Cite error: There are
<ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the
Why are there only external links? An example of a 'references' section (and probably even notes) would be instructive, I think. —
mark ✎ 16:56, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
Yes, I think an example of a "References" section needs to be added in the standard position (that is, under the "See also" section.) --
Mecandes 12:14, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
This is the page I was looking for when joining Wikipedia! Is there a place for it somewhere in the Help: domain? —
dogears ( talk) 22:50, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Include indentation [ edit ]
Could text indentation (using the "
:") be included in that article, please. -- Dietmar Lettau 12:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
Use of bold [ edit ]
Why is the word
unladen in boldface in the lead paragraph? I'd remove this in a real article. — D. Monack 08:18, 29 July 2008 (UTC) talk
I see that the actual article does the same thing, so I guess I'll remove it in both places. —
D. Monack 08:20, 29 July 2008 (UTC) talk
Another article? [ edit ]
I guess the real question should be, "Why isn't a featured article used for annotation?" If this is supposed to be instructional, shouldn't the best possible example be used?
Autorack even has a cleanup notice on it. Ideally, the example used would have a references section and maybe an infobox. — D. Monack 08:25, 29 July 2008 (UTC) talk
Repetitive annotation [ edit ]
Should the annotation about the picture really repeat so many times?
Craig Pemberton ( talk) 02:12, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
Are autoracks special in any way? [ edit ]
Why autoracks specifically? What is so special about them? Do you guys, huh, like autoracks?
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 ( talk) 22:07, 7 March 2013 (UTC)