Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from Wikipedia:UNDELETE)
Jump to: navigation, search

Administrator instructions

Shortcuts:

Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases

Contents

Embryonics Project (2)[edit]

It's exactly my point: the page was deleted specifically due to the reason of copyright infringement. The problem has been fixed, the page should logically be restored -128.178.116.11 (talk) 15:40, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done. Please respond in the section on this subject above. It is proposed to move it to Wikiversity. ~Amatulić (talk) 17:34, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Your request for move to Wikiversity was denied, and your neutrality on this issue is highly questionable. I advise you remove yourself from this discussion, due to your bias.66.220.250.160 (talk) 12:50, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Coming into this discussion as a non-administrator with no connection to the discussion, it seems clear to me that the anonymous user demanding that the article be restored to the main article space and refusing transwiki restoration, is the biased one. Please do answer the latest points on copyright violation referring to books that predate the article. --Slashme (talk) 06:30, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tekmira Pharmaceuticals[edit]

I, Rich Farmbrough, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. All the best: Rich Farmbrough23:30, 21 August 2014 (UTC).
23:30, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
  • There were some concerns over it being promotional, but I didn't see it as being so promotional that I'd decline the speedy- however you will need to address this before resubmitting it through AfC. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:23, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, this company is in the news with the Ebola outbreak, so a stub already exists. I will see what the best way forward is. All the best: Rich Farmbrough21:54, 24 August 2014 (UTC).

Fulmer Cup[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -G8R8U2 (talk) 01:10, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

I have no clue why this page was deleted. The information contained on the page is significant for thousands of college football fans, even though there is a new site tabulating the results, so the link may not work. The page here is a historical record that gets updated once a year when the "award" is administered. It is still an active compilation. Apparently some Bot deleted the page; and I'm requesting the information and the page be restored. Thank you.

  • X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fulmer Cup, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Hahc21 (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:19, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
  • It looks like it went through a deletion discussion at AfD, meaning that it wasn't deleted by a bot. You can go through WP:DR if you want, but you will need to show that the award itself has received coverage in reliable sources. Existing or being useful aren't reasons in and of themselves to keep an article. (WP:ITEXISTS, WP:ITSUSEFUL, WP:ITSPOPULAR) Stuff like that can make it more likely that something will gain coverage in WP:RS, but it's not a guarantee. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:22, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Robotics Club,Pashchimanchal Campus[edit]

The Page is in Wikipedia to provide information about multi-college organisation in Nepal which is contributing in Technical development of students in Engineering Colleges of Nepal. You can also view the information about Robotics club in Institute of Engineering[IOE]'s [robotics.ioe.edu.np "Institute of Engineering"] Check |url= scheme (help). Institute of Engineering. . Thanks for the concern you provide to this page. Thank you -Krishna418 (talk) 02:41, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Krishna418, the article I deleted was about a club in a single college. To the best of my memory, we have never in the last 8 years considered such a club notable, so I do not see how I would accomplish anything useful if I undeleted it: the community would surely remove it. But if you really have good source for it being a multi-college national organization, why not write an article from that perspective with an appropriate title? I'm still not sure the consensus would be to keep it, but it would at least have a chance. If you'd like the text of the deleted article emailed to you as a start , let me know on my talk page--and make sure you have email enabled. DGG ( talk ) 08:10, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

José Antunes Sobrinho[edit]

This person has notability and the sources will be improoved. This is not an ad. I'd like if this page was undeleted. Thank you. -Márcio Bertuol (talk) 12:05, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done The article uses phrases that are very promotional as far as Wikipedia is concerned. It was written as if it was a press release as opposed to a neutral article and would require a complete and total re-write in order to meet our NPOV policy. This is actually pretty understandable, since you are editing on behalf of a marketing (PR) company. Don't take this the wrong way, but you're used to writing things in a promotional manner because for most of your job it's not only acceptable but it's expected. It's just that on here, the tone needs to be very, very different in order to pass neutrality standards. Think of it this way: like in that old TV show, all we want is "just the facts". This doesn't mean that it has to be choppy, just that rather than playing up Antunes Sobrinho's talents with various phrases that come across as WP:PROMOTIONAL, WP:PUFFERY, or overly flowery (to Wikipedia) we would prefer a paragraph that reads like this:
"Shortly after graduating from the Institute for Hydraulic and Environmental Studies of Delft, Antunes Sobrinho began working for (insert company name here). In 1982 he began working for Engevix Engenharia SA and became its managing director in 1986. Antunes Sobrinho has worked on multiple hydro power projects in Brazil and has been involved in over 40.000 MW either in hydro or thermal power plants."
This condenses not only the bit about his graduation but also his early career. It's not that we don't want to be thorough, but it shouldn't be overly promotional either. Using phrases such as "major hydro power projects" and " From small to large projects Mr. Antunes has been involved in over 40.000 MW either in hydro or thermal power plants." comes across like you're trying to sell him- and that's not Wikipedia's purpose. Again, you work for a marketing company and I do acknowledge that you're used to writing in a promotional manner and not the style we do here, so I understand that it can be difficult. I had a big problem with NPOV writing when I first started editing, so I can only imagine what it'd be like from your perspective. Now that said, since you do have a conflict of interest I'd recommend that you not create any further copies in the mainspace. I'd personally recommend that you go through WP:AfC, our articles for creation process. This will allow you to work on a copy at your leisure. It won't be in the mainspace, but it will give you time to fix any issues and have the article approved by a non-involved editor, which will help allay concerns of COI. The only drawback is that this can take a while, but the benefit is that you will be able to fix any issues with the article if it's declined, whereas on the mainspace it would just be deleted. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:30, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ingloreusemodz[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 174.59.247.74 (talk) 12:37, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done I'm sorry, but the article is written in a fairly non-neutral, hero-worship tone and even if it was restored, you'd have to completely re-write it in order to have it pass guidelines for neutrality. There's also an issue of notability since the article didn't have any sourcing. He sounds interesting- anyone who tries to shut down child pornography sites is OK in my book- but right now it's just better if you just write a new copy of the article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:33, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rajesh_Bhatt[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -183.82.229.106 (talk) 12:41, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

