Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Notice board

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

WikiProject Comics
Home Assessments Cleanup Discussion Improvements Notice board Popular pages Workgroups
Article alerts · Copyright · Getting Involved · Manual of Style · Naming conventions · References · Statistics · Templates · Userbox
Comiclogo.svg

Welcome to WikiProject Comics (WP:CMC), a project formed by Wikipedians to increase, expand, improve, and better organize articles related to comics in Wikipedia, the largest encyclopedia in the world! We rely on comics enthusiasts worldwide to make this the best comics encyclopaedia on the web. If you are interested in participating, why not see how you can get involved?

If you would like to help, please inquire on the talk page and see the to-do list there. The scope of WikiProject Comics is improve the vast expanse of knowledge that comics have become. This WikiProject will attempt to cover all comics-related information included on Wikipedia. We will do this through volunteer contributors and editors. If you are interested in joining the WikiProject, please feel free to add your name to the Participants list below, and find yourself an article to adopt.

For more information on WikiProjects, please see Wikipedia:WikiProjects and Wikipedia:WikiProject best practices.

Comics Portal
WikiProject Comics talk
⇒ Get Involved Intro
Notice Board
⇒ Article alerts New!
⇒ Assessments Help
⇒ B-Class FAQ New!
⇒ Cleanup listing Help
⇒ Peer review Help
⇒ To-do list Help
Category:WikiProject Comics
Shortcuts:

Contents

Alerts

Articles for deletion
Proposed deletions
Peer reviews
Requested moves

Deletion discussions

To edit this section, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Comics and animation

Space Cat

AfDs for this article:
Articles for deletion/Space Cat Articles for deletion/Space Cat (2nd nomination) Articles for deletion/Space Cat (music)
Space Cat (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: "Space Cat" – news · books · scholar · free images)

Somehow survived an AFD ages ago. I can't find a single reliable source on it, however — 0 hits in Google Books. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:43, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete. Largely per nom as a discontinued strip that never got beyond at most a few college newspapers, and apparently never got collected in any fashion per nom.Tyrenon (talk) 20:03, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete - With something like this, there would need to be substantial coverage to establish notability; there is not in this case. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 20:42, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete Can't find reliable sources. A cartoon having previously run in some newspapers doesn't automatically establish notability with reliable sourcing. Nwlaw63 (talk) 21:22, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable underground comic. SaveATreeEatAVegan 21:59, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:16, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete. There just aren't any sources out there that would be considered to be reliable secondary sources. Most of what I did find were articles that just mirrored this wiki entry.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:30, 7 February 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
  • Comment: Advised active AFD admin User:CharlieEchoTango of possible closure per WP:SNOW. SaveATreeEatAVegan 23:09, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Southies

Southies (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: "Southies" – news · books · scholar · free images)

A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This failed television pilot fails Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Neelix (talk) 01:23, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Gene Belcher

Gene Belcher (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: "Gene Belcher" – news · books · scholar · free images)

Insufficient notability for this character. No third-party evidence given. Logical Cowboy (talk) 06:27, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:55, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

The article should stay! There are sources from sites, the official website has info, other websites that air the show like Global TV and FOUR, so it has sources.--TBrandley (talk) 18:02, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

See WP:RS. Self-published sources and other wikis are not reliable sources. Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:06, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

This character should have his own page to develop as the series progresses. Every other show on Fox's Sunday night animation domination has many individual character pages.--TBrandley (talk) 18:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

What about WP:Articles for deletion/Tina Belcher? Logical Cowboy (talk) 18:40, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Other characters have pages including Bob Belcher--TBrandley (talk) 22:59, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

--TBrandley (talk) 04:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

As noted above: "See WP:RS. Self-published sources and other wikis are not reliable sources." Most of these sources fail WP:RS. You should click on this link: WP:RS and read what it says there. Logical Cowboy (talk) 06:29, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep. Other characters have pages--TBrandley (talk) 04:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, you're not allowed to vote twice. Or three times. Logical Cowboy (talk) 06:24, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

List of Code Lyoko characters

List of Code Lyoko characters (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: "List of Code Lyoko characters" – news · books · scholar · free images)

