Wikipedia:WikiProject Contributor clean-up/Qworty

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Qworty clean-up[edit]

This sub-page is intended for clean-up of the editing performed by Qworty and his sock accounts.

Instructions[edit]

Please choose any of the articles that have not been cleared. After you have reviewed Qworty's changes and made any necessary corrections, <s>strike through</s> the entire listed article and diffs; indent a comment underneath indicating that you are done; summarize what action, if any, was needed; sign with 4 tildes ~~~~. To avoid duplicating effort you may want to begin by indenting a comment that you are "working" the selected title. Please use a good edit summary on any article that you edited as a result of these checks to summarize your action.

Note: Edits made by Qworty should not simply be reverted, and unsourced contentious information should not be added back into biographies, especially BLPs. Non-contentious information may be reinstated if no attempt was made to request citations and these should have a {{cn}} tag added.

These reports (now split across 4 pages), cover contributions to 2448 articles by User:Qworty from timestamp 2007-03-11 09:30:41 UTC to timestamp 2013-05-12 00:24:59 UTC and 92 articles edited by socks of his control.

When all articles in a given section are finished, please consider adding {{cot|Section completed ~~~~}} below the section header and {{cob}} below the last article in the section.

All of these reports were generated by Contribution Surveyor at 2013-05-25T20:00:59+00:00 in 0.08 sec.

An observation[edit]

It is my belief that most of Qworty's editing not relating to contemporary writers or publishers is largely unproblematic but that his fiddling with author biographies in particular has been sometimes malicious and damaging to the project. Priority should be placed on the author bios, paying particular attention to his "Delete-Unsourced" edit summary rationales, in which he seems to have taken particular glee. Carrite (talk) 17:08, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Useful links[edit]

Qworty task force participants[edit]

Qworty edits[edit]

Articles being checked

Articles 1 through 20[edit]

Section complete - Bilby (talk) 14:49, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Article is alright; Qworty's edits were genuine vandalism reversion. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:08, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article is fine. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:29, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Now deleted. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 02:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No problems here. Seth Kellerman (talk) 05:00, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This article was one of Qworty's hatchetjobs. User:Lastitem may be a Qworty sock - it added negative material in 2010 [1] that was gradually whittled away, then readded by Qworty in 2012 almost verbatim [2]. However, it seems to be reasonably NPOV right now and none of Qworty's edits currently stand. Seth Kellerman (talk) 04:44, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disagreed with redirect. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Material has since been removed/reverted. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Seems ok. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
One small cleanup made - if anyone cares to review it, [3] - article is otherwise fine with most of Qworty's edits long since subsumed. Seth Kellerman (talk) 19:27, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This one is well handled by now.--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 02:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to have already been reverted. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 02:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Had already been reverted - Seth Kellerman (talk) 17:36, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I believe this article is okay - see Talk:John McCain presidential campaign, 2008#Qworty for more. Wasted Time R (talk) 02:00, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article was/is a puff piece about an author Robert Clark Young apparently liked. I've proposed it for deletion for reasons explained in the PROD nomination. Seth Kellerman (talk) 23:45, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Seth Kellerman (talk) 04:47, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
All since removed. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Since removed. Note that I was involved with this dispute at the time. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Edit war. Changes since removed. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Large scale removal of content. Since fixed. - Bilby (talk) 14:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No problems here. Seth Kellerman (talk) 01:35, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Already reverted by Alf. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 02:11, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 21 through 40[edit]