i'm Rajesh bhatt ... Film Director... i would like to create my wiki page you can check my personal website - www.rajeshbhatt.info

kindly restore the information

  • X mark.svg Not done and will not be done I'm sorry, but not only was the material a copyright violation, but it was also wildly promotional. There's no way that we could restore that to the mainspace, as it would require a complete and total re-write in order to fit our neutrality policy (WP:NPOV). We also discourage people from making articles about themselves or things that they are involved in (ie, you editing an article for your own movie.) If you do want to create an article, I'd recommend that you make it via WP:AfC- the only thing is that you will still have to show notability by providing sources that are independent of you and in a reliable source. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:14, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

User:Sangonca/Workmen's Auto Insurance[edit]

I, Sangonca, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Sangonca (talk) 13:52, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

I'd been taking this past few months to find more references to support the validity of the article. Today when I was going to work on it, the article got deleted. I appreciate if you give me the chance to work on it with the new information I found so that I can send it for review one last time.

Thanks!

@Sangonca: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/FibroScan[edit]

I, Bananasinpj, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bananasinpj (talk) 14:21, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done And will not be done. That was nothing more than an advertisement the product. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 16:36, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
(edit conflict) @Bananasinpj: X mark.svg Not done - this article is a copyright violation, substantially copied from the company website at www.knscanada.com, so cannot be restored. Even if a formal copyright release were made, this is far too promotional: copying a company's website is not the way to make an encyclopedia article. Wikipedia is not for advertising or promotion of any kind. JohnCD (talk) 16:41, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Joseph Joseph[edit]

Joseph Joseph is a Multi-award-winning Kitchenware manufacturer based in the United Kingdom selling in over 100 countries worldwide - Press: [1],[2] Mentions:[3],[4],[5],[6] -141.0.59.138 (talk) 15:20, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

What are you going on about? The article isn't deleted, and doesn't seem to be proposed for deletion either. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:20, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Mr. Christiansen .jpg[edit]

Trying to add this photo to 'Nordic Valley, Utah', this is a 'free' from copyright. It's an old family photo with permission to use by me and my family. I'm the daughter of Mr. Christiansen. Not sure why this is so hard to add to my entry about Nordic Valley. It's OK to use this photo of him. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Calirose (talkcontribs) 16:53, 22 August 2014‎

@Calirose: I guess the picture you mean is File:Mr. Christiansen, Nordic Valley.jpg. Unfortunately, we are not the people who make this difficult: it is the complicated law of copyright. Just saying "It's OK to use this photo" is not enough. The place to ask advice is Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. They will need to know things like: Who took the photograph? When? Has it ever been published? JohnCD (talk) 20:10, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Go Rentals[edit]

I would like to view and revise the page as a stub -HollyQ (talk) 17:45, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done For now. I've asked the user to follow our COI guidelines and create a clear disclosure. Pending that this could be userified. Either way, going forward all article creations should go through AFC. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:39, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

The Nekci Menij Show[edit]

This page was about an online show I currently produce. I did not create or edit the page but I know it was properly referenced and reviewed by regular contributors. I do not know why it was deleted, or any reason that it should be, other than knowing that some individuals have recently unfairly reported other references to my work online. I would be happy to make any necessary changes myself to see the page reinstated. Thank you. -2.220.154.104 (talk) 23:24, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done. This article was deleted after a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Nekci Menij Show, and articles deleted in that way are not restored here. If you consider that the close did not reflect the consensus of the discussion, or you have more information, you should first contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Sandstein (talk). Then, if your concerns are not addressed, you may apply at WP:Deletion review. JohnCD (talk) 13:45, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Draft:David Lozeau[edit]

I, Poopa12, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Poopa12 (talk) 00:27, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" §FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:51, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Xendan.org[edit]

I think this article should be created since it is about a #1 Kurdish website in Kurdistan -Hzr Kurdistani (talk) 08:48, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

@Hzr Kurdistani: Yes check.svg Userfied - the page has been restored to the userspace at User:Hzr Kurdistani/Xendan.org. You may work on improving the article's assertion of notability at its new location, but please contact Bbb23 (talk · contribs), the administrator who deleted the page, before moving it back to the article space. Please see the criteria for speedy deletion and the relevant notability guidelines - you need to show references to "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.". JohnCD (talk) 13:50, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Undeletion or open Johncongo[edit]

Can you help me undelete or open the article as i will like to create it properly

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Johncongo 11:26, 23 August 2014 (UTC) Latertinsna 11:26, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done This "article" has never been deleted. I have already provided you information on your talkpage so that you would not request undeletion of something that was not deleted. the panda ₯’ 11:37, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

