Wikipedia:XfD today

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Shortcuts:

This page transcludes (or when this is not feasible, links to) all of the deletion debates opened today on the English-language Wikipedia, including articles, categories, templates, and others, as a convenience to XfD-watchers. Please note that because this material is transcluded, watchlisting this page will not provide you with watchlist updates about deletions; WP:DELT works best as a browser bookmark checked regularly.

Contents


Speedy deletion candidates[edit]

The category is at Category:Candidates for speedy deletion.

Articles[edit]

Guide to deletion
Centralized discussion
Proposals: policy other Discussions Ideas

Note: inactive discussions, closed or not, should be archived.

Purge server cache


Lisa Christine Holmberg[edit]

Lisa Christine Holmberg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Lisa Christine Holmberg" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable, fails WP:ACTORBIO, no major (or minor) roles, bit parts as noted. Unverified claims in history section, not mentioned in some of the references cited. ☾Loriendrew☽ (talk) 02:34, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 02:37, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 02:38, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Jewish Messiah claimants[edit]

Jewish Messiah claimants (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jewish Messiah claimants" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Jewish Messiah Claimants has been nominated on the basis that the entry consists of "Original Research," with the content/inclusion of entries within this category being entirely subjective, with large areas of this article never being substantiated with citations, with other areas of the entry having support from unreliable sources, with the entries in the list having adequate representation in pre-existing and well documented List of messiah claimants, with indications within talk that sections of this article have been copied verbatim (plagiarized) from a single outside source. That as "original research" this entry has failed to develop from inception in 2006 to a properly sourced article and thus is still classified as a "start" quality article. Recommendation therefore to;

  • Delete with redirection to List of messiah claimants which adequately and correctly reflects content within.--Lfrankbalm (talk) 01:58, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 03:01, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep With 36 references and a dozen books that directly address the subject of Jewish Messiah claimants, I'm not sure what more to look for. Compared to this one, List of messiah claimants is rather poorly written and sourced; if anything a reverse merge might be justified. Given that there are rather distinct differences between a potential Jewish Messiah and those of other faiths, the additional details that are provided in this article are specifically relevant. The article can use editing, restructuring and more thorough referencing, but the source material is already in the article. Issues with content should be dealt with in the article and have no bearing on the notability of the article itself. Alansohn (talk) 03:26, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Vern Hughes[edit]

Vern Hughes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Vern Hughes" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Re-nominating after the previous AfD went away from the matters at hand. Fails WP:POLITICIAN as he hasn't held any elected office at international, national or state level, and has not received any significant coverage from reliable sources independent of the subject - an automatic fail for WP:N. His former party, People Power, was not a major state (sub-national) party and this means WP:POLOUTCOMES is also a fail. The three independent sources do not provide the significant coverage required and the remainder are not independent, except for the Latham Diaries which is apparently a single mention only and therefore an example of namechecking and in this case attempting to inherit notability. The lack of proper citations of the last three sources makes them unreliable and they only support commentary by the subject and are therefore not independent. They also appear to be only contributions and not full presentations as such. This all being the case, this article is in effect promotional and should be deleted. Curse of Fenric (talk) 01:55, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 02:16, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 02:16, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep. This was closed as no consensus a week ago, and making a second nomination because you disagree with the outcome is utterly inappropriate. Take the previous close to WP:DRV if you disagree with the closer's decision (not that they could have come down any other way). The Drover's Wife (talk) 02:43, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Mangke Saath Tumhara[edit]

Mangke Saath Tumhara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Mangke Saath Tumhara" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 12:13, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:12, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Shatter Me[edit]

Shatter Me (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Shatter Me" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This book is not notable in and of itself. Clearly promotional material disguised as a Wikipedia book entry. Nyanburger (talk) 13:19, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Disagree about it being strictly promotional material. The article has been contributed to by a number of editors over 2.5 years, and the original author wrote several other articles from scratch (including at least one book with a different author and publisher). I won't speak about the notability, as I'm unfamiliar with the guidelines, other than: obviously some people are interested in this book, so what's the harm in keeping it? It was receiving 150 views/day even before Lindsey Sterling's album by the same name. 194.94.44.220 (talk) 16:33, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:05, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:05, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep, but clean. If it's down to whether or not it's promotional, I don't think that it's promotional enough to really warrant deleting on that reason alone- we can always clean up an article if it's salvageable, which this one appears to be since this wasn't really promotional as much as it was written with a fan-tone. As far as notability goes, I did see where the book got reviews from various sources, including the Horn Book Guide. There was also some coverage from EW, as well as in-depth coverage here, here, and here. It's not the strongest amount of sources, but it is enough to establish notability- especially since there does appear to have been more coverage. Of course, if anyone is willing I'd actually prefer that we have a page for the series as a whole as opposed to only the first book having an article: it's easier to prove notability for a series and this way we're not left with an article that only covers one book if it ends up that only the first entry has enough to merit its own page. I'd also say that the author may have received enough coverage to merit an entry of her own, as I've come across a lot of sources that mention her and the series, but focus predominantly on her. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 10:45, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:11, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Jim Reed (attorney)[edit]

Jim Reed (attorney) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jim Reed (attorney)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Subject does not appear to be any more notable than thousands of other lawyers, judges, or congressmen that have lived. Primefac (talk) 15:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment  Is there no place to merge this topic?  Why is this at AfD?  Unscintillating (talk) 05:25, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Unscintillating, where would it be merged to? Primefac (talk) 12:22, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • A person whose only substantive claim of notability is as an unelected candidate in elections that he hasn't won does not pass WP:NPOL — if you cannot demonstrate that he was already notable enough for other things to get past a different notability rule independently of his candidacy, then he has to win the election, not merely run in it, to gain notability from the election itself. Delete (or redirect if there's a viable target), without prejudice against recreation if he wins an assembly seat. Bearcat (talk) 07:43, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:11, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Intramedullary Cement Osteosynthesis[edit]

Intramedullary Cement Osteosynthesis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Intramedullary Cement Osteosynthesis" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This article, by editor Iospress2014, probably fails WP:COI. The reference is a primary source, and the technique does not seem to have received coverage beyond that source. Perhaps this technique will someday become notable, but it is not now. ubiquity (talk) 18:49, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

At the risk of speaking against my own proposal, I will note that the reference is from a peer-reviewed journal. Does an article in a peer-reviewed journal guarantee notability? ubiquity (talk) 02:43, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:10, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

The reference is not the only primary source for this method and it has received coverage beyond that source as well. Indeed this method has initially been introduced in 2011 in 41st Malaysian Orthopedic Association Annual General Meeting / Annual Scientific Meeting & 5thASEAN Arthroplasty Association Meeting[1].

