Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
 Usernames for administrator attention

Important! Please remember the following:

  1. This page is for usernames that are such blatant and serious problems that they need to be immediately blocked.
  2. Reports are assessed according to the username policy and the UAA instructions. Please read those pages first.
  3. Please discuss less-serious violations with the user so that they can rename or abandon their account in good faith.
  4. If, after discussion with a user, the problem still seems unresolved, a username request for comment may be in order.
  5. Please do not leave a username warning template on a user's talk page and then immediately report them here. Either discuss it with the user, or report it for admin action, but don't do both at the same time.
  6. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not.
  7. Do not report a username unless it has been used in the last 2-3 weeks. Older accounts are likely abandoned and reports of such users will be summarily declined.


Feed-icon.svg You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
This page was last updated at 22:48 on 13 July 2014 (UTC). Purge the cache of this page if it is out of date.
Note: Patrollers are kindly asked to monitor usernames listed at Filter 102, Filter 148, Filter 149, Filter 354 (tags), WP:UAA/HP, and CAT:UAA.

Bot-reported[edit]

Wait until the user edits. Daniel Case (talk) 15:46, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Comment: Don't know what was going on, but I really wouldn't mind if that's all the editing they ever do. Daniel Case (talk) 15:50, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Comment: Again, not really sure what's up. Daniel Case (talk) 15:52, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. In non-templated fashion; it could be a variant spelling of Lipschitz. Daniel Case (talk) 15:58, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Being discussed with the user. Daniel Case (talk) 16:00, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Not a blatant violation of the username policy, but it's worth keeping an eye on their edits. Daniel Case (talk) 16:02, 13 July 2014 (UTC)
Wait until the user edits. besides it could be Wiki for Wikipedia and Coxy for Cox 5 albert square (talk) 22:32, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

User-reported[edit]

Not a blatant violation of the username policy. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. If they edit again. I can't find a name connection. Daniel Case (talk) 16:08, 13 July 2014 (UTC)