Wikipedia:WikiProject Mixed martial arts/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to the assessment department of the Mixed martial arts WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's mixed martial arts articles. The resulting article ratings are used within the project to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work, and are also expected to play a role in the WP:1.0 program,

The assessment is done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Mixed Martial Arts}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Martial arts articles by quality, which serve as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

For more information on assessment, see the general assessment FAQ.

Assessment instructions[edit]

An article's assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Mixed Martial Arts}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Mixed Martial Arts| ... | class=??? | ...}}

The following values may be used:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed mixed martial arts articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Current status[edit]


Log[edit]

The full log of assessment changes for the past thirty days is available here. Unfortunately, due to its extreme size, it cannot be transcluded directly.

Requests for assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

B.J. Penn's page as well as Anderson Silva's page probably could use a reassessment. A few of us have been making semi-significant changes and contributions. I think BJ's page is probably up to B quality now. In any case we could use a reassessment as well as some suggestions for what we need to do to get all the way to A quality. Thanks in advance Floodo1 (talk) 20:45, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

B.J. Penn is up to be in my view, I've added the an 'auto peer review' which can be a use full step before WP:Peer Review and the trying fot WP:GA both look well on the way. --Nate1481 12:13, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Matt Hughes' s page probably could use a reassessment. I've made significant changes, expanding the article and adding pictures. Please give me some suggestions for what I need to do to get the A quality. I improved the article, reaching 135 references and 8 pictures. LlamaAl (talk)