Unlike conventional orthopedics surgical method that they use metal implants to stabilize fractures, this method does not need any metal construct to fix the bone, hence it obviates the majority of operative risks that may be associated with surgical techniques that involve metal implants such as plates, nails or screws. At the same time, cement that has been used in this method incorporates in the bone structure and improves mechanical properties and resistance of the treated bone therefore IMCO is very useful for patients with osteoporosis in which introduction of metal constructs may jeopardize the egg shell cortices of the bone. Allowing this article be remained in Wikipedia will facilitate orthopedics surgeons as well as researchers continuing this field and will be beneficial for patients with long bone fractures. IMCO is a surgical method and its use by other surgeon or researchers will not provide any credential or financial benefit for authors or editors. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iospress2014 (talkcontribs) 13:58, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete for now a single just-published article in a peer-reviewed journal, especially from a less major publisher like IOS press, does not meet medical sourcing requirement; conference presentations add nothing to it. When it is referred to by others, then it will be notable--but an article by the inventor himself proves nothing about notability. The argument above shows a promotional intent: after orthopedic surgeons know about it and use it, only then will it be the appropriate time for an encyclopedia article. DGG ( talk ) 05:51, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, postdlf (talk) 15:36, 23 October 2014 (UTC)


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:09, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Delete per DGG, not enough coverage in independent reliable sources to be notable. Jinkinson talk to me 01:45, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

The 10 Legendary Singles[edit]

The 10 Legendary Singles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "The 10 Legendary Singles" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

PROD was denied and a citation added but this can rate a small mention in Led Zeppelin or Led Zeppelin discography. Regional-only albums are generally less notable. —Justin (koavf)TCM 06:54, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete: Limited release only in New Zealand, not notable enough for its own article. SliverOfLight (talk) 09:35, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:14, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:14, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep  By inspection, the Dave Lewis book published in London states that the collection is "notable and collectable"...and London is not local to New Zealand.  Unscintillating (talk) 00:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
That is a false claim. I have a copy of Dave Lewis's book. Nowhere in the article does it mention a page number. I have searched Lewis's book and nowhere does it state categorically that it is "notable AND collectable". I should also point out this collection is not even regarded as an official release. It was released without the knowledge of the band, hence you won't find it listed on the official Atlantic or the Led Zeppelin website discography. SliverOfLight (talk) 00:59, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
First of all, I checked the article and I have not made a "false claim"...by inspection of the article what I have said can be verified as being stated in the article, and by basic knowledge of geography, London is not local to New Zealand.  And you know what else is interesting, the reason for the removal of the prod was, link, "RS describes it as 'notable and collectable' - claim included."  So what is disingenuous is the nomination ignoring the reason for the removal of the prod while mentioning it as if the removal was a reason for deletion, after having made no attempt to discuss the matter on the talk page of the article.  I don't see that the article says that the band was not aware of this release, so you seem to be in possession of additional information on this topic.  What is your source of information?  Now, if this release was in violation of some international copyright law, there might be a WP:NOT issue to consider.  Unscintillating (talk) 02:27, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Please state the page number in Dave Lewis's book where the author claims this release is "notable AND collectable". Nowhere in the article is there a citation with page number to this. Simply claiming a book says such and such without verification is insufficient. It's interesting to note Dave Lewis in his last book From a Whisper to a Scream: Complete Guide to Their music (2012) makes no mention of this release at all. SliverOfLight (talk) 10:27, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
The version of the book I saw did not have page numbers, however the set is one of a number of items discussed. At the beginning of the chapter "The Collectable Led Zeppelin" Lewis writes "The following is a guide to ... 100 notable and collectable Led Zeppelin memorabilia items..."
Note that while this is sufficient to remove a prod, it does not make an Afd disingenuous.
All the best: Rich Farmbrough03:58, 19 October 2014 (UTC).
The copy of Celebration Day I have, every page is numbered. You might have a fake/pirated version there. SliverOfLight (talk) 04:23, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Keep or merge. Simply because an album is "regional" it does not become less notable. In any event we should cover the releases of major bands during their lifetimes, as well as we can. All the best: Rich Farmbrough03:58, 19 October 2014 (UTC).

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 17:08, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete, or possibly merge. Non-notable compilation album. Clearly fails SIGCOV, one disputed source is insufficient. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 23:11, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

James Holmes (programmer)[edit]

James Holmes (programmer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "James Holmes (programmer)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I cannot find the necessary coverage of this person himself in reliable sources, directly and in detail to meet WP:BIO. The original article was created by User:Jholmes612, probably the subject. The single claim to notability "Oracle Magazine named him “Java Developer of the Year” in 2002" has been copied and repeated in many documents but I cannot trace the original publication to verify this. Even if substantiated, this is insufficient to meet our notability standards. Just Chilling (talk) 22:24, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 23:21, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 23:21, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete—I think the better chance of notability would be via WP:AUTHOR, but while the books he's written have reasonable holdings per worldcat, they're the kind of low-level technical books that don't tend to garner in-depth reviews. Lesser Cartographies (talk) 10:10, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • keep Clearly meets NAUTHOR. Both Struts and Art of Java are in over 600 libraries. And, a/c worldcat, translated into Japanese and Chinese and Spanish. The combination shows the importance of the works. DGG ( talk ) 04:46, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 17:17, 23 October 2014 (UTC)


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:05, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Sad Beautiful Tragic[edit]

Sad Beautiful Tragic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Sad Beautiful Tragic" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fails WP:NSONGS and WP:GNG. Has no independent third party notability except minor passable mentions in "Album"reviews. Its chart performance of one week is already present in Taylor Swift discography. This article should be deleted or worse, kept as a plausible redirect to Red. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 06:23, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

