Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Wikipedia:UNDEL)
Jump to: navigation, search

Administrator instructions

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts:

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases

Contents

iNext LTD is Limited[edit]

DEAR Wikipedia Admins you should undelete iNext, LTD caus not only is this my First page but iNex LTS is a bramd new company "Save page" button below -Techinfosource (talk) 01:24, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. A7 speedy deletions will not be restored here; please see WP:Notability (organizations and companies). —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 01:32, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
@Techinfosource: X mark.svg Not done - this article has not been restored because it does not appear to meet our guidelines for inclusion of articles about companies. In general, Wikipedia considers a topic to be notable if there exist multiple reliable sources of information on the topic, external to the subject itself. Articles concerning companies will be deleted on sight if they are considered to be unambiguous advertising or promotion, or if they do not contain a credible assertion of the significance of the subject.
Since this is a brand new company, it is unlikely that there is yet enough independent comment about it to make an article. Wikipedia is not here to help announce "up and coming" companies. If you are connected with the company, please read the guideline Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, JohnCD (talk) 12:29, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

KUVC tech was having already a Article Previous To two spedy deletion[edit]

dear sir, KUVC tech got a tag Speedy deletion Two times Because of my changes , First changes makes this article as advertisment and second (now you taged this Under section 47. While this page was already on Wiki . One more thing , I tried to create one new article and second times i edited a running article both times company comes under section 47 so what is the standard and how can we check for a right article to be created on wiki -Ankit Tiwari (talk) 05:11, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done It was actually deleted under criterion A7 see WP:CSD#A7. There was no claim of importance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:10, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Busan Brothers Bokjiwon Incident (부산 형제복지원 사건)[edit]

I, Tofoo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tofoo (talk) 08:09, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:17, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Kate O'Brien[edit]

{{subst: }} — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.198.40.172 (talkcontribs)

  • @87.198.40.172:. It is unclear what you are requesting here. Kate O'Brien already exists and Draft:Kate O'Brien never existed. Your IP has never made an edit before. If an article you created or edited was deleted, but please the username of the account you edited under, the IP that made the edit if it was not logged in, or the exact article title so that we can find the article in question. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:44, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Klasjet[edit]

Hello, i wrote a page about company Klasjet, I did it for the first time , so I was using another wikipedia's page as an example and accidentally pasted this tag {{advert}} from another page. Maybe this is a reason that my page is in articles for deletion process. I want to apologise for this. -MonMic (talk) 14:42, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

  • @MonMic: Neither Klasjet or KlasJet has ever existed, nor do you have any deleted contributions. It looks like you have a draft article on the subject at User:MonMic. I will move the page to your sandbox since your user page is not the correct place for article drafts, but nothing has been deleted at this time. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:48, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

User:Hekamede[edit]

My user account seems to no longer be active, although it isn't showing up in the deletion log. I'd like it back please! -86.181.49.158 (talk) 16:03, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Accounts actually cannot be deleted - not only is there no means to do so in the MediaWiki software, but we legally need to maintain a list of all contributors to a page. Unless you have set an email address, you won't be able to change your password and admins will not be able to do so for you. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:51, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
@86.181.49.158: If you can't remember/retrieve the password for your old account, you are of course welcome to create a new one. --ThaddeusB (talk) 18:04, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

BazaarCart[edit]

Its an informative article about a small business,it does not us epromotional but factual language. pls dont delete this article -NIM562 (talk) 17:47, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

@NIM562: BazaarCart has not (yet) been deleted. Contest its deletion at Talk:BazaarCart. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 17:51, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Actually, WikiDan, there is a deletion record for "Bazaar Cart"; it was deleted twice yesterday as a G11. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:53, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I understand that. But there is no undeletion needed here, as the article has already been recreated. Should it survive its current deletion nomination (unlikely) it can just be moved to the proper title. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:17, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Radio Nova (Newport)[edit]

I, Nick.gee, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nick.gee (talk) 19:39, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:10, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nova FM[edit]

I, Nick.gee, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nick.gee (talk) 19:41, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