It was a mistake i meant Johncongo and this is the draft https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Johncongo Johncongo is the same as Johncongo rapper it was created when Johncongo was unable to be created Pls help..i will like to create it and redirect Johncongo_(rapper) to Johncongo

Johncongo[edit]

I will like to create the article properly https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Johncongo -Latertinsna 13:00, 23 August 2014 (UTC) Latertinsna 13:13, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done and will not be done This already exists in the mainspace at Johncongo (rapper). However I do also want to note that the page was already previously deleted several times at Johncongo to the point where they had to protect it from re-creation. I also don't see where the current article really deals with a lot of the issues of notability, as most of the links are dead and the others don't even seem to mention him. I will probably bring this to AfD, to give you fair warning. If it is deleted, then I would like to formally ask that you stop trying to re-create this on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 16:10, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

RKX HaXer (Security researcher)[edit]

This Page was about RKX HaXer security researcher from Pakistan and founded XSS in many sites also in google, born on 1999 february -Iameijazb (talk) 13:27, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done – Please contact User:NawlinWiki, the admin who deleted the article as WP:CSD#A7. Since you want to create an article on a pseudonym (not an actual person's name) you would need high quality evidence of their importance. Even in case of a pseudonym you'd need to satisfy WP:BLP – unsourced articles about persons are routinely deleted. The deleted article was unsourced since it did not link to any actual writings about this person. It falls way short of what would be expected here. EdJohnston (talk) 15:23, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Khorasan Institute of Higher Education[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Eidiani (talk) 14:47, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

"Khorasan Institute of Higher Education" was established in 1994, as a response to he high demand for higher education in The Islamic Republic of Iran. Please see the below link.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_in_Iran http://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%85%D8%A4%D8%B3%D8%B3%D9%87_%D8%A2%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B2%D8%B4_%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%DB%8C_%D8%AE%D8%B1%D8%A7%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%86 www.khorasan.ac.ir

X mark.svg Not done – Please contact User:FreeRangeFrog, the admin who deleted it as WP:CSD#G11. Usually you expected to give some evidence of notability; simply linking to the college's own website is not sufficient. Since the website seems to be in Farsi, this makes it difficult for editors who don't speak that language to assist you. If the Khorasan Institute has been mentioned in English-language publications that would help your case. EdJohnston (talk) 15:02, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
I don't have a problem with the recreation of this article, as with any article about a school. I don't doubt the institution is notable. The problem was that it was so blatantly promotional it was beyond repair at that point, so it makes no sense to undelete. An article about a school is not a brochure about the school, it's a series of sourced neutral facts about the school. I'd invite Eidiani to create a draft or use AFC and work on it that way instead of creating it directly. The Teahouse is also helpful for new editors. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 15:15, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Lauren McLaughlin[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Karenhu (talk) 19:22, 23 August 2014 (UTC) Lauren McLaughlin page--I will remove the social media references, and the line about "autographed copies may be found at gotoelf.com"--will that resolve the problem? Prior to the addition of those items last week, there seemed to be no controversy about the page. Thank you, Karen Hunter

  • X mark.svg Not done I'm sorry, but there are multiple issues here. First off, the promotional material goes beyond what you've mentioned above. The article is rife with various statements that come across as promotional and WP:PEACOCK in tone. At best, it's just wildly non-neutral and comes across as a fan page or the author's personal website. Please don't take that as me being harsh, it's just that the page would have to be re-written in order to fit our neutrality policy. A good example of one of the sentences that came across as promotional would be this one: "As Go To ELF! reached its second printing milestone, the ELF Book Project was launched, giving free copies of the book to prisons, shelters, hospices, mental health facilities, for people in recovery, and for anyone who wants to make positive changes in their lives." But there's an issue beyond that: I'm also not really seeing where she would ultimately pass our notability guidelines as a whole. I can't really find anything in a search to show that she or her work would pass WP:AUTHOR, which is a fairly strict guideline as a whole. You could try writing a new version at WP:AfC or at Draft:Lauren McLaughlin (by the by, articles should not be prefaced with Wikipedia:, as this is used for policy based pages), but I'm just worried about the lack of notability here. I saw coverage in WP:PRIMARY sources and in places Wikipedia wouldn't consider usable (blogs, merchant sites, etc), but not really in places where it'd be a reliable sources (newspaper articles about her or her work- ones that she has not written or worked for, etc). Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 19:46, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

User:Kooroshict/Vegetarianism and philosophies[edit]

I, 178.131.19.210, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 178.131.19.210 (talk) 20:36, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done It is not appropriate to request the undeletion of drafts inside someone else's userspace. If you are Kooroschict, then please login and re-request below the panda ₯’ 20:42, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

PlantUML[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -76.10.150.106 (talk) 21:49, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

I created Draft:PlantUML and I believe I have properly referenced at least three reliable sources (it's my first time creating a section, and I used the Wizard). A Google Scholar search for PlantUML turns up a lot these days. PlantUML should be restored, or merged/replaced with Draft:PlantUML. 76.10.150.106 (talk) 21:49, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done. Be patient; your draft has been submitted for review but, as explained in the box at the foot of it, there is a considerable queue. If it is accepted, it will be moved to the article space at PlantUML; if not, you will be given feedback. JohnCD (talk) 22:09, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

User:3371.NGO26/Action with Lao Children[edit]

I, 219.74.16.193, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 219.74.16.193 (talk) 22:56, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