This article has no factual content whatsoever. Written entirely in-universe and has a citation to YouTube. The article is about a TV Show Code Lyoko, which has recently declined from its popular status. -Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 20:46, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete as it's entirely in-universe and unsourced. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:56, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep Can be fixed through regular editing. Notable TV shows are normally entitled to a character list article like this. Jclemens (talk) 01:27, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
  • A currently running cartoon with 5 seasons and a long run on Cartoon Network? Definitely notable. I still think the character list needs to be killed with fire, as cartoons are generally less likely to muster up enough out-of-universe information to warrant a character sheet. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 02:01, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
  • I also want to say that "regular editing" is something this article lacks. Also, If you look at it, the only factual information is information about the voice actor. Nothing else. Regular editing cannot fix this article because there is little to no known factual information. The only way would be to completely rewrite it with more information on hand, which is far from "regular editing." Character lists like this from notable tv shows are definitely considerable. But not all are notable. ---Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 04:25, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bmusician 08:23, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep All notable shows have a side article to list their characters, and another to list their episodes. We need to stop having things like this go to AFD all the time, and instead just pass a guideline to accept or deny them all once and for all. Dream Focus 07:02, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Lesser Known British Comic Strips

Lesser Known British Comic Strips (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: "Lesser Known British Comic Strips" – news · books · scholar · free images)

This article appears to embody the very antithesis of WP's notability requirements in that it actively seeks to list comic strips that are lesser known. This is besides the fact that it is a list and should be named as such. Rubiscous (talk) 01:21, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

An encyclopedia should be a collection of fact without the qualification of how important they are. The strip cartoons in this entry, although relatively lesser known today, were highly popular in their time and individually lasted for decades. Rather than have a group of stubs it is, in my opinion, better to collect them in a single article. The importance factor will be different for different individuals. How can any person or group take the right for deletion of an item that was highly accepted in its time. This becomes sencorship. The entry could, however, be combined with another relavant entry, but never deleted!

DonJay (talk) 02:42, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

  • The point is that "lesser known" is highly subjective. What constitutes "lesser known"? There's no way you can objectively define that term, putting it in direct violation of WP:NPOV. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 05:19, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. If the cartoons in this list were highly popular and notable in their time, then considering that notability is not temporary it is inappropriate to describe them collectively as 'lesser known'. The notability in its own right of each individual strip in the list is not in dispute right here and now, just whether the article should exist as a whole. You are correct about things being different for different individuals - the degree of how 'known' a comic strip was is completely arbitrary. Unless a notable list of 'lesser known british comic strips' exists off-project in a reliable source, or we have reliable sources for each individual strip describing each one as 'lesser known' then putting together a list in this manner is original research. To cut down on stubs by collecting together a list is fine, the above suggestion by Darkness Shines of List of British comic strips, or by publication for example List of Daily Mail comic strips would be more acceptable alternatives because the criteria for inclusion in such lists would not be subjective. Note that such lists would have to include all the more notable strips that fit the criteria which have their own articles, and that these strips should be given appropriate prominence, thus the current article would make a poor starting point compared with simply starting another list from scratch. Rubiscous (talk) 05:42, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

The proposal is for deletion, not modification. Consequently it should be rejected. The original entry was not a true list, but rather a collection of stubs, which it was hoped could be enlarged. A better title might have been "British Strip Cartoons of the Early 20th Century". It was my hope that, when each item had been enlarged, that a separate entry could be made, By collecting the stubs together it would be more obvious that additions to them was needed. There has been several edits of this nature. My objection has not been because of change, but rather of deletion due to the use of "Lesser Known" in the title. DonJay (talk) 15:20, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete "Lesser known" anything is problematic. If something is both notable and verifiable enough for a general-interest encyclopedia, in would generally not be "lesser-known" by definition. Looking at the article, I'd say neither of the first two entries are "lesser known": the first ran for 23 years and the second (apparently) almost 30. A better approach to the same material might be a (non-list) article on 20th century British newspaper comics or similar, but since fixing it would require a total rewrite up to and including the title, my vote is to delete. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:19, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

The majority of items in an encyclopedia are "lesser known" (in fact, unknown) to an individual. That is why they are there, to become "better known". Deletion is to destroy this possibility of becoming known. Unless the information is preserved within the encyclopedia, the information is likely to be lost. Consequently a deletion should not occur unless the content is elsewhere.