To correct any thing that needed correcting on the wiki page -Nick.gee (talk) 19:43, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:11, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Paul Hunter.jpg[edit]

The file had a valid fair use rationale, and therefore it isn't a copyright violation. -Armbrust The Homunculus 22:06, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

A few userfy requests[edit]

Please userfy both article and talk pages. These are top 100 websites. The last one is a copyvio i'll take care of it or send page blanked. Valoem talk contrib 22:34, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done For the XNXX pages, there is literally nothing remotely useful in the history. The various creations were all either "I like this website" or "This is a bad website, don't visit it". I removed the page protection so you can create a new article, but there is nothing to restore.
For the Guangming Daily page, what were you hoping to gain by its restoration? As noted, it was a pure copyright violation and the source still works, so if you want to see the text just go to the source linked in the deletion notice. (A few words were changed by later editors, but it would be far better to start from scratch). Again, feel free to start a new article/draft article on the subject, but I don't see any reason to restore the old version (and a speedy deletion is not a hinderance to a fresh creation.) --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:03, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
@ThaddeusB: To answer you question, I believe in the full history being intact when an article is restored. I also look at categories and structure to rewrite the article so no copy vio occurs which is why I also request the talk. Valoem talk contrib 04:21, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
@Valeom:, when possible we don't leave copyright violations, even in the article history. I have pasted the infobox & categories to User:Valoem/Guangming Daily (China). Neither meets the definition of creative output, so neither carries any copyright that requires attribution. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:04, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Minzy[edit]

Minzy is a South Korean singer who has been active for 6 years. There is no reason for her article to be deleted. Although she has no solo work so far, her contributions to her group 2NE1 are significant. She is the main dancer of the group and one of the best dancers in her company YG Entertainment. -Shovelqueen (talk) 03:53, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minzy, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Natg 19 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

minzy 2ne1[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -114.79.19.252 (talk) 04:11, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done Same as the above. The title is now a redirect. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 07:19, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Jaz zohar[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Jazzohar (talk) 06:01, 26 March 2015 (UTC) i want to restore my deleted page named jaz zohar. because it was 100% genuine. no fake imformation was provided. Please restore my page this is my humble request to u or tell me why my page is deleted

  • Offhand it looks like there wasn't really anything to truly assert notability enough to pass WP:GNG. The page also had some promotional tones to it, which also led to it being deleted. It also somewhat comes across as a bit of a personal webpage, which is a violation of WP:NOT. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:29, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Deborah_Valdez-Hung[edit]

Rewrite the content again and then click the "Save page" button below -202.86.143.154 (talk) 06:06, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

  • I can't see where there was an article at that location. Were you talking about Draft:Deborah Valdez-Hung? (Which was formerly User:Deborah Valdez - Hung/sandbox/.) If so, then that article has not been deleted and is still an active draftspace article. Now if you're talking about User:Deborah Valdez - Hung, then that's a different story. It looks like that was deleted as a WP:G11 (unambiguous promotion) and you'd have to ask User:Jimfbleak if he'd restore it. However since there is already a draft article that looks to contain the same information (albeit less promotional in tone), I don't really see where a restoration of the userpage content is entirely necessary, unless you're looking for the sources listed in the page. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:23, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruscism[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -195.78.246.249 (talk) 07:10, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 07:18, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chris Hernandez[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Dvins236 (talk) 16:25, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

@Dvins236: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:Chris Hernandez. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 23:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

User:Jeremy112233/My sandbox/150[edit]

I would like to work on a draft I asked to be deleted because I had abandoned my work on Wikipedia for a while, and would like to work on this one in particular. Would you mind please restoring it? -Jeremy112233 (Lettuce-jibber-jabber?) 23:30, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

@Jeremy112233: Yes check.svg Done. JohnCD (talk) 10:28, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Bmezhou (talk) 00:43, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

I created the page 'Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering'. The page was deleted since "20:13, 26 March 2015 Randykitty (talk | contribs) deleted page Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering (G3: Blatant hoax: cover is from "Science", link to homepage is a different journal)"

I want to undelete the page so I can correct the above mistakes.