This doesnt appear to have been deleted just tagged for deletion. Also this is in a users name space so should really be edited by the userpage owner. Amortias (T)(C) 23:00, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done. There is no point undeleting this, because there is already a mainspace article Action with Lao Children. You are welcome to improve that. JohnCD (talk) 08:37, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Chennai International Queer Film Festival[edit]

I, 117.193.186.202, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 117.193.186.202 (talk) 01:08, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 08:43, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Action_with_Lao_Children[edit]

Studying this topic and possible NGO collaboration opportunities -219.74.16.193 (talk) 03:59, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

This article has not been deleted, and is not proposed for deletion. You are welcome to improve it, if you have more information with reliable sources. JohnCD (talk) 08:41, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
  • X mark.svg Not done It looks like they were referring to this userspace draft. The only problem is that the page doesn't contain any actual content at all- it's just the example page template. There's nothing to restore and as JohnCD said, you're welcome to help improve the pre-existing page on the subject. On a side note, if you were trying to use the draftspace as a potential study space, please be aware that this would somewhat be considered a misuse of Wikipedia as a webhost as we're not a place to host studywork or schoolwork, unless you're planning to use it to help improve the pre-existing article. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 13:50, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Sanchit_Dang[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -59.91.67.65 (talk) 14:56, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done With no reason provided, this "article" that was deleted 1.5 years ago will not be undeleted. Then again, even with a reason, it won't likely be good enough: WP:NMUSIC would apply, as would WP:BLP the panda ₯’ 15:08, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
  • FWIW, it doesn't look like it's necessarily a hoax per this video, but there is still a very serious lack of notability. I can't see anything to show where Dang would pass any of our notability guidelines for performers. (WP:PERFORMER) Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 15:55, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Ivan Smolović[edit]

I wanna create new article under name of Ivan Smolović. He is Montenegrin football player who firmed contract for MFK Košice in Slovakian league -Cicimau (talk) 17:22, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Page inder this name is blocked because is cteated on wrong way. Dear wikipedia please help me and unblock this name because i wanna create article under this name with good sources. Thank you. -Cicimau (talk) 17:33, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ivan Smolović, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Mark Arsten (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 17:42, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
  • On a side note, you could probably create a new version at WP:AfC and run it through that process. The only problem is that you will still need to show how he passes the notability guidelines now, but AfC will give you more time to work on proving that. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 17:42, 24 August 2014 (UTC)
  • @Cicimau: It looks like you did try to make a new copy in the article's talk page. Please do not do that, as it is considered to be generally inappopriate to try to get around the article's protection to do that. I've moved it to your userspace at User:Cicimau/Ivan Smolović and I've marked it as an AfC submission. Please work on improving what you've had so far and then run it through AfC. You can also request deletion review, but it'd probably be better to wait and do that after you finish working on the userspace article. Do not move it back to the mainspace article's talk page- run it through the proper channels instead. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 17:46, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Bisaha[edit]

I, 76.219.200.105, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 76.219.200.105 (talk) 21:28, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.. Note that the WP:Notability requirement is for references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." His own website and his band's website are not enough. JohnCD (talk) 10:38, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Daichi Shibata (footballer)[edit]

This article was deleted following Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daichi Shibata (footballer). Now that he made a fully professional start a fortnight ago for Kataller Toyama against Montedio Yamagata in the J. League Division 2 as per [7] can it please be restored? I contacted the closing Admin User:slakr a week ago about this, but he is currently frolicking with chaos. -Nfitz (talk) 02:47, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

@Nfitz: can you help me find Shibata on that site? I don't see his name in the Toyama team here. JohnCD (talk) 10:33, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
@JohnCD:; you linked to the most recent match (August 24) where he didn't appear - here. I linked above to the August 10 match, where he (number 31) started - here's perhaps a better link in English from same site [8]. He also started on August 17 - [9]. Nfitz (talk) 14:18, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
OK, Yes check.svg Done. Please update the article and add the reference. JohnCD (talk) 15:04, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Thanks - will do. Nfitz (talk) 02:06, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Ghuniya[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Raj Koyborto (talk) 05:30, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done. No reason given. User has also been indef blocked, therefore no action taken. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:24, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harry Nagle[edit]

I, Harrynagle, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. This was worked on extensively then accidentally neglected by an assistant for the 6 months. Harry Nagle (talk) 06:09, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. This page has never been submitted for review; please complete it and submit it as soon as convenient. "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia.
Note that if it is to be accepted, the article will need references showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" to establish Wikipedia:Notability. You should also read Wikipedia:Autobiography and understand that if an article about you is accepted others can and will edit it, and you will not be able to insist on your preferred version. JohnCD (talk) 13:54, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Sandip Goswami[edit]

Thank you very much. But I am unable to understand clearly about " Notable ". Celebrities are notable! Who are trying to destroy our society, killing innocent ordinary people,controlling world economy and creating poverty. Ordinary people in the world are suffering. Here a poet like Sandip Goswami is fighting against the powerful abuses in the world. I believe that a true poet is in born Notable personality. They have sacrificed their life in favor of ordinary people without any demand. Please read the books of Sandip Goswami. Truly we want to touch your heart with love and respect. Here a page in Wikipedia is only a medium. We want only better tomorrow for people in the world. Please try to understand our mission with love and respect. Best wishes to you and your family.