Section complete - Mangoe (talk) 17:34, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Done, all POV editing long since subsumed. Seth Kellerman (talk) 18:57, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done, no issues. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:09, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nominated for deletion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. B. Stoddard. Seth Kellerman (talk) 22:34, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion closed as no consensus; article stubbified. Note that most of the article was unsourced puffery. Seth Kellerman (talk) 00:24, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Qworty removed much content from this article but in this case his edits seem to have been according to policy. No problems. Seth Kellerman (talk) 04:17, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
At AfD Brustopher (talk) 21:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Kept, but there is essentially nothing left of the original Quorty version. Mangoe (talk) 17:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Article has been almost completely rewritten since these changes. Brustopher (talk) 21:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing too bad, article's been heavily rewritten anyway.Brustopher (talk) 21:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing too bad, article's been heavily rewritten anyway.Brustopher (talk) 21:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All seems to be alright with this article. HOWEVER, 123.224.94.138 should be investigated as a possible Qworty sockpuppet. 123.224.94.138 very insistently fought to keep material that Qworty introduced. Seth Kellerman (talk) 01:47, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Seth Kellerman (talk) 19:11, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
All edits overwritten.--Brustopher (talk) 21:49, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
No real issues in his edits. The article's still a bit of a mess tho. Brustopher (talk) 21:49, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done, no issues. Seth Kellerman (talk) 19:05, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Most of his problematic edits had already been overwritten. Brustopher (talk) 13:23, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done, No violation--My76Strat (talk) 23:05, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Was unsourced editorializing, removed. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 03:05, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done - a potential issue with the article posted to the article's talk page. Seth Kellerman (talk) 03:35, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 41 through 60[edit]

Section complete - Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Has since been turned into a redirectBrustopher (talk) 13:31, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
All good. Brustopher (talk) 13:31, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Problematic edits previously overwritten. Brustopher (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Problematic edits previously overwritten. Brustopher (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • No problems. Qworty's edits were removing genealogical info (which has since been restored) and nominating it for deletion. Seth Kellerman (talk) 08:42, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • No current problems. Most of his editing was copyediting, and the rest of it no longer relevant as the case has been updated. Seth Kellerman (talk) 08:47, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Can't say there's no problems here because it looks like the article has been whitewashed since Qworty's edit, but there are no current Qworty-related problems. Seth Kellerman (talk) 08:49, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Qworty went to war to try and make the article as derogatory as possible, but by now the article is informative and well balanced; none of his edits remain. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:12, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Article seems to be in alright shape at this time. Quorty's edit was a violation of WP:UNDUE, but that error has been fixed over the years. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:09, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • No problems. A majority of the edits were POV-pushing, but were reverted by others at the time. The last dozen edits were constructive grammatical fixes. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:03, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • No problems - his edits to this article were generally constructive. Seth Kellerman (talk) 08:46, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edits were more-or-less harmless original research, and all have been deprecated. Seth Kellerman (talk) 08:38, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Three unproblematic sourced edits from 2008-09, all of which seem to be long deprecated from the article. Carrite (talk) 16:03, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oldest edit deprecated, several edits reverted. One long deletion stands, arguably it was peacock material touting who used this self-publishing press. Qworty was a content warrior in attempting to label the subject a "vanity press" rather than a "self-publishing company." The tendentious phrasing does not appear in the article as of today, thus I believe there is no lasting damage resulting from Qworty's editorial participation here. Carrite (talk) 16:13, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 61 through 80[edit]

Section complete - Ceronomus (talk) 02:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Qworty nominated it for deletion, the discussion was closed as Keep. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:19, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Appears to have been legitimate cleanup of promotional language. Seth Kellerman (talk) 09:22, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Clear bias shown by QWORTY, but has already been corrected Ceronomus (talk) 01:37, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • QWORTY edits already fixed by prior editors Ceronomus (talk) 01:50, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit was "Afd: Nominated for deletion". Discussion was closed as keep. Ceronomus (talk) 20:28, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Some lingering issues found and fixed Ceronomus (talk) 01:48, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 81 through 100[edit]

Deleted. Seth Kellerman (talk) 00:29, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 101 through 120[edit]

Section Complete Ceronomus (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit was "Afd: Nominated for deletion". Discussion was closed as keep. Ceronomus (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done. Unfortunately, most of this content could not be restored because it was primarily OR. Viriditas (talk) 00:59, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit was "Afd: Nominated for deletion". Discussion was closed as keep. Ceronomus (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit was "Afd: Nominated for deletion". Discussion was closed as keep. Ceronomus (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Seth Kellerman (talk) 23:29, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Article was (and still is) a mess, but Qworty's edits were according to policy. Seth Kellerman (talk) 16:21, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit was "Afd: Nominated for deletion". Discussion was closed as keep. Ceronomus (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit was "Afd: Nominated for deletion". Discussion was closed as keep. Ceronomus (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit was "Afd: Nominated for deletion". Discussion was closed as keep. Ceronomus (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted. Seth Kellerman (talk) 16:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done. Seth Kellerman (talk) 16:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Done Seth Kellerman (talk) 16:24, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 121 through 140[edit]