Kyruin[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Kyruin (talk) 01:52, 27 March 2015 (UTC) wow its about a real aspiring pro player, who is almost on a pro team in eSports they deleted it. I am not Kyruin. I am a big fan after watching him stream.

  • X mark.svg Not done - this page was deleted in accordance with criterion for speedy deletion A7. If you believe that this decision was made in error, or that significant new information has come to light since the deletion, please contact the administrator who carried out the deletion, user C.Fred (talk · contribs). If you have already done so, your concerns can be taken to deletion review. Hasteur (talk) 14:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
    @Kyruin: What you need is reliable sources that talk about teh subject in depth. Otherwise, there is nothing to write an article with. Additionally, if you are not this person (as you claim), you should change your username to avoid impersonating someone else. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:12, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Interuniversal travel[edit]

Please userfy both talk page and page to my space, I have found some sources suggesting that multiverse theory hypothesizes this, and it is termed in science fiction. -Valoem talk contrib 04:16, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Valoem/Interuniversal travel. Userfied the talk page also. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:16, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Versatile Security[edit]

I, Thoren1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Thoren1 (talk) 04:50, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

I am still working on the article content -Thoren1 (talk) 04:45, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Thoren1 This page has been deleted twice already for CSD:G13. What are you going to do improve this submission so that it can be promoted to mainspace? Hasteur (talk) 14:06, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/TDI International India (P) Limited[edit]

I, BhaskarCopywriter, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BhaskarCopywriter (talk) 07:28, 27 March 2015 (UTC) Fixing title/link of the request Hasteur (talk) 14:08, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. The page can now be found at Draft:TDI International. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:17, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Syneto[edit]

I, Patkoscsaba, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Patkoscsaba (talk) 08:13, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Reliable sources for the page are now available and I wish to update its content and resubmit it for approval-Patkoscsaba (talk) 08:15, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:20, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

TechArete[edit]

I, 58.65.188.42, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 58.65.188.42 (talk) 08:44, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

  • I can't find any page under the title you describe in mainspace, Draft space, and the old AFC space. Could you please clarify your request? Hasteur (talk) 14:10, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
  • @58.65.188.42: the username (or IP if logged out) of the account that created the article would also work - you don't have any deleted contributions under your current IP. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:31, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Reliable Business Case[edit]

Like to finish the work i started -Tskogstrom (talk) 11:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:21, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Piggywinkle (definition)[edit]

Please do not delete the informational article, "Piggywinkle". It discusses a new important word. -Writer freak (talk) 17:05, 27 March 2015 (UTC) Writer freak (talk) 17:05, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done and will not be done. Important to whom? Among other things, Wikipedia is not a dictionary, nor is it a platform for writing about things you made up. This is an encyclopedia, not a personal playground. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:05, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Allumer Jewellery[edit]

I, Nleithsmith, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nleithsmith (talk) 18:09, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:24, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Activist Ageing[edit]

It seemed to have been erased and the search now redirects to the page "activity theory (aging)" which is totally unrelated to activism and ageing -MaudeG3 (talk) 18:23, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

@MaudeG3: Nothing was deleted. You can just go to the article history and revert the edit that made it a redirect. I just did that. ~Amatulić (talk) 19:00, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

RogB Pickups[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -The Naughty Badger (talk) 19:31, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

I have only just put the page up, and had not had a chance to edit it further when someone deleted it. Similar pages are in existence, so I find this unannounced deletion not very fair at all. Thank you.