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. We don't appreciate the proselytising, and we don't appreciate being used for propaganda or advertising of any sort. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 11:15, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mining Indaba (conference)[edit]

I, Tdasilva mine, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Want to edit page with new/correct information to be submitted -Tdasilva mine (talk) 19:40, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:38, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nuell Entertainment[edit]

I, Gnuell, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gnuell (talk) 22:10, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Symbol declined.svg Declined. It was only two sentences and appeared to have a publicity purpose. You may create it again.
Also, please disclose your conflict of interest, since you seem to be writing in behalf of your company Nuell Entertainment. You agreed to such disclosure when you created an account here. See wmf:Terms of Use section 4. Is Gnuell your actual name? ~Amatulić (talk) 23:34, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/ChemPartner[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Zym27 (talk) 02:59, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 04:41, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

John Figarelli[edit]

No copyrighted material was submitted. Removed any copyrighted material. 1st time user. Thank you for understanding. -Johnfigwiki (talk) 03:47, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done the page was very promotional. It can be rewritten without words like passion, appreciation, lovely and terrific, and without including quotes. It is tough to write about yourself in a neutral way, and this is likely a WP:AUTO situation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 05:21, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Ebru_TV[edit]

Station is an important part of remaining FTA stations in the Ku Band, referenced in many FTA related wikipedia articles, as well as articles about notable TV series like Spooks and Doctor Who that they are currently airing. In addition the notability guidelines specificly state that TV stations that are actually broadcasting (not just streaming) are automaticly notable, so it should not have been deleted for the reason given - not meeting the general notability guidelines. The amount of references from other articles shows it is notable as well. -192.199.225.10 (talk) 06:52, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ebru TV, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:42, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Mark Atkin[edit]

I, Ajnosonja, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Ajnosonja (talk) 08:24, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:43, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

King Price Insurance[edit]

I, KingPrice, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. KingPrice (talk) 14:21, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done and will not be done. This was a blatant advertisement: "With their fiery advertising, no-nonsense cover and royal service, King Price is fast becoming one of the most talked about insurance companies in the country" etc. Wikipedia is not a free advertising noticeboard: anything like that is deleted at sight. JohnCD (talk) 15:53, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
Note: requester username-soft-blocked as company account. JohnCD (talk) 16:10, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Feefo[edit]

Johndesmond (talk) 15:12, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

@Johndesmond: Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:08, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

please I want my "jezrealgizzy" to be undeleted[edit]

Jezrealgizzy is the name of the userpage.

The reason why my page was deleted was because I was trying to create an article page when I am having a userspage, I dint give information about myself And dint notes wiki admin that i was creating an articles page. so my "jezrealgizzy" userespage was deleted because of copyright of myself. Please I'll be glad you guys can help me undelete my "jezrealgizzy" page

Thank you.

  • Yes check.svg Done. See User:Jezrealgizzy. Take a look at our guidance on user pages when you get a chance. I don't think there's anything on the page which really runs afoul of that guideline, but it's worth a look. Protonk (talk) 17:17, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Vikrant Koul[edit]

Was not able to add references somehow. Many of them exist. The person in question is an actor and has recently appeared in a supporting role in a leading bollywood film -Ramita.k.singh (talk) 18:16, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done. @Ramita.k.singh: Note that because this article is a biography of a living person it must contain reliable sources. I've restored the article and replaced the deletion tag. If sources are not added within 7 days the article will be deleted again. If you need help finding sources or removing the tag once you've found them let me know. Protonk (talk) 18:22, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

8 prime spirals[edit]

the 8 prime spirals are a significant advancement in primality, sieve of atkin is based on the 1995 work and recent prime algorithm tests in pyprimes confirm it is a significant advancement in prime number theory -Drprinceton (talk) 18:51, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

I requested deletion because the article was written as an argument for the significance of the theory and as a dismissal of its detractors. Wikipedia articles must be neutral and cannot take the form of an advocacy piece. Besides that, Wikipedia topics need to be notable, which doesn't mean "important", but does most typically mean that one ought to be able to find plenty of independent significant coverage of the topic in reliable sources. I can't find anything like that for this theory, not even enough to cover Wikipedia's requirement of verifiability for any assertion in its corpus. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:56, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
@Drprinceton: X mark.svg Not done. Largo Plazo's points are valid: see also the policy Wikipedia:No original research. Read it all, but note particularly that it includes:

"If no reliable third-party sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article about it. If you discover something new, Wikipedia is not the place to announce such a discovery."

JohnCD (talk) 22:09, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Guido_Vrolix_in_his_studio.jpg and few others[edit]

per OTRS ticket:2014082510014282 Ankry (talk) 20:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

per OTRS ticket:2014082510014282 Ankry (talk) 20:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

per OTRS ticket:2014082510014282 Ankry (talk) 20:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

per OTRS ticket:2014082510014282 Ankry (talk) 20:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

per OTRS ticket:2014082510014282 Ankry (talk) 20:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

per OTRS ticket:2014082510014282 Ankry (talk) 20:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

per OTRS ticket:2014082510014282 Ankry (talk) 20:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

per OTRS ticket:2014082510014282 Ankry (talk) 20:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

per OTRS ticket:2014082510014282 Ankry (talk) 20:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

per OTRS ticket:2014082510014282 Ankry (talk) 20:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

per OTRS ticket:2014082510014282 Ankry (talk) 20:37, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Steelbro[edit]

