Wikipedia talk:Reviewing good articles
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
dead link[edit]
The "Duplication Detector" link in How to review a Good article nomination and Useful tools is broken, can anyone replace it?--Megaman en m (talk) 14:50, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Editing during a GA review[edit]
I have a situation where someone has been editing after I have started the GA review page on 29 September 2020. My sense is to reject the edits and edit the article as it was when I inserted the "Starts GA Review" 5 days ago. Can any admin or GA reviewer give me some advice about this situation? You can have a look here at the history and when I started the GA, here -- Whiteguru (talk) 10:09, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
- The edits should stand, just review them, too. Part of the GA process is editing, and if it's not the nominator making edits there is a chance they're unaware. No reason to reject them purely because a review is ongoing. Kingsif (talk) 13:12, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
Discussion to merge[edit]
Noting for any watchers that there is a discussion to merge this guideline into WP:GANI and other GA project pages at Wikipedia:Good Article proposal drive 2023. Ovinus (talk) 20:48, 5 January 2023 (UTC)