Wikipedia:WikiProject Creationism/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to the assessment department of the Creationism WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about the Creationism and related topics. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Creationism}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Creationism articles by quality and Category:Creationism articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Creationism WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Creationism}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Creationism
|class=  
|importance=
|attention=
|needs-infobox=
|small= 
|Intelligent design=
|Intelligent design-importance=
|Young Earth creationism=
|Young Earth creationism-importance=
}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Creationism articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance scale[edit]

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of the Caribbean.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Status Template Meaning of Status
Top {{Top-Class}} This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information.
High {{High-Class}} This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge.
Mid {{Mid-Class}} This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas.
Low {{Low-Class}} This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia.
None None This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed.

Importance assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Creationism}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Creationism| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

We are currently discussing which articles should be counted as being of Top-importance at Wikipedia:WikiProject Creationism/Assessment/Top-importance articles.

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

Louisiana Science Education Act Zack Kopplin

Assessment log[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.


November 17, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 7, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 3, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Creationist (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as NA-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as NA-Class (rev · t).

August 21, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 14, 2014[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 6, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 20, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 19, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 18, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 15, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 25, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 22, 2014[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 11, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 9, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Jan Peczkis (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

December 28, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 18, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Tom Bethell (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

December 16, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 14, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 6, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 5, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 22, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Paul Chien (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

November 15, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 13, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 29, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 18, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 2, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 25, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 24, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 27, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Chuck Missler (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

May 19, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 8, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 8, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 19, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 23, 2013[edit]

Removed[edit]

March 7, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 26, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • The Mysterious Islands (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to NA-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).

February 22, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 18, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 5, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 22, 2013[edit]

Removed[edit]

January 4, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 26, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 14, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 4, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 30, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 4, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 22, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 5, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Alan Hayward (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Gap creationism (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Harry Rimmer (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

August 25, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 12, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 11, 2012[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 14, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 8, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 31, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 24, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

May 15, 2012[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • From the Dust (talk) removed. Quality rating was Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

April 30, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • From the Dust (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

April 25, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 20, 2012[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 16, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Scopes Trial (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from High-Class to Top-Class (rev · t).

April 15, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 13, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 12, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 11, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 8, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 17, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 6, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 29, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 19, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 4, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 24, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 24, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 19, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 17, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 31, 2011[edit]

Removed[edit]

December 19, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 9, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Reason in the Balance (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to NA-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from High-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).

December 5, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 2, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 27, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 22, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 18, 2011[edit]

Removed[edit]

November 16, 2011[edit]

Removed[edit]

November 13, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 11, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 18, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 14, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 13, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 15, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 10, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 2, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 9, 2011[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 8, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Rick Perry (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

August 2, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 31, 2011[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 26, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 25, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 22, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 15, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 10, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 29, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • C. John Collins (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to NA-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).

May 22, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Worklist[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

This page was once used by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team. It is preserved because of the information in its edit history. This page should not be edited or deleted. Wikiproject article lists can be generated using the WP 1.0 web tool.