Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Requests for assessment[edit]


If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below. Requests for formal A-Class review should be made at the review department. B-Class requests are assessed using the five B-class criteria(FAQ). Please consider entering articles you have worked on in the military history article writing contest.

  • T48 Gun Motor Carriage I want another review for this, which I improved massively. Please assess against B-class Criteria. Cheers, Tomandjerry211 (talk) 22:03, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
    • Start class. Let me get this clear. They produced 962. Of which 650 were supplied to the USSR. Britain took 30, the US the remaining 281. One disappeared into the Twilight Zone. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:48, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
    • B class, and nice work Nick-D (talk) 01:43, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
  • M13 Half-track Fixed Problems and want another assessment. Cheers, Tomandjerry211 (talk) 18:29, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
The discrepancy between use only at Anzio and use in the Battle of the Bulge remains in the lead. American sources are cited for the weight and power to weight ratio, which both use tonnes as the unit of measure. I presume the American source used tons, and since you also cite this information to a British source, I can't tell if you performed a conversion to metric tons from US tons. As an American combat vehicle, these should be stated in tons. (i.e. 2000 pounds, not 1000 kilos). Cheers. --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:28, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
I noticed a typo in this and the M13 (others?) where the compression ratio is stated as 6:3:1. That should be expressed as 6.3:1. --Lineagegeek (talk) 00:32, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Rodney Mundy Another Admiral of the Fleet. Please update assessment. Thanks. Dormskirk (talk) 23:03, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
  • T30 Howitzer Motor CarriageWant assessment against B-class Criteria. Thanks, Tomandjerry211 (talk) 20:34, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Collins-class submarine replacement project - Requesting an independent assessment against the B-class criteria, and (if necessary) any suggestions for improvement. -- saberwyn 01:04, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
    • B class. I'm not an expert of this topic so unfortunately I can't give you much help here, although the article appears to cover the subject fairly well for me. Perhaps request a Peer Review if you would like to receive suggestions for improvement? All the best. Anotherclown (talk) 08:49, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
      • Thanks very much, Anotherclown. The request for suggestions was more if it failed to meed the B-class criteria, so no further action required. -- saberwyn 10:39, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
  • No. 30 Transport Unit RAAF -- expanded from stub, the last of the new or improved articles I'm working on for a potential Good Topic on No. 91 (Composite) Wing in Korea. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 07:01, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Australian Army during World War I - rewritten. Pls assess for B. Also if you have any cmts for further development that would be appreciated also. Anotherclown (talk) 09:42, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
    B class Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:06, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Benjamin Franklin Graves. Just noticed that this article I created in 2011 got a Start Class Assessment in 2013, would welcome another look at it. Knowing the information & references available on this person do not know what else could be improved. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 20:18, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
    B class Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:06, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Battle of Grandreng - French Revolutionary Wars. Please assess for B class. Thanks. Djmaschek (talk) 03:20, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Please also check the military history assessment backlog for articles needing assessment.