Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
 Usernames for administrator attention

Important! Please remember the following:

  1. This page is for usernames that are such blatant and serious problems that they need to be immediately blocked.
  2. Reports are assessed according to the username policy and the UAA instructions. Please read those pages first.
  3. Please discuss less-serious violations with the user so that they can rename or abandon their account in good faith.
  4. If, after discussion with a user, the problem still seems unresolved, a username request for comment may be in order.
  5. Please do not leave a username warning template on a user's talk page and then immediately report them here. Either discuss it with the user, or report it for admin action, but don't do both at the same time.
  6. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not.
  7. Do not report a username unless it has been used in the last 2-3 weeks. Older accounts are likely abandoned and reports of such users will be summarily declined.


Feed-icon.svg You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
This page was last updated at 16:15 on 27 April 2015 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
Note: Patrollers are kindly asked to monitor usernames listed at Filter 102, Filter 148, Filter 149, Filter 354 (tags), WP:UAA/HP, and CAT:UAA.


Bot-reported[edit]

User-reported[edit]

Wait until the user edits. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 11:55, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Wait until the user edits. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 11:55, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Problem: This account does not exist or may be hidden. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 21:49, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Comment: Userpage deleted under speedy deletion criterion U2. Diannaa (talk) 01:01, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Please discuss this with the user first, and consider opening a community discussion at RFCN if they disagree with your concerns. Personally I think it's just far enough away from their band name to be acceptable. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 21:40, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user, since they have edited constructively. Diannaa (talk) 01:06, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Wait until the user edits. Randykitty (talk) 12:58, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Wait until the user edits. Randykitty (talk) 12:58, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Randykitty (talk) 13:01, 27 April 2015 (UTC)