Wikipedia:WikiProject Austria/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to the assessment department of the Austria WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Austria related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Austria}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Austria articles by quality and Category:Austria articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Austria WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

Quality assessments[edit]

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Austria}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Austria|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Austria articles) Featured article FA 
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Austria articles) A-Class article A 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Austria articles)  GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Austria articles) B-Class article B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Austria articles) C-Class article C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Austria articles) Start-Class article Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Austria articles) Stub-Class article Stub 
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Austria articles) Featured list FL 
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Austria articles)  List 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Austria articles) Category page Category 
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Austria articles) Disambiguation page Disambig 
File (for files; adds pages to Category:File-Class Austria articles)  File 
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Austria articles)  Portal 
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Austria articles)  Project 
Template (for templates; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Austria articles)  Template 
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Austria articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Austria articles)  ??? 

After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added either to the article's talk page or to the /Comments subpage which will appear as a link next to the assessment. Adding comments will add the article to Category:Austria articles with comments. Comments that are added to the /Comments subpages will be transcluded onto the automatically generated work list pages in the Comments column.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Austria}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Austria| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale[edit]

Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Top The article is one of the core topics about Austria. Generally, this is limited to those articles that are are included as sections of the main Austria article. A reader who is not involved in the Austria field will have high familiarity with the subject matter and should be able to relate to the topic easily. Articles in this importance range are written in mostly generic terms, leaving technical terms and descriptions for more specialized pages. Austria
High The article covers a topic that is vital to understanding Austria.
Mid The article covers a topic that has a strong but not vital role in the history of Austria. Many readers will be familiar with the topic being discussed, but a larger majority of readers may have only cursory knowledge of the overall subject. Articles at this level will cover subjects that are well known but not necessarily vital to understand Austria. Due to the topics covered at this level, Mid-importance articles will generally have more technical terms used in the article text. Most people involved in the history of Austria will be rated in this level.
Low The article is not required knowledge for a broad understanding of Austria. Few readers outside the Austrian history field or that are not Austrian history students may be familiar with the subject matter. It is likely that the reader does not know anything at all about the subject before reading the article. Articles at this range of importance will often delve into the minutiae of the Austria, using technical terms (and defining them) as needed. Topics included at this level include most practices and infrastructure of Austria.

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.


  • Wrote/translated the article for Schloss Eggenberg (Graz) as well as created some related articles in English, could another member of the project please offer assessments for this article and perhaps the related articles? Thanks! Smf77 (talk) 06:56, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
  • Winter of Terror - Currently unassessed. New WikiProject Austria template has been added and waiting to be assesed. Adamdaley (talk) 11:46, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Innsbruck Cathedral – I created this article in January 2013 and have expanded it significantly since the initial assessment. Bede735 (talk) 14:06, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Battle of Vienna - This article is most definitely not start quality. It should be at least a C. Tomh903 (talk) 19:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Assessment log[edit]

Austria articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

September 28, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 27, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 26, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Steyr HS .50 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Steyr M (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

September 25, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 24, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 23, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 22, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Czech Corner (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Felix Gottwald (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • Stefan Petzner (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 21, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Gaston Glock (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

September 20, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 19, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 18, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 17, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Czech Corner (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 15, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 14, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 13, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Pillersee (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

September 12, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • .376 Steyr (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

September 11, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 10, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 9, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 8, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 7, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 6, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 5, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 4, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Kladivo (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

September 3, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Huszár-class destroyer (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

  • Hohe Munde (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

September 2, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 1, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 31, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 30, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 29, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 28, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 27, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 26, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 25, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 24, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Hannes Schneider (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

August 22, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 21, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 20, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 19, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 18, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 17, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 16, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 15, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 14, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 13, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 12, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 11, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Oberstabswachtmeister (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

August 10, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 9, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 8, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]