Wikipedia:WikiProject Conservatism/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
  Main   Talk   Portal   Showcase   Assessment   Collaboration   Incubator   Guide   Newsroom   About Us   Commons  
Shortcut:

Article assessment involves determining the quality and importance of articles within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work, and are also expected to play a role in the Version 1.0 Editorial Team program. The article review processes provide constructive criticism which is used by editors to improve articles.

Contents

Requests[edit]

All requests are posted to the project noticeboard here.

Assessment

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new quality and/or importance rating for it, please feel free click the button. This will result in an assessment rating of Stub, Start, C or B, but not usually feedback. For article feedback see Wikipedia:Article feedback.


Peer review

There is a tool available for semi-automated peer review. For more information see User:AndyZ/peerreviewer/guide. Peer review is intended for high-quality articles that have already undergone extensive work. To obtain an informal peer review of an article you must first nominate it here: Wikipedia:Peer review. To request that members review the article click the button:


Good article

To have an article reviewed for Good article class first nominate it here: Wikipedia:Good article nominations. To request that a member review the article click the button:


Featured article

To request that members review an article for Featured article first nominate it here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates. Then click the button:


Instructions[edit]

Quality assessment[edit]

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Conservatism}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Conservatism|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Conservatism articles) Featured article FA 
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Conservatism articles) A-Class article A 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Conservatism articles)  GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Conservatism articles) B-Class article B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Conservatism articles) C-Class article C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Conservatism articles) Start-Class article Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Conservatism articles) Stub-Class article Stub 
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Conservatism articles) Featured list FL 
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Conservatism articles)  List 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

Book (for Wikipedia books; adds pages to Category:Book-Class Conservatism articles) Wikipedia Book Book 
Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Conservatism articles) Category page Category 
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Conservatism articles) Disambiguation page Disambig 
Draft (for drafts; adds pages to Category:Draft-Class Conservatism articles)  Draft 
FM (for files; adds pages to Category:FM-Class Conservatism articles) Featured media FM 
File (for files; adds pages to Category:File-Class Conservatism articles)  File 
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class Conservatism articles) Redirect page Redirect 
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Conservatism articles)  Portal 
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Conservatism articles)  Project 
Template (for templates; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Conservatism articles)  Template 
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Conservatism articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Conservatism articles)  ??? 

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Conservatism}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Conservatism|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project:

Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Conservatism articles)  Top 
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Conservatism articles)  High 
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Conservatism articles)  Mid 
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Conservatism articles)  Low 
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Conservatism articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Conservatism articles  ??? 

The importance parameter should be assigned according to the importance scale below.

Importance scale[edit]

WikiProject article importance scheme

Statistics[edit]

Quality assessment: 68.5% complete
Importance assessment: 55.8% complete
Conservatism article rating and assessment scheme
(NB: Listing, Log & Stats are updated on a daily basis by a bot)
Daily log of status changes
Current Statistics

Index · Statistics · Log · Update

Assessment log

May 26, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 25, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 23, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 22, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 21, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 20, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Ion Mihai Pacepa (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Metapedia (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

May 19, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Kate Obenshain (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Mona Charen (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

May 18, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 17, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Michael Ashcroft (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 16, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Theodore Beale (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Removed[edit]

May 15, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Lemuel Boulware (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

May 13, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Oliver North (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t).
  • Zionism (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

  • James Gattuso (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

May 12, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 11, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 10, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Michael Ashcroft (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Steve Laffey (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Removed[edit]

May 9, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 7, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 6, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 5, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 3, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 2, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 1, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 29, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 28, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Matt Kibbe (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • Micky Hammon (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

April 27, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 25, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 24, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 23, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Larry Kawa (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

April 21, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 20, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 17, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 16, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 15, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 13, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 12, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 9, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Sean Fieler (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

April 8, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 7, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Steve Hilton (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

April 4, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 3, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Reports


Former featured articles

Paul BremerTom BrinkmanUnited States ConstitutionBruce Johnson (Ohio politician)John MajorPolitical correctnessRead my lips: no new taxesNicolas SarkozyJean SchmidtMargaret ThatcherDaniel WebsterZionism

Former good articles

Edmund BurkeCapitalismRobert Stewart, Viscount CastlereaghWinston ChurchillDeath panelRush LimbaughMichigan Republican PartyRape and pregnancy controversies in United States elections, 2012Condoleezza Rice


Templates[edit]

  • WikiProject Conservatism (Talkpage banner), for all articles which fall within the scope of this project:

{{WikiProject Conservatism|class=|importance=}}

WikiProject Conservatism  
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
 ???  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 

Stubs[edit]

Currently there are no conservatism stubs, identification of stubs is accomplished by setting class=stub in the banner. This categorizes article talk pages into Category:Stub-Class Conservatism articles. Politics stub templates can also be useful. The stub for a politician is {{Poli-bio-stub}} and a political organization is {{poli-org-stub}}. See WP:WikiProject Conservatism/Templates for more stubs.