Wikipedia:WikiProject Peru/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Peru
National Flag of Peru
Coat of Arms of the Republic of Peru
Location of Peru in South America
IRC
#wikipedia-en-wpperu
Main pages
Main project talk
Peru portal talk
New articles talk
Cleanup articles talk
Nuvola apps kedit.png Peer review talk
Deletion talk
Peru related ACID
Article improvement drive talk
  Previous collaborations talk
  Featured collaborations talk
  Previous nominations talk
Peru Assessment
Assessment department talk
  Assessment bot log talk
Task forces
Translation project talk
Images task force talk
Maps task force talk
Congressional project talk
Other
Outreach talk
Template list talk
Category structure talk
Notability criteria talk
External links talk

Welcome to the assessment department of the Peru WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Peru related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{PeruProjectBanner}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Peru articles by quality and Category:Peru articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Peru WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

Quality assessments[edit]

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Peru}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Peru|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Peru articles) Featured article FA 
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Peru articles) A-Class article A 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Peru articles)  GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Peru articles) B-Class article B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Peru articles) C-Class article C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Peru articles) Start-Class article Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Peru articles) Stub-Class article Stub 
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Peru articles) Featured list FL 
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Peru articles)  List 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Peru articles) Category page Category 
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Peru articles) Disambiguation page Disambig 
File (for files; adds pages to Category:File-Class Peru articles)  File 
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Peru articles)  Portal 
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Peru articles)  Project 
Template (for templates; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Peru articles)  Template 
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Peru articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Peru articles)  ??? 

After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added either to the article's talk page or to the /Comments subpage which will appear as a link next to the assessment. Adding comments will add the article to Category:Peru articles with comments. Comments that are added to the /Comments subpages will be transcluded onto the automatically generated work list pages in the Comments column.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{PeruProjectBanner}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Peru| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale[edit]

Label Criteria Examples
Top See Criteria for Top classification Peru, Culture of Peru, Lima
High Topics that are very notable within Peru, and not unheard of outside of it, and can be reasonably expected to be included in any print encyclopedia Trujillo, National University of San Marcos
Mid Topics that are reasonably notable on a national level within Peru without necessarily being famous or very notable internationally
Low Topics of mostly local interest or those that are only included for complete coverage or as examples of a higher-level topic; peripheral or trivial topics

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.


Mariano Iberico Rodríguez[edit]

I translated and added significant amounts of information to this article. As an important historical figure I think this article should be assessed. Ibrmrn (talk) 17:32, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Agree The article should now be a start-class given the amount of information. It needs sources, nonetheless.
Disagree Importance has been set to "low" given the lack of information to demonstrate how notable the person truly is. Regards.--MarshalN20 | Talk 03:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Monastery of San Francisco, Lima[edit]

I've made some descriptive additions, divided the article into titles, and added several more references. While the article is still not detailed, I request to see whether it is still a stub. sweetsunray (talk) 16:30, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Agree I made it a "Mid" importance article and raised its status to "start" class.--MarshalN20 | Talk 02:58, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Paracas[edit]

I've made some descriptive additions to the top of the page but the main problem with this page is that it uses the Disambiguation template and category and does not represent Paracas (the municipality) and it's importance as a tourism destination. Indeed, in the list of Disambiguation, it is even compared to toilet paper. Please excuse my omission of reference for the population number - I will have it confirmed this same day. It is my hope that we can create a new Paracas(disambiguation) page and permit the Paracas page to represent the town as I feel it should. I do not have the permissions, beyond editing existing pages, to create pages or change templates and categories and I rely on others with these permissions to do so please. Thank you. Rein Petersen (talk) 16:30, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Chalaca[edit]

I've helped greatly improve the Peruvian section, and other parts, of this article. I believe this to be a subject of mid to high importance as it relates to the sports history of Peru. The class currently stands as un-rated, and according to another project it is valued as a "start" class, but that rating was done long ago and I've also recently submited a change in rating from that project. I personall view the article as "B" class. It can't be considered a start class since it has several citations and improvements. Thanks in advance.--MarshalN20 (talk) 23:12, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Tourism in Peru[edit]

I created the Tourism in Peru article and I think it should be assessed as it is an article of great importantance. Also, I do not think that it has potential to become one of the better articles related to Peru. Nevertheless, I think it should be improved on as it is an important Peru-related article. Vivaperucarajo (talk) 22:38, 11 June 2008 (UTC)

Assessed as high importance, start class. It needs much more references and a lot of copyediting. --Victor12 (talk) 19:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Peru national football team[edit]