One reason that a collection of stub articles is attractive, is that a peson with knowledge on a subject can easily see where information is sparse, and can possibly add to it. This cannot be done with descrete entries, as it would be necessary to refer to a list and examine each independantly. DonJay (talk) 16:10, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:10, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete - the material in this article is interesting, and I have no reason to believe it isn't true, but I agree that as it is it fails WP:OR (containing no sources) and WP:IINFO. 'Lesser known British comic strips' is simply never going to work as a topic of an article. However, a List of British comic strips, or an article on the History of British comic strips, would be acceptable, providing that they were properly sourced.

Robofish (talk) 22:40, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

  • The reasons given by Robofishtalk are not relevant . Sources (WP-OR) are given within the text as being the newspapers. These are available in many public libraries. WP-INFO does not apply as the entries are not indiscriminate, by any of the categories given in WP-INFO. In fact they are part of a set. Also the statement "never going to work as a topic of an article" can not be proven, and is unlikely to be true.

The opening sentence of WP-INFO is "Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia" . The definition of Encyclopedia (OXFORD) is "a work containing general information on all branches of knowledge". Rejection of this 'request for deletion' should be made. DonJay (talk) 14:57, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

  • Keep and reanem, per DarknessShines. This is a good example of just where a list article can be useful. We don't have to show formal WP:Notability for each and every entry here, and it can defuse much of the trouble over just such an argument. Besides which, several of these are almost certainly notable anyway: Varoomshka was the infamous "Tits in the Grauniad" strip, Lord God Almighty was an early work by Steve Bell and both Sporting Sam and (the utterly ghastly) The Larks are noteworthy on the basis of their long-running.
If anyone is itching to delete British comic strips, then I suggest starting at the mess that is Category:Beano strips, where any number of unreferenced one-para and entirely trivial articles refuse to die, despite regular attempts. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:20, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep That something is lesser known does not make it unimportant, or even non-notable. WP should have appropriate coverage for subjects depending on their importance and the extent of sourcing available, and in many cases this will be less than a full article, if if the notability guidelines permit an article to be written, they do not require that there should be a separate article in all cases--we have the flexibility to do what is suitable to the specific topics. And if these are regarded as non-notable, the guidelines are all very specific that notable does not apply to the content within an article--logically , how could it, because then every event in a person;s life would need to be separately notable if it were to be mentioned at all. DGG ( talk ) 21:06, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep - I've added two more sources to the article. It's a list article with a focused, discriminate criterion for its entries. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:28, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Bart Thompson. Xavexgoem (talk) 16:12, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Chaos Campus

Chaos Campus (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: "Chaos Campus" – news · books · scholar · free images)

I found no notability for this comic book. Fails WP:BK. SL93 (talk) 22:00, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:11, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep: The comic series has its own website, which includes detailed information regarding volumes, and issues. What does an article meeting criteria at WP:COMIC have to do with WP:BK? OSU1980 00:30, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Comment. The issue is that this article isn't about the comic, it's about the published version of one of the comic's arcs. All books must be independently notable outside of the series or creator, meaning that it must have several secondary sources to show notability. These can be in the form of reviews from reliable secondary sources, interviews with the creator about the book itself (not about the series as a whole, but this specific book), and tv spots about the book. The creator being notable or the series being notable does not guarantee notability for the individual volumes. The confusing part about this article is that it initially talks like it is about volume 1 of the series, then starts talking about the series as a whole. It would probably help to make the article about the series as a whole rather than the individual volume. Even the more popular and mainstream comic series rarely have entries for individual volumes, so it wouldn't really be a good idea for this to just be about an individual volume. I'll try and see what sources I can find and make it about the series, but I'll warn you that what can be used as a reliable source is pretty harsh. Primary sources (this is anything that is put out by the series' creator or anyone representing him) cannot be used as a source unless there are multiple reliable secondary sources to back up the claims. In other words, there should be so many other sources that using a primary source would be unnecessary and redundant. Indie series usually get a lot of word of mouth around non-notable blogs and other sites that don't count as reliable sources on Wikipedia, so sometimes it can be very difficult to find sources. There's a lot of popular webcomics and indie comics that have a fan following, but don't qualify to be on Wikipedia because of this. Maybe CC will fall into this category, maybe not. In any case, being popular doesn't automatically give the comic the type of notability required by Wikipedia's standards. It makes it more likely to have reliable sources, but not guaranteed to have them. Like I said, I'll see what I can find. I just wanted to clarify things a little.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 08:56, 1 February 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
  • Comment. What I'm finding right now is that this is a self-published series (the comic creator also started the publishing company that is printing them) and that most of the sources I'm finding are blogs. Blogs cannot be used as a reliable source unless it's by someone that's considered to be an absolute authority on the subject, meaning that they're someone who is often quoted in books or are so notable themselves that they'd have articles written about them. Most blogs do not fill this requirement, not even if they've been around for a long time and have a big following. A great example is the book blog "Book Chick City". They've been around forever and have a large number of followers, but still wouldn't be considered a reliable blog source. It's kind of tricky when it comes to that sort of thing, but a good rule of thumb is to look at how the blog is published. If the blog has something like "Blogger", "Wordpress" or the like in the URL or anywhere else in the blog, it shouldn't be linked to. The only exception I've seen is where the ALA has a blog that they run through Blogger. I'm still looking and I'm trying to improve the article, but just existing isn't enough to merit an article. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:20, 1 February 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
  • Merge and redirect to the author's entry, Bart Thompson. I found two sources, one of which is a very brief review of one of the individual comics. The other is an interview that is mostly about the author, but mentions this series as one of his biggest titles. I'm going to merge any of the pertinent information (mostly the interview information) and clean up the author's page a little, putting in some inline citations since everything is on the bottom in EL.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 09:55, 1 February 2012 (UTC)tokyogirl79
  • Delete the page and merge any relevant information as suggested by User:Tokyogirl79. SaveATreeEatAVegan 05:22, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Merge and redirect per Tokyogirl79 SpeakFree (talk)(contribs) 16:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Katrina Stoneheart