The Naughty Badger (talk) 19:31, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done - For a subject to have an article on Wikipedia, it must meet our inclusion criteria. In short, this means the subject must be covered in depth by reliable sources. I see no evidence that RogB Pickups has met the criteria, so restoring the article as a draft would just waste your time as it would surely be deleted later anyway. If I am mistaken and reliable source coverage exists, please reply with links to such sources. --ThaddeusB (talk) 20:30, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

New Zealand redirects[edit]

No reasoning given. -65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:34, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

No reasoning given. -65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:34, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

No reasoning given. -65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:34, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Please undelete all the New Zealand stub type redirects. They are impossible to find now. Also undelete all the ones I don't know about but of this form -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:34, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

If possible, undelete all the stub-type redirects that were deleted at around this time (November 2014) since I can't see how any of it is uncontroversial or just housekeeping. It just makes stub types impossible to use. -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 04:37, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Yes check.svg DoneThese were created by moves in September 2007. Are you still trying to use these names? They are now called Template:NewZealand-stub, Template:NewZealand-bio-stub and Template:NewZealand-geo-stub. They got this way after this discussion Wikipedia:Stub_types_for_deletion/Log/2007/September#A group of redirect reversals, The conclusion here was to reverse redirects with a fairly clear statement not to delete. So I think I will restore. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:02, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Others include (from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&offset=20141026143436&type=delete&user=Wizardman&page=&tagfilter= etc)
Present your case against each of these.Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:24, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
I agree that these look like improper deletions. Redirects are cheap and certainly ones that have existed since 2008 (on average) should not be unilaterally deleted by an admin. One would think an admin of Wizardman's experience would know better. --ThaddeusB (talk) 17:45, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
@Wizardman: seems to have mass deleted another set of redirects 26 October 2014 that @Nyttend: restored that Wizardman deleted again. (If I'm extrapolating from the history of {{NJ-school-stub}} correctly) -- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 03:34, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Very simply, stub types should be accessible to editors, so that they can be accessed and found, same as any other redirect use. Redirects make finding that stub types exist much easier, since one would expect the standard abbreviations to be available such as "NZ" or "NJ", since stub-type template names do not follow standard grammar rules. Thus all the UAE, NJ and NZ redirects should be restored ; consider that {{US-bio-stub}} exists and {{UK-stub}} so one would expect at the very least the country of New Zealand should be available.-- 65.94.43.89 (talk) 03:34, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

warx2[edit]

I think this page need to be undeleted. won the best film of the year award. http://www.pbs.org/pov/blog/best-documentaries-of-2014-large-graphic.php. -Lifetough (talk) 05:46, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

The page exists and can be found at WARx2. --ThaddeusB (talk) 05:53, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

User:Metcalfep/sandbox[edit]

I, Metcalfep, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Metcalfep (talk) 06:50, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

@Metcalfep: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 11:32, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

gurdip singh anand[edit]

my article content is different from previous one and is not copied from other website and then click the "Save page" button below -Ubskjt (talk) 07:38, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Well, RHaworth did error in doing a G4 (recreation) deletion as the previous AfD ended early as a G12 (copyright violation) deletion. It happens - we all make mistakes sometimes. (He could have probably speedy deleted under another criteria, but not G4). On that basis you could kindly ask him to restore or userify, or you could pursue deletion review. However, I think it would be a waste of your time as the subject does not appear to meet our inclusion criteria. --ThaddeusB (talk) 17:41, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Ryn Weaver[edit]

Not a vanity page. Her single Octahate has over 1 million hits on YouTube, performed on Late Show w David Letterman, multiple interviews with international publications, performing at SXSW, Coachella, Bonaroo 2015. written for Gwen Stefani and collaborated with Cashmere Cat, Passion Pit, Benny Blanco. Provides soundtrack for current MTV Real World season -2602:306:36EB:96F0:217:F2FF:FE4D:B5E6 (talk) 16:06, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryn Weaver, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user MelanieN (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 17:32, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

2010–11 Foolad F.C. season[edit]

Article was prodded, however articles for every other season remain. Should have been improved not deleted. Nfitz (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2015 (UTC) -Nfitz (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. Davewild (talk) 19:51, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Antal Szabo, Impressionist Painter[edit]

I, Cjhmacacct, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Cjhmacacct (talk) 02:40, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Davewild (talk) 07:54, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Abhishek Karn[edit]