ETA: I forgot to check the history and it seems tha the original AFD nomination resulted in merge only and nothing concrete has changed from that. So yeah, this should be merged. —Indian:BIO [ ChitChat ] 06:26, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:53, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 17:43, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep, seems fine. Everyking (talk) 22:25, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Universidad San Juan de la Cruz[edit]

Universidad San Juan de la Cruz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Universidad San Juan de la Cruz" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I'm aware that universities are normally considered notable. However, I'm having trouble persuading myself that this one exists at all. It doesn't have an .edu domain; it doesn't have a street address; it doesn't get any hits on Gnews or its archive. Yes it was authorised to grant degrees in 1996, but that was eighteen years ago. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universidad Empresarial de Costa Rica. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:42, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 21:00, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 21:02, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Rebuttal:

Universidad San Juan de la Cruz (http://www.universidadsanjuan.ac.cr), does have a street address @ 100 metros al Norte Palacio Municipal San Pablo Heredia, Costa Rica 40203 [1], (ICAES), Apdo. Postal 75, 2200 Coronado, San José, Costa Rica [2] and the U.S.A. @ American Learning Center 8300 Old Courthouse Rd Vienna, VA 22182 [3].


The University has both email as well as phone contact information listed within its websites. SJDLC University has an {ac.cr} domain, which is equivalent to a USA {.edu} domain, > example: University of Costa Rica (http://www.ucr.ac.cr), a Costa Rican State University.[4]


The University is affiliated with the Costa Rica Bar Association ("abogados.or.cr" "U San Juan"),> Google. Central America Workers Movement / as Costa Rican solidarity CMTC [5], CMTC Programs for People with Disabilities [6], Central Institute of Social Studies (ICAES) [7].


The University is affiliated with the Costa Rican, SOER [8], SOER, Disadvantage Youth Programs [9], National Academy of Sciences (ac.cr) [10], California University FCE pcu.edu (http://cde.ca.gov), and Akamai University, U.S.A. [11]. SJDLC University is recognized by several (http://CHEA.org) Higher Education Organizations as well as Foreign Ministries. > See, Wikipedia Revised Article <


SJDLC University (Campus location) @ 100 metros al Norte Palacio Municipal San Pablo Heredia, Costa Rica 40203 [12]


SJDLC University (Affiliated Campus) @ Instituto Centroamericano de Estudios Sociales (ICAES), Apdo. Postal 75, 2200 Coronado, San José, Costa Rica [13]


SJDLC University (Affiliated Campus) @ American Learning Center 8300 Old Courthouse Rd Vienna, VA 22182 U.S.A [14]


— Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.66.168.215 (talk) 01:30, 24 October 2014 (UTC) 173.66.168.215 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

  • Comment. For the record, some countries use the .ac domain (as this one does) instead of the .edu domain. These countries include such academically unreliable countries as the United Kingdom! Not having an .edu URL is most certainly not an indicator that an institution is not genuine. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:54, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Comment - would appear to be a degree-awarding, UNESCO-registered, university but a closer inspection suggests the "undergraduate degrees" consist of 2-3 4-month blocks; effectively 2 semesters. I think we need more information (ideally from independent third parties) before calling this one. Stlwart111 01:40, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

RTB2[edit]

RTB2 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "RTB2" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Plain advertising The Banner talk 18:54, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete Advertising. (I've also never seen such high rate of wikilinking). Amortias (T)(C) 21:22, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
    • I can imagine. I had cleaned out the article already a few times, it was protected due to disruptive editing but it only becomes worse, so the clear objective is advertising. The Banner talk 08:38, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Will clean up to remove advertising 202.160.16.131 (talk) 08:23, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Partial done (let's just close it already) 202.160.16.131 (talk) 09:08, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
      • No way. The Banner talk 09:44, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
        • At Wikipedia, discussions does not end like that. Just do it already. I've cleaned it UP, you see?! 202.160.16.131 (talk) 10:39, 24 October 2014 (UTC) [just let a bot end this!]
          • And if you don't, I'll remove this AfD. 202.160.16.131 (talk) 10:40, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
            • 100% keep This article may be useful for researches. WHAT ABOUT RTB1? 202.160.16.131 (talk) 10:46, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
              • Let a bot handle the vandalism. I will handle the rest. 202.160.16.131 (talk) 10:49, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
                • I do not see vandalism, just disruptive editing by an probably involved editor. Both articles RTB1 and RTB2 are completely unsourced, so you better get some independent, prior published reliable sources conform Wikipedia:reliable Sources. And please behave a bit. The Banner talk 12:07, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Revert to this version - but with a smaller logo and some references - Wikipedia is not a directory - Arjayay (talk) 12:13, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Done and sorry about the post at the top 202.160.16.131 (talk) 12:28, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment. This article, along with a few dozen other Asian media related articles, has been the object of ongoing disruption for many years. I have been watching these articles and taking care of the most egregious disruption but I've been trying to be careful to avoid interfering with those content issues that are not associated with the disruption. Discussion has taken place previously on this subject, if need be, ping me and I will find them. Tiderolls 12:51, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Check page history of RTB2. 202.160.16.131 (talk) 03:48, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 21:46, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brunei-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 21:46, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 01:00, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Peter Stone (Degrassi character)[edit]

Peter Stone (Degrassi character) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Peter Stone (Degrassi character)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable TV character. Horrible sourcing, trivial information, and nothing but plot details. Gloss 21:48, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Excellent point. I retract that argument but I'm still a proponent of deleting the article. Beyond the content itself not being notable, the article is written in-universe, isn't cited, and parts of it (see season 6) are copied and pasted directly from the fan wiki. EBY (talk) 02:27, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:39, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:39, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:39, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Merge to List of Degrassi: The Next Generation characters. There aren't enough references available to confer notability to the character alone. Tchaliburton (talk) 12:57, 27 October 2014 (UTC)


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:56, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Vagif Ibrahimov[edit]

