that were true, then you would be more about disability-access-barrier-modification, than about vengeful deletion, or so inclined to despise anyone who would ask f/ anything that you are not familiar with.
The search does continue.
The discussion is very important.
The reason that I had gone here is to search f/ a template.
I do, hereby, request a "please do explain further" template, so as to ensure that that message can be easily sent.
- * * * Further, wikipedia : what_The_Fuck_Oh_My_God!_Too_Many_Damn_Three_Letter_Acronyms._ARRRGGGHHH!, is not a mere lark; if someone were searching f/ that ridiculous article, then such links might make the search much faster.
- * * * Furthermore, they do call me "disruptive vandal", as well as much worse,.....
They do, as well, call me "friend", which can be, ironically, worse than most any other insult.
None of you know my face, personally; I do not know your face, nor your telephone-number: I am not your friend, thus far.
If any of you would ever want to be my friend, & f/ me to be your friend, then that is acceptable; however, it is not true, hitherto.
Whereas, the overwhelming verdict is that I am a "disruptive vandal", I shall, now, begin to earn that stripe; three years of trying it politely has not achieved any access, thus far.
If you do really, truly, need a "disruptive vandal", which is what I am inadvertently, then what do you think that I might create by intent?
- * * * * * * * That is, unless that hearing would have an extremely specific schedule.