I, Reviewer Editor, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Reviewer Editor (talk) 05:05, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Davewild (talk) 07:56, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Jujiro-matsuda.jpg[edit]

not my image. Photo of a long-dead Japanese captain of industry, I can make a case for the file's rationale. -Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 08:56, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done please provide valid information template and fair use rationale. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:00, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
Thanks and fixed!--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 04:47, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Coeleen Kiebert[edit]

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:02, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jackie K. Cooper[edit]

I, Scarnold1962, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Scarnold1962 (talk) 16:53, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:02, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Cappadocia Ultra Trail[edit]

I, 81.57.40.138, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 81.57.40.138 (talk) 18:33, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:02, 29 March 2015 (UTC)


Draft:Inventioning (band)[edit]

I, CStack3, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. CStack3 19:29, 29 March 2015 (UTC)


Hi, I was working on the needed documentation to strengthen "Inventioning(band)" but the page was deleted by the time I could open the link.

I would like to meet the objections of the prior editor and continue work on "Inventiong (band)" if allowed.

Please note, I am a disabled Wikipedia contributor and donor to Wikipedia. Sometimes it takes me longer to finish a project than I would like, but I know your needs for quality and third-party documentation.

Thank you,

Charles R. Stack, MPH

"CStack3" on Wikipedia

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:02, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

IMbesharam.com[edit]

I, 50.153.130.27, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 50.153.130.27 (talk) 21:38, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Symbol question.svg Question: I can't find any trace of a deleted page with this title, in the main space or in the Draft or AfC spaces. Please give the exact title of the page you mean (capitalisation is significant), or the username of the account that created it. JohnCD (talk) 11:45, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
  • It surely is - I thought I looked there? Anyway, Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request to a new location at Draft:IMBesharam. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 13:44, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Craig Soley[edit]

I, Samwates, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Samwates (talk) 03:18, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

@Samwates: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Check out WP:Notability (people). JohnCD (talk) 11:49, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

WOTH25.png[edit]

This file was deleted under F4 (no source). However, I'm pretty sure I remember indicating its source as either [1] or [2]. And besides, as a simple combination of a circle, two numerals, and three plain words against a solid background, this image is definitely ineligible for copyright protection in the U.S. -Minh Nguyễn 💬 04:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done restored. THe name has "File:" on the front. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:54, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Jennifer Cheng[edit]

I, Glamitco1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Glamitco1 (talk) 04:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Note this submission will be rejected for promotion unless you tone down the advertising and hype. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:57, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Undeletion of Shekhar Chatterjee[edit]

We have many more resources that prove the notability of the article. As per AFD, the article was considered non-notable only because the article was published in City Section of Times of India and not National Section. But now I have many resources that relate the article the article to national news coverages and hence decide it's notability. -182.237.12.10 (talk) 13:40, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shekhar Chatterjee, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user J04n (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 13:47, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Jagan Ramamoorthy[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Talentagent2015 (talk) 13:51, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

I am a talent agent for this world class artist and I have many more things to add about his career that began at the age of seven and continues to be one of a legacy torchbearer in his unique style of playing the violin and carrying forth his mentor's lineage in the western world, after having done a terrific work in the east as well. There are many more important things and external links etc to be added. So, kindly review this request and allow for retention of this page. The person in this article is unique and has a wide range of creative successes and repertoire related material that millions of others can be easily inspired by.

Thank you.

Tammie D.

Talent Agent.

X mark.svg Not done First of all, if you are the subject's talent agent you shouldn't be writing an article about him. See WP:COI. Second, the article was deleting under G11 - unambiguous promotion. This is not a judgement on the importance of the subject, but rather a judgement on the quality of the writing. This is what tends to happen when people with a conflict of interest write an article - they are unable to be neutral (which is required of all Wikipedia articles) and the article is deleted on those grounds.
If you insist on trying again, please do so by using the article for creation process so that the article can be review for neutrality before it hits mainspace. If the article remains non-neutral, it will be declined with advice on how to fix it instead of being deleted outright. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:35, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jon Stokes[edit]

I, 86.181.168.89, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 86.181.168.89 (talk) 14:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)


Hello,

We are still working on rectifying this article so would be most grateful if you could keep it open for us.