Section completed Ceronomus (talk) 21:34, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edit is valid and still in place. No problems here. Ceronomus (talk) 20:55, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 20:55, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 20:55, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, closed with no consensus. Article still remains. No further issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Original article proposed for deletion by Qworty in 2008 and deleted after its second nomination.Removed 28 Mar 2014 by Scottywong. Ceronomus (talk) 21:14, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • AfD: Nominated for deletion, article remains. No issues. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Section about alleged professional misconduct later removed after what looks to have been a frenzied edit war that did not involve Qworty. Ceronomus (talk) 21:33, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed [4]. - Seth Kellerman (talk) 23:35, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 141 through 160[edit]

Articles 161 through 180[edit]

  • Edited section, "Contemporary forms of tribalism" already removed as speculative. No remaining issues. Ceronomus (talk) 20:31, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 181 through 200[edit]

  • All traces of QWORTY's edits long since removed Ceronomus (talk) 01:41, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edited section (Cultural References) later removed from article. No conflict Ceronomus (talk) 20:20, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Damage by QWORTY repaired by prior editors Ceronomus (talk) 01:40, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 201 through 220[edit]

Articles 221 through 240[edit]

Articles 241 through 260[edit]

Articles 261 through 280[edit]

  • No problematic edits made. Page has subsequently greatly evolved anyhow. Ceronomus (talk) 20:39, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 281 through 300[edit]

Articles 301 through 320[edit]

Articles 321 through 340[edit]

Articles 341 through 360[edit]

Articles 361 through 380[edit]

Articles 381 through 400[edit]

Articles 401 through 420[edit]

Articles 421 through 440[edit]

Articles 441 through 460[edit]

Articles 461 through 480[edit]

Articles 481 through 500[edit]

Articles 501 through 520[edit]

Articles 521 through 540[edit]

Articles 541 through 560[edit]

Articles 561 through 580[edit]

Articles 581 through 600[edit]

Articles 601 through 620[edit]

Articles 621 through 640[edit]

  • FYI: There were WP:COI problems with this article (which did not involve Qworty), though rather than simply reverting to the old sourced version, Qworty deleted most of the content. I've essentially reverted to a pre-COI version and incorporated some of the (non-COI) subsequent edits. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:17, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 641 through 660[edit]

Articles 661 through 680[edit]

Articles 681 through 700[edit]

All checked, nothing changed. Mangoe (talk) 20:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There was one potentially questionable edit here but the section has since been deleted anyway. Mangoe (talk) 20:49, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 701 through 720[edit]

Articles 721 through 740[edit]

Articles 741 through 760[edit]

Articles 761 through 780[edit]

Articles 781 through 800[edit]

Articles 801 through 820[edit]

Articles 821 through 840[edit]

all checked; no issues. Mangoe (talk) 13:06, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 841 through 860[edit]

Section completed Ceronomus (talk) 18:34, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 861 through 880[edit]

All minor or uncontroversial Mangoe (talk) 20:24, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 881 through 900[edit]

Articles 901 through 920[edit]

Section complete - Bilby (talk) 15:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation, grammar. - Bilby (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 13:19, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed some unsourced content. Some since returned. Seems fair enough. - Bilby (talk) 15:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Corrected year. - Bilby (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Minor copyedits. - Bilby (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed a review as COI. Rewrote, expanded and replaced. - Bilby (talk) 15:17, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Minor copyedits. - Bilby (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalisation. - Bilby (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, layout. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalisation. - Bilby (talk) 14:05, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 921 through 940[edit]

Section complete - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed unsourced content. Subsequently sourced and returned. - Bilby (talk) 07:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalization. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Reorganised list. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedits. Removed some content on reasonable grounds. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Corrected year. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Spelling. - Bilby (talk) 09:25, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 941 through 960[edit]

