Wikipedia:WikiProject Energy/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to the assessment department of the Energy WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about Energy or the people of Energy. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Energy}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Energy articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Energy WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Energy}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Energy
|class=
|attention=
|collaboration-candidate=
|past-collaboration=
|peer-review= 
|old-peer-review=
|needs-infobox=
}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed energy articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

Assessment log[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

August 28, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • ETRR-2 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Removed[edit]

August 27, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 26, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 25, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 24, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 23, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 22, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 21, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 20, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 19, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 18, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 17, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 16, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 15, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Worklist[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

This page was once used by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team. It is preserved because of the information in its edit history. This page should not be edited or deleted. Wikiproject article lists can be generated using the WP 1.0 web tool.