Wikipedia:WikiProject Scientology/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to the assessment department of the Scientology WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's Scientology related articles. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Scientology}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Scientology articles by quality and Category:Scientology articles by importance, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Scientology WikiProject is free to add or change the rating of an article.
Why didn't the reviewer leave any comments? 
Unfortunately, due to the volume of articles that need to be assessed, we are unable to leave detailed comments in most cases. If you have particular questions, you might ask the person who assessed the article; they will usually be happy to provide you with their reasoning.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

Quality assessments[edit]

An article's quality assessment is generated from the class parameter in the {{WikiProject Scientology}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Scientology|class=???}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter to describe the quality of the article (see Wikipedia:Quality scale for assessment criteria):

FA (for featured articles only; adds articles to Category:FA-Class Scientology articles) Featured article FA 
A (adds articles to Category:A-Class Scientology articles) A-Class article A 
GA (for good articles only; adds articles to Category:GA-Class Scientology articles)  GA 
B (adds articles to Category:B-Class Scientology articles) B-Class article B 
C (adds articles to Category:C-Class Scientology articles) C-Class article C 
Start (adds articles to Category:Start-Class Scientology articles) Start-Class article Start 
Stub (adds articles to Category:Stub-Class Scientology articles) Stub-Class article Stub 
FL (for featured lists only; adds articles to Category:FL-Class Scientology articles) Featured list FL 
List (adds articles to Category:List-Class Scientology articles)  List 

For pages that are not articles, the following values can also be used for the class parameter:

Book (for Wikipedia books; adds pages to Category:Book-Class Scientology articles) Wikipedia Book Book 
Category (for categories; adds pages to Category:Category-Class Scientology articles) Category page Category 
Disambig (for disambiguation pages; adds pages to Category:Disambig-Class Scientology articles) Disambiguation page Disambig 
FM (for files; adds pages to Category:FM-Class Scientology articles) Featured media FM 
File (for files; adds pages to Category:File-Class Scientology articles)  File 
Redirect (for redirect pages; adds pages to Category:Redirect-Class Scientology articles) Redirect page Redirect 
Portal (for portal pages; adds pages to Category:Portal-Class Scientology articles)  Portal 
Project (for project pages; adds pages to Category:Project-Class Scientology articles)  Project 
Template (for templates; adds pages to Category:Template-Class Scientology articles)  Template 
NA (for any other pages where assessment is unnecessary; adds pages to Category:NA-Class Scientology articles)  NA 
??? (articles for which a valid class has not yet been provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Scientology articles)  ??? 

After assessing an article's quality, comments on the assessment can be added either to the article's talk page or to the /Comments subpage which will appear as a link next to the assessment. Adding comments will add the article to Category:Scientology articles with comments. Comments that are added to the /Comments subpages will be transcluded onto the automatically generated work list pages in the Comments column.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance assessment[edit]

An article's importance assessment is generated from the importance parameter in the {{WikiProject Scientology}} project banner on its talk page:

{{scientology| ... | importance=??? | ...}}
Top
High
Mid
Low
???

The following values may be used for importance assessments:

Importance scale[edit]

Label Criteria Reader's experience Editor's experience Example
Top The article is one of the core topics about Scientology. A reader who is not involved in the field of Scientology will have high familiarity with the subject matter and should be able to relate to the topic easily. Articles in this importance range are written in mostly generic terms, leaving technical terms and descriptions for more specialized pages. Scientology
High The article covers a topic that is vital to understanding Scientology. A reader who is not involved in the field of Scientology will have a reasonable level of familiarity with the subject matter, but may need clarifications for some of the more technical terminology. Articles in this importance range are written in mostly generic terms, however with more specificity and technical terms than the Top-importance articles. Office of Special Affairs
Mid The article covers a topic that has a strong but not vital role in the history of Scientology. Many readers will be familiar with the topic being discussed, but a larger majority of readers may have only cursory knowledge of the overall subject. Articles at this level will cover subjects that are well known but not necessarily vital to understand Scientology, such as specific aspects of Scientology. Due to the topics covered at this level, Mid-importance articles will generally have more technical terms used in the article text. Most people involved in Scientology will be rated in this level. Clear (Scientology)
Low The article is not required knowledge for a broad understanding of Scientology. Few readers outside the Scientology field or that are not adherents to it may be familiar with the subject matter. It is likely that the reader does not know anything at all about the subject before reading the article. Articles at this range of importance will often delve into the minutiae of Scientology, using technical terms (and defining them) as needed. Topics included at this level include most practices and infrastructure of Scientology. Tone scale

