Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Coordinators/Election 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Voting is now concluded.

Current time is 20:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC)


Overview[edit]

The project coordinators are generally responsible for maintaining all of the procedural and administrative aspects of the project, and serve as the designated points-of-contact for procedural issues. They are not, however, endowed with any special executive powers.

The Lead Coordinator (one open position) bears overall responsibility for coordinating the project; the Coordinators (four open positions) aid the Lead Coordinator and focus on specific areas that require special attention.

Responsibilities[edit]

From Wikipedia:WikiProject Christianity/Coordinators:

The primary responsibility of the project coordinators is the maintenance and housekeeping work involved in keeping the project and its internal processes running smoothly; this includes a variety of tasks, such as keeping the announcement and open task lists updated, overseeing the assessment and review processes, managing the proposal and creation of task forces, and so forth. There is fairly little involved that couldn't theoretically be done by any other editor, of course—in only a few places have the coordinators been explicitly written into a process—but, since experience suggests that people tend to assume that someone else is doing whatever needs to be done, it has proven beneficial to formally delegate responsibility for this administrative work to a specified group. The coordinators also have several additional roles. They serve as the project's designated points of contact, and are explicitly listed as people to whom questions can be directed in a variety of places around the project. In addition, they have highly informal roles in leading the drafting of project guidelines, overseeing the implementation of project decisions on issues like category schemes and template use, and helping to informally resolve disputes and keep discussions from becoming heated and unproductive. The coordinators are not, however, a body for formal dispute resolution; serious disputes should be addressed through the normal dispute resolution process.

Some more specific examples of day-to-day coordinator work can be found here.

Voting is now concluded.


Comment: Tinucherian opted to be Assistant Co-ordinator and nominated John Carter for the role of Lead Co-ordinator.

=== Nomination process ===


  • Any member of the project may nominate themselves for a position by adding their statement in the "Candidates" section below by the start of the election. The following boilerplate can be used:
=== Name ===

{{user|Name}}
: Statement goes here...

==== Comments and questions for Name ====

*
  • The election will be conducted using simple approval voting. Any member of the project may support as many of the candidates as they wish. The candidate with the highest number of endorsements will become the Lead Coordinator (provided he or she is willing to assume the post); the next four candidates will become Coordinators.
  • Both project members and interested outside parties are encouraged to ask questions of the nominees or make general comments.

Candidates[edit]

Voting is now concluded.
(This is a simple approval vote; only "support" votes should be made. All other votes will be discounted.)

Current time is 20:59, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Sample nomination[edit]

Name[edit]

Name (talk · contribs)

Statement goes here...

Comments and questions for Name[edit]

Votes in support of Name[edit]

to be left empty until the elections actually begin

Nominations[edit]

John Carter[edit]

John Carter (talk · contribs)

I have been somewhat active with Wikipedia:WikiProject Saints and a few of the other Christianity WikiProjects. My strengths, such as they are, are primarily in assessment, review, portal development and maintenance, and working on templates as required. I consider myself somewhat knowledgable about several areas of Christianity, but I hope others would say that I don't have such a high opinion of myself that I would place my own opinions before those of individuals who are more knowledgable about the particular subject in question. John Carter (talk) 18:47, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Comments and questions for John Carter[edit]

  • John did a great job at organizing this whole election and has shown his dedication to the project. I especially applaud his attempts to keep all of the Christianity related projects in the loop. Grk1011 (talk) 02:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Votes in support of John Carter[edit]

  1. I Support John Carter!!Ltwin (talk) 00:41, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
  2. Support for John Carter - Tinucherian (talk) 06:35, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
  3. Kristamaranatha (talk) 19:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
  4. I tooooooo support John Carter Lijujacobk (talk) 03:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
  5. Grk1011 (talk) 02:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Tinucherian[edit]

Tinucherian (talk · contribs · count)

I am a member of WikiProject Christianity since a few months ago , but I am an active member since then. My efforts include setting up of WikiProject Indian Christianity and maintaining it. This Project is a workgroup of WikiProject Christianity now. My activities includes article assessment , monitoring recent changes , fighting vandalism , active participation on talk page and related AFDs, creation of templetes / categories for the prjt, maintenance and other housekeeping work , welcoming new members etc in both the main project and work group. I also contribute myself to various christainity articles which I have knowledge and interest. My thelogical ideas doesnt restrict me to look with skepticism to any other traditions or belifs in Christainity and I earnestly try my level best to help everyone. I have started Portal:Indian Christianity and help maintain it. I am being WP:Bold and nominating myself as a Coordinator. I wish you continue to serve this project to make it one of best managed projects in Wikipedia. - Tinucherian (talk) 02:28, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Comments and questions for Tinucherian[edit]

  • Tinucherian has been very active in the project and recently spearheaded a campaign to fight the backlog of unassessed articles. When problems arose regarding the assessments, he was notified, apologized, and even offered to fix any of the problems that he might have caused. Grk1011 (talk) 02:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Votes in support of Tinucherian[edit]

  1. . I Support. Paulrach (talk) 18:43, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
  2. John Carter (talk) 18:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
  3. Kristamaranatha (talk) 19:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
  4. Lijujacobk (talk) 03:51, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
  5. Grk1011 (talk) 02:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
  6. Noblevmy (talk) 11:07, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Secisek[edit]

Secisek (talk · contribs · count)

User:Secisek is very active in WikiProject Christianity especially in the maintainance of several workgroups notably Syriac Christianity,Indian Christianity ,Anabaptist to name a very few. He actively helped creation of several workgroups , templates and categories for the main and sub projects. -(nomination by User:Tinucherian)

Comments and questions for Secisek[edit]

Votes in support of Secisek[edit]

  1. I support Secisek , His contributions to this project and many of the workgroups is really appreciable. - Tinucherian (talk) 06:40, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
  2. John Carter (talk) 18:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC) - The Christianity project's wouldn't be anywhere near as effective and successful without him.
  3. Kensplanet (talk) 15:55, 15 April 2008 (UTC) A very active editor of Wikiproject Christianity

General comments[edit]

Please make any general comments not related to one of the candidates on the talk page.