Vagif Ibrahimov (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Vagif Ibrahimov" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Content fork of the unsourced Vagif Ibrahimov Rza oglu, created after the nomination. Looks like selfpromo. Effectively unsourced, as the given sources are links to works, not the required independent sources. Google, with its severe limitations towards other scripts than Western, only gives 5 hits, all Wikipedia related. So within the limitations, the subject fails WP:GNG. The Banner talk 22:04, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Given that the original article was tagged for BLPPROD (by me) and that there appears to be one reference (however useless it might be) there now, it doesn't qualify under that process; therefore, it might be worth keeping this AfD open to determine the fate of both of these articles. I'm not !voting yet, but I felt it best to give my suggestion on what process might work best here. --Kinu t/c 22:40, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Instead the other article has been redirected to this one, so it's all a moot point now. We may as well have an actual discussion. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:46, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Azerbaijan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:55, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

List of rugby union players by country[edit]

List of rugby union players by country (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "List of rugby union players by country" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I have a number of problems with this list. A major one is that there is not a clear inclusion criteria. From what I can see it may include anyone who is notable that has played rugby union, regardless of whether they are notable for playing it, but I'm not sure. As per WP:LSC: "Selection criteria should be unambiguous, objective, and supported by reliable sources" -- we don't have that here. If this was the inclusion criteria (having played rugby), I don't know any reliable sources (as per WP:LISTN -- "One accepted reason why a list topic is considered notable is if it has been discussed as a group or set by independent reliable sources") that discuss this list as a group. We do have categories and lists that would seem to make this redundant, such as Category:Rugby union players, Category:Lists of international rugby union players and country-by-country lists such as List of Australia national rugby union players. Lastly this article is ten years old and has only a small handful of incoming links. An alternative to deletion may be changing to a redirect to Category:Rugby union players. Shudde talk 07:18, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Shudde talk 07:25, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:15, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:15, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Please read WP:NOTDUP. postdlf (talk) 21:18, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Strong delete: A complete list of people who have played rugby union is a folly. Without a clear inclusion criteria this list is pointless. Even a list of everyone who has ever played in a test match would likely be too large for one article. Mattlore (talk) 22:12, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep but rework. Have this as a "list of lists article" IE - have every heading in the style of Argentina or Australia. Also see WP:CLN. Just because a category exists, doesn't mean a list should not, or vice-versa. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 06:42, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep per WP:LISTPURP as an index of articles and per WP:NOTDUP as complementary to the category structure. The nom, in addition to being unfamiliar with that guideline, seems to think it's harder to determine whether an article should be listed as a union rugby player than to determine whether it should be categorized as a union rugby player, when it's the same assertion of fact either way. So their argument about inclusion criteria can be dismissed as without basis and contradicted by their own nomination. The "strong delete" !voter doesn't seem to be commenting on this list, so it's hard to understand where they're coming from. Perhaps they do not know that lists can be limited to only notable entries, or they have not noticed that much of this list's content is organizing links to the separate lists for individual countries rather than repeating their content. postdlf (talk) 16:37, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment: Both Argentina and Australia don't link to lists of rugby union players from those countries. Instead they link to lists of players who have represented those countries in test matches. If the article was kept on this basis then the article would need renaming to something like List of rugby union players who have played for their country. Either way, we are agreed that if this article is kept then some inclusion criteria need to be set. It can not be a list of every person who has ever played the sport of rugby union. Most of those people would not be notable enough for Wikipedia articles (ie me, when I was at primary school). Mattlore (talk) 21:27, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
    • No one is trying to make it a "list of every person who has ever played the sport...", so that's a strawman, not a valid argument. There are relatively few redlinks in this list, so even assuming all should be removed it doesn't appear that limiting inclusion to notable players has even been difficult in practice. Not that it matters here... postdlf (talk) 23:12, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
      • Even if the list is limited to notable players, as you seem to be suggesting, that would mean that under the New Zealand heading for example there would be 1,125 player names? Even if you included the link to the list of national representatives, you would still need to list the >612 players that are in the category but have not played for the All Blacks. I don't understand what notability criteria you are suggesting to make the list worthwhile to keep. As per the nom, it is not worth keeping this article unless criteria can be established, hence the delete "vote". Mattlore (talk) 23:45, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
        • Lists can always be broken into sublists, whether subdivided by name or time period or other method.

          If by "notability criteria", you mean LISTN, it's obvious even from the portion quoted above by the nom that it's not required that all lists satisfy it; it's just one way to evaluate lists, and not really relevant here because we're dealing with an index of articles. Try reading WP:LISTPURP and WP:CLN instead. postdlf (talk) 00:43, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

          • That's fine, I understand they can be broken into sublists etc. So are you proposing that this list stays and then 48 new articles of List of XcountryX rugby union players are created? I'm just trying to understand what you are proposing, as you said above you aren't proposing this to be a "list of every person who has ever played the sport...", which is how the title and intro currently read. Mattlore (talk) 03:20, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
            • I'm proposing that editing decisions should be made by editors through normal, non-deletion processes. postdlf (talk) 16:02, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
      • 'No one is trying to make it a "list of every person who has ever played the sport..."' -- great, so what is your definition of notable? You haven't actually suggested one. Che Guevara and George W. Bush played rugby, but surely they're not going to be included. So notable for playing, but what is that? Can't be professional, because many notable players were amateur. First-class rugby? Well the definition of that changes from region to region (even finding a definition of first-class is hard). Playing internationally? In which case lets rename the article to say that for a start. -- Shudde talk 22:16, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
        • As I already asked above (and to which you have not responded), why do you think it's any more difficult to determine who belongs in this list of rugby union players than in Category:Rugby union players or its subcats? The inclusion criteria should be exactly the same. Why would you think otherwise?

