Wikipedia:WikiProject Hertfordshire/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search


Contents

Quality scale[edit]

]

Article progress grading scheme [
Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Featured article FA
{{FA-Class}}
Reserved exclusively for articles that have received "Featured article" status, and meet the current criteria for featured articles. Definitive. Outstanding, thorough article; a great source for encyclopedic information. No further editing is necessary unless new published information has come to light; but further improvements to the text are often possible. Tourette Syndrome (as of July 2007)
A-Class article A
{{A-Class}}
Provides a well-written, reasonably clear and complete description of the topic, as described in How to write a great article. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, with a well-written introduction and an appropriate series of headings to break up the content. It should have sufficient external literature references, preferably from reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy (peer-reviewed where appropriate). Should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. At the stage where it could at least be considered for featured article status, corresponds to the "Wikipedia 1.0" standard. Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject matter would typically find nothing wanting. May miss a few relevant points. Minor edits and adjustments would improve the article, particularly if brought to bear by a subject-matter expert. In particular, issues of breadth, completeness, and balance may need work. Peer-review would be helpful at this stage. Durian (as of March 2007)
GA
{{GA-Class}}
The article has passed through the Good article nomination process and been granted GA status, meeting the good article standards. This should be used for articles that still need some work to reach featured article standards, but that are otherwise acceptable. Good articles that may succeed in FAC should be considered A-Class articles, but having completed the Good article designation process is not a requirement for A-Class. Useful to nearly all readers. A good treatment of the subject. No obvious problems, gaps, excessive information. Adequate for most purposes, but other encyclopedias could do a better job. Some editing will clearly be helpful, but not necessary for a good reader experience. If the article is not already fully wikified, now is the time. International Space Station (as of February 2007)
B
{{B-Class}}
Commonly the highest article grade that is assigned outside a more formal review process. Has several of the elements described in "start", usually a majority of the material needed for a comprehensive article. Nonetheless, it has some gaps or missing elements or references, needs editing for language usage and/or clarity, balance of content, or contains other policy problems such as copyright, Neutral Point Of View (NPOV) or No Original Research (NOR). With NPOV a well written B-class may correspond to the "Wikipedia 0.5" or "usable" standard. Articles that are close to GA status but don't meet the Good article criteria should be B- or Start-class articles. Useful to many, but not all, readers. A casual reader flipping through articles would feel that they generally understood the topic, but a serious student or researcher trying to use the material would have trouble doing so, or would risk error in derivative work. Considerable editing is still needed, including filling in some important gaps or correcting significant policy errors. Articles for which cleanup is needed will typically have this designation to start with. Munich air disaster (as of May 2006) has a lot of helpful material but contains too many lists, and needs more prose content and references.
Start
{{Start-Class}}
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas, and may lack a key element. For example an article on Africa might cover the geography well, but be weak on history and culture. Has at least one serious element of gathered materials, including any one of the following:
  • a particularly useful picture or graphic
  • multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic
  • a subheading that fully treats an element of the topic
  • multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article
Useful to some, provides a moderate amount of information, but many readers will need to find additional sources of information. The article clearly needs to be expanded. Substantial/major editing is needed, most material for a complete article needs to be added. This article still needs to be completed, so an article cleanup tag is inappropriate at this stage. Real analysis (as of November 2006)
Stub
{{Stub-Class}}
The article is either a very short article or a rough collection of information that will need much work to bring it to A-Class level. It is usually very short, but can be of any length if the material is irrelevant or incomprehensible. Possibly useful to someone who has no idea what the term meant. May be useless to a reader only passingly familiar with the term. At best a brief, informed dictionary definition. Any editing or additional material can be helpful. Coffee table book (as of July 2005)

Usage instructions

  • Code below is for customizing the template for a specific WikiProject. Fields are optional, and will default to generic examples if left blank.
  • Specifying the Project field will link the class labels to the appropriate quality category in the given project in the format "FA-Class Project articles".
  • Specifying article class examples will display the provided text in the example for the given quality.
  • The rows for List, Template, Dab, Cat, and NA will not be displayed unless a value is specified for the desired parameter.

Copy & paste

{{Grading scheme
|Project          =
|FA_example       =
|A_example        =
|GA_example       =
|B_example        =
|Start_example    =
|Stub_example     =
|List_example     =
|Template_example =
|Dab_example      =
|Cat_example      =
|NA_example       =
|}}

Importance scale[edit]

For now, this will use the Wikipedia version 0.5 importance scale, as modified by the discussion at [1].

Top Subject is fundamental to Herts or of significant international interest
High Subject is of significant national interest and/ or impact
Mid Subject is of interest/ impact beyond its local area
Low The subject is of interest within its local area or subject
None Unassessed, importance still to be determined

Log[edit]

September 18, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 17, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 16, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Minette Walters (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

September 14, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 6, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 5, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 2, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 31, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 30, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 26, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 25, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 21, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 20, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 19, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 18, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 17, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 14, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 13, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 9, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 6, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Billy Law (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

August 4, 2014[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 1, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Corus Hotels (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

July 29, 2014[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Billy Law (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

July 26, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 20, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 12, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 10, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 5, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 4, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 1, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 30, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Jack Midson (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

June 28, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 25, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 24, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 21, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 20, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

June 18, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 16, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Craig Westcarr (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

June 11, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 7, 2014[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 5, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Ashridge Business School (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Royston Cave (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

June 4, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • River Quin (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 2, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 29, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 27, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 26, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 25, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 24, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 20, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 19, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 16, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 15, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 6, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 29, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Anthony Berkeley Cox (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).
  • Johnny Douglas (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

April 27, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 25, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Don Anthony (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

April 23, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 13, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 11, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • River Beane (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

April 10, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • River Lynch (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

March 28, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Mark Halsey (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Joe Davison (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

March 23, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 17, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 16, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Marlon King (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

March 15, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Jack English (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

March 13, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Frank McPherson (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from C-Class to B-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

March 11, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 10, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 9, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 4, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 2, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 23, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 19, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 12, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 8, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 31, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 30, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Aqueduct Lock (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

January 26, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Mary Portas (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

January 23, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • David Gauke (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

January 21, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Luisa Zissman (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

January 19, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 16, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Ray Cooper (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Removed[edit]

January 14, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Amphibalus (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

January 13, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 12, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 10, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 9, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 7, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 2, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Dean Incent's House (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from NA-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

December 30, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]