|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Consensus page.|
|This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot II. Threads with no replies in 30 days may be automatically moved.|
"Consensus is a partnership between interested parties working positively for a common goal." -- Jimmy Wales
Bird article name (capitalisation)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Crowned Crane about four articles related to birds species. The rationale is that there is no reason why bird names should be capitalised while Wikipedia recommends that all animal names should not be written with capitals. Please participate to the discussion.
Thank you! Mama meta modal (talk) 09:07, 9 March 2014 (UTC).
Request for comments
There is now also an ongoing request for comments on the same subject: Talk:Crowned Crane#Request for comments.
The discussion was closed (and the pages moved) on 26 March 2014, see Talk:Crowned crane#Requested move for details.
- Move review for species pages at Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2014 March. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
An important discussion started on Talk:Crowned crane and Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2014 March#Black crowned crane now moved to Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#A new proposal regarding bird article names.
- The consensus is now clear. The relevant pages will soon be checked and made consistent with Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style#Bird common name decapitalisation.
- H. H. Wander Strata (talk) 23:07, 2 May 2014 (UTC).
- I think it's very good but not sure how practical it is. I've certainly found myself in 1 against many situations, and I usually walk away. Much more common are a few against many situations. That's much more difficult. The history of the yogurt title comes to mind, and of course the US city name controversy, and much more current now is the RM discussion at Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Expand description of Forum shopping
At present the policy on WP:FORUMSHOP says "Forum shopping, admin shopping, and spin-doctoring. Raising essentially the same issue on multiple noticeboards, or to multiple administrators, is unhelpful to finding and achieving consensus." (Talk page archives show different versions of this line.) I suggest expanding the description to say "Raising essentially the same issue on multiple noticeboards or talk pages,...." (Suggested addition in italics.) Thoughts? – S. Rich (talk) 23:12, 1 May 2014 (UTC)