Kind regards,

Sophie

@86.181.168.89: The article was restored back in August with a promise to work on it. Not a single edit was made after that. I can restore it again, but I need some assurance that you will actually work on it this time - Article for creation is not an indefinite holding space for articles that no one is working on. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:39, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:European Cloud Partnership[edit]

I, Shroomer69, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Shroomer69 (talk) 15:21, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:41, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Fever Hut[edit]

I, 176.12.107.140, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 176.12.107.140 (talk) 17:38, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? Reviewers: The blue link is essentially this request posted on the draft's page. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:54, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
Symbol possible vote.svg Declined pending further information. This was undeleted over six months ago with a pledge that it would be worked on, but no edits were made to improve the entry for resubmission. Articles for creation is not an indefinite hosting service for material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia's article mainspace. We may be willing to restore it again, but only if you provide a definite assurance that you actually intend to work on it and provide a short description of what you intend to do to improve it to meet our policies and guidelines. Please advise.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:46, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
  • @Howibass:. He'd added a similar line at the AfC space, which I've deleted since it's identical to the IP's comment here, which is likely Howibass himself. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:38, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Coinsecure[edit]

Droidmaxxx (talk) 02:52, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Upcoming exchange in India by one of key Bitcoin community member Benson Samuel, Also Moderator of Bitcointalk.org Indian sub-forum and Investor Mohit Kalra Son of well Know Business industrialist in Delhi -Droidmaxxx (talk) 02:52, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

  • This also looks like it was deleted per WP:G11, as the content was extremely promotional in tone. When writing articles, avoid WP:PEACOCK terms and writing things like "we" and "our". Wikipedia is not like WP:NOTLINKEDIN and other websites where you can create listings that you control. Wikipedia articles must be neutrally written and show notability by way of multiple independent and reliable sources. This article is a good start, but you would need more to show notability since notability is WP:NOTINHERITED by being associated with notable persons, companies, or subjects. I would personally recommend that you create a draft article at WP:AfC and work on a new article from scratch, since it's extremely unlikely that any of the content will be restored. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:03, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
  • Yep. I would add that if an editor can't recognize that content and especially tone were promotional and unencyclopedic they should probably gain more experience in reading and writing. Drmies (talk) 13:54, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Edith von Welser-Ude[edit]

I suggest that this page be undeleted because:

The article is about a German public figure, a photographer and the "first lady" of Munich for over a decade when Christian Ude was the mayor. You can find more information here (in German): http://welser-ude-foto.de/aktuelles.htm http://www.sueddeutsche.de/bayern/edith-von-welser-ude-liebling-der-genossen-1.1580301 http://www.galerie-der-kulturen.de/html/kuenstler_welser-ude.html http://www.sueddeutsche.de/muenchen/edith-von-welser-ude-wird-wir-sind-oberbuergermeister-1.363825 http://www.muenchen.tv/mediathek/tag/edith-von-welser-ude/ http://www.hangzhou.gov.cn/main/zpd/English/Gallery/foreigners/T197671.shtml

Yes, the article could use more details, and I will add some. --Piotr (Venezuela) (talk) 05:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

  • @Piotr (Venezuela): I'd probably recommend that you work on a copy in your userspace at User:Piotr (Venezuela)/Edith von Welser-Ude before adding anything to the mainspace, mostly because sometimes it can take a while to really flesh out and source an article. Also, while Peridon is somewhat easygoing with article restorations, the article consisted of the lines "Edith von Welser-Ude is a German socialite. She has been married to former Mayor of Munich Christian Ude since 1984." It's not really enough to really restore. Finally, I will warn you that being married to a notable person does not always mean that this notability is inherited- it's quite common for spouses of mayors (and many notable persons) to fail notability criteria. What you need to show in the article are sources that specifically focus on her as opposed to just mentioning her briefly in relation to her husband. Some mention of her husband is expected and sources like this are good, but you need for there to be a lot of sources that really go beyond her status as "wife of mayor". Also be very careful about guest spots on shows and the like since sometimes those are not the type that would give notability, as seems to somewhat be the case with this link, which appears to be a recipe. What you need are appearances where they really go into depth about her work as a whole. Showings in galleries are good since those can raise the chances of her gaining coverage, but having a show doesn't necessarily give notability unless she was part of an exhibit in a notable museum and/or part of their permanent collection. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Niquenya D. Fulbright[edit]