Section complete - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalization. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalization. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Formatting. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Capitalization, punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Changed wikilink. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, date change. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Tense. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed nn name. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Spelling. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Punctuation. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Spelling. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Incorrectly removed name, since reverted. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Spelling. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 07:09, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 961 through 980[edit]

section completed. Mangoe (talk) 17:48, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Above six all minor grammar/usage fixes. Mangoe (talk) 12:38, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Above six all minor grammar/usage tweaks. Mangoe (talk) 12:34, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 981 through 1000[edit]

Articles 1001 through 1020[edit]

Section complete. - Bilby (talk) 15:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed spaces. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, removal of content. Seems to have been accepted by other edits, source now used later in the article. Left as is. - Bilby (talk) 15:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Reverted vandalism. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Minor correction. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Spelling corrections. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of content. Bulk since returned with sources. - Bilby (talk) 15:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of unsourced content in a BLP. Material has been replaced, still unsourced. Tagged for sources, will revisit to source or clean after some more time has passed. - Bilby (talk) 15:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:56, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of content, some unsourced, some not. Returned most content, minus the overly promotional material, and added sources. Moved to proper title. - Bilby (talk) 15:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Update, removal of wikilink. Returned wikilink, as its used seemed consistent. - Bilby (talk) 15:16, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1021 through 1040[edit]

Section complete - Bilby (talk) 10:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, removed spam. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 10:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. Article since recreated, so wikilink returned. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 10:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed link, text. Returned both. - Bilby (talk) 10:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:34, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of content. Article had sources, but not inline. Returned content that could be sourced. - Bilby (talk) 10:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 10:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1041 through 1060[edit]

Section completed - Sgubaldo (talk) 11:01, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of redlinked names. A bit iffy, but ok. - Bilby (talk) 06:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of link to subject. Since returned. - Bilby (talk) 06:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 06:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 06:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unwarranted removal of link to author. Returned link. - Bilby (talk) 06:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 06:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed link to author, seems to be in response to COI edit. Returned the link as it seems useful. - Bilby (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of redlinks. One wasn't read, but the text has since been removed. - Bilby (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed double redirect. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed incorrect link. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Content was removed as unsourced. Returned the bulk of the content, with sources added. - Bilby (talk) 03:10, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. Article since recreated, link returned. - Bilby (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. Article since recreated and link returned. - Bilby (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, no problems. - Bilby (talk) 06:09, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1061 through 1080[edit]

Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal - incorrect wikilink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems, but article since recreated, so I added it back. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedits. A bit POV, perhaps, but ok. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed valid link. Returned. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed valid link. Returned. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink, then name. Name was (properly) returned by another user. - Bilby (talk) 09:02, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1081 through 1100[edit]

Section complete
Possibly ok at the time. I would add it back, but it is now moot. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedits, but ok. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid edit. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid edit. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid edit. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid edits. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A bit harder. Unexplained removal of a non-redlink. I would put it back, but it is in part of a direct quote, in a way that suggests that it might be best leaving it out. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Some questionable removals, but all since repaired. - Bilby (talk) 15:33, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Redlink removal, although link was possibly valid for a different target. Seems ok as a removal, though. -Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Inappropriate removal of content, since fixed. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 15:24, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1101 through 1120[edit]

Section complete
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed wikilink. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
A lot had been removed. I've returned some, and raised one section which I think could be ok on the talk page. - Bilby (talk) 01:26, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I returned some of the content that was removed - edit summaries were questionable, and some of the content was viable, if a bit too promotional. Trimmed back and removed promotional language. - Bilby (talk) 02:50, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, removed extra external links. All seemed ok. - Bilby (talk) 02:24, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid redlink removal, although questionable approach. - Bilby (talk) 02:24, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed wikilink. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. - Bilby (talk) 02:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1121 through 1140[edit]

Section completed --My76Strat (talk) 07:58, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit, removal of external link. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of redlinks. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of redlinks. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removals were ok overall - mostly promotional text. Some very strange copyvio in the article, that seems to have come from competitor's institutions. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of redlinks. Both were correctly removed at the time, although one was to the wrong article. I have restored one, as the correct article now exists. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ugly article. Removed content since returned with better context. - Bilby (talk) 14:43, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Acceptable removal - content was not needed, and promotional. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed vandalism. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Edits ok. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 14:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Literary Death Match: (2 edits, 0 major, -9) (-9)(-24167)
    Restored large content removal, not completely un-sourced at time of removal and additional sources were ready and available to show the edits were in good faith. I added many references to the restored content.--My76Strat (talk) 07:52, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1141 through 1160[edit]