          Would you categorize Bush as a rugby player? If not, then he shouldn't be in a list of them either. Do you think that this kind of threshold issue is somehow unique to this topic, or that we've never dealt with it in Wikipedia before? Many fields have hobbyists or dabblers as well as dedicated practitioners. Bush has also made paintings. Do you think that means we are therefore somehow unable to list or categorize artists? Do you think that just because there is a question regarding the inclusion of particular articles, that we must delete the list rather than use the list's talk page to resolve it? Are you unfamiliar with WP:ATD? postdlf (talk) 16:02, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

          • If it's so easy to determine the criteria for inclusion in the list, why not add it to the article! That would clear all this up. If you can't do that, then why insist it's easy? I don't know whether Bush would be categorised as a rugby player or not, arguments could be made either way, but as we're not discussing whether or how to categorise an article, but rather what's the inclusion criteria for a list, so why don't we do the later? Your argument seems to be that because Category:Rugby union players exists this list should not be deleted, but we still don't know what this list actually is (other than a list of articles in Category:Rugby union players -- which is a very circular criteria). If people want to create List of Test rugby union players by country, or List of professional rugby union players, or List of international rugby union players then great. I'm not opposed to that, all would meet WP:LISTN and have selection criteria as per WP:LSC. But the nominee here isn't any of those three lists, to be so it would have to be renamed, completely rewritten, and actually referenced. How is doing all that any different to deleting this list and creating a different one? -- and who is going to do it, those here that vote keep? Hands up anyone. I still don't know what this list is, other than maybe "it's whatever you want it to be!" -- Shudde talk 03:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
            • Given that your nomination was originally based in part on the list duplicating the category (not a valid argument per WP:NOTDUP), your rationale seems to have shifted significantly if you now think the category also shouldn't exist, so I'm not sure what arguments you've abandoned and which you now stand behind. A "list of articles in Category:Rugby union players" is quite proper per WP:CLN, as has been explained throughout this discussion. Beyond that, you seem to have fallen on a WP:TNT argument, which I don't think applies here because there are valid entries in the list at present, and in any event a TNT-based deletion would be without prejudice to recreation of the same list topic and so wouldn't accomplish what you apparently want to accomplish. postdlf (talk) 17:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment -- I struck some of the reasons for deletion, but my main reasons remain. At the moment I'm still not sure what this is a list of? So what it is people are actually voting to keep? Neither of the keep votes have actually clarified what the inclusion criteria is for this list. User:Lugnuts does suggest making it a list of lists, but of what lists? International rugby union players? In which case the page needs to be renamed, reorganised (for example George Gregan and Corné Krige are listed under Zambia, but played for Australia and South Africa respectively), and referenced (at the moment not a single entry is referenced). -- Shudde talk 22:05, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
    • That's for editors to decide through normal processes. Either a list (or list of lists) of players by country of origin or a list of players by team would be proper and verifiable. It's also conceivable that one list could organize links to both. postdlf (talk) 16:02, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
      • I don't think it is very constructive to be saying "this list must stay" but at the same time to be saying "I have no idea what this list should look like". Obviously if it stays and becomes a list of lists of players who have played test matches, as Lugnuts seems to have suggested above, then that is very different than if it stays and tries to list all notable rugby players, like in Category:Rugby union players. It seems like all you want is a list here, without any idea about what kind of list, or for what purpose. Mattlore (talk) 20:34, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
        • Because neither a list of notable players of international matches nor a list (or list of lists) of all notable rugby players should be deleted. I'd probably expect "players by country" to mean "players by country of origin", but that's not something this AFD should be deciding, and even if it were decided that renaming was in order, that's obviously different from deletion. I feel like a broken record for linking to WP:ATD again and again, but I'm not seeing that policy observed in your or the nominator's comments. Please read it. postdlf (talk) 22:15, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 22:59, 23 October 2014 (UTC)


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 00:54, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Pipeline marketing[edit]

Pipeline marketing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Pipeline marketing" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This concept appears non-notable and possibly is itself a marketing/advert vehicle. It's poorly referenced, lots of WP:OR Gaff ταλκ 00:34, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Delete - per WP:OR and lack of notability. I have not found any notable source that can support the existence of this alleged kind of marketing. It seems to me just a new buzzword invented by someone. As far as I know, this is not an expression used in the marketing field, online or offline. What the article (very very confusingly) describes is something identical or extremely similar to Account-based marketing, for which Wikipedia already has an article. LowLevel73(talk) 02:02, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:54, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete on the basis that this would need to be fundamentally rewritten to be encylcopedic. The article does indeed read like a sales pitch and feels very much at odds with that articles should not resemble persuasive essays considering much of the article consists of original research. Many of the sources in the article do not even mention the topic. I, JethroBT drop me a line 02:02, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Chaha Hai Tujhko[edit]

Chaha Hai Tujhko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Chaha Hai Tujhko" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 11:15, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete - can't see this article being expanded. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:50, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:28, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Faria Sabnam Tripti[edit]

Faria Sabnam Tripti (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Faria Sabnam Tripti" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Lacks reliable sources. Tamravidhir (talk!) 12:27, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Comment - Speedy delete under A3 has already been declined. Jethwarp (talk) 03:14, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep - (oops forgot to vote) passes WP:Notability guidelines. Jethwarp (talk) 03:14, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep - A notable model. Nothing gained by destroying the article. FeydHuxtable (talk) 12:54, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:00, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:28, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Chhotto Ekta Jibon Niye[edit]

Chhotto Ekta Jibon Niye (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Chhotto Ekta Jibon Niye" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 11:07, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:25, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Na Jeona[edit]

Na Jeona (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Na Jeona" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 11:07, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:24, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Akash Prodip Joley[edit]

Akash Prodip Joley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Akash Prodip Joley" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 11:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:26, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:24, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

After Hours (EP)[edit]

After Hours (EP) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "After Hours (EP)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Future release. Don't add albums before we know they'll be notable. WP:NALBUM. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:05, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Question - the creator redirected this title to a new, identical article at After Hours (Glamour of the Kill EP). I'll add the AfD template there too. BUT - the articles were created with maintenance tags dating to Oct 2014, which I read as this being a recreation of some sort. Could an admin check to see if a page has already been made and deleted, and deal with it accordingly? Thanks, ansh666 20:50, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
    • And again, to After Hours (Glamour of the Kill album). ansh666 20:19, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
      • And now the article is back at the second page, though the original (named in the AfD) is now a redirect to an appropriate title. I guess, let that one stand and redirect the others to match. ansh666 19:00, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:24, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Alex Nuñez[edit]

Alex Nuñez (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Alex Nuñez" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable charater, article contains 0 sources and tons of trivial content. Gloss 21:47, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