I, 73.209.3.104, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 73.209.3.104 (talk) 06:34, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:39, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
  • I will say that you will likely need to be a little careful with editing the tone, since it does come across slightly like a press release at times. Nothing so major that I wouldn't restore it, but it does somewhat veer off into "official bio" territory. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Jayy Von Monroe[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Deidaramonroe (talk) 13:05, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

  • @Deidaramonroe: Von Monroe may meet our inclusion criteria, but the article failed to show why and also had no references. ALL articles on living people are required to have references to reliable sources. If you like, I can restore the article to draft space so that you can submit the article through articles for creation after making improvements, but it won't be restored to mainspace. Let me know if interested. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:45, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/toothpick.com[edit]

I, Sicsdrewad, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sicsdrewad (talk) 14:22, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The page can now be foudn at Draft:Toothpick.com. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:47, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Forte Village Resort[edit]

Can you please userfy this page? I'd like to restart the page in a way that it is not seen as promotional. -Estimator Unilateral Made (talk) 18:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - the page can now be found at Draft:Forte Village Resort. Please use the "submit" button on the template I added to the page when you think it is ready. That way it won't be deleted again if it is still promotional. --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:05, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Cory Spotts[edit]

Public figure who is still active and is linked from several other Wikipedia articles. Sources can be provided. -CorySpotts (talk) 19:54, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

I have removed the sources from this page, as they are ultimately irrelevant (they remain in history). Note that just being linked to from other Wikipedia articles is not a reason to have a Wikipedia page on him. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
I'm not sure if the article is actually on the same subject as described in the request but... Yes check.svg Done - as a contested proposed deletion, the article has been restored on request. --ThaddeusB (talk) 21:08, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

NWF Tri-State Championship[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Axe2x (talk) 20:11, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

I believe that A11 deletions cannot be contested here, and even if they could, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern Wrestling Federation (2nd nomination) seems to preclude this request anyways, as pages deleted after a deletion debate cannot be restored here, and the consensus was that the championship pages were likewise to be deleted. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 20:33, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done I think A11's could be challenged here if they were incorrect, but the first approach should be to the deleting admin. In this case A11 would not be applicable as the competition's existence is confirmed by independent references I found. But thanks to the AFD that said the organisation cannot have an article here, it could apply to its matches too. Si I will just leave it deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:08, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Sonu Ratra[edit]

I, Ez1989, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ez1989 (talk) 21:35, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done, nothing to do. The draft isn't deleted. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:10, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Acting Witan of Mercia[edit]

Can you please open this article again for editing and then resubmission? Thanks Snoobysoo (talk) 22:31, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:11, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Lauren Selig[edit]

I, 76.104.195.235, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 76.104.195.235 (talk) 00:39, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 01:08, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

User:Westside Test Anxiety Scale[edit]

I, DrD001, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DrD001 (talk) 02:04, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

I do not know why article was deleted,

It was deleted because it had lain fallow (i.e. there had been no non-automated edits done to it) for six months. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 03:02, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
  • Yes check.svg Done I've restored it and moved it to Draft:Westside Test Anxiety Scale, the correct location for AfC drafts. DrD001, please leave this article in the draftspace. It's a lot easier to track the articles this way and it's confusing to move them around too much- especially since moving them around can sometimes end up with them getting placed in the wrong location, which is what happened here. (You placed this on a userpage, by which I mean that you made it seem as if there was a user by the name of "Westside Test Anxiety Scale".) I'm a little surprised that the declining editor didn't notice that the other draftcopy was just a redirect to the copy they declined, but that's kind of why Wikipedia tends to prefer that AfC articles remain in one easily identifiable location. In any case, the article is now back in the draftspace and you can work on it. One thing I can recommend is that you will need to use in-line citations, preferably ones that we can link to and verify in some form or fashion. Google Scholar and Google Books can sometimes offer previews, so that tends to be a good place to start. A lot of academic outlets and databases like JSTOR have preview pages, which can also be used to verify the content if another editor has access to an institution that offers database access. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:21, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Autonomous sensory meridian response[edit]

please restore full history of both page and talk, article is notable -Valoem talk contrib 02:59, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