Katrina Stoneheart (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View AfD)
(Find sources: "Katrina Stoneheart" – news · books · scholar · free images)

Unremarkable television cartoon character - no notability outside the series, and no significant coverage found for the individual character. Provided sources are not reliable. Tried redirecting to the main series article, but page creator kept reverting, so bringing this here for definitive resolution. MikeWazowski (talk) 23:30, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:44, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 02:17, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
  • delete per nom. "Unremarkable" sums it up best. Andy Dingley (talk) 02:21, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Requested moves, merges, and splits

To edit these sections, see moves, merges, and splits

Requested moves

Proposed merges


Proposed splits

Recent creations

Bot generated

This list was generated from these rules (ruleset version). Questions and feedback are always welcome! The search is being run manually, but eventually will run ~daily with the most recent ~7 days of results.

AlexNewArtBot archives | TedderBot archives | Rules | Match log and errors

Human generated

To edit this section, go to this page


April 2011

August 2010

July 2010

June 2010

Cleanup

Quality

Featured articles

The project has 17 featured articles. 7 of them, or 41.2%, are flagged for cleanup.

Article Maintenance categories
300 (film) «FA» Articles with dead external links (Jan 2009)
Captain Marvel (DC Comics) «FA, High» Articles with dead external links (Oct 2008)
Megatokyo «FA» Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009)
Roy of the Rovers «FA» Articles needing additional references (Aug 2009), Articles with dead external links (Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2009)
Superman (film series) «FA» Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2009)
The Adventures of Tintin «FA, Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008)
Watchmen «FA, High» Articles to be merged (Aug 2009)

Featured lists

The project has 1 featured lists. None of them is flagged for cleanup.

A-Class articles

The project has 2 A-Class articles. None of them is flagged for cleanup.

Good articles

The project has 71 good articles. 7 of them, or 9.9%, are flagged for cleanup.

Article Maintenance categories
Barbara Gordon «GA» Vague or ambiguous time
Clara Elsene Peck «GA» Articles with dead external links (Aug 2009)
Hergé «GA, High» Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2007)
Jyllands-Posten Muhammad cartoons controversy «GA» Cleanup (Jun 2009)
Michigan State University libraries «GA» Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2007)
The Transformers (IDW Publishing) «GA» Articles that may contain original research (Aug 2009)
Wanted (2008 film) «GA» Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009)

Importance

Top-importance articles

The project has 57 top-importance articles. 35 of them, or 61.4%, are flagged for cleanup.