[3][4]). Tchaliburton (talk) 13:20, 27 October 2014 (UTC)


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:23, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Jane Woh Kaise Log The[edit]

Jane Woh Kaise Log The (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jane Woh Kaise Log The" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 11:12, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep - Notable song in my opinion. Please tag it for expansion. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:52, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Redirect. Without any references to suggest its notability independent of the movie in which it appears, I think the title should be directed to Pyaasa. Deli nk (talk) 14:40, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:22, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Vera de Spinadel[edit]

Vera de Spinadel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Vera de Spinadel" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable academic. The "wide international recognition" that her work on the metallic means (a rather fringey area) referred to in the article seems to have no source or evidence on Google Scholar. She seems to have been the author of one rather middling paper "From the golden mean to chaos" that was cited a few times, but not enough to make a pass of WP:PROF. Sławomir Biały (talk) 19:53, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:01, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete As per nom. Amortias (T)(C) 21:13, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:22, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Arjun Kanungo[edit]

Arjun Kanungo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Arjun Kanungo" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fails GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. The mid-day link in the reference section is false/dead. Harsh (talk) 11:34, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Harsh (talk) 11:36, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Harsh (talk) 11:37, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:44, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:22, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Prothom Kadam Phool[edit]

Prothom Kadam Phool (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Prothom Kadam Phool" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Not notable and has no reliable sources. Tamravidhir (talk!) 12:13, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep - decent content at present, and can be expanded if tagged appropriately. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:48, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:53, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Alt year:(Find sources: "Prothom Kadam Phool (1970)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
Alt spelling:(Find sources: "Prathom Kadam Phool (1970)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
Bengali:(Find sources: "প্রথম কদম ফুল" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
and per WP:INDAFD: Prothom Kadam Phool & alt: Pratham Kadam Phool
  • Keep this brand new decent stub that is sourced and further sourcable. Seems a bit problematic to send an improvable topic to AFD within hours of its creation. We are self-admittedly imperfect and a work in progress after all. Let its author continue in good faith and revisit later. Schmidt, Michael Q. 04:02, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:21, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Projapoti E Mon[edit]

Projapoti E Mon (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Projapoti E Mon" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 11:11, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:34, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Ei Prithibir Pore[edit]

Ei Prithibir Pore (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Ei Prithibir Pore" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 11:09, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Aao Huzoor Tumko[edit]

Aao Huzoor Tumko (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Aao Huzoor Tumko" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 11:12, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:37, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep - Notable song in my opinion. Please tag it for expansion. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:53, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Shudhu Gaan Geye Porichoy[edit]

Shudhu Gaan Geye Porichoy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Shudhu Gaan Geye Porichoy" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 11:08, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Monero Ronge Rangabo[edit]

Monero Ronge Rangabo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Monero Ronge Rangabo" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 11:08, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:29, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:18, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Kajra Mohabbatwala[edit]

Kajra Mohabbatwala (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Kajra Mohabbatwala" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 11:12, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Harsh (talk) 11:17, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Harsh (talk) 11:18, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:18, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Mark Simmons (author)[edit]

Mark Simmons (author) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Mark Simmons (author)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
  • Notability, COI. This is a businessman who has co-authored 2 books and co-authored an app. COI (Autobiography?): The picture is taken directly from the subject's personal website. The primary editor has the same name as the subject. Notability: there are only 2 (that I found) reliable, 3rd party mentions of the subject - one from when he was running a (seems defunct) business and one a blurb about one of the books and basically mentions his name branding legend". I could find no reliable 3rd party articles or books that confirm any of the personal details of the subject or the subject's impact on the world. The rest of the supporting citations were dead links or primary sources.EBY (talk) 20:59, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 21:09, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:36, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:18, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Beder Meye Jyotsna (song)[edit]

Beder Meye Jyotsna (song) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Beder Meye Jyotsna (song)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 11:13, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:18, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Aguner Din Sesh Hobe Ekdin[edit]

Aguner Din Sesh Hobe Ekdin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Aguner Din Sesh Hobe Ekdin" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 11:13, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:40, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Jennifer Lyons[edit]

Jennifer Lyons (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jennifer Lyons" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Not notable. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ENTERTAINER LADY LOTUSTALK 20:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Weak delete - I'm not sold on this one. Seems to have had some minor roles in various shows/films. Very little sources seem to be available in the first place, outside of an IMDB page that looks like her manager wrote out for her. Gloss 21:43, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 17:18, 23 October 2014 (UTC)


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Kotha Hoyechhilo[edit]

Kotha Hoyechhilo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Kotha Hoyechhilo" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 11:15, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Ei Buke Boichhe Jamuna[edit]

Ei Buke Boichhe Jamuna (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Ei Buke Boichhe Jamuna" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 11:16, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:43, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Erene[edit]

Erene (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Erene" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Singer does not appear to be notable. She is unsigned, has very few secondary sources available with little media coverage, and has a very short and non-notable discography. Additionally, the two major contributors to the article have conflicts of interest, resulting in the blocking of one due to it being an account strictly for promotional reasons User:Ereneofficial. Since then, the article has had some minor edits made by IPs, but still does not meet notability guidelines. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 16:12, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:16, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Aaj Mon Cheyeche[edit]

Aaj Mon Cheyeche (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Aaj Mon Cheyeche" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 12:13, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:52, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:16, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Banhuayklang School[edit]

Banhuayklang School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Banhuayklang School" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Primary school with no clear indication of notability. I was unable to find reliable sources in English. Kinu t/c 15:54, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:11, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Let a Woman Be a Woman[edit]

Let a Woman Be a Woman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Let a Woman Be a Woman" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I know that charting is an indication of notability but do we really need this stub? Much of its sourcing is consequential to How You Like Me Now?, and notability is not inherited. The chart information can be carried at Dyke and the Blazers. Launchballer 14:53, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:09, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:09, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:12, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Jiboner Golpo Achhe Baki Olpo[edit]

Jiboner Golpo Achhe Baki Olpo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Jiboner Golpo Achhe Baki Olpo" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 12:15, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:56, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:14, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Alor Michil[edit]