The content of the page has been greatly improved since the last check which gave it a "B rating." When currently looking at the Peru national football team page and comparing it to other national football team pages in Wikipedia, a major difference can be seen in favor of the structure and content of the Peruvian article. I do not think the article is still ready to be classified as an "A" article (Some grammar revisions are needed), but I think that as of now the article deserves a "GA" rating. Just to further prove my point, prior to the many edits done to the article, several of the information was unsourced, the structure of the article was messy, the grammar was horrible, and the topics were few and sometimes irrelevant. Now, several parts of the article that needed citation now have them, the structure of the article is relevant to the subject and easy to read, and the grammar only has a few minor errors.--MarshalN20 (talk) 14:48, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Have you checked the suggestions at Wikipedia:WikiProject Peru/Peer review#Peru national football team? It seems to me some work is still required to achieve GA status, specially regarding references. --Victor12 (talk) 16:18, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
I have attempted to follow the structure of the Scotland national football team article, but did not want to completely copy the article. I believe that the Peruvian article stands strong by this point and deserves a rating above the B class. However, since I have been the major contributor to the article (only by this point and time; meaning that I don't want to sound as owner of the article), in order to follow the rules of Wikipedia I would like for the article to be reviewed and given a higher rating (if possible).--[|!*//MarshalN20\\*!|] (talk) 22:19, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Well, the article made it to GA status. However, by this point I think the article is good enough to be judged an "A" class article. In order for this "A" rating to be official, I would need for someone from the project to make another review. There's no major problems with the article, perhaps some minor details that could be fixed, so a review would not be hard at all.--[|!*//MarshalN20\\*!|] (talk) 23:37, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Hmmm... we haven't implemented A-class reviews in this wikiproject just yet but if you're confident enough about the article you can take it to WP:FAC to see if it is accepted as one of Wikipedia's featured articles. Just be sure to check it against featured article criteria first, these are described at WP:FACR. --Victor12 (talk) 00:04, 12 June 2009 (UTC)

Universitario de Deportes[edit]

I have increased the content of the article since it was last reviewed by the Peru Wikiproject and would like another review. --MicroX 02:07, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

The article is currently tagged as B class which seems to be appropiate per Wikipedia:WikiProject Peru/Assessment#Quality scale. There are still some areas which can be improved, specially referencing and copyediting. For further improvement you might want to ask for a peer review by members from this wikiproject. You can do so at Wikipedia:WikiProject Peru/Peer review. --Victor12 02:27, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Machu Picchu[edit]

I think as many others that the article Machu Picchu might be in the Top-class scale. There are many reasons, like that it is on of the main icon of Peruvian culture. The article is include in Template:Peru topics, so it has more that high importance. Also in the Wikiproject about South America, the assessment scale is Top. Please, I claim for the change: Machu Picchu (High Importance) to Machu Picchu (Top).--Kanon6917 23:27, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Done. --Victor12 23:58, 30 August 2007 (UTC)


Clarinda (poet)[edit]

and

Academia Antártica[edit]

These are related articles that I wrote (from scratch) in October 2009. The first is about a Peruvian poet who is becoming increasingly more famous for her proto-feminist (maybe) poem "Discurso en loor de la poesía", which she published under the pseudonym "Clarinda". The second is about the literary group to which she and several other colonial-era poets belonged. I have referenced many reliable sources. Not sure how to add these to the Project Peru catalogue and receive ratings for them. Thanks. elDustado 05:12, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

Agricultural history of Peru[edit]

I recently added some references to this article and expanded on the significance of Peruvian guano in the nation's agricultural history. The article is currently rated stub class, which, by looking at the amount of text alone, I think definitely does not apply anymore. The article has 5 sources, albeit most of them are about the guano. The article still does need more references and a user pointed out on the discussion page, it still could use expansion. However, I feel that this article has outgrown stub class and is a start-class, or possible C-class article. Thank you for reviewing this article. Altamel (talk) 16:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Agree I have assessed it as a "C" class article. Regards.--MarshalN20 | Talk 02:48, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Pisco Sour[edit]

Massive update done to it by me. I believe it meets (at least) GA-class at this point (when compared to Caesar (cocktail)). If anyone from the project can provide a look to it, help improve it, etc., please come by and help out. Regards.--MarshalN20 | Talk 02:51, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Assessment log[edit]

The text below is transcluded from Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Peru articles by quality log

Peru articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a weekly basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

March 5, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

March 4, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

March 3, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 2, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

March 1, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

February 28, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

February 27, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

February 26, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

February 25, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

  • Aqu Q'asa (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Kisu Qutu (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Lemon drop pepper (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Muntirayuq (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Pachak Pata (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Q'illu Pachaka (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Sisiwa (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • T'alla Kallanka (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Wank'ayuq Saywa (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Willkarana (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Yawriwiri (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

February 24, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

February 23, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

February 22, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

February 21, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Vitcos (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

February 20, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Andean Community (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Huaynaputina (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

  • Aqu Suntu (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Chhijmuni (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Chunta (Peru) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Kuntur K'uchu (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Puka Suntu (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Rumi Urqu (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Thujsa (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Tintaya (Arequipa) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Wachu Willka (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Wayta Urqu (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Yuraq Rumi (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

February 19, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

February 18, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

February 17, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

February 16, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

February 15, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

February 14, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

February 13, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Awqa Urqu (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Qarwa K'anti (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Qarwa Urqu (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Wachu Intiyuq (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

February 12, 2015[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

February 11, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

February 10, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

February 9, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

February 8, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Chullpa (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Low-Class to Unknown-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

February 7, 2015[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]