  • As long as Hut 8.5 is cool with it, I'll restore it. The page looks like it passes GNG quite easily now, but the deleted stuff had gone through AfD so I'm not sure if this would still require his input or not. I figure that I'll go with protocol first with this. I don't see anything that would really be an issue to restore. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 04:24, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
  • No objection as the recreated version is much better than either of the old versions. This might potentially end up back at AfD as few of the sources appear to pass WP:MEDRS though. Hut 8.5 06:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
@Tokyogirl79: , @Hut 8.5: I mean this history here Autonomous Sensory Meridian Response. Valoem talk contrib 23:40, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Alistair A. Vogan[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Kingsley Kuchner (talk) 08:42, 1 April 2015 (UTC)


Hello,

I would like to have the article I submitted, which was initially rejected for formatting reasons, to be undeleted so that I might make the required corrections. Unfortunately, the submission remained dormant for more than six months due to circumstances beyond my control.

Thank you for understanding.

Kind regards,

Kingsley Kuchner

To start a page called Draft:Alistair A. Vogan, type in the box below. When you are done, preview the page to check for errors and then save it.

A page with this title has previously been deleted.

If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below.

   21:23, 31 March 2015 JohnCD (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Alistair A. Vogan

The page required corrections to formatting but was left dormant for a six month period. I would like to have it undeleted so that the required changes can be made for resubmission.} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingsley Kuchner (talkcontribs) 08:45, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:24, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
  • On a side note, IMDb is not usable as a reliable source because it is ultimately a routine database listing and merchant sources like Amazon should not be on Wikipedia at all. Not only is their primary reason for existence to sell something to you, but by linking to it this can come across as Wikipedia personally endorsing the site and/or product. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 11:27, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Draft:BFKL[edit]

I, Ieet2, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ieet2 (talk) 12:05, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. --ThaddeusB (talk) 14:56, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Protrader[edit]

It doesn't an advertising information and its proven by valuably links. The content of the article was improved according to all wikipedia requires. -VasyaLukyanenko (talk) 12:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

@VasyaLukyanenko: The page was not deleted as "advertising", but rather for lack of "notability". I have restored the page, but moved it to draft space. It can now be found at Draft:Protrader. The AfD was way back in 2011, so there is a decent chance notability has been established since then. However, you need additional reliable sources to establish notability, and the article be a summary of what those sources say. Here is a news search to point you in the right direction... Please use the articles for creation process but hitting the "submit" button at the top of the draft article when you think it is ready. This way it will be reviewed by an experienced editor and advice given if improvements are needed instead of the article just being deleted on sight again. --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:04, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Mars Initiative[edit]

Mars Initiative is unique and not associated with colonization. It is to develop a prize for the first landing, regardless of whether the landing party stays or visits. It is distinct and separate from colonization efforts. If you Google Mars Initiative, it is mentioned in many places on the web and is a real organization -173.172.30.74 (talk) 16:48, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

coming home (in the fairest of the seasons)[edit]

this page contains information about a new Feature Film project.Mod144 19:46, 1 April 2015 (UTC) and then click the "Save page" button below -Mod144 19:46, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done. The article isn't deleted (yet), but when it is, you need to discuss it with the deleting administrator. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:30, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Sam Becker[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Hcostello17 (talk) 00:14, 2 April 2015 (UTC) dont delete he is a college player for stonehill college and a highly reguarded player in the draft.

Draft:Brajendra Navnit[edit]

I, Amnendranavnit, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Amnendranavnit (talk) 03:31, 2 April 2015 (UTC)182.65.38.230 (talk) 03:29, 2 April 2015 (UTC)