Alor Michil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Alor Michil" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 11:01, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Year:(Find sources: "Alor Michil (1974)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
Bengali:(Find sources: "আলোর মিছিল" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)
and WP:INDAFD: Alor Michil

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:14, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Super Definition plasma cutting machine[edit]

Super Definition plasma cutting machine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Super Definition plasma cutting machine" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I believe I was mistaken in accepting this draft. Looking in more detail I see insufficient referencing. I am not concerned about the WP:CIRCULAR reference from Wikipedia, that can be removed at any time, but I am concerned that the remainder are insufficient. My concern was raised sufficiently to make a SPI report at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jason Crew since I perceive some sort of attempt to use WIkipedia to legitimise something I cannot quite define. Under these circumstances it is best to present the item to the community formally for discussion. Fiddle Faddle 08:16, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 21:37, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete - this is a machine that was released in June by a company that doesn't have an article, or else I would maybe recommend a bullet entry in that. This product does not have a single article mention or review - nothing. All I could find was a press release and some company chatter on a few machinist forums. EBY (talk) 01:56, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:14, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Gordon Wagner (economist)[edit]

Gordon Wagner (economist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Gordon Wagner (economist)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

This person is not notable by WP:ACADEMIC or WP:PERSON. The article is largely unsourced. bender235 (talk) 05:54, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep The article has sources that get to the heart of the matter. He made significant contributions to the international scene.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:03, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Strong Delete As written, I would have recommended a speedy especially after doing a search and unable to find ANY 3rd party sources that establish the subject's notability at all. The article sources are the subject's own Master's thesis, Doctoral thesis, and some newsletters. EBY (talk) 02:02, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Question for !Keeps - can you please give some reliable sources that this is a notable economist? I found no international contributions, no other references of any kind, no promise (the subject is dead) of future references. It fails all pertinent notability criteria: WP:NACADEMICS, WP:GNG - WP:BASIC. EBY (talk) 16:14, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep The article is referenced and promising. It needs significant expansion with better references, but should not be deleted.Zigzig20s (talk) 06:45, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete - Fails WP:ACADEMIC. Fails WP:GNG because none of sources are "independent of the subject", almost all of them are from his employers, one is about his doctoral thesis. Just one of a myriad of university professors worldwide. Also see: WP:NOTMEMORIAL Point 4. The LDS may highly esteem the late professor, but that doesn't establish notability. Kraxler (talk) 14:01, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:14, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

MultiSafepay[edit]

MultiSafepay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "MultiSafepay" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I have originally prodded it under the following rationale (which I believe is still valid): "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement." It has since been deprodded by creator, User:GameLegend, who added some sources and asked me for a re-review. Unfortunately, I do not believe that the article, even with the new sources, meets the cited policies; the added sources don't seem reliable/mainstream enough to change my original assessment. Time for a wider community discussion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:35, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:13, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

List of contestants from the UK national selection for the Eurovision Song Contest[edit]

List of contestants from the UK national selection for the Eurovision Song Contest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "List of contestants from the UK national selection for the Eurovision Song Contest" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Clearly a duplicated overkill of information already covered at a variety of areas. All the winners can be found at United Kingdom in the Eurovision Song Contest. The individual national selection shows can be found in annual articles at Category:United Kingdom in the Eurovision Song Contest. Plus there is also Eurovision: Your Country Needs You which covers basically the same information but in more coherent detail.   Wes Mouse | chat  03:33, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 21:38, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 21:38, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 21:39, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 21:39, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:13, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Nutan(banladeshi actress)[edit]

Nutan(banladeshi actress) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Nutan (Bangladeshi actress)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable. The cited source doesn't provide enough reliable information. Tamravidhir (talk!) 11:04, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Comment - Simple Google search with her real or stage names yields no results other than the one in the article which is a passing mention. Impossible to have an actress with 120 films and no press coverage. Could someone please search with better tools? Thanks. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 21:25, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Note that I moved it to the correct title: Nutan (Bangladeshi actress). Regards. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 22:04, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:22, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:12, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Panchi Nadiya Pawan Ke[edit]

Panchi Nadiya Pawan Ke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Panchi Nadiya Pawan Ke" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

No reliable source. It uses YouTube videos and other Wikipedia articles as references. Tamravidhir (talk!) 11:06, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep - Notable song. Please tag it for sources. Kautilya3 (talk) 16:56, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:24, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:12, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Ilija Fonlamov Francisković[edit]

Ilija Fonlamov Francisković (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Ilija Fonlamov Francisković" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Recent article about a Serbian art student. The article was filled with unsourced personal info and (what appear to be) grand claims that aren't born out by the sources. For example the article claimed "In Austria he was recognised as reincarnation of German painter from 16. century Matthias Grünewald" while the local news article says a local Austrian teacher compared him to Grünewald while he was on a student exchange visit! This chap has been offered a place at the Sorbonne so is clearly a talented painter, but with the only coverage coming from a local news website and a Belgrade tabloid magazine, it looks like a case of WP:TOOSOON to me. Sionk (talk) 13:22, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Not right at all First of all, he is not a art student, I think you can find that in same sources.He is recognised as prodigy because of that fact. Secondly, isn't it the same, I mean - "In Austria he was recognised as reincarnation of German painter from 16. century Matthias Grünewald" and "...Austrian teacher compared him to Grünewald while he was on a student exchange visit"? Also, I have to add that your serbian-english translation is not right at all, there is no teacher but teacherS... I added a video recorded about him also on one of biggest serbian TV, TV PRVA, but I am not sure you will be able to understand! --Volimsebese1965 (talk) 22:03, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Well, by art student I mean he is a school student who excells at art. Sionk (talk) 22:09, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
    • Okay, that's right! However, I hope you will have more sources about him soon.--Volimsebese1965 (talk) 22:13, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 17:33, 23 October 2014 (UTC)


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:10, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Universidad Empresarial de Costa Rica[edit]

Universidad Empresarial de Costa Rica (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Universidad Empresarial de Costa Rica" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