I, 131.203.63.202, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 131.203.63.202 (talk) 02:12, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. JohnCD (talk) 12:21, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/John Clement[edit]

I, Bookspro, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Bookspro (talk) 02:20, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:21, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Isaac Haller[edit]

I explained who i am, in my music production and good it's going on Youtube. There's no reason why it should be deleted. Absolutely no reason. My other page, Sketch17ify, got deleted because of some Mythical creature that can see fairy's. So, I've been getting false claims on speedy deletion.I, Isaac Haller, would like this page brought back up, under the FALSE claim of CSD A7. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sketch17ify (talkcontribs) 03:25, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done We typically do not undelete WP:A7 articles. You can try asking User:Bbb23 to restore it, but there's another issue beyond the whole WP:A7 thing that will likely keep him or any other admin from restoring it. The article as a whole was also fairly promotional in tone, which would also prevent us from restoring it. Finally, please be aware that notability guidelines are very, very strict. I honestly can't see where you currently pass notability guidelines for yourself or for your channel. Please understand that this isn't to be mean and isn't randomly done: notability guidelines require that you and/or your channel receive coverage in independent and reliable source (WP:RS) like newspaper articles and the like. I can't see where you have received any of that. On a side note, your statement here can come across as you being insulting towards the admins who deleted the page and/or the people who nominated them. That's not a very good way to ask for someone to do something for you. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 05:57, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/VezTek USA[edit]

I, AmandaBro, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AmandaBro (talk) 05:08, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:17, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
  • On a side note, I removed the word "prestigious" from the article. It comes across as a WP:PEACOCK term and should be avoided. Although I do have to warn you: BBB ratings don't count towards notability for Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 06:17, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Alex Paul Menon[edit]

I, Trvpb, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. This page is about a pro-poor, pro-development person who is trying to change the face of the dynamic underprivilege. I wasn't able to update due to personal reasons. Please undelete so that i can update. Trvpb (talk) 10:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Protonk (talk) 15:58, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nouf Mohammed Al-Marwaai[edit]

I, Mannukoshy, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Mannukoshy (talk) 12:03, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Protonk (talk) 15:58, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/DIISSC Orchestra[edit]

I, Reibou, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Reibou (talk) 13:29, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Protonk (talk) 15:58, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tawon Car[edit]

I, Gsarwa, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Gsarwa (talk) 13:56, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Protonk (talk) 15:58, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Windows Calendar[edit]

I am requesting history-only undeletion for this page (and the corresponding talk page); that is, for the page history - this page is currently a redirect but was previously an article - to be restored. Please see the very strong argument for restoring this page's history made by User:Unscintillating: User talk:RoySmith#Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windows Calendar (continued) -Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 16:57, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

  • I'm not seeing an argument to restore the history there. I'm seeing an argument from Unscintillating that the article shouldn't've been deleted in the first place. In general, articles which happen to have titles that are useful search terms are deleted and replaced with a redirect, the reasoning being that enforcing the deletion outcome is a lot easier if reversing it requires more than reverting to a previous page version. Why should the page history be restored? Protonk (talk) 17:06, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
    • @User:Protonk: Okay, if you want an argument for that specifically, here's one: the content could be useful at Features new to Windows Vista (the current redirect target) and also List of Microsoft Windows components. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 17:08, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
      • @RoySmith: any objections to my restoring the history behind this redirect? I don't see a major problem with it, but you've declined to restore the history, so I wanted to rope you in. Protonk (talk) 17:21, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
        • IMHO, it doens't seem in line with the consensus of the AfD, but, I certainly have no objections if you feel it is appropriate. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:25, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
          • Thanks. My guess is it doesn't really hurt anything assuming the article isn't later restored. I've added the page to my watchlist so hopefully I can keep an eye on that. Protonk (talk) 17:39, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

@User:Protonk and other interested parties: please see Wikipedia talk:Deletion review#History undeletion underneath redirect for some background on this type of undeletion request. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 17:13, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

  • Yes check.svg Done I've restored the page history. I don't see a reason to restore the talk page history so I'm disinclined to do that. Protonk (talk) 17:39, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/College Admissions Counselors (CAC)[edit]

I, 24.182.38.90, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 24.182.38.90 (talk) 18:31, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

I, Urcollegeworld, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Urcollegeworld (talk) 18:37, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

I intend to work on the page and make the necessary changes -Urcollegeworld (talk) 18:39, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

It looks to me as though you may have a conflict of interest here. Your username is very like their url, www.yourcollegeworld.com - and given the promotional nature of the first version, I'm dubious about doing this but I'll leave it to the regulars here to decide. Dougweller (talk) 18:50, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
Symbol declined.svg Declined. @Urcollegeworld: your username is a violation of Wikipedia:Username policy. Please read it, and go to WP:CHU/Simple to change your username to something that represents only you and not an organization. Until then, I see no reason to restore a draft that is clearly intend for promotional or publicity purposes. It would be a good idea for you to review and comprehend WP:CORP and WP:NPOV also, before even considering restoring this for submission. ~Amatulić (talk) 20:51, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Aditya Bhat[edit]

Aditya Bhat is a big name in bollywood industry, he is the writer and the director. some of his popular work is Rakhi ka swayamvar which is the most popular TV reality show in India, I have even submitted the link. Its not for promotion, We are a fan group of Mr Aditya Bhat, kindly undelete the page -InstaServ (talk) 19:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