Given the number and variety of articles with which this project shall be dealing, I believe that we should devote a good deal of attention in the short run to determining which of the articles we consider to be of greatest importance to the project. We now have a page at Wikipedia:WikiProject Scientology/Assessment/Top-importance articles where we can discuss which articles should receive top-importance ranking. Any and all input is more than welcome.

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it in a new subsection at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Scientology.

Assessment log[edit]

Scientology articles:
Index · Statistics · Log
The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

August 29, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 10, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 6, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 12, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Going Clear (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

June 1, 2014[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 26, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 25, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 15, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 11, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 4, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 25, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 8, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 28, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 27, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 24, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 16, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 2, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Anne Archer (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

November 20, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 3, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Jere Gillis (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

November 1, 2013[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Jere Gillis (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

October 29, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 2, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 24, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Roy Wallis (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 6, 2013[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 5, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Leah Remini (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

August 23, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 13, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • The Hole (Scientology) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to GA-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

August 11, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Karen Black (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

July 18, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 14, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Nazanin Boniadi (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).
  • Tony Ortega (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

July 8, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 4, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 28, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 23, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Philip Gale (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

May 30, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

April 19, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 14, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Jim Meskimen (talk) reassessed. Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

March 26, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 26, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 21, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 14, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

February 23, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Gold Base (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Unassessed-Class (rev · t).

February 2, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 31, 2013[edit]

Removed[edit]

January 29, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 25, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 18, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • L. Fletcher Prouty (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).

January 8, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 6, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 5, 2013[edit]

Removed[edit]

January 4, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 22, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 24, 2012[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Sharon Case (talk) removed. Quality rating was Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

November 20, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 17, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 9, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

November 3, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 19, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 13, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 6, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 4, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 10, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 10, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 10, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

June 25, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

June 6, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Katie Holmes (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to B-Class (rev · t).

June 1, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 30, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

May 29, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Katie Holmes (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from FA-Class to Unassessed-Class (rev · t).

May 28, 2012[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 27, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 16, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 15, 2012[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 8, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Lisa Marie Presley (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Mid-Class (rev · t).
  • Sharon Case (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

April 26, 2012[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 13, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 8, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 19, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 13, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

February 5, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 20, 2012[edit]

Removed[edit]

January 7, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 29, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • L-Ron (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

December 28, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 25, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

December 23, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 19, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 15, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

November 14, 2011[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Qasr Ahmad (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Low-Class (rev · t).

November 8, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 10, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 11, 2011[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Peter Medak (talk) removed. Quality rating was Stub-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Unknown-Class (rev · t).

September 6, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 1, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 23, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 17, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Tom Cruise (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Top-Class (rev · t).

July 16, 2011[edit]

Removed[edit]

  • Tom Cruise (talk) removed. Quality rating was B-Class (rev · t). Importance rating was Top-Class (rev · t).

July 6, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 6, 2011[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 20, 2011[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 20, 2011[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 5, 2011[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

April 17, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 2, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 14, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Writers of the Future (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

March 7, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Aaron Saxton (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to GA-Class (rev · t).
  • USS YP-422 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

Assessed[edit]

March 6, 2011[edit]

Reassessed[edit]