PROD. Subject does not appear notable (unremarkable competition record); some sources are: 1, 2, 3, and 4. CSD(A7) might be a possibility. Janggeom (talk) 01:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
PROD removed, would support AfD PROD was removed by editor claiming subject is notable. Papaursa (talk) 12:59, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep This BLP in unreferenced, but my search shows he seems to have notability in Australia. Papaursa (talk) 22:48, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. (Improve.) I would make the same comments here as in a past discussion; in short: I believe notability could be established through printed Australian sources. Janggeom (talk) 01:12, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak AfD unless the books referenced in the article contain significant coverage. If so, or if someone finds other coverage, then the article should be kept. I found the term "model mugging" in articles not related to her. Papaursa (talk) 22:48, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
comment I cannot find anything online. I have sent a message to the original author of the article. jmcw (talk) 11:57, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep I did not find a third-party reference linking her with Model Mugging. I did find a reference to her presidency. She seems a respectable teacher in a respectable organization - I would recommend to leave this article as not being clearly fluff. jmcw (talk) 11:34, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Uncertain As a martial artist there's no reason to keep the article, but I'm not sure about his alleged criminal activities. Papaursa (talk) 22:48, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak AFD I corrected the information in the article. He had 2 good placings in the European judo championships--2nd in 1969 and 3rd in 1970. I don't think that's quite enough to pass WP:Athlete, but others may feel differently. Papaursa (talk) 22:48, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Being mentioned in the Encyclopaedia Britannica is good enough for me. I added text and sourcing plus I removed the notability tag from the article. Papaursa (talk) 20:21, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD I just removed material that was a copyright violation. Even with that material he failed WP:GNG and WP:MANOTE. Papaursa (talk) 20:34, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak AfD He was a medalist at the Commonwealth fencing championships. This is another one that I'd say doesn't quite meet the notability guidelines, but suspect others will disagree. Papaursa (talk) 20:21, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
'Keep as not clearly fluff. jmcw (talk) 09:49, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD Can find no third party references, but there appear to be a lot of English clubs assoicated with it. Papaursa (talk) 22:48, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I added a reference - I believe this article could be improved. jmcw (talk) 09:49, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD unless all professional boxers are notable. The article consists of his boxing record and a description of his loss on The Contender television show. Papaursa (talk) 20:21, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD With only 7 fights since 2007, it's unlikely he meets the WP:N criterium of "fully professional". Papaursa (talk) 23:28, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
AfD since the notability guidelines say routine sports coverage is not sufficient for a standalone article. Papaursa (talk) 23:09, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
