Wikipedia:WikiProject Big 12 Conference/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to the assessment department of the Big 12 WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about Big 12. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Big 12}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Big 12 Conference articles by quality and Category:Big 12 Conference articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Big 12 WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Big 12}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Big 12
|class=
|attention=
|collaboration-candidate=
|past-collaboration=
|peer-review= 
|old-peer-review=
|needs-infobox=
}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Big 12 Conference articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Big 12}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Big 12| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale[edit]

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Big 12.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to certain audiences—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Status Template Meaning of Status
Top {{Top-Class}} Main articles of member schools (e.g. Texas Tech University), their primary atheltics pages (e.g. Texas A&M Aggies), and the Big 12 Conference page.
High {{High-Class}} The sports teams within the universities (e.g. Nebraska Cornhuskers football), rivalries (e.g. Red River Rivalry), bowls in which the Big 12 is affiliated with on a yearly basis (e.g. Alamo Bowl), tournaments (e.g. Big 12 Men's Basketball Tournament)
Mid {{Mid-Class}} Yearly Bowls (e.g. 2008 Cotton Bowl Classic), Yearly Tournaments (e.g. 2008 Big 12 Men's Basketball Tournament), or seasons (e.g. 2005 Texas Longhorns football team)
Low {{Low-Class}} Coaches (e.g. Bob Knight), Players (e.g. Sam Bradford), Mascots (e.g. Truman the Tiger) and member school sporting venues (e.g. Frank Erwin Center). Note: Only players and coaches that competed in Big 12 Sports (see The Big 12 Handbook ) when their school was a part of the Big 12 conference should be included.
None None This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed.

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

Assessment log[edit]

Big 12 Conference articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

August 28, 2014[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 12, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 11, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 18, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 6, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 5, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 15, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 6, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 25, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 2, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Texas Bowl (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

February 13, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 12, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 28, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Wes Kittley (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

December 21, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 18, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Jace Amaro (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

December 6, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 2, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 23, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Texas Bowl (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

September 3, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 19, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 31, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 6, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 5, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 29, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 27, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 25, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 2, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 10, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 22, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 2, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 14, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 12, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 27, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 10, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 27, 2012[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 10, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 10, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 10, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 14, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 31, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 30, 2012[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 29, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 27, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 26, 2012[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 25, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 23, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 18, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 10, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 28, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 12, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 11, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 8, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 17, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 15, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 23, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 27, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 17, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 13, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 12, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 10, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 29, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 20, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 15, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 27, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 20, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Seth Doege (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

September 12, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 7, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Baron Batch (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

September 5, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 1, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 31, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 29, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 26, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 25, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 22, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 20, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 19, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 18, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 17, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 1, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 26, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 1, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 17, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 13, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Don Flora (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

April 29, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 20, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 17, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 7, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Pat Knight (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to B-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

April 4, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 27, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 21, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 4, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 3, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 28, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Bob Stoops (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

February 13, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Worklist[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

This page was once used by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team. It is preserved because of the information in its edit history. This page should not be edited or deleted. Wikiproject article lists can be generated using the WP 1.0 web tool.