Wikipedia:WikiProject Biography/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Crystal personal.svg WikiProject Biography
General information (edit · changes)
Announcements
Departments
Work groups and subprojects
Things you can do (edit)


Biography article statistics

This list is generated automatically on alternate nights.
view full worklist

Shortcuts:

Welcome to the assessment department of the Biography WikiProject. This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Biography articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

Category:Biography articles by quality serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist. The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Biography}} project banner. Filling in a rating in the class parameter of the {{WikiProject Biography}} template on the talk page of an article causes the name of that article to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Biography articles by quality.

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get an article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Biography WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
How may I begin assessing articles? 
Assessment may be done through a variety of ways, but the most efficient is through use of the MetaData article assessment script.

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions on how to assess a Biography article[edit]

An article's assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Biography}} project banner on the article's talk page. Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed biography articles. At present, there are over 100,000 biography articles that need assessment (e.g., that need to have a class inserted in the class parameter of the {{WikiProject Biography}} template).

Biography articles to be assessed have some aspects of the {{WikiProject Biography}} template on their talk page, but the template may be incomplete. Select an article from the list at Category:Unassessed biography articles. Then, look over the article in anticipation of filling out the parameters of the {{WikiProject Biography}} template. Finally, add in the proper parameters to the talk page template, as outlined below.

Class parameter[edit]

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed biography articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

Priority parameter[edit]

The following values may be used for the priority parameter:

  • Top
  • High
  • Mid
  • Low

The parameter is not used if an article's class is set to NA, and may be omitted in those cases. The importance should be assigned according to the priority scale below. Note that the priority is used on the workgroup lists only.

Core parameter[edit]

The template also has a core=yes parameter for core articles only, as selected by the Core Biographies team.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Priority scale[edit]

Priority must be regarded as a relative term. If priority values are applied within this project, these only reflect the perceived importance to this project and to the work groups the biography falls under. An article judged to be "Top-Class" in one context may be only "Mid-Class" in another project. The criteria used for rating article priority are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it).

Article importance grading scheme
Label Criteria Examples
Top High probability that non-Historians would look this up. Limited to the top 200 biographies. Must have had a large impact outside of their main discipline, across several generations, and in the majority of the world. For instance, Einstein, brilliant physicist, but his theories have affected people outside of physics and in many other countries besides his nation of origin and several generations. His ideas have changed the way people think. No member should give this rating to any biography without first getting Project approval from the other members. Albert Einstein
High Must have had a large impact in their main discipline, across a couple of generations. Had some impact outside their country of origin. Patrick Henry
Mid Important in their discipline. John Seigenthaler, Sr.
Low Subject is notable in their main discipline. Morena Baccarin

08:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)08:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)08:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)08:52, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you would like an outside opinion on a new quality rating for an article, please feel free to list it below.
Note: This is only to rate the article on quality - you will probably not get feedback on the article.
If you desire comments please use the peer review process.
If you assess an article, please remove it so others will not waste time reviewing the same article(s).
It is also helpful to leave a brief note on article's talk, under a heading "B-class review", stating why the article was failed (or that it was reviewed and passed).
Make sure to check the overview on how to assess a Biography article for details on how to assess. Thanks!

Articles submitted here will not be rated above 'B'; see Wikipedia:Good articles and Wikipedia:Featured articles for higher assessments.
Edit this section and place request here:

  1. Alexander Hannett. Reassessment wished. The article has been improved in the last several days. Alexhannett (talk) 17:16, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  2. Ivi Adamou. Reassessment wished. Dimitris  talk 14:53, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
  3. Benjamin De Casseres. Reassessment wished. Dylan38 (talk) 18:25, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
  4. Radojko Avramović. Reassessment requested. Vastly improved over the past couple of weeks. Thanks. LRD NO (talk) 09:19, 7 May 2014 (UTC)
  5. Gail Cobb Assessment requested. Illegitimate Barrister 04:18, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
  6. Michael J. McShane. Reassessment wished. Since September 21, 2012, apparent improvements have been made. Thanks. XeroxKleenex (talk) 07:29, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
  7. John Cowper Powys -- This needs to be upgraded from start class. Rwood128 (talk) 21:47, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
  8. James Hanley (novelist) -- Needs re-assessing as it is no longer start class.Rwood128 (talk) 12:39, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
  9. Marty Walsh (politician) - Article needs assessment. --TommyBoy (talk) 23:12, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
  10. Roy Masters (commentator) - Requesting re-assessment, please and thank you. Mrtea (talk) 17:58, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
  11. Ruby G. Woodson (educator) - Article needs assessment. --Bill Woodson 07:49, 26 May 2014 (UTC) 8:47, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
  12. Sir Richard Fletcher, 1st Baronet I have expanded this article substantially. I don't know what class it is now but it is certainly no longer a stub. Regards--Ykraps (talk) 15:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
  13. William B. Evans - Article needs assessment. --TommyBoy (talk) 21:29, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
  14. Thomas P. Gordon - Article needs assessment. --TommyBoy (talk) 23:39, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
  15. Mustafa Akaydın – Needs reassessment. Ibadibam (talk) 19:32, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
  16. Florian Znaniecki --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:29, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
  17. Jan Matejko --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:29, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
  18. Hamish Peacock needs assessment NickGibson3900 (talk) 06:00, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
  19. John J. Pettus. Needs re-assessment as I don't think it's a stub anymore. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 07:21, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
  20. Irvin B. Nathan - Article needs assessment. --TommyBoy (talk) 00:05, 19 June 2014 (UTC)
  21. Manuel Lujan, Jr. - Article needs assessment. --TommyBoy (talk) 00:22, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
  22. Richard Olney - Article needs assessment. --TommyBoy (talk) 01:26, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
  23. Philip Habib - Article needs assessment. --TommyBoy (talk) 02:15, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
  24. Clare O'Neil - Recently expanded, currently rated stub. -- Vivien Street (talk) 01:08, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
  25. Cindy Hill (politician) - Article needs assessment. --TommyBoy (talk) 03:11, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
  26. Steven Novella - Expanded 5X, considering DYK submission, please update assessment. --Kyle(talk) 17:11, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
  27. John VI, Duke of Brittany - I came across this one with still a Stub rating on its talk page. I took the liberty of moving it to a Start rating, but would appreciate someone else looking to see if it is better than that. 1bandsaw (talk) 03:30, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  28. Amadeus IV, Count of Savoy - I've fleshed this one out so I hope it's no longer Stub 1bandsaw (talk) 05:08, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  29. Thomas, Count of Flanders - I've fleshed this one out so I hope it's no longer Stub 1bandsaw (talk) 05:08, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
  30. Paul Martin (illustrator) - Requesting re-assessment. I've researched this as far as it can go over past year. Everything referenced. Jim Percy (talk) 14:47, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
  31. Boniface, Count of Savoy - I've fleshed this one out so I hope it's no longer Stub 1bandsaw (talk) 07:45, 11 July 2014 (UTC)
  32. Cecile of Baux - I've fleshed this one out so I hope it's no longer Stub 1bandsaw (talk) 07:45, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

Statistics[edit]

Current status[edit]


Historical counts[edit]

Monthly changes[edit]

Assessment log[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Biography articles by quality log

Worklist[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.