Article Maintenance categories
Alan Moore «Top» Articles with minor POV problems (Mar 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2009)
Alternative comics «Top» Articles lacking sources (Oct 2008)
American comic book «Top» Articles needing additional references (Oct 2007), Articles that may contain original research (Jul 2009), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Apr 2007, Oct 2007, Nov 2007, May 2008, Jun 2009)
Archie Andrews (comics) «Top» Articles needing additional references (Feb 2009), Articles with trivia sections (Jan 2008), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Dec 2007)
Archie Comics «Top» Articles to be split (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Oct 2008)
Carl Barks «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007)
Cartoonist «Top» Articles lacking sources (May 2009)
Cerebus the Aardvark «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2007, Feb 2008, Jul 2008, Feb 2009, Mar 2009, May 2009)
Comics «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2008)
Comics Code Authority «Top» Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2007
Comic book «Top» Articles lacking reliable references (Nov 2007), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Mar 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Oct 2007)
Comic strip «Top» Articles lacking in-text citations (May 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2007, Apr 2008, May 2009)
DC Comics «Top» Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Mar 2009, Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Nov 2007, Dec 2008, Aug 2009)
Dilbert «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Jul 2008)
Doonesbury «Top» Articles needing additional references (Jan 2007), Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2008)
Fantastic Four «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2007, Jan 2009, Feb 2009)
Graphic novel «Top» Articles lacking reliable references (Jun 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (May 2008), Cleanup (Jun 2009), Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Jun 2009), Wikipedia introduction cleanup
Jack Kirby «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2008, Nov 2008, May 2009)
Jean Giraud «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2008)
Justice League «Top» Articles needing additional references (Aug 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Aug 2009), Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (May 2009)
Little Nemo «Top» Articles lacking sources (May 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Mar 2009)
Mad (magazine) «Top» Articles with unsourced statements (May 2009)
Manga «Top» Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2007
Marvel Comics «Top» Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Jun 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2007, Apr 2008, Feb 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009), Current events (Sep 2009)
Osamu Tezuka «Top» Articles needing additional references (Oct 2007), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Mar 2008)
Peanuts «Top» Articles needing additional references (Oct 2008), Articles with dead external links (May 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Jun 2007, Mar 2008)
Penciller «Top» Articles needing additional references (May 2009)
Popeye «Top» Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Jan 2009, Jul 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2007, Apr 2008, Oct 2008, Jan 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009)
Robert Crumb «Top» Articles lacking in-text citations (Apr 2009)
Stan Lee «Top» Articles lacking in-text citations (Jan 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Dec 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Aug 2008, Dec 2008, Jan 2009, Feb 2009, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
The Adventures of Tintin «FA, Top» Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008)
The Family Circus «Top» Articles needing additional references (Apr 2008)
Will Eisner «Top» Articles needing additional references (Mar 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2008, Jul 2009)
Wonder Woman «Top» Articles with dead external links (Oct 2008, Nov 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009)
X-Men «Top» Articles needing additional references (Feb 2007)

High-importance articles

The project has 378 high-importance articles. 214 of them, or 56.6%, are flagged for cleanup. A detailed listing is suppressed due to size restrictions.

Listing by number of categories assigned

Articles with 13 cleanup categories assigned

Article Maintenance categories
Mister Fantastic «High» Articles lacking reliable references (May 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles to be expanded (Dec 2008), Articles with peacock terms, Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2008, Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (May 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (May 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (May 2009)

Articles with 12 cleanup categories assigned

Article Maintenance categories
Sabretooth (comics) Articles needing additional references (Sep 2008, Feb 2009), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with dead external links (Jan 2009, Feb 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Jan 2009, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009), Cleanup (Aug 2007), Comics articles needing issue citations

Articles with 11 cleanup categories assigned

Article Maintenance categories
Green Goblin «High» Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2009, Feb 2009, Apr 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009), Cleanup (Jan 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Jan 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (May 2009), Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (May 2009)

Articles with 10 cleanup categories assigned

Article Maintenance categories
Fictional history of Wolverine Articles lacking reliable references (Apr 2008), Articles needing additional references (Jul 2009), Articles to be expanded (Mar 2009), Articles to be split (Feb 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Feb 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Comics articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction
Juggernaut (comics) Articles needing additional references (Sep 2008), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles to be split (Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Kryptonite «High» Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2007, Feb 2008, Mar 2008, Apr 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2008, Feb 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Mar 2008)
Mystique (comics) Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Mar 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing clarification (Apr 2009), Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Mar 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Mar 2009)
Stan Lee «Top» Articles lacking in-text citations (Jan 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Dec 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Aug 2008, Dec 2008, Jan 2009, Feb 2009, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Super Friends Articles lacking sources (Oct 2008), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Mar 2009), Articles with trivia sections (Oct 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2008, Oct 2008, Jan 2009, Mar 2009, Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing clarification (Mar 2009)
X-Force Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2008), Articles to be expanded (Feb 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, May 2007, Sep 2008), Cleanup (Sep 2008), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Sep 2008), Wikipedia laundry list cleanup