Removed vandalism. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed vandalism. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlinks. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Edits were ok, but needed a reference. Ref added. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mostly ok. I returned the IMDB link, as I think they're useful, but the rest of the edits were ok. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Edit summary was questionable, but valid removals. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Seems valid. Others have since removed the context, so best left out anyway. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Previously reverted. - Bilby (talk) 16:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1161 through 1180[edit]

Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of redlink and name. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of redlink and name. A bit iffy, but the name was unsourced, so left removed.. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Text removals. Seem fair, made it more neutral. - Bilby (talk) 12:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed mention of self-published books. Talk page discussion was in favour of some mention, so I returned the prose coverage and explained on talk, but left out the full list. - Bilby (talk) 12:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed name. Not ideal, but seems ok. - Bilby (talk) 12:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed name. Not ideal, but seems ok. - Bilby (talk) 12:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
NPOV rewording. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Poor removal, but the article has since moved on, so no need to add back. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of text. Since reverted. - Bilby (talk) 12:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ok removal, since added back. - Bilby (talk) 11:33, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of unsourced text, removal of bibliography. All since restored. - Bilby (talk) 12:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of unsourced content, external links. Bulk of the content since returned with sources. No action necessary. - Bilby (talk) 12:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1181 through 1200[edit]

Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Formatting. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Formatting. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Incorrect removal of link. Now not relevant. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Incorrect removal under WP:RED. Article changed, so link no longer relevant. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. Since recreated, but article changed. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copy edit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Incorrect removal under WP:RED. Article changed, so link no longer relevant. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Incorrect removal under WP:RED. Since returned. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed redlink, incorrect link. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 07:36, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removed names. Seemed worth adding back, so I did so. - Bilby (talk) 07:36, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Copyedit. No problems. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Questionable removal under WP:RED. Added back. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Incorrect removal under WP:RED. Returned name, but article needs refs, and I'm not sure of the current status of the gallery. - Bilby (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1201 through 1220[edit]

Articles 1221 through 1240[edit]

Articles 1241 through 1260[edit]

Articles 1261 through 1280[edit]

Articles 1281 through 1300[edit]

Articles 1301 through 1320[edit]

Articles 1321 through 1340[edit]

Articles 1341 through 1360[edit]

Articles 1361 through 1380[edit]

Articles 1381 through 1400[edit]

Articles 1401 through 1420[edit]

Articles 1421 through 1440[edit]

Articles 1441 through 1460[edit]

Articles 1461 through 1480[edit]

Currently being discussed on talk page. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 03:03, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1481 through 1500[edit]

Articles 1501 through 1520[edit]

Articles 1521 through 1540[edit]

Articles 1541 through 1560[edit]

Articles 1561 through 1580[edit]

Articles 1581 through 1600[edit]

Articles 1601 through 1620[edit]

Articles 1621 through 1640[edit]

Articles 1641 through 1660[edit]

Articles 1661 through 1680[edit]

Articles 1681 through 1700[edit]

Articles 1701 through 1720[edit]

Articles 1721 through 1740[edit]

Articles 1741 through 1760[edit]

Articles 1761 through 1780[edit]

Articles 1781 through 1800[edit]

* Sara Noxx: (6 edits, 0 major, -81) (-667)(-180)(-81)(-124)(-459)(-231)

Qworty's edits were completely unacceptable, and I fixed them at the time, commenting on the talk page.  The Steve  09:18, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 1801 through 1820[edit]

Articles 1821 through 1840[edit]

Articles 1841 through 1860[edit]

Articles 1861 through 1880[edit]

Articles 1881 through 1900[edit]

Articles 1901 through 1920[edit]

Articles 1921 through 1940[edit]

Articles 1941 through 1960[edit]

Articles 1961 through 1980[edit]

Articles 1981 through 2000[edit]

