Wikipedia:WikiProject Science/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Index · Statistics · Log

Welcome to the assessment page for WikiProject Science.

Contents

FAQs[edit]

What is the purpose of article assessments? 
The assessment system allows a WikiProject to monitor the quality of articles in its subject areas, and to prioritize work on these articles. The ratings are also used by the Wikipedia 1.0 program to prepare for static releases of Wikipedia content.
Are these ratings official? 
Not really; these ratings are meant primarily for the internal use of the project, and usually do not imply any official standing within Wikipedia as a whole.
Who can assess articles? 
In general, anyone can add or change an article's rating. However, the "GA" and "FA" labels should only be used on articles that have been reviewed and are currently designated as good articles or featured articles, respectively. Individual WikiProjects may also have more formal procedures for rating an article, and please note that the WikiProject bears ultimate responsibility for resolving disputes.
How do I assess an article? 
Consult the quality scale below; once you have chosen the level that seems to be closest to the article, set the class parameter in the WikiProject banner template to the level's name (omitting "Class" from the end). For example, to rate an article as "B-Class", use |class=B in the banner. Again, the "FA" and "GA" labels should not be added to articles unless are currently designated as such.
Someone put a project banner template on an article, but it's not really within the WikiProject's scope. What should I do? 
Because of the large number of articles we deal with, we occasionally make mistakes and add tags to articles that shouldn't have them. If you notice one, feel free to remove the tag, and optionally leave a note on the article's talk page (or directly with the person who tagged the article).
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
Feel free to change it—within reason—if you think a different rating is justified; in the case of major disputes, the WikiProject as a whole can discuss the issue and come to a consensus as to the best rating.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are somewhat subjective, but it's the best system we've been able to devise. If you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if the article is within this project's scope but doesn't have a project banner on its talk page? 
Due to the large number of articles we cover, not all articles within our scope can be tagged. However you can help increase the number of tagged articles by tagging the talk page of any untagged articles within our scope you come across with {{WikiProject Science}}.

How to rate articles[edit]

Any member of Wikiproject Science are invited to rate articles for the project. Articles with unassessed quality can be found at Category:Unassessed science articles and articles with unassessed importance ratings can be found at Category:Unknown-importance science articles

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in any of the project banners found on article's talk page:

For example adding {{WikiProject Science|class=B|importance=mid}} produces:

WikiProject Science (Rated B-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This page is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
B-Class article B  This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This page has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Science}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Science|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class science articles) Featured article FA 
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class science articles) A-Class article A 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class science articles)  GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class science articles) B-Class article B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class science articles) C-Class article C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class science articles) Start-Class article Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class science articles) Stub-Class article Stub 
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class science articles) Featured list FL 
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class science articles)  List 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

Book (for Wikipedia books; adds pages to Category:Book-Class science articles) Wikipedia Book Book 
Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class science articles) Category page Category 
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class science articles) Disambiguation page Disambig 
File (for files; adds pages to Category:File-Class science articles)  File 
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class science articles) Redirect page Redirect 
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class science articles)  Portal 
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class science articles)  Project 
Template (for templates; adds pages to Category:Template-Class science articles)  Template 
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class science articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed science articles)  ??? 


Top
High
Mid
Low

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Quality scale[edit]

This table is transcluded here, and is identical to the one at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment.

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance scale[edit]

WikiProject article importance scheme

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

Assessments[edit]

Use this section for assessment discussions and comments:

Log[edit]

September 20, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 15, 2014[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 12, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

September 11, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 9, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Airone (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

September 1, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 29, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 28, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

August 23, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Reporting bias (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

August 21, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 18, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 17, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 16, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 5, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 2, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 31, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 30, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 28, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 27, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 25, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 23, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 22, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 21, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Vantablack (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

July 19, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 17, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Vantablack (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

Removed[edit]

  • The Zoist (talk) removed. Quality rating was Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

July 10, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • The Zoist (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

July 7, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Heated bath (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

July 5, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 1, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 27, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 26, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Ivy Parker (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

June 25, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 21, 2014[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 19, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Māori science (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

June 18, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 17, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 14, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 12, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 11, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 9, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 7, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 6, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 5, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 4, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 2, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 1, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • E. E. Kurth (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

May 31, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • E. E. Kurth (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

May 23, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 22, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Gail Hanson (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

May 20, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Grant Allen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

May 18, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 17, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 16, 2014[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 15, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 6, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 30, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 29, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 24, 2014[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 23, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 22, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 21, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 17, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 14, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 13, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 11, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 10, 2014[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 9, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 8, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 6, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 5, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 4, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 1, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 31, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 30, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 27, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Science of team science (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).
  • Science studies (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).
  • Scientific demonstration (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).
  • Scientocracy (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

March 24, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]