Articles with 9 cleanup categories assigned

Article Maintenance categories
American comic book «Top» Articles needing additional references (Oct 2007), Articles that may contain original research (Jul 2009), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Apr 2007, Oct 2007, Nov 2007, May 2008, Jun 2009)
Beast Wars Neo Articles lacking sources (Aug 2007), Articles that may contain original research (Aug 2007, Sep 2007), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2007), Cleanup (Aug 2007), Transformers articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Aug 2007), Wikipedia laundry list cleanup
Beavis and Butt-head Articles lacking reliable references (Jan 2009), Articles needing additional references (Jan 2009), Articles with sections that need to be turned into prose, Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Jan 2008, Jan 2009, Jun 2009), Cleanup (Jan 2007, Jun 2009)
Brainiac (comics) Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Jul 2008, Oct 2008, Feb 2009, Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Vague or ambiguous time, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Jul 2008, Oct 2008)
Dazzler Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2007, Mar 2008, Apr 2008, Jun 2008, Oct 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Jean Grey «High» Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Jan 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Jun 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Jun 2009)
Krypton (comics) Articles lacking reliable references (Apr 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Jul 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Mar 2009), Articles with too many examples, Articles with unsourced statements (Dec 2006, Feb 2007, Feb 2008, Nov 2008)
Luke Cage Articles needing additional references (Dec 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2008, Oct 2008, Mar 2009, Apr 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Magneto (comics) «High» Articles lacking reliable references (Aug 2009), Articles needing additional references (Dec 2008, Jan 2009), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Jun 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Comics articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Wikipedia articles with incorrect tenses
Nick Fury «High» Articles with trivia sections (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2007, Oct 2007, Aug 2008, Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Popeye «Top» Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Jan 2009, Jul 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2007, Apr 2008, Oct 2008, Jan 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009)
Professor X «High» Articles that may contain original research (Nov 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (Jan 2008, Aug 2009)
She-Hulk Articles needing additional references (Jul 2008), Articles needing more detailed references, Articles with unsourced statements (Jul 2008, Oct 2008, Dec 2008, Apr 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Sovereign Seven Articles lacking sources (Oct 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Oct 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2008, Oct 2008), Cleanup (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Oct 2008), Wikipedia introduction cleanup
Uatu Articles lacking reliable references (May 2009), Articles that may contain original research (May 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with peacock terms, Articles with unsourced statements (May 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (May 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (May 2009)
WildStorm Productions «High» Articles needing additional references (Jun 2007, Aug 2008), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (May 2009, Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Jun 2007, Feb 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009)

Articles with 8 cleanup categories assigned

Article Maintenance categories
Beast (comics) Articles lacking reliable references (Jan 2008), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009, Sep 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (Nov 2008)
Bullseye (comics) Articles to be expanded (Mar 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Dec 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles with incorrect tenses
Comic book «Top» Articles lacking reliable references (Nov 2007), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Mar 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Oct 2007)
Frank Miller (comics) «High» Articles lacking reliable references (Oct 2007, Dec 2008), Articles that may contain original research (Oct 2007), Articles to be expanded (Aug 2007), Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2008, Dec 2008, Jan 2009), BLP articles lacking sources
Kingpin (comics) «High» Articles with dead external links (Oct 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Apr 2009)
Magik (comics) Articles lacking sources (Apr 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2008, Sep 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Cleanup (Mar 2009, Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Nightcrawler (comics) Articles needing additional references (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2007, Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Comics articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction
S.H.I.E.L.D. Articles lacking reliable references (Jan 2009), Articles needing additional references (Jan 2009), Articles with trivia sections (Jul 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Oct 2008, Nov 2008, Jan 2009, Jul 2009)
Silver Surfer «High» Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with dead external links (Aug 2009), Articles with improper non-free content, Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Superhero «High» Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2007), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Mar 2007, Oct 2007, Nov 2007, Jan 2008, Jul 2008, Jan 2009)
Surge (comics) Articles needing additional references (Oct 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2007, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009), Cleanup (Sep 2007), Comics articles needing cleanup, Comics articles needing issue citations
The Cisco Kid Articles to be expanded (Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Aug 2009), Cleanup (Aug 2009), Wikify (Aug 2009), Wikipedia articles needing clarification (Aug 2009), Wikipedia articles needing reorganization, Wikipedia articles needing rewrite (Aug 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Aug 2009)
Thing (comics) «High» Articles needing additional references (Oct 2006), Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2007, Jun 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Tokyopop Articles lacking reliable references (Dec 2007), Articles needing expert attention (Feb 2009), Cleanup (Mar 2007, Dec 2007), Miscellaneous articles needing expert attention, Wikipedia articles in need of updating, Wikipedia articles needing reorganization, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Dec 2007)