Articles 2001 through 2020[edit]

Article reduced to redirect and deleted in 2013. Mangoe (talk) 14:04, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 2021 through 2040[edit]

Section completed-- Mangoe (talk) 02:31, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 07:23, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid. Mangoe (talk) 02:26, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Valid. Mangoe (talk) 02:26, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Already reverted. Mangoe (talk) 02:31, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not a great removal, but seems ok. - Bilby (talk) 11:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 11:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 11:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Returned content, added refs. - Bilby (talk) 11:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Returned some content + ref. - Bilby (talk) 11:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Reverted and cited. Mangoe (talk) 02:22, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Valid. Mangoe (talk) 02:26, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 2041 through 2060[edit]

Section completed-- Mangoe (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 23:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Questionable summary, but valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 23:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 23:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Returned content, formatted. - Bilby (talk) 23:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal, some since returned. - Bilby (talk) 23:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Partially reverted edit. - Bilby (talk) 23:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 23:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Previously fixed. - Bilby (talk) 23:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Previously fixed. - Bilby (talk) 23:40, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. Mangoe (talk) 02:50, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal - not entirely a necessary one, but the ref wasn't needed, and removing it is ok. - Bilby (talk) 07:17, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not really a valid removal, but the content was duplicated, so it worked out. - Bilby (talk) 22:55, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal, although the reason was less so. - Bilby (talk) 04:35, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. I've put article up for AFD due to lack of notability. Mangoe (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 07:17, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 22:55, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Technically all valid. Mangoe (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Returned the removed content. - Bilby (talk) 14:58, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Valid but reverted. I replaced it with current info. Mangoe (talk) 02:50, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Valid removal. - Bilby (talk) 14:58, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 2061 through 2080[edit]

Articles 2081 through 2100[edit]

Articles 2101 through 2120[edit]

Articles 2121 through 2140[edit]

Articles 2141 through 2160[edit]

Articles 2161 through 2180[edit]

Articles 2181 through 2200[edit]

Articles 2201 through 2220[edit]

Articles 2221 through 2240[edit]

Re-instated 1 deletion. Kept the other deletion as it was valid.
No issues. Psychonaut (talk) 07:43, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 2241 through 2260[edit]

Articles 2261 through 2280[edit]

Articles 2281 through 2300[edit]

Articles 2301 through 2320[edit]

Articles 2321 through 2340[edit]

Articles 2341 through 2360[edit]

Articles 2361 through 2380[edit]

Articles 2381 through 2400[edit]

Articles 2401 through 2420[edit]

  • Qworty totally gutted this useful article with two swift cuts, summarized as "WP:Trivia", but other editors restored the page, so no further edits are needed. Catherineyronwode (talk) 03:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 2421 through 2440[edit]

Section completed-- Mangoe (talk) 16:03, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Articles 2441 through 2448[edit]

Section completed--My76Strat (talk) 03:27, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done, restored large content removal; information is not contentious therefore specific instances where requested should us the {{cn}} tag; added {{refimprove}} tag--My76Strat (talk) 03:13, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This was reverted already, and some sources added --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 01:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This was reverted already, and sources added --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 01:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Most material already reverted/re-added --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 01:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Most material was already re-added. Much was originally unsourced. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 01:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Removal of massively long plot description. The fanboys added it back. Nothing to see here. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 01:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Some material already re-added. He removed a huge biography section, that has zero sources (it was perhaps written by someone familiar with the subject). I left a note on the talk page of the article, to leave it up to editors there how to restore the material in a sourced fashion. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 02:01, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This was actually counter-vandalism. --Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 01:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sock 1 through 20[edit]

Section completed - Sgubaldo (talk) 21:51, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sock 21 through 40[edit]

Section completed - Sgubaldo (talk) 22:01, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sock 41 through 60[edit]

Section completed - Sgubaldo (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Removed blatant "notable author" self-promotion Catherineyronwode (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Promo edit was already removed. Catherineyronwode (talk) 07:03, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sock 61 through 80[edit]

Section completed - Sgubaldo (talk) 21:54, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sock 81 through 92[edit]

Finished on June 4, 2013
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Contributor_clean-up/Qworty&oldid=1186403019"