I'm aware that universities are normally considered notable. However, I'm having trouble persuading myself that this one exists at all. It doesn't have an .edu domain; it doesn't have a street address; it doesn't get any hits on Gnews or its archive. Yes it was authorised to grant degrees in 1997, but that was seventeen years ago. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universidad San Juan de la Cruz. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:38, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 21:02, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 21:02, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Comment just a few notes:
  1. The Costa Rican Ministry of Education seems to think it exists, having accredited three courses there (B.Acc., BBA and MBA)[15], though none of its degrees are accredited by the higher standard SINAES [16]. This dissertation also classifies it as inactive due to a lack of recent graduates [17] (p.47).
  2. Not all universities use the .edu domain (take European or Japanese universities, for example).
  3. The closest thing I could find for a street address was a postal one: P. O. Box 62-2050 in San Jose, Costa Rica.
  4. It's mentioned in Der Spegiel for allegedly selling Doctorial and Professor titles [18] (in German).
I'm not sure you could classify this private university in the traditional brick and mortar sense, but it did crop up quite a lot while I was googling - mainly for degree accreditation at other educational institutions. Maybe the best angle for notability would be the accreditation mill allegation. Fuebaey (talk) 06:21, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:08, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Comment If some effort was put into improving it, this would likely be a Keeper. VMS Mosaic (talk) 03:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Joyce Kirby[edit]

Joyce Kirby (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Joyce Kirby" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

No evidence of meeting WP:ENTERTAINER. One contemporary news account refers to her as an "accomplished actor", but this is a trivial mention. Although it's likely that there is some bias regarding online sources due to the era in which worked, a 1974 book claims that she never "achieved anything more than serviceable professional status in the ranks of film players", which is about the closest anything is ever going to come to flat out saying "she doesn't meet WP:ENTERTAINER", and suggests strongly that contemporary sources establishing notability don't exist. Canadian Paul 17:55, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 18:09, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 18:09, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:06, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Oi Jhinuk Phota Sagorbelay[edit]

Oi Jhinuk Phota Sagorbelay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Oi Jhinuk Phota Sagorbelay" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 10:59, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:20, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:06, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Abhi Na Jao Chhodkar[edit]

Abhi Na Jao Chhodkar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Abhi Na Jao Chhodkar" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 10:59, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Harsh (talk) 11:21, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Harsh (talk) 11:21, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete Nice song, but a Wikipage? Kautilya3 (talk) 17:32, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:05, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Chupi Chupi Bolo Keu Jene Jabe[edit]

Chupi Chupi Bolo Keu Jene Jabe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Chupi Chupi Bolo Keu Jene Jabe" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non-notable and unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 10:59, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Harsh (talk) 11:20, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete No evidence of notability. --Rotten regard 21:33, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:05, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Piya Piya Piya Ke Dake Amare[edit]

Piya Piya Piya Ke Dake Amare (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Piya Piya Piya Ke Dake Amare" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Not notable. The article is unreferenced. Tamravidhir (talk!) 10:55, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Harsh (talk) 11:18, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Harsh (talk) 11:18, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Delete No evidence of notability. --Rotten regard 21:31, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:05, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Aron Anazia[edit]

Aron Anazia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Aron Anazia" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Non notable actor/producer/director. No credits listed on IMDB. The LVS article is a press release from him and the indiewire article is a "Tell us your story" article. No RS Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:51, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:05, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Greg Wilson (DJ)[edit]

Greg Wilson (DJ) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Greg Wilson (DJ)" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Unsourced BLP. But much to my surprise, his 337k Google hits (on "Greg Wilson" and DJ) boil down to a mere 191 unique hits, in my opinion not enough to pass WP:GNG The Banner talk 17:23, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 18:10, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 18:11, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Keep. References currently being added. Existing references from reputable UK and international dance music press assert the cultural significance of Greg Wilson as a DJ, including his pioneering role in mixing as a style of presenting music in nightclubs, and embracing electro-funk in the face of widespread criticism in the black music scene before the eventual dominance of its sound and hybrid forms. - Soundofdusk (talk) 06:19, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Bill Napier[edit]

Bill Napier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Bill Napier" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Fails WP:BIO, specifically, WP:PROF and WP:AUTHOR. Our notability rules for who should be subject to a WP:BLP are much more strict now than they were in 2007 when we last discussed this article and there are no more forthcoming sources on which to write an encyclopedic article. jps (talk) 18:50, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:27, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

  • delete no significant coverage to establish WP:PROF or WP:AUTHOR. LibStar (talk) 02:23, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE j⚛e deckertalk 00:07, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Haynes Educational Center[edit]

Haynes Educational Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View AfD · Stats)
(Find sources: "Haynes Educational Center" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR)

Just your average local place. Not notable. 由雅なおは (talk) 19:00, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 21:44, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 21:44, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:03, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Files[edit]

Possibly unfree files[edit]

October 31[edit]

File:Velva Darnell.jpg[edit]

File:Velva Darnell.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Appears to be a studio head shot. No evidence the upload owns the copyright. Eeekster (talk) 02:34, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

File:MattEllis2014.jpg[edit]

File:MattEllis2014.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
  • Sourced as "Commissioned photographer" and the artist's website which conflicts with license claim. Eeekster (talk) 02:41, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Files for deletion[edit]

October 31[edit]

Categories[edit]

October 31[edit]

NEW NOMINATIONS[edit]

Category:Church History[edit]

Nominator's rationale: Which church? Editor2020, Talk 03:39, 31 October 2014 (UTC)



Redirects[edit]

October 31[edit]

Empire of Soviet Socialist Republics[edit]

This phrase seems to be made up. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 02:17, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Templates[edit]

October 31[edit]


Miscellany (WikiProjects, user pages, etc.)[edit]

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion#2014-10-31

Deletion review[edit]

31 October 2014[edit]

Einstein Syndrome[edit]

Einstein Syndrome (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)

Hi, I was wondering if there was a way to userfy this page. I have an interest in the topic, and understand the article was deleted more than once (there was no second deletion discussion). Cheers! Ema--or (talk) 00:37, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

  • Comment You're probably looking for Einstein syndrome with a lowercase 's' (which has been deleted at AfD, and also deleted as a {{db-repost}}). The content at the page you linked has only been redirects and/or copyvios. --ais523 03:01, 31 October 2014 (UTC)