X mark.svg Not done. @InstaServ:, the article had a strongly promotional tone, including meaningless peacock terms like referring to someone as "esteemed". Try Wikipedia:Articles for creation next time, since you clearly have a conflict of interest about this subject. Furthermore, your use of the pronoun "we" in your request implies that the account "InstaServ" is accessible by multiple people. Is that correct? ~Amatulić (talk) 20:41, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Futz! (TV series)[edit]

The original reasoning for (speedy) deletion no longer applies, so this page must be restored according to my understanding of policy. The deleting administrator has refused to do so without providing valid reasoning: User talk:RHaworth/2014 Jan 11#Restore request -Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 21:17, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

  • No. Protonk (talk) 21:21, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
    • Why? Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 21:22, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
      • For the same reason RHaworth gave months ago. It's trivial to create a talk page and fill out a project banner. Protonk (talk) 21:24, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
        • I want the history of the page back - in case it isn't obvious already. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 21:27, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
          • No, it's irrelevant, the history has only one edit, consisting solely of a tag for WikiProject Television. You can re-create it yourself quite easily without arguing about it, but I don't see any reason for that redirect to have a talk page at all. Symbol declined.svg Declined. ~Amatulić (talk) 21:40, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

hegemon_group_international[edit]

This page was the start of a company profile. There was no advertising whatsoever. I just started the article. It looks like it was deleted in 2012 as well, but I did not write that and have no idea what the content of that article was. If you review the article that I created yesterday, you should agree that it was nothing more than a basic company profile. -Realmofanonymity (talk) 01:36, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

The phrase "building upon the success of..." sounds pretty promotional to me. Is there any reason why you can't just expand the article Hubert Humphrey (MLM), which already has far more detail about Hegemon Group International than the article you created? ~Amatulić (talk) 05:00, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Bubble Beat[edit]

The last version of this article is marked speed delete as too much content looks like promotion purpose, I'm sorry for that, I'll re write and submit a new one from scratch, but mean while I'd like to have that one back, because I don't have a backup yet, thanks. -Ianluo (talk) 06:37, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 07:06, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

AAVP Ashram[edit]

Creating more content to upload -14.96.128.80 (talk) 09:20, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

  • What do you plan to add? Anyway if you want this could be restored as a draft, but otherwise there is no indication of any importance in what is there. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:33, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Swami Visheshanand Ji[edit]

Creating more content for upload -14.96.128.80 (talk) 09:22, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

  • What do you plan to add? Anyway if you want this could be restored as a draft, but otherwise there is no indication of any importance in what is there. This was nominated for deletion as well as speedy deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:33, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Swami Alkhanand Ji[edit]

Creating a content for upload -14.96.128.80 (talk) 09:23, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

  • What do you plan to add? Anyway if you want this could be restored as a draft, but otherwise there is no indication of any importance in what is there. This was nominated for deletion as well as speedy deleted. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:33, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Draft:Raksha Changappa[edit]

I, Polymath0, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Polymath0 (talk) 12:43, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Raksha Changappa[edit]

Kindly let me edit the article to meet Wiki standards. -Polymath0 (talk) 12:45, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Radical Islam in Australia[edit]

Reasons for un-deletion request

  • 1. Article received a number of "delete" votes prior to article expansion including a large number of edits affecting the articles coverage, tone and structure. Had the vote taken place after this significant changes were made, the result would have been in favour of "keep."
  • 2. Voters who requested deletion did not respond to arguments in favour of "keep."
    • 2.1. Arguments were made for keeping the page (e.g. why the article topic was valid, etc.). This arguments were not discussed prior to deletion.
    • 2.2. Arguments made for "delete" received comments and responses which pointed to logical flaws in citing particular WP policies as cause for deletion (e.g. WP:Fork). It was argued that these policies do not apply to the article under discussion. No response or further discussion was made.
  • 3. The final cause for deletion was not specified. This is especially concerning as WP policies cited as reasons for deletion may have been irrelevant to the discussion or not sufficiently demonstrated how they applied in this case.

I.am.a.qwerty (talk) 14:43, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

  • X mark.svg Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radical Islam in Australia, it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion. After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review. Protonk (talk) 14:50, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Noting the updated arguments: @I.am.a.qwerty: REFUND still isn't the place for this. If you feel the deletion discussion was improperly closed your route is to speak to the closing admin and if they aren't willing to reverse it, take it to DRV. This board is only for deletions which can be uncontroversially reversed and AfDs like this one are explicitly not covered here. Protonk (talk) 15:05, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

James Cox and Sons[edit]

The article is about a well know californian company, owner of which was the inventor of Rolling thin film oven, which is now widley used by bitumen testing laboratories across the world. The invention by this company led to the present day ASTM and AASHTO test standards for rolling thin film oven test -217.41.41.130 (talk) 15:08, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Probably referring to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/James Cox and Sons. --Finngall talk 15:26, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Yes check.svg Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:24, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Obscure_(Band)[edit]

