Wikipedia:WikiProject Country Music/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Index · Statistics · Log
Shortcut:

Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Country Music! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Country Music related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Country Music}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Country Music articles by quality and Category:Country Music articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Country Music WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

Quality assessment[edit]

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Country Music}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Country Music|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Country Music articles) Featured article FA 
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Country Music articles) A-Class article A 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Country Music articles)  GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Country Music articles) B-Class article B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Country Music articles) C-Class article C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Country Music articles) Start-Class article Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Country Music articles) Stub-Class article Stub 
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Country Music articles) Featured list FL 
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Country Music articles)  List 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

Book (for Wikipedia books; adds pages to Category:Book-Class Country Music articles) Wikipedia Book Book 
Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Country Music articles) Category page Category 
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Country Music articles) Disambiguation page Disambig 
File (for files; adds pages to Category:File-Class Country Music articles)  File 
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class Country Music articles) Redirect page Redirect 
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Country Music articles)  Portal 
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Country Music articles)  Project 
Template (for templates; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Country Music articles)  Template 
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Country Music articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Country Music articles)  ??? 

Quality scale[edit]

The scale for assessments is defined at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment. Articles are divided into the following categories.

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Country Music}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Country Music|importance=???}}

The following values may be used for the importance parameter to describe the relative importance of the article within the project:

Top (adds articles to Category:Top-importance Country Music articles)  Top 
High (adds articles to Category:High-importance Country Music articles)  High 
Mid (adds articles to Category:Mid-importance Country Music articles)  Mid 
Low (adds articles to Category:Low-importance Country Music articles)  Low 
NA (adds articles to Category:NA-importance Country Music articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid importance rating has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unknown-importance Country Music articles  ??? 

The importance parameter should be assigned according to the importance scale below.

Importance scale[edit]

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Country Music.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

WikiProject article importance scheme

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. Please note that an importance rating may not be given in some cases if the reviewer is unfamiliar with the subject.

If you assess an article, please strike it off using <s>Strike-through text</s> so that other editors will not waste time going there too. Thanks!

Quality log[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

April 17, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • For a Boy (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • God Made Girls (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • RaeLynn (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

April 16, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 14, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 13, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • 24/7 (2Yoon song) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Redirect-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Mid-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

April 11, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Texas Ruby (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

April 9, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 8, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 5, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 4, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 3, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Wally Brandt (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

April 2, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Lester Flatt (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

April 1, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 30, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 29, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 28, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Ilse DeLange (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

March 27, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Jeff Dayton (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

March 26, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 25, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 24, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Mickey Guyton (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

March 23, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 21, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 18, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 17, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Eric Paslay (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

March 16, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 15, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 13, 2015[edit]

Removed[edit]

March 11, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 9, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 8, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Eric Uglum (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

March 7, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 5, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 4, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 1, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 28, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 26, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 25, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 23, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 22, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 21, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 19, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 18, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 17, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 13, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 12, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 10, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

February 8, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 7, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 6, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • 35 MPH Town (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

February 5, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 4, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Hoot Hester (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

February 3, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 1, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 29, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 27, 2015[edit]

Assessed[edit]