, the circumstances are different here. --Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 18:41, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Seems like common sense. I know these aren't speedyible, but shouldn't we just {{prod}} these in the future? -- NORTH ^talk 03:21, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

North - the {{prod}} template is not used for template deletions - only articles -- master_son^Talk^- ^Edits 03:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I see that now... but I've used it successfully on a template before here. -- NORTH ^talk 07:04, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Per nom - -- master_son^Talk^- ^Edits 03:46, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unnecessary. Jmlk17 06:27, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete deprecated. V60 ^{干什么？ · VDemolitions · ER 3} 15:20, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.