Wikipedia:WikiProject Secret Societies/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to the assessment department of the Secret Societies WikiProject! This department focuses on assessing the quality of Wikipedia's articles about Secret Societies or the people of Secret Societies. While much of the work is done in conjunction with the WP:1.0 program, the article ratings are also used within the project itself to aid in recognizing excellent contributions and identifying topics in need of further work.

The ratings are done in a distributed fashion through parameters in the {{WikiProject Secret Societies}} project banner; this causes the articles to be placed in the appropriate sub-categories of Category:Secret Societies articles by quality, which serves as the foundation for an automatically generated worklist.

Contents

Frequently asked questions[edit]

How can I get my article rated? 
Please list it in the section for assessment requests below.
Who can assess articles? 
Any member of the Secret Societies WikiProject is free to add—or change—the rating of an article.
What if I don't agree with a rating? 
You can list it in the section for assessment requests below, and someone will take a look at it. Alternately, you can ask any member of the project to rate the article again.
Aren't the ratings subjective? 
Yes, they are, but it's the best system we've been able to devise; if you have a better idea, please don't hesitate to let us know!

If you have any other questions not listed here, please feel free to ask them on the discussion page for this department.

Instructions[edit]

An article's assessment is generated from the class and importance parameters in the {{WikiProject Secret Societies}} project banner on its talk page:

{{WikiProject Secret Societies
|class=
|attention=
|collaboration-candidate=
|past-collaboration=
|peer-review= 
|old-peer-review=
|needs-infobox=
}}

The following values may be used for the class parameter:

Articles for which a valid class is not provided are listed in Category:Unassessed Secret Societies articles. The class should be assigned according to the quality scale below.

Quality scale[edit]

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Importance scale[edit]

The criteria used for rating article importance are not meant to be an absolute or canonical view of how significant the topic is. Rather, they attempt to gauge the probability of the average reader of Wikipedia needing to look up the topic (and thus the immediate need to have a suitably well-written article on it). Thus, subjects with greater popular notability may be rated higher than topics which are arguably more "important" but which are of interest primarily to students of Secret Societies.

Note that general notability need not be from the perspective of editor demographics; generally notable topics should be rated similarly regardless of the country or region in which they hold said notability. Thus, topics which may seem obscure to a Western audience—but which are of high notability in other places—should still be highly rated.

Status Template Meaning of Status
Top {{Top-Class}} This article is of the utmost importance to this project, as it forms the basis of all information.
High {{High-Class}} This article is fairly important to this project, as it covers a general area of knowledge.
Mid {{Mid-Class}} This article is relatively important to this project, as it fills in some more specific knowledge of certain areas.
Low {{Low-Class}} This article is of little importance to this project, but it covers a highly specific area of knowledge or an obscure piece of trivia.
None None This article is of unknown importance to this project. It remains to be analyzed.

We are currently discussing which articles should be counted as being of Top-importance at Wikipedia:WikiProject Secret Societies/Assessment/Top-importance articles.

Requesting an assessment[edit]

If you have made significant changes to an article and would like an outside opinion on a new rating for it, please feel free to list it below.

  • Alpha_et_Omega The article has had a significant amount of new material added with many new citations. Should now be well above Start Class.
  • Horseman's Word has had significant changes since its rating as a stub class article

Assessment log[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

Unexpected changes, such as downgrading an article, or raising it more than two assessment classes at once, are shown in bold.

October 22, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

October 21, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

September 24, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 23, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 6, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 10, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 6, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

July 28, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Illuminati (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

July 25, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 6, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 26, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 9, 2014[edit]

Removed[edit]

March 28, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 26, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

March 23, 2014[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

March 15, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 17, 2014[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 9, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 8, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

January 3, 2014[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 30, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 29, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 28, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 27, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 26, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 25, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

December 21, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 16, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • 33/5 (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to NA-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Low-Class to NA-Class (rev · t).
  • James A. Colescott (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

December 8, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Removed[edit]

December 6, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Tongmenghui (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

December 2, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 24, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Bohemian Grove (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to C-Class (rev · t).
  • Mark Dice (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t).

November 11, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

November 4, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • American Legion of Honor (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class (rev · t). Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class (rev · t).

October 31, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 17, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 17, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 17, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 9, 2013[edit]

Removed[edit]

September 23, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 17, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

September 5, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

August 28, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

  • Thuggee (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to C-Class (rev · t).

August 27, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 23, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 22, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 21, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 18, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 17, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 16, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 15, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 14, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 13, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

August 1, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 24, 2013[edit]

Removed[edit]

July 20, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 17, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 11, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 8, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 3, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

July 2, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 30, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 26, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 25, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 24, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

June 23, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Germanenorden (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Unknown-Class (rev · t).

June 10, 2013[edit]

Removed[edit]

May 26, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

May 20, 2013[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

April 13, 2013[edit]

Removed[edit]

March 13, 2013[edit]

Assessed[edit]

February 22, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

January 28, 2013[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 24, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 20, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

December 1, 2012[edit]

Renamed[edit]

Assessed[edit]

  • Tiandihui (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class (rev · t). Importance assessed as Low-Class (rev · t).

November 25, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 29, 2012[edit]

Reassessed[edit]

October 23, 2012[edit]

Assessed[edit]

Worklist[edit]

The logs in this section are generated automatically (on a daily basis); please don't add entries to them by hand.

This page was once used by the Version 1.0 Editorial Team. It is preserved because of the information in its edit history. This page should not be edited or deleted. Wikiproject article lists can be generated using the WP 1.0 web tool.