This is prominent band from Dhaka Bangladesh. We need to upload this information at wikipedia as an world wide accepted database. Please visit www.obscurebd.com or www.facebook.com.bdobscure. I am a member od the band. So I am authorized to provide the information. So please allow Obscure_(Band)as a page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Raajuesheikh (talkcontribs) 19:53, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Note: Of the speedy deletions this article has, the most recent deletion is a A7. Articles meeting this criterion are generally not undeleted either because they require a complete rewrite or they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. This page has been protected against creation due to repeated deletion and creation, and so you need to provide a very compelling and policy-compliant reason for it to be undeleted regardless of the A7s and G12. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 22:19, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
X mark.svg Not done. See WP:BAND for inclusion criteria, and explain exactly which of those your band meets. Furthermore, as a member of the band, you have a conflict of interest (read WP:COI for guidance). You shouldn't be writing an article about yourselves at all. You can try submitting it using the Wikipedia:Articles for creation process but you shouldn't be posting it to main article space. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:36, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Malou22/sandbox[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Malou22 (talk) 21:43, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

How to use an Article[edit]

How if the abandoned confused to edit and then he have nothing to do is to vandal. Like me I'm not Vandalising I am just guessing if you wish to speedy delete it it's Okay, I m not a perfect person so if you think I am vandalising pls. Wish to delete

Useful Encyclopedia (talk) 21:43, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

If this is regarding Facebook mobile · ( talk | logs | links | watch ) · [revisions], Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. If not, I honestly have no idea what you're trying to say. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 21:56, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

Young Republicans of Free State High School[edit]

We are apart of the Kansas GOP and work with many people such as senators and reps and I am going to add on to it everyday the person who did this is bias. -Colton1755 (talk) 02:46, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Note: The page was speedily-deleted under criterion A7. Pages deleted under that criterion are generally not undeleted because they require complete rewrites to be viable encyclopedia articles or because they violate our biographical or fair-use policies. As has been explained to you on your talk page, you need to prove notability first. I would also suggest reading WP:What Wikipedia is not to get some idea of what a Wikipedia article should not be. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 06:45, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
  • Offhand, I'll say that you're likely to have trouble getting this restored because there really isn't anything to show that your school's organization is particularly noteworthy. Notability is WP:NOTINHERITED by having an association with notable persons or organizations. Most school clubs/organizations will never gain enough coverage in reliable sources (WP:RS) to merit an article. Most don't even get enough to merit a mention in the school's page. I don't see where this was the result of a bias and to be honest... I'd actually recommend that you not make any edits on articles that you have any sort of personal conflict of interest with. I see that you've made several edits that were "authorized by Connie O'Brien", which smacks of WP:OWNERSHIP. While I do think that the blanked section should be removed, you've got to understand that O'Brien does not own the page and saying that you're making edits that she authorized gives off the impression that she is controlling everything on that page. So far the edits haven't been particularly bad and you have divulged your COI, which is good, but I am somewhat troubled by your accusations of bias (because of the deletion of your school organization's page) and by the "authorized" statement. I'd personally recommend that rather than directly edit the article and make substantial edits to articles for politicians you're personally representing (in any shape or form), that you look into getting someone from one of the applicable WikiProjects to do it for you. The thing is, while you can still edit with a conflict of interest (WP:COI), it's still heavily discouraged and in this instance I think that it'd be best if you tried to work with a more experienced Wikipedia editor without a conflict of interest. While the likelihood of someone coming in to look at the article for this particular politician is low, the last thing anyone wants is for someone to see that an intern/representative of O'Brien is editing the page. That's led to more than one newspaper voicing concerns of bias and manipulation. I don't mean that to sound harsh, but that's why we recommend that people with a COI (especially a strong one) not make large amounts of edits to pages they're involved with. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:21, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jaryn Satterfield[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Jpfthebest (talk) 03:25, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:50, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Calarts School of Dance[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Cyberpuke 03:57, 29 August 2014 (UTC) Hello, I am requesting the retrieval of the CalArts School of Dance page. When it was developed, it was thorough and information, and I plan on incorporating it within the main CalArts page that is sensible and meet Wikipedia's standard. Thanks.

It's not under that title. Is the capitalisation accurate (Wikipedia articles are case-sensitive)? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 05:53, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
  • I can't find anything in your edit history about a School of Dance. Did you make it under a different account name? Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 08:08, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Other pages that may be of interest to Cyberpuke include CalArts School of Film/Video, Gregory Ecklund. I have restored the early history of Aaron Rose. The is also Sharon Disney Lund School of Dance, but this is just a redirect. Is any of this what you want back? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:16, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Buddha was born in Nepal Campaign[edit]

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Buddhanepal9 (talk) 16:45, 29 August 2014 (UTC)


Please undelete "Buddha was born in Nepal Campaign".

This is the sentiments of 1,000,000 Petition signers from all over the world. Enough evidence was provided with the links.

Thanks a lot.

==Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pattamukkil Family[edit]

I, Jowinvp, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jowinvp (talk) 17:09, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

==

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Pattamukkil Family[edit]

I, Jowinvp, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jowinvp (talk) 17:09, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Pattamukkil Family[edit]

Historical Relevance -Jowinvp (talk) 17:12, 29 August 2014 (UTC) [1]

==[edit]

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Nggaunt (talk) 18:04, 29 August 2014 (UTC)


{subst:Refund/G13|User:Nggaunt/sandbox}

User:Nggaunt/sandbox[edit]

I, Nggaunt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nggaunt (talk) 18:04, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

==User:Nggaunt/sandbox[edit]

I, Nggaunt, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Nggaunt (talk) 18:06, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

==

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Nggaunt (talk) 18:06, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

I would like to amend the submission.

subst:Refund/G13|User:Nggaunt/sandbox — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nggaunt (talkcontribs) 18:15, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

  1. ^ https://www.facebook.com/pattamukkilfamily/info