Articles with 7 cleanup categories assigned

Article Maintenance categories
A Modest Destiny Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2006, Articles lacking reliable references (Sep 2007), Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2007), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2007), Articles with sections that need to be turned into prose, Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007), Cleanup (Sep 2007)
Black Widow (Marvel Comics) Articles with dead external links (Oct 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Cannonball (comics) Articles lacking reliable references (Jan 2008), Articles needing additional references (Mar 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (Nov 2008)
Electro (Marvel Comics) Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2008, Jan 2009, Apr 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Comics articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction
Forge (comics) Articles with unsourced statements (Jan 2008, Nov 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Hal Jordan «High» Articles lacking reliable references (Aug 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Mar 2009), Articles with dead external links (May 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Mar 2007, Mar 2009), Wikipedia articles needing clarification (Mar 2009)
Jesse Blaze Snider Articles lacking reliable references (Mar 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009, May 2009), Cleanup (Mar 2009), NPOV disputes (Mar 2009), Wikify (Mar 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Mar 2009)
List of characters in Megatokyo Articles lacking reliable references (Jul 2008), Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2008, Dec 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with trivia sections (Feb 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Sep 2008), Cleanup (Jul 2008)
List of DC Multiverse worlds «High» Articles with dead external links (Dec 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (May 2008, Sep 2008, Nov 2008, Aug 2009), Wikipedia articles needing clarification (Jul 2009), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Nov 2008)
List of female comics creators Articles needing additional references (Jan 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2008, Jun 2008, Jul 2008, Aug 2008, Sep 2008), Cleanup (Jan 2009)
List of Green Lanterns Articles lacking sources (Aug 2009), Articles that may contain original research (Feb 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles to be merged (Apr 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Feb 2009)
Manga outside Japan «High» Articles that may contain original research (Jun 2009), Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2009, Jun 2009, Aug 2009), Vague or ambiguous time
Marvel Comics «Top» Articles with specifically-marked weasel-worded phrases (Jun 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Mar 2007, Apr 2008, Feb 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009), Current events (Sep 2009)
Marvel Nemesis: Rise of the Imperfects (comics) Articles lacking reliable references (Oct 2008), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Cleanup (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Oct 2008), Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (Oct 2008), Wikipedia introduction cleanup
Mary Jane Watson «High» Articles lacking in-text citations (Oct 2008), Articles needing additional references (Mar 2008, Jul 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing style editing (Apr 2008), Wikipedia articles with plot summary needing attention (Apr 2009)
Meggan Articles needing additional references (Sep 2008), Articles that may contain original research (Sep 2009), Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2009, Apr 2009, Sep 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
One Year Later Articles lacking reliable references (Aug 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Apr 2009, May 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
Rachel Summers Articles needing additional references (Apr 2009, May 2009), Articles that need to differentiate between fact and fiction, Articles with unsourced statements (Nov 2008, Jul 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations, Wikipedia articles needing copy edit (Jun 2009)
Reboot (fiction) Accuracy disputes (Apr 2009), Articles needing additional references (Oct 2007, Dec 2007, May 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Apr 2009, May 2009, Jun 2009)
Richard Branson Articles with dead external links (Mar 2009), Articles with unsourced statements (Feb 2007, Apr 2007, Jun 2007, Jul 2007, Oct 2008, Aug 2009)
Rogue (comics) Articles to be expanded (Sep 2008), Articles with unsourced statements (Oct 2008, Apr 2009, May 2009, Jul 2009, Aug 2009), Comics articles needing issue citations
X-Men: The Manga Articles lacking sources (Oct 2008), Articles to be expanded (Jul 2008, Oct 2008), Articles with sections that need to be turned into prose, Cleanup (Apr 2007, Oct 2008), Wikify (Jun 2008)
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Notice_board&oldid=409356299"
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Interaction
Toolbox
Print/export