Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Peer review/Richard Dawkins
I would like to submit this article for peer review, as I feel that it has undergone profound improvement recently. My hope is that it will achieve Featured Article status. I feel that it is excellently sourced, nicely laid out, and well written. It was recently nominated for FA status, but turned down due to some referencing issues (inconsistency of format being the main one). However, I think that these issues have been solved, and would like to get some outside opinion before re-submitting it as an FA candidate.--AC+79 3888 (talk) 10:07, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
There were only two very minor points generated by the program. It looks like a very strong article to me.
- Per Wikipedia:Context and Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates), months and years (as in "January/February 1997" are generally not linked unless they provide context.[?]
- Per Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings), headings generally should not repeat the title of the article. For example, instead of using the heading ==Books about Dawkins and his ideas==, use ==Further reading== or